Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill












4












$begingroup$


Landfills seem like disgusting, nasty places that could be breeding grounds for all sorts of viruses and bacteria. What is the likelihood that the next lethal superbug or virus (like Ebola) could originate there?










share|improve this question









New contributor




bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    Landfills seem like disgusting, nasty places that could be breeding grounds for all sorts of viruses and bacteria. What is the likelihood that the next lethal superbug or virus (like Ebola) could originate there?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      Landfills seem like disgusting, nasty places that could be breeding grounds for all sorts of viruses and bacteria. What is the likelihood that the next lethal superbug or virus (like Ebola) could originate there?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Landfills seem like disgusting, nasty places that could be breeding grounds for all sorts of viruses and bacteria. What is the likelihood that the next lethal superbug or virus (like Ebola) could originate there?







      society diseases viruses bacteria






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 32 mins ago









      Cyn

      11.2k12454




      11.2k12454






      New contributor




      bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 hours ago









      bremen_mattbremen_matt

      1243




      1243




      New contributor




      bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      bremen_matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Slim.



          Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.



          The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.



          The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.



          Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.



          I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.



          (Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
            $endgroup$
            – bremen_matt
            4 hours ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
            $endgroup$
            – Starfish Prime
            4 hours ago












          • $begingroup$
            @bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
            $endgroup$
            – Starfish Prime
            4 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
            $endgroup$
            – Innovine
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer deserves a bounty.
            $endgroup$
            – Renan
            3 hours ago



















          2












          $begingroup$

          Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.



          However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.



          If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.



          While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
            $endgroup$
            – Agrajag
            1 hour ago





















          1












          $begingroup$

          Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
          Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.



          All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
          They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.



          So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
            $endgroup$
            – Starfish Prime
            3 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
            $endgroup$
            – Gustavo Almeida
            3 hours ago



















          0












          $begingroup$

          You could definitely make this the premise of a story.




          1. Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.


          abandoned lab
          source




          1. Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.


          2. In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.


          3. Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.


          4. It begins...







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).




            • People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.


            • People scavenge there.


            • Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.


            • People eat food they find in landfills.



            enter image description here
            (People in garbage landfill. Mexico)



            enter image description here
            (Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)



            We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.



            So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?



            Yes. Unfortunately.




            One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
            communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
            putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
            diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.



            Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
            and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
            countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
            stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
            substances at landfills.




            The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.



            What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "579"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });






              bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143813%2flikelihood-that-a-superbug-or-lethal-virus-could-come-from-a-landfill%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              5 Answers
              5






              active

              oldest

              votes








              5 Answers
              5






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              Slim.



              Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.



              The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.



              The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.



              Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.



              I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.



              (Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
                $endgroup$
                – bremen_matt
                4 hours ago








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                4 hours ago












              • $begingroup$
                @bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                4 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
                $endgroup$
                – Innovine
                4 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                This answer deserves a bounty.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                3 hours ago
















              5












              $begingroup$

              Slim.



              Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.



              The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.



              The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.



              Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.



              I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.



              (Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
                $endgroup$
                – bremen_matt
                4 hours ago








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                4 hours ago












              • $begingroup$
                @bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                4 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
                $endgroup$
                – Innovine
                4 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                This answer deserves a bounty.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                3 hours ago














              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              Slim.



              Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.



              The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.



              The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.



              Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.



              I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.



              (Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Slim.



              Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.



              The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.



              The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.



              Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.



              I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.



              (Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 4 hours ago









              Starfish PrimeStarfish Prime

              1,04112




              1,04112












              • $begingroup$
                In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
                $endgroup$
                – bremen_matt
                4 hours ago








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                4 hours ago












              • $begingroup$
                @bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                4 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
                $endgroup$
                – Innovine
                4 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                This answer deserves a bounty.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                3 hours ago


















              • $begingroup$
                In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
                $endgroup$
                – bremen_matt
                4 hours ago








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                4 hours ago












              • $begingroup$
                @bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                4 hours ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
                $endgroup$
                – Innovine
                4 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                This answer deserves a bounty.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                3 hours ago
















              $begingroup$
              In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
              $endgroup$
              – bremen_matt
              4 hours ago






              $begingroup$
              In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
              $endgroup$
              – bremen_matt
              4 hours ago






              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              @bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              4 hours ago






              $begingroup$
              @bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              4 hours ago














              $begingroup$
              @bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              4 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              @bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              4 hours ago




              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
              $endgroup$
              – Innovine
              4 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
              $endgroup$
              – Innovine
              4 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              This answer deserves a bounty.
              $endgroup$
              – Renan
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              This answer deserves a bounty.
              $endgroup$
              – Renan
              3 hours ago











              2












              $begingroup$

              Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.



