“is” operation returns false with ndarray.data attribute, even though two array objects have same id





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







8















Two python objects have the same id but "is" operation returns false as shown below:



a = np.arange(12).reshape(2, -1)
c = a.reshape(12, 1)
print("id(c.data)", id(c.data))
print("id(a.data)", id(a.data))

print(c.data is a.data)
print(id(c.data) == id(a.data))


Here is the actual output:



id(c.data) 241233112
id(a.data) 241233112
False
True


My question is... why "c.data is a.data" returns false even though they point to the same ID, thus pointing to the same object? I thought that they point to the same object if they have same ID or am I wrong? Thank you!










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    @C.Nivs They don't even necessarily have different memory addresses (something which Python doesn't expose). Whatever memory was used for the first may have been reused for the second.

    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @C.Nivs Don't think of it in terms of memory addresses. How memory is managed is completely implementation dependent. All you know for sure is that two objects that overlap in time will not have the same id.

    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Aran-Fey, that's okay a good question(though asked before) can sometimes be resurrected for a fruitful discussion

    – amanb
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @C.Nivs no, ids do not belong to variables. They belong to objects. Many variables can reference the same object.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    @juanpa.arrivillaga fair enough. Thanks for the explanation

    – C.Nivs
    4 hours ago


















8















Two python objects have the same id but "is" operation returns false as shown below:



a = np.arange(12).reshape(2, -1)
c = a.reshape(12, 1)
print("id(c.data)", id(c.data))
print("id(a.data)", id(a.data))

print(c.data is a.data)
print(id(c.data) == id(a.data))


Here is the actual output:



id(c.data) 241233112
id(a.data) 241233112
False
True


My question is... why "c.data is a.data" returns false even though they point to the same ID, thus pointing to the same object? I thought that they point to the same object if they have same ID or am I wrong? Thank you!










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    @C.Nivs They don't even necessarily have different memory addresses (something which Python doesn't expose). Whatever memory was used for the first may have been reused for the second.

    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @C.Nivs Don't think of it in terms of memory addresses. How memory is managed is completely implementation dependent. All you know for sure is that two objects that overlap in time will not have the same id.

    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Aran-Fey, that's okay a good question(though asked before) can sometimes be resurrected for a fruitful discussion

    – amanb
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @C.Nivs no, ids do not belong to variables. They belong to objects. Many variables can reference the same object.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    @juanpa.arrivillaga fair enough. Thanks for the explanation

    – C.Nivs
    4 hours ago














8












8








8








Two python objects have the same id but "is" operation returns false as shown below:



a = np.arange(12).reshape(2, -1)
c = a.reshape(12, 1)
print("id(c.data)", id(c.data))
print("id(a.data)", id(a.data))

print(c.data is a.data)
print(id(c.data) == id(a.data))


Here is the actual output:



id(c.data) 241233112
id(a.data) 241233112
False
True


My question is... why "c.data is a.data" returns false even though they point to the same ID, thus pointing to the same object? I thought that they point to the same object if they have same ID or am I wrong? Thank you!










share|improve this question
















Two python objects have the same id but "is" operation returns false as shown below:



a = np.arange(12).reshape(2, -1)
c = a.reshape(12, 1)
print("id(c.data)", id(c.data))
print("id(a.data)", id(a.data))

print(c.data is a.data)
print(id(c.data) == id(a.data))


Here is the actual output:



id(c.data) 241233112
id(a.data) 241233112
False
True


My question is... why "c.data is a.data" returns false even though they point to the same ID, thus pointing to the same object? I thought that they point to the same object if they have same ID or am I wrong? Thank you!







python numpy numpy-ndarray memoryview






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 21 mins ago









smci

15.6k679109




15.6k679109










asked 6 hours ago









drminixdrminix

513




513








  • 1





    @C.Nivs They don't even necessarily have different memory addresses (something which Python doesn't expose). Whatever memory was used for the first may have been reused for the second.

    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @C.Nivs Don't think of it in terms of memory addresses. How memory is managed is completely implementation dependent. All you know for sure is that two objects that overlap in time will not have the same id.

