How to draw a nice diagonal matrix?












4















How to typeset a nice looking diagonal matrix? I find myself, once again, fiddling with phantoms and running raiseboxes to get an aesthetic result. This kind of micromanagement is bad practice, but why does the default look so bad and is there a better way? Two diagonal matrices side by side



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & ddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
end{bmatrix}
&
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & raisebox{-0.4ex}{(ddots)}rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt} & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt}
end{bmatrix}
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question























  • First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago
















4















How to typeset a nice looking diagonal matrix? I find myself, once again, fiddling with phantoms and running raiseboxes to get an aesthetic result. This kind of micromanagement is bad practice, but why does the default look so bad and is there a better way? Two diagonal matrices side by side



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & ddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
end{bmatrix}
&
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & raisebox{-0.4ex}{(ddots)}rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt} & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt}
end{bmatrix}
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question























  • First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago














4












4








4


0






How to typeset a nice looking diagonal matrix? I find myself, once again, fiddling with phantoms and running raiseboxes to get an aesthetic result. This kind of micromanagement is bad practice, but why does the default look so bad and is there a better way? Two diagonal matrices side by side



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & ddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
end{bmatrix}
&
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & raisebox{-0.4ex}{(ddots)}rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt} & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt}
end{bmatrix}
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question














How to typeset a nice looking diagonal matrix? I find myself, once again, fiddling with phantoms and running raiseboxes to get an aesthetic result. This kind of micromanagement is bad practice, but why does the default look so bad and is there a better way? Two diagonal matrices side by side



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & ddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
end{bmatrix}
&
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & raisebox{-0.4ex}{(ddots)}rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt} & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt}
end{bmatrix}
end{align*}

end{document}






matrices






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









MankkaMankka

24227




24227













  • First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago



















  • First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago

















First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

– JouleV
1 hour ago





First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

– JouleV
1 hour ago




1




1





Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

– JouleV
1 hour ago





Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

– JouleV
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














A TABstack alternative.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
begin{document}
[ operatorname{diag} x =
bracketMatrixstack{
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & cddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here



While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
begin{document}
fixTABwidth{T}
[ operatorname{diag} x =
bracketMatrixstack{
x_1 & 0 & 12345\
0 & cddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485276%2fhow-to-draw-a-nice-diagonal-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    A TABstack alternative.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
    TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
    setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
    setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
    newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
    begin{document}
    [ operatorname{diag} x =
    bracketMatrixstack{
    x_1 & 0 & 0\
    0 & cddots & 0 \
    0 & 0 & x_n
    }
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
    TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
    setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
    setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
    newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
    begin{document}
    fixTABwidth{T}
    [ operatorname{diag} x =
    bracketMatrixstack{
    x_1 & 0 & 12345\
    0 & cddots & 0 \
    0 & 0 & x_n
    }
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




























      4














      A TABstack alternative.



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
      TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
      setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
      setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
      newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
      begin{document}
      [ operatorname{diag} x =
      bracketMatrixstack{
      x_1 & 0 & 0\
      0 & cddots & 0 \
      0 & 0 & x_n
      }
      ]
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
      TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
      setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
      setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
      newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
      begin{document}
      fixTABwidth{T}
      [ operatorname{diag} x =
      bracketMatrixstack{
      x_1 & 0 & 12345\
      0 & cddots & 0 \
      0 & 0 & x_n
      }
      ]
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























        4












        4








        4







        A TABstack alternative.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
        TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
        setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
        setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
        newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
        begin{document}
        [ operatorname{diag} x =
        bracketMatrixstack{
        x_1 & 0 & 0\
        0 & cddots & 0 \
        0 & 0 & x_n
        }
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
        TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
        setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
        setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
        newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
        begin{document}
        fixTABwidth{T}
        [ operatorname{diag} x =
        bracketMatrixstack{
        x_1 & 0 & 12345\
        0 & cddots & 0 \
        0 & 0 & x_n
        }
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        A TABstack alternative.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
        TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
        setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
        setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
        newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
        begin{document}
        [ operatorname{diag} x =
        bracketMatrixstack{
        x_1 & 0 & 0\
        0 & cddots & 0 \
        0 & 0 & x_n
        }
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
        TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
        setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
        setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
        newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
        begin{document}
        fixTABwidth{T}
        [ operatorname{diag} x =
        bracketMatrixstack{
        x_1 & 0 & 12345\
        0 & cddots & 0 \
        0 & 0 & x_n
        }
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 53 mins ago









        Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

        162k9206418




        162k9206418






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485276%2fhow-to-draw-a-nice-diagonal-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            ジョン・ファウルズ

            16 Maret Daftar isi Peristiwa | Kelahiran | Meninggal | Hari raya dan peringatan | Menu navigasis