              However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.



              If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.



              While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
                $endgroup$
                – Agrajag
                1 hour ago


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.



              However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.



              If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.



              While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
                $endgroup$
                – Agrajag
                1 hour ago
















              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.



              However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.



              If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.



              While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.



              However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.



              If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.



              While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 3 hours ago









              BenBen

              610216




              610216












              • $begingroup$
                This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
                $endgroup$
                – Agrajag
                1 hour ago




















              • $begingroup$
                This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
                $endgroup$
                – Agrajag
                1 hour ago


















              $begingroup$
              This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
              $endgroup$
              – Agrajag
              1 hour ago






              $begingroup$
              This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
              $endgroup$
              – Agrajag
              1 hour ago













              1












              $begingroup$

              Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
              Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.



              All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
              They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.



              So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
                $endgroup$
                – Gustavo Almeida
                3 hours ago
















              1












              $begingroup$

              Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
              Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.



              All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
              They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.



              So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
                $endgroup$
                – Gustavo Almeida
                3 hours ago














              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
              Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.



              All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
              They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.



              So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
              Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.



              All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
              They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.



              So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 3 hours ago









              Gustavo AlmeidaGustavo Almeida

              1,516112




              1,516112








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
                $endgroup$
                – Gustavo Almeida
                3 hours ago














              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
                $endgroup$
                – Gustavo Almeida
                3 hours ago








              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              3 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
              $endgroup$
              – Gustavo Almeida
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
              $endgroup$
              – Gustavo Almeida
              3 hours ago











              0












              $begingroup$

              You could definitely make this the premise of a story.




              1. Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.


              abandoned lab
              source




              1. Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.


              2. In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.


              3. Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.


              4. It begins...







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                You could definitely make this the premise of a story.




                1. Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.


                abandoned lab
                source




                1. Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.


                2. In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.


                3. Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.


                4. It begins...







                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  You could definitely make this the premise of a story.




                  1. Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.


                  abandoned lab
                  source




                  1. Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.


                  2. In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.


                  3. Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.


                  4. It begins...







                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You could definitely make this the premise of a story.




                  1. Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.


                  abandoned lab
                  source




                  1. Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.


                  2. In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.


                  3. Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.


                  4. It begins...








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  WillkWillk

                  117k28221489




                  117k28221489























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).




                      • People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.


                      • People scavenge there.


                      • Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.


                      • People eat food they find in landfills.



                      enter image description here
                      (People in garbage landfill. Mexico)



                      enter image description here
                      (Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)



                      We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.



                      So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?



                      Yes. Unfortunately.




                      One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
                      communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
                      putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
                      diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.



                      Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
                      and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
                      countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
                      stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
                      substances at landfills.




                      The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.



                      What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).




                        • People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.


                        • People scavenge there.


                        • Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.


                        • People eat food they find in landfills.



                        enter image description here
                        (People in garbage landfill. Mexico)



                        enter image description here
                        (Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)



                        We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.



                        So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?



                        Yes. Unfortunately.




                        One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
                        communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
                        putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
                        diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.



                        Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
                        and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
                        countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
                        stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
                        substances at landfills.




                        The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.



                        What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).




                          • People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.


                          • People scavenge there.


                          • Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.


                          • People eat food they find in landfills.



                          enter image description here
                          (People in garbage landfill. Mexico)



                          enter image description here
                          (Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)



                          We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.



                          So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?



                          Yes. Unfortunately.




                          One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
                          communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
                          putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
                          diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.



                          Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
                          and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
                          countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
                          stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
                          substances at landfills.




                          The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.



                          What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).




                          • People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.


                          • People scavenge there.


                          • Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.


                          • People eat food they find in landfills.



                          enter image description here
                          (People in garbage landfill. Mexico)



                          enter image description here
                          (Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)



                          We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.



                          So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?



                          Yes. Unfortunately.




                          One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
                          communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
                          putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
                          diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.



                          Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
                          and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
                          countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
                          stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
                          substances at landfills.




                          The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.



                          What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 33 mins ago









                          CynCyn

                          11.2k12454




                          11.2k12454






















                              bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                              bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143813%2flikelihood-that-a-superbug-or-lethal-virus-could-come-from-a-landfill%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Masuk log Menu navigasi

                              Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                              Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области