    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Aran-Fey, that's okay a good question(though asked before) can sometimes be resurrected for a fruitful discussion

    – amanb
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @C.Nivs no, ids do not belong to variables. They belong to objects. Many variables can reference the same object.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    @juanpa.arrivillaga fair enough. Thanks for the explanation

    – C.Nivs
    4 hours ago














  • 1





    @C.Nivs They don't even necessarily have different memory addresses (something which Python doesn't expose). Whatever memory was used for the first may have been reused for the second.

    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @C.Nivs Don't think of it in terms of memory addresses. How memory is managed is completely implementation dependent. All you know for sure is that two objects that overlap in time will not have the same id.

    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Aran-Fey, that's okay a good question(though asked before) can sometimes be resurrected for a fruitful discussion

    – amanb
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @C.Nivs no, ids do not belong to variables. They belong to objects. Many variables can reference the same object.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    @juanpa.arrivillaga fair enough. Thanks for the explanation

    – C.Nivs
    4 hours ago








1




1





@C.Nivs They don't even necessarily have different memory addresses (something which Python doesn't expose). Whatever memory was used for the first may have been reused for the second.

– chepner
6 hours ago





@C.Nivs They don't even necessarily have different memory addresses (something which Python doesn't expose). Whatever memory was used for the first may have been reused for the second.

– chepner
6 hours ago




3




3





@C.Nivs Don't think of it in terms of memory addresses. How memory is managed is completely implementation dependent. All you know for sure is that two objects that overlap in time will not have the same id.

– chepner
6 hours ago





@C.Nivs Don't think of it in terms of memory addresses. How memory is managed is completely implementation dependent. All you know for sure is that two objects that overlap in time will not have the same id.

– chepner
6 hours ago




1




1





@Aran-Fey, that's okay a good question(though asked before) can sometimes be resurrected for a fruitful discussion

– amanb
6 hours ago





@Aran-Fey, that's okay a good question(though asked before) can sometimes be resurrected for a fruitful discussion

– amanb
6 hours ago




3




3





@C.Nivs no, ids do not belong to variables. They belong to objects. Many variables can reference the same object.

– juanpa.arrivillaga
6 hours ago





@C.Nivs no, ids do not belong to variables. They belong to objects. Many variables can reference the same object.

– juanpa.arrivillaga
6 hours ago




2




2





@juanpa.arrivillaga fair enough. Thanks for the explanation

– C.Nivs
4 hours ago





@juanpa.arrivillaga fair enough. Thanks for the explanation

– C.Nivs
4 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















12














a.data and c.data both produce a transient object, with no reference to it. As such, both are immediately garbage-collected. The same id can be used for both.



In your first if statement, the objects have to co-exist while is checks if they are identical, which they are not.



In the second if statement, each object is released as soon as id returns its id.



If you save references to both objects, keeping them alive, you can see they are not the same object.



r0 = a.data
r1 = c.data
assert r0 is not r1





share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    what is confusing is the fact that data looks like an attribute, but is probably a property

    – Jean-François Fabre
    6 hours ago











  • In my tests, the id's are different in the first run, but change to become the same on subsequent runs.

    – amanb
    6 hours ago











  • @Jean-FrançoisFabre so would that mean that the object itself is only returned when a getter is called, and the property is not actually stored in the class? I'm not quite familiar with the differences between a property vs attribute

    – C.Nivs
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    a property is a method disguised as an attribute. So it can return a discardable integer, object, whatever.

    – Jean-François Fabre
    6 hours ago



















3














In [62]: a = np.arange(12).reshape(2,-1) 
...: c = a.reshape(12,1)


.data returns a memoryview object. id just gives the id of that object; it's not the value of the object, or any indication of where a databuffer is located.



In [63]: a.data                                                                 
Out[63]: <memory at 0x7f672d1101f8>
In [64]: c.data
Out[64]: <memory at 0x7f672d1103a8>
In [65]: type(a.data)
Out[65]: memoryview


https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#memoryview



If you want to verify that a and c share a data buffer, I find the __array_interface__ to be a better tool.



