A phrase ”follow into" in a context





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















I'm a ( an old style ) basketball fan and when I was reading this article



And I encountered this line,




Walton inherited a team that was ripped to the studs by Kobe Bryant's retirement tour and propped up by a pair of the NBA's worst contracts — Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov, one of whom is still cashing checks not to play for the Lakers and the other of whom cost them their No. 2 pick from 2015 in a salary dump. Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




What would this phrase "follow into" mean in this context?



I can not find any definition either by paid or free dictionaries.



I appreciate you all native speakers' support in advance(m_m).










share|improve this question





























    1















    I'm a ( an old style ) basketball fan and when I was reading this article



    And I encountered this line,




    Walton inherited a team that was ripped to the studs by Kobe Bryant's retirement tour and propped up by a pair of the NBA's worst contracts — Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov, one of whom is still cashing checks not to play for the Lakers and the other of whom cost them their No. 2 pick from 2015 in a salary dump. Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




    What would this phrase "follow into" mean in this context?



    I can not find any definition either by paid or free dictionaries.



    I appreciate you all native speakers' support in advance(m_m).










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      I'm a ( an old style ) basketball fan and when I was reading this article



      And I encountered this line,




      Walton inherited a team that was ripped to the studs by Kobe Bryant's retirement tour and propped up by a pair of the NBA's worst contracts — Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov, one of whom is still cashing checks not to play for the Lakers and the other of whom cost them their No. 2 pick from 2015 in a salary dump. Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




      What would this phrase "follow into" mean in this context?



      I can not find any definition either by paid or free dictionaries.



      I appreciate you all native speakers' support in advance(m_m).










      share|improve this question














      I'm a ( an old style ) basketball fan and when I was reading this article



      And I encountered this line,




      Walton inherited a team that was ripped to the studs by Kobe Bryant's retirement tour and propped up by a pair of the NBA's worst contracts — Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov, one of whom is still cashing checks not to play for the Lakers and the other of whom cost them their No. 2 pick from 2015 in a salary dump. Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




      What would this phrase "follow into" mean in this context?



      I can not find any definition either by paid or free dictionaries.



      I appreciate you all native speakers' support in advance(m_m).







      phrases






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Kentaro TomonoKentaro Tomono

      7231719




      7231719






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2















          Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles




          This means:




          Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.




          “Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.



          “Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            48 mins ago



















          1














          Consider the key section of the sentence:




          ...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..




          Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have




          Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...




          In short the pattern here is



          "A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."



          To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:




          Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




          without changing the meaning at all.






          share|improve this answer


























          • You explained basically the same thing using different words.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago













          • Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            49 mins ago











          • @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.

            – David Siegel
            43 mins ago






          • 1





            You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            38 mins ago



















          0














          In that context "followed into" means "became/turned into/made"






          share|improve this answer
























          • With much appreciation!

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago






          • 1





            @Kentaro Tomono I think this is not quite right, i will try an answer.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago











          • @DavidSiegel Oh, thank you.....

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago











          • He had come up with a selection of players that followed into a great team, that became a great team.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @ Kaique "followed into" is not a grammatical unit here, "Players that followed' is

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "481"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205237%2fa-phrase-follow-into-in-a-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2















          Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles




          This means:




          Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.




          “Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.



          “Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            48 mins ago
















          2















          Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles




          This means:




          Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.




          “Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.



          “Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            48 mins ago














          2












          2








          2








          Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles




          This means:




          Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.




          “Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.



          “Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”






          share|improve this answer














          Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles




          This means:




          Walton built the picks, who came later, into a good team.




          “Who Followed” is one idea, and “into a team” is a different idea.



          “Into” is used to say “he turned ingredients into a result.”







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          whiskeychiefwhiskeychief

          52129




          52129













          • Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            48 mins ago



















          • Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            48 mins ago

















          Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.

          – Kentaro Tomono
          48 mins ago





          Thanks! I think yours would be almost same with David Siegel's. But yours is much simpler, kindly let me have some time to choose the best answer.

          – Kentaro Tomono
          48 mins ago













          1














          Consider the key section of the sentence:




          ...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..




          Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have




          Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...




          In short the pattern here is



          "A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."



          To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:




          Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




          without changing the meaning at all.






          share|improve this answer


























          • You explained basically the same thing using different words.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago













          • Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            49 mins ago











          • @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.

            – David Siegel
            43 mins ago






          • 1





            You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            38 mins ago
















          1














          Consider the key section of the sentence:




          ...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..




          Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have




          Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...




          In short the pattern here is



          "A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."



          To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:




          Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




          without changing the meaning at all.






          share|improve this answer


























          • You explained basically the same thing using different words.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago













          • Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            49 mins ago











          • @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.

            – David Siegel
            43 mins ago






          • 1





            You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            38 mins ago














          1












          1








          1







          Consider the key section of the sentence:




          ...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..




          Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have




          Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...




          In short the pattern here is



          "A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."



          To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:




          Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




          without changing the meaning at all.






          share|improve this answer















          Consider the key section of the sentence:




          ...Walton built the crop of draft picks who followed into a team attractive enough ..




          Here "the crop of draft picks who followed" is the group of people who were picked by the team after the drafts of Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. Call this geoup of players "the guys" and we have




          Walton built the guys into a team attractive enough...




