How to write this math term? with cases it isn't working












2















enter image description here



I can't find a way to write this in Latex. Any hints where to start?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Mico
    1 hour ago
















2















enter image description here



I can't find a way to write this in Latex. Any hints where to start?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Mico
    1 hour ago














2












2








2








enter image description here



I can't find a way to write this in Latex. Any hints where to start?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












enter image description here



I can't find a way to write this in Latex. Any hints where to start?







math-mode






share|improve this question







New contributor




Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Debotush DamDebotush Dam

132




132




New contributor




Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Mico
    1 hour ago



















  • Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Mico
    1 hour ago

















Welcome to TeX.SE.

– Mico
1 hour ago





Welcome to TeX.SE.

– Mico
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'drcases' environment
begin{document}

[
begin{drcases}
g^l_{ij} = frac{partial e}{partial w^l_{ij}} = dots\
w^l_{ij} = dots
end{drcases}
qquad
begin{tabular}{@{}l}
for $l=dots$\
for $i=dots$\
for $j=dots$
end{tabular}
]
end{document}





share|improve this answer































    2














    Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools}
    begin{document}
    begin{align*}
    left.begin{aligned}
    g_{ij}^i &=frac{partial e}{partial w_{ij}^I}=A(I_i)delta^{ell+1}_j\
    w_{ij}^i &=w_{ij}^ell-r,g_{ij}^ell\
    end{aligned}right}qquad
    begin{array}{l}
    text{for $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,}\
    text{for $i=0,1,2,dots N^{ell+1}$,}\
    text{for $j=1,2,3,dots N^{ell+1+2}$}
    end{array}
    end{align*}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
























    • +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...

      – Mico
      22 mins ago





















    0














    A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    newcommand{pder}[2]{frac{partial #1}{partial #2}}

    begin{document}

    [
    left.
    begin{aligned}
    g_{ij}^l &= pder{e}{w_{ij}^l} = mathcal{A}(I_i^l)delta_i^{l+1}
    \[2ex]
    w_{ij}^l &= w_{ij}^l-rg_{ij}^l
    end{aligned}
    right}
    qquad
    begin{alignedat}{2}
    &text{for} &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
    &text{for} & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^{l+1},\
    &text{for} & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^{l+1}.
    end{alignedat}
    ]
    end{document}


    The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.



    enter image description here





    share
























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Debotush Dam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485405%2fhow-to-write-this-math-term-with-cases-it-isnt-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:



      enter image description here



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools} % for 'drcases' environment
      begin{document}

      [
      begin{drcases}
      g^l_{ij} = frac{partial e}{partial w^l_{ij}} = dots\
      w^l_{ij} = dots
      end{drcases}
      qquad
      begin{tabular}{@{}l}
      for $l=dots$\
      for $i=dots$\
      for $j=dots$
      end{tabular}
      ]
      end{document}





      share|improve this answer




























        2














        A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools} % for 'drcases' environment
        begin{document}

        [
        begin{drcases}
        g^l_{ij} = frac{partial e}{partial w^l_{ij}} = dots\
        w^l_{ij} = dots
        end{drcases}
        qquad
        begin{tabular}{@{}l}
        for $l=dots$\
        for $i=dots$\
        for $j=dots$
        end{tabular}
        ]
        end{document}





        share|improve this answer


























          2












          2








          2







          A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:



          enter image description here



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{mathtools} % for 'drcases' environment
          begin{document}

          [
          begin{drcases}
          g^l_{ij} = frac{partial e}{partial w^l_{ij}} = dots\
          w^l_{ij} = dots
          end{drcases}
          qquad
          begin{tabular}{@{}l}
          for $l=dots$\
          for $i=dots$\
          for $j=dots$
          end{tabular}
          ]
          end{document}





          share|improve this answer













          A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:



          enter image description here



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{mathtools} % for 'drcases' environment
          begin{document}

          [
          begin{drcases}
          g^l_{ij} = frac{partial e}{partial w^l_{ij}} = dots\
          w^l_{ij} = dots
          end{drcases}
          qquad
          begin{tabular}{@{}l}
          for $l=dots$\
          for $i=dots$\
          for $j=dots$
          end{tabular}
          ]
          end{document}