In [66]: a.__array_interface__['data']                                          
Out[66]: (50988640, False)
In [67]: c.__array_interface__['data']
Out[67]: (50988640, False)


It even shows the offset produced by slicing - here 24 bytes, 3*8



In [68]: c[3:].__array_interface__['data']                                      
Out[68]: (50988664, False)




I haven't seen much use of a.data. It can be used as the buffer object when creating a new array with ndarray:



In [70]: d = np.ndarray((2,6), dtype=a.dtype, buffer=a.data)                    
In [71]: d
Out[71]:
array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
[ 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]])
In [72]: d.__array_interface__['data']
Out[72]: (50988640, False)


But normally we create new arrays with shared memory with slicing or np.array (copy=False).






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55658189%2fis-operation-returns-false-with-ndarray-data-attribute-even-though-two-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12














    a.data and c.data both produce a transient object, with no reference to it. As such, both are immediately garbage-collected. The same id can be used for both.



    In your first if statement, the objects have to co-exist while is checks if they are identical, which they are not.



    In the second if statement, each object is released as soon as id returns its id.



    If you save references to both objects, keeping them alive, you can see they are not the same object.



    r0 = a.data
    r1 = c.data
    assert r0 is not r1





    share|improve this answer





















    • 4





      what is confusing is the fact that data looks like an attribute, but is probably a property

      – Jean-François Fabre
      6 hours ago











    • In my tests, the id's are different in the first run, but change to become the same on subsequent runs.

      – amanb
      6 hours ago











    • @Jean-FrançoisFabre so would that mean that the object itself is only returned when a getter is called, and the property is not actually stored in the class? I'm not quite familiar with the differences between a property vs attribute

      – C.Nivs
      6 hours ago






    • 5





      a property is a method disguised as an attribute. So it can return a discardable integer, object, whatever.

      – Jean-François Fabre
      6 hours ago
















    12














    a.data and c.data both produce a transient object, with no reference to it. As such, both are immediately garbage-collected. The same id can be used for both.



    In your first if statement, the objects have to co-exist while is checks if they are identical, which they are not.



    In the second if statement, each object is released as soon as id returns its id.



    If you save references to both objects, keeping them alive, you can see they are not the same object.



    r0 = a.data
    r1 = c.data
    assert r0 is not r1





    share|improve this answer





















    • 4





      what is confusing is the fact that data looks like an attribute, but is probably a property

      – Jean-François Fabre
      6 hours ago











    • In my tests, the id's are different in the first run, but change to become the same on subsequent runs.

      – amanb
      6 hours ago











    • @Jean-FrançoisFabre so would that mean that the object itself is only returned when a getter is called, and the property is not actually stored in the class? I'm not quite familiar with the differences between a property vs attribute

      – C.Nivs
      6 hours ago






    • 5





      a property is a method disguised as an attribute. So it can return a discardable integer, object, whatever.

      – Jean-François Fabre
      6 hours ago














    12












    12








    12







    a.data and c.data both produce a transient object, with no reference to it. As such, both are immediately garbage-collected. The same id can be used for both.



    In your first if statement, the objects have to co-exist while is checks if they are identical, which they are not.



    In the second if statement, each object is released as soon as id returns its id.



    If you save references to both objects, keeping them alive, you can see they are not the same object.



    r0 = a.data
    r1 = c.data
    assert r0 is not r1





    share|improve this answer















    a.data and c.data both produce a transient object, with no reference to it. As such, both are immediately garbage-collected. The same id can be used for both.



    In your first if statement, the objects have to co-exist while is checks if they are identical, which they are not.



    In the second if statement, each object is released as soon as id returns its id.



    If you save references to both objects, keeping them alive, you can see they are not the same object.



    r0 = a.data
    r1 = c.data
    assert r0 is not r1






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 6 hours ago

























    answered 6 hours ago









    chepnerchepner

    262k35251345




    262k35251345








    • 4





      what is confusing is the fact that data looks like an attribute, but is probably a property

      – Jean-François Fabre
      6 hours ago











    • In my tests, the id's are different in the first run, but change to become the same on subsequent runs.

