How to draw a nice diagonal matrix?












4















How to typeset a nice looking diagonal matrix? I find myself, once again, fiddling with phantoms and running raiseboxes to get an aesthetic result. This kind of micromanagement is bad practice, but why does the default look so bad and is there a better way? Two diagonal matrices side by side



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & ddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
end{bmatrix}
&
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & raisebox{-0.4ex}{(ddots)}rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt} & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt}
end{bmatrix}
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question























  • First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago
















4















How to typeset a nice looking diagonal matrix? I find myself, once again, fiddling with phantoms and running raiseboxes to get an aesthetic result. This kind of micromanagement is bad practice, but why does the default look so bad and is there a better way? Two diagonal matrices side by side



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & ddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
end{bmatrix}
&
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & raisebox{-0.4ex}{(ddots)}rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt} & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt}
end{bmatrix}
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question























  • First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago














4












4








4


0






How to typeset a nice looking diagonal matrix? I find myself, once again, fiddling with phantoms and running raiseboxes to get an aesthetic result. This kind of micromanagement is bad practice, but why does the default look so bad and is there a better way? Two diagonal matrices side by side



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & ddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
end{bmatrix}
&
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & raisebox{-0.4ex}{(ddots)}rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt} & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt}
end{bmatrix}
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question














How to typeset a nice looking diagonal matrix? I find myself, once again, fiddling with phantoms and running raiseboxes to get an aesthetic result. This kind of micromanagement is bad practice, but why does the default look so bad and is there a better way? Two diagonal matrices side by side



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & ddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
end{bmatrix}
&
operatorname{diag} x &=
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & raisebox{-0.4ex}{(ddots)}rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt} & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n rule[3.4ex]{0pt}{0pt}
end{bmatrix}
end{align*}

end{document}






matrices






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









MankkaMankka

24227




24227













  • First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago



















  • First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago

















First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

– JouleV
1 hour ago





First, use DeclareMathOperator if you use "diag" many times in the document.

– JouleV
1 hour ago




1




1





Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

– JouleV
1 hour ago





Hmm, the problem is not with bmatrix, but with ddots.

– JouleV
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














A TABstack alternative.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
begin{document}
[ operatorname{diag} x =
bracketMatrixstack{
x_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & cddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here



While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
begin{document}
fixTABwidth{T}
[ operatorname{diag} x =
bracketMatrixstack{
x_1 & 0 & 12345\
0 & cddots & 0 \
0 & 0 & x_n
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485276%2fhow-to-draw-a-nice-diagonal-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    A TABstack alternative.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
    TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
    setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
    setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
    newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
    begin{document}
    [ operatorname{diag} x =
    bracketMatrixstack{
    x_1 & 0 & 0\
    0 & cddots & 0 \
    0 & 0 & x_n
    }
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
    TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
    setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
    setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
    newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
    begin{document}
    fixTABwidth{T}
    [ operatorname{diag} x =
    bracketMatrixstack{
    x_1 & 0 & 12345\
    0 & cddots & 0 \
    0 & 0 & x_n
    }
    ]
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




























      4














      A TABstack alternative.



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
      TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
      setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
      setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
      newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
      begin{document}
      [ operatorname{diag} x =
      bracketMatrixstack{
      x_1 & 0 & 0\
      0 & cddots & 0 \
      0 & 0 & x_n
      }
      ]
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
      TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
      setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
      setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
      newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
      begin{document}
      fixTABwidth{T}
      [ operatorname{diag} x =
      bracketMatrixstack{
      x_1 & 0 & 12345\
      0 & cddots & 0 \
      0 & 0 & x_n
      }
      ]
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























        4












        4








        4







        A TABstack alternative.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
        TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
        setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
        setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
        newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
        begin{document}
        [ operatorname{diag} x =
        bracketMatrixstack{
        x_1 & 0 & 0\
        0 & cddots & 0 \
        0 & 0 & x_n
        }
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
        TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
        setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
        setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
        newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
        begin{document}
        fixTABwidth{T}
        [ operatorname{diag} x =
        bracketMatrixstack{
        x_1 & 0 & 12345\
        0 & cddots & 0 \
        0 & 0 & x_n
        }
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        A TABstack alternative.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
        TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
        setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
        setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
        newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
        begin{document}
        [ operatorname{diag} x =
        bracketMatrixstack{
        x_1 & 0 & 0\
        0 & cddots & 0 \
        0 & 0 & x_n
        }
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        While not needed for diagonal matrices of the type portrayed by the OP, the package has a fixTABwidth{<T or F>} declaration to fix all column widths to the largest found in the matrix. That can be helpful if there are wide matrix entries:



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools,tabstackengine}
        TABstackMath% STACK MATRIX IN MATH MODE
        setstacktabbedgap{10pt}% INTER-COLUMN GAP SIZE
        setstackgap{L}{1.5baselineskip}% INTER-ROW BASELINESKIP
        newcommandcddots{raisebox{-1pt}{$ddots$}}
        begin{document}
        fixTABwidth{T}
        [ operatorname{diag} x =
        bracketMatrixstack{
        x_1 & 0 & 12345\
        0 & cddots & 0 \
        0 & 0 & x_n
        }
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 53 mins ago









        Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

        162k9206418




        162k9206418






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485276%2fhow-to-draw-a-nice-diagonal-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

            Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области