What was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?












1















This Wikipedia page says the following:




Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
instructions implemented in the main CPU




So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.



But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    1















    This Wikipedia page says the following:




    Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
    instructions implemented in the main CPU




    So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.



    But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      1












      1








      1








      This Wikipedia page says the following:




      Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
      instructions implemented in the main CPU




      So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.



      But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      This Wikipedia page says the following:




      Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
      instructions implemented in the main CPU




      So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.



      But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?







      history intel floating-point cpu x86






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      manassehkatz

      3,132625




      3,132625






      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      user12280user12280

      232




      232




      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



          Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



          In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



          I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.





          * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug






          share|improve this answer
























          • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

            – Stephen Kitt
            27 mins ago



















          2














          As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.






          share|improve this answer


























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "648"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9660%2fwhat-was-the-last-cpu-that-did-not-have-the-x87-floating-point-unit-built-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



            Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



            In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



            I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.





            * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug






            share|improve this answer
























            • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

              – Stephen Kitt
              27 mins ago
















            2














            All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



            Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



            In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



            I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.





            * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug






            share|improve this answer
























            • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

              – Stephen Kitt
              27 mins ago














            2












            2








            2







            All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



            Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



            In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



            I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.





            * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug






            share|improve this answer













            All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



            Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



            In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



            I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.





            * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            KazKaz

            2,456942




            2,456942













            • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

              – Stephen Kitt
              27 mins ago



















            • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

              – Stephen Kitt
              27 mins ago

















            Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

            – Stephen Kitt
            27 mins ago





            Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

            – Stephen Kitt
            27 mins ago











            2














            As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.






            share|improve this answer






























              2














              As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.






              share|improve this answer




























                2












                2








                2







                As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.






                share|improve this answer















                As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 42 mins ago

























                answered 56 mins ago









                Stephen KittStephen Kitt

                40k8163173




                40k8163173






















                    user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9660%2fwhat-was-the-last-cpu-that-did-not-have-the-x87-floating-point-unit-built-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Masuk log Menu navigasi

                    Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                    Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области