      – amanb
      6 hours ago











    • @Jean-FrançoisFabre so would that mean that the object itself is only returned when a getter is called, and the property is not actually stored in the class? I'm not quite familiar with the differences between a property vs attribute

      – C.Nivs
      6 hours ago






    • 5





      a property is a method disguised as an attribute. So it can return a discardable integer, object, whatever.

      – Jean-François Fabre
      6 hours ago














    • 4





      what is confusing is the fact that data looks like an attribute, but is probably a property

      – Jean-François Fabre
      6 hours ago











    • In my tests, the id's are different in the first run, but change to become the same on subsequent runs.

      – amanb
      6 hours ago











    • @Jean-FrançoisFabre so would that mean that the object itself is only returned when a getter is called, and the property is not actually stored in the class? I'm not quite familiar with the differences between a property vs attribute

      – C.Nivs
      6 hours ago






    • 5





      a property is a method disguised as an attribute. So it can return a discardable integer, object, whatever.

      – Jean-François Fabre
      6 hours ago








    4




    4





    what is confusing is the fact that data looks like an attribute, but is probably a property

    – Jean-François Fabre
    6 hours ago





    what is confusing is the fact that data looks like an attribute, but is probably a property

    – Jean-François Fabre
    6 hours ago













    In my tests, the id's are different in the first run, but change to become the same on subsequent runs.

    – amanb
    6 hours ago





    In my tests, the id's are different in the first run, but change to become the same on subsequent runs.

    – amanb
    6 hours ago













    @Jean-FrançoisFabre so would that mean that the object itself is only returned when a getter is called, and the property is not actually stored in the class? I'm not quite familiar with the differences between a property vs attribute

    – C.Nivs
    6 hours ago





    @Jean-FrançoisFabre so would that mean that the object itself is only returned when a getter is called, and the property is not actually stored in the class? I'm not quite familiar with the differences between a property vs attribute

    – C.Nivs
    6 hours ago




    5




    5





    a property is a method disguised as an attribute. So it can return a discardable integer, object, whatever.

    – Jean-François Fabre
    6 hours ago





    a property is a method disguised as an attribute. So it can return a discardable integer, object, whatever.

    – Jean-François Fabre
    6 hours ago













    3














    In [62]: a = np.arange(12).reshape(2,-1) 
    ...: c = a.reshape(12,1)


    .data returns a memoryview object. id just gives the id of that object; it's not the value of the object, or any indication of where a databuffer is located.



    In [63]: a.data                                                                 
    Out[63]: <memory at 0x7f672d1101f8>
    In [64]: c.data
    Out[64]: <memory at 0x7f672d1103a8>
    In [65]: type(a.data)
    Out[65]: memoryview


    https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#memoryview



    If you want to verify that a and c share a data buffer, I find the __array_interface__ to be a better tool.



    In [66]: a.__array_interface__['data']                                          
    Out[66]: (50988640, False)
    In [67]: c.__array_interface__['data']
    Out[67]: (50988640, False)


    It even shows the offset produced by slicing - here 24 bytes, 3*8



    In [68]: c[3:].__array_interface__['data']                                      
    Out[68]: (50988664, False)




    I haven't seen much use of a.data. It can be used as the buffer object when creating a new array with ndarray:



    In [70]: d = np.ndarray((2,6), dtype=a.dtype, buffer=a.data)                    
    In [71]: d
    Out[71]:
    array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
    [ 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]])
    In [72]: d.__array_interface__['data']
    Out[72]: (50988640, False)


    But normally we create new arrays with shared memory with slicing or np.array (copy=False).






    share|improve this answer






























      3














      In [62]: a = np.arange(12).reshape(2,-1) 
      ...: c = a.reshape(12,1)


      .data returns a memoryview object. id just gives the id of that object; it's not the value of the object, or any indication of where a databuffer is located.