          In short the pattern here is



          "A built B into C" so "built into" is the compound verb. Here A is "Walton" B is "the crop of draft picks who followed" and C is "a team attractive enough..."



          To help clarify this, the final sentence of the paragraph could be rewritten as:




          Starless and cap-strapped is not the best starting point, but Walton built the group of players who were drafted subsequent to Deng and Mozgov, into a team attractive enough to lure LeBron to Los Angeles.




          without changing the meaning at all.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 36 mins ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          David SiegelDavid Siegel

          1,767112




          1,767112













          • You explained basically the same thing using different words.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago













          • Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            49 mins ago











          • @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.

            – David Siegel
            43 mins ago






          • 1





            You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            38 mins ago



















          • You explained basically the same thing using different words.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago













          • Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            49 mins ago











          • @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.

            – David Siegel
            43 mins ago






          • 1





            You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.

            – Kentaro Tomono
            38 mins ago

















          You explained basically the same thing using different words.

          – Kaique
          2 hours ago





          You explained basically the same thing using different words.

          – Kaique
          2 hours ago













          @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.

          – David Siegel
          2 hours ago







          @Kaique I do not think so at all. "followed" does not belong with "into". "Followed modifies "players" to indicate which players: those who followed [the poor picks] . "Followed' here is a sequence in time. not followed in the sense of "he followed where Joe led" or any of several other posisble senses on "followed". The answer by whiskeychief does say pretty much the same thing that I did.

          – David Siegel
          2 hours ago















          Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.

          – Kentaro Tomono
          49 mins ago





          Thanks! I think the image became clearer in myself. So, I bet the verb "follow" here would be equal, like, "continued to play together",am I wrong? I wish or doubt that there should have been a comma between follow and into in my personal opinion.

          – Kentaro Tomono
          49 mins ago













          @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.

          – David Siegel
          43 mins ago





          @Kentaro Tomono Not quite. "Follow" here means "came after" or "jointed the team after." It refers back to "Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov," and "the players who followed" are those who joined later than Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov. I think a comma after "followed" would be undesirable.

          – David Siegel
          43 mins ago




          1




          1





          You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.

          – Kentaro Tomono
          38 mins ago





          You are right. Who followed were the "the crop of draft picks" ( which are persons ). Thanks!.

          – Kentaro Tomono
          38 mins ago











          0














          In that context "followed into" means "became/turned into/made"






          share|improve this answer
























          • With much appreciation!

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago






          • 1





            @Kentaro Tomono I think this is not quite right, i will try an answer.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago











          • @DavidSiegel Oh, thank you.....

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago











          • He had come up with a selection of players that followed into a great team, that became a great team.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @ Kaique "followed into" is not a grammatical unit here, "Players that followed' is

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago
















          0














          In that context "followed into" means "became/turned into/made"






          share|improve this answer
























          • With much appreciation!

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago






          • 1





            @Kentaro Tomono I think this is not quite right, i will try an answer.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago











          • @DavidSiegel Oh, thank you.....

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago











          • He had come up with a selection of players that followed into a great team, that became a great team.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @ Kaique "followed into" is not a grammatical unit here, "Players that followed' is

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago














          0












          0








          0







          In that context "followed into" means "became/turned into/made"






          share|improve this answer













          In that context "followed into" means "became/turned into/made"







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          KaiqueKaique

          1,796623




          1,796623













          • With much appreciation!

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago






          • 1





            @Kentaro Tomono I think this is not quite right, i will try an answer.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago











          • @DavidSiegel Oh, thank you.....

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago











          • He had come up with a selection of players that followed into a great team, that became a great team.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @ Kaique "followed into" is not a grammatical unit here, "Players that followed' is

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago



















          • With much appreciation!

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago






          • 1





            @Kentaro Tomono I think this is not quite right, i will try an answer.

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago











          • @DavidSiegel Oh, thank you.....

            – Kentaro Tomono
            2 hours ago











          • He had come up with a selection of players that followed into a great team, that became a great team.

            – Kaique
            2 hours ago











          • @ Kaique "followed into" is not a grammatical unit here, "Players that followed' is

            – David Siegel
            2 hours ago

















          With much appreciation!

          – Kentaro Tomono
          2 hours ago





          With much appreciation!

          – Kentaro Tomono
          2 hours ago




          1




          1





          @Kentaro Tomono I think this is not quite right, i will try an answer.

          – David Siegel
          2 hours ago





          @Kentaro Tomono I think this is not quite right, i will try an answer.

          – David Siegel
          2 hours ago













          @DavidSiegel Oh, thank you.....

          – Kentaro Tomono
          2 hours ago





          @DavidSiegel Oh, thank you.....

          – Kentaro Tomono
          2 hours ago













          He had come up with a selection of players that followed into a great team, that became a great team.

          – Kaique
          2 hours ago





          He had come up with a selection of players that followed into a great team, that became a great team.

          – Kaique
          2 hours ago













          @ Kaique "followed into" is not a grammatical unit here, "Players that followed' is

          – David Siegel
          2 hours ago





          @ Kaique "followed into" is not a grammatical unit here, "Players that followed' is

          – David Siegel
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205237%2fa-phrase-follow-into-in-a-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Masuk log Menu navigasi

          Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

          Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области