Is it a good practice to use a static variable in a Test Class and use that in the actual class instead of...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
public void method1(){
if(Test.isRunningTest){
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
} else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
apex unit-test code-coverage
New contributor
add a comment |
I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
public void method1(){
if(Test.isRunningTest){
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
} else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
apex unit-test code-coverage
New contributor
2
What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.
– David Reed♦
4 hours ago
I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.
– Apz
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
public void method1(){
if(Test.isRunningTest){
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
} else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
apex unit-test code-coverage
New contributor
I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
public void method1(){
if(Test.isRunningTest){
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
} else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
apex unit-test code-coverage
apex unit-test code-coverage
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
ApzApz
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
2
What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.
– David Reed♦
4 hours ago
I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.
– Apz
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2
What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.
– David Reed♦
4 hours ago
I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.
– Apz
4 hours ago
2
2
What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.
– David Reed♦
4 hours ago
What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.
– David Reed♦
4 hours ago
I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.
– Apz
4 hours ago
I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.
– Apz
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean
flag should be.
You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:
- Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive
- Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing
In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest()
(at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible
flag in your production code.
public with sharing class MyClass
{
@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()
{
if (!shouldDoStuff) return;
// actual logic
}
public static void doNonGatedStuff()
{
doStuff();
// other logic
}
}
@IsTest class MyClass
{
@IsTest static void testDoStuff()
{
MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;
// rest of test
}
}
Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger
, which would obviously default to false
. You set it to true
before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false
so that any further operations will still run the trigger.
P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.
– Adrian Larson♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2(){
if(mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257558%2fis-it-a-good-practice-to-use-a-static-variable-in-a-test-class-and-use-that-in-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean
flag should be.
You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:
- Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive
- Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing
In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest()
(at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible
flag in your production code.
public with sharing class MyClass
{
@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()
{
if (!shouldDoStuff) return;
// actual logic
}
public static void doNonGatedStuff()
{
doStuff();
// other logic
}
}
@IsTest class MyClass
{
@IsTest static void testDoStuff()
{
MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;
// rest of test
}
}
Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger
, which would obviously default to false
. You set it to true
before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false
so that any further operations will still run the trigger.
P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.
– Adrian Larson♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean
flag should be.
You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:
- Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive
- Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing
In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest()
(at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible
flag in your production code.
public with sharing class MyClass
{
@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()
{
if (!shouldDoStuff) return;
// actual logic
}
public static void doNonGatedStuff()
{
doStuff();
// other logic
}
}
@IsTest class MyClass
{
@IsTest static void testDoStuff()
{
MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;
// rest of test
}
}
Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger
, which would obviously default to false
. You set it to true
before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false
so that any further operations will still run the trigger.
P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.
– Adrian Larson♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean
flag should be.
You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:
- Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive
- Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing
In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest()
(at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible
flag in your production code.
public with sharing class MyClass
{
@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()
{
if (!shouldDoStuff) return;
// actual logic
}
public static void doNonGatedStuff()
{
doStuff();
// other logic
}
}
@IsTest class MyClass
{
@IsTest static void testDoStuff()
{
MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;
// rest of test
}
}
Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger
, which would obviously default to false
. You set it to true
before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false
so that any further operations will still run the trigger.
You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean
flag should be.
You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:
- Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive
- Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing
In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest()
(at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible
flag in your production code.
public with sharing class MyClass
{
@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()
{
if (!shouldDoStuff) return;
// actual logic
}
public static void doNonGatedStuff()
{
doStuff();
// other logic
}
}
@IsTest class MyClass
{
@IsTest static void testDoStuff()
{
MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;
// rest of test
}
}
Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger
, which would obviously default to false
. You set it to true
before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false
so that any further operations will still run the trigger.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
110k19120256
110k19120256
P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.
– Adrian Larson♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.
– Adrian Larson♦
3 hours ago
P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.
– Adrian Larson♦
3 hours ago
Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.
– Adrian Larson♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2(){
if(mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.
add a comment |
No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2(){
if(mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.
add a comment |
No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2(){
if(mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.
No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:
@isTest
public class myTestClass{
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1(){
// code //
}
public static testMethod void myTestMethod2(){
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //
}
}
public class actualClass{
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2(){
if(mySwitch){
//do something from myTestMethod2
}
}
}
You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
264k13211458
264k13211458
add a comment |
add a comment |
Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257558%2fis-it-a-good-practice-to-use-a-static-variable-in-a-test-class-and-use-that-in-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.
– David Reed♦
4 hours ago
I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.
– Apz
4 hours ago