      In [63]: a.data                                                                 
      Out[63]: <memory at 0x7f672d1101f8>
      In [64]: c.data
      Out[64]: <memory at 0x7f672d1103a8>
      In [65]: type(a.data)
      Out[65]: memoryview


      https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#memoryview



      If you want to verify that a and c share a data buffer, I find the __array_interface__ to be a better tool.



      In [66]: a.__array_interface__['data']                                          
      Out[66]: (50988640, False)
      In [67]: c.__array_interface__['data']
      Out[67]: (50988640, False)


      It even shows the offset produced by slicing - here 24 bytes, 3*8



      In [68]: c[3:].__array_interface__['data']                                      
      Out[68]: (50988664, False)




      I haven't seen much use of a.data. It can be used as the buffer object when creating a new array with ndarray:



      In [70]: d = np.ndarray((2,6), dtype=a.dtype, buffer=a.data)                    
      In [71]: d
      Out[71]:
      array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
      [ 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]])
      In [72]: d.__array_interface__['data']
      Out[72]: (50988640, False)


      But normally we create new arrays with shared memory with slicing or np.array (copy=False).






      share|improve this answer




























        3












        3








        3







        In [62]: a = np.arange(12).reshape(2,-1) 
        ...: c = a.reshape(12,1)


        .data returns a memoryview object. id just gives the id of that object; it's not the value of the object, or any indication of where a databuffer is located.



        In [63]: a.data                                                                 
        Out[63]: <memory at 0x7f672d1101f8>
        In [64]: c.data
        Out[64]: <memory at 0x7f672d1103a8>
        In [65]: type(a.data)
        Out[65]: memoryview


        https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#memoryview



        If you want to verify that a and c share a data buffer, I find the __array_interface__ to be a better tool.



        In [66]: a.__array_interface__['data']                                          
        Out[66]: (50988640, False)
        In [67]: c.__array_interface__['data']
        Out[67]: (50988640, False)


        It even shows the offset produced by slicing - here 24 bytes, 3*8



        In [68]: c[3:].__array_interface__['data']                                      
        Out[68]: (50988664, False)




        I haven't seen much use of a.data. It can be used as the buffer object when creating a new array with ndarray:



        In [70]: d = np.ndarray((2,6), dtype=a.dtype, buffer=a.data)                    
        In [71]: d
        Out[71]:
        array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
        [ 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]])
        In [72]: d.__array_interface__['data']
        Out[72]: (50988640, False)


        But normally we create new arrays with shared memory with slicing or np.array (copy=False).






        share|improve this answer















        In [62]: a = np.arange(12).reshape(2,-1) 
        ...: c = a.reshape(12,1)


        .data returns a memoryview object. id just gives the id of that object; it's not the value of the object, or any indication of where a databuffer is located.



        In [63]: a.data                                                                 
        Out[63]: <memory at 0x7f672d1101f8>
        In [64]: c.data
        Out[64]: <memory at 0x7f672d1103a8>
        In [65]: type(a.data)
        Out[65]: memoryview


        https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#memoryview



        If you want to verify that a and c share a data buffer, I find the __array_interface__ to be a better tool.



        In [66]: a.__array_interface__['data']                                          
        Out[66]: (50988640, False)
        In [67]: c.__array_interface__['data']
        Out[67]: (50988640, False)


        It even shows the offset produced by slicing - here 24 bytes, 3*8



        In [68]: c[3:].__array_interface__['data']                                      
        Out[68]: (50988664, False)




        I haven't seen much use of a.data. It can be used as the buffer object when creating a new array with ndarray:



        In [70]: d = np.ndarray((2,6), dtype=a.dtype, buffer=a.data)                    
        In [71]: d
        Out[71]:
        array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
        [ 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]])
        In [72]: d.__array_interface__['data']
        Out[72]: (50988640, False)


        But normally we create new arrays with shared memory with slicing or np.array (copy=False).







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 6 hours ago

























        answered 6 hours ago









        hpauljhpaulj

        118k787160




        118k787160






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55658189%2fis-operation-returns-false-with-ndarray-data-attribute-even-though-two-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

            Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области