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          MicoMico

          287k32392781




          287k32392781























              2














              Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{mathtools}
              begin{document}
              begin{align*}
              left.begin{aligned}
              g_{ij}^i &=frac{partial e}{partial w_{ij}^I}=A(I_i)delta^{ell+1}_j\
              w_{ij}^i &=w_{ij}^ell-r,g_{ij}^ell\
              end{aligned}right}qquad
              begin{array}{l}
              text{for $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,}\
              text{for $i=0,1,2,dots N^{ell+1}$,}\
              text{for $j=1,2,3,dots N^{ell+1+2}$}
              end{array}
              end{align*}
              end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer
























              • +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...

                – Mico
                22 mins ago


















              2














              Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{mathtools}
              begin{document}
              begin{align*}
              left.begin{aligned}
              g_{ij}^i &=frac{partial e}{partial w_{ij}^I}=A(I_i)delta^{ell+1}_j\
              w_{ij}^i &=w_{ij}^ell-r,g_{ij}^ell\
              end{aligned}right}qquad
              begin{array}{l}
              text{for $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,}\
              text{for $i=0,1,2,dots N^{ell+1}$,}\
              text{for $j=1,2,3,dots N^{ell+1+2}$}
              end{array}
              end{align*}
              end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer
























              • +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...

                – Mico
                22 mins ago
















              2












              2








              2







              Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{mathtools}
              begin{document}
              begin{align*}
              left.begin{aligned}
              g_{ij}^i &=frac{partial e}{partial w_{ij}^I}=A(I_i)delta^{ell+1}_j\
              w_{ij}^i &=w_{ij}^ell-r,g_{ij}^ell\
              end{aligned}right}qquad
              begin{array}{l}
              text{for $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,}\
              text{for $i=0,1,2,dots N^{ell+1}$,}\
              text{for $j=1,2,3,dots N^{ell+1+2}$}
              end{array}
              end{align*}
              end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer













              Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{mathtools}
              begin{document}
              begin{align*}
              left.begin{aligned}
              g_{ij}^i &=frac{partial e}{partial w_{ij}^I}=A(I_i)delta^{ell+1}_j\
              w_{ij}^i &=w_{ij}^ell-r,g_{ij}^ell\
              end{aligned}right}qquad
              begin{array}{l}
              text{for $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,}\
              text{for $i=0,1,2,dots N^{ell+1}$,}\
              text{for $j=1,2,3,dots N^{ell+1+2}$}
              end{array}
              end{align*}
              end{document}


              enter image description here







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 59 mins ago









              marmotmarmot

              119k6154288




              119k6154288













              • +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...

                – Mico
                22 mins ago





















              • +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...

                – Mico
                22 mins ago



















              +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...

              – Mico
              22 mins ago







              +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...

              – Mico
              22 mins ago













              0














              A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{amsmath}

              newcommand{pder}[2]{frac{partial #1}{partial #2}}

              begin{document}

              [
              left.
              begin{aligned}
              g_{ij}^l &= pder{e}{w_{ij}^l} = mathcal{A}(I_i^l)delta_i^{l+1}
              \[2ex]
              w_{ij}^l &= w_{ij}^l-rg_{ij}^l
              end{aligned}
              right}
              qquad
              begin{alignedat}{2}
              &text{for} &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
              &text{for} & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^{l+1},\
              &text{for} & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^{l+1}.
              end{alignedat}
              ]
              end{document}


              The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.



              enter image description here





              share




























                0














                A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}

                newcommand{pder}[2]{frac{partial #1}{partial #2}}

                begin{document}

                [
                left.
                begin{aligned}
                g_{ij}^l &= pder{e}{w_{ij}^l} = mathcal{A}(I_i^l)delta_i^{l+1}
                \[2ex]
                w_{ij}^l &= w_{ij}^l-rg_{ij}^l
                end{aligned}
                right}
                qquad
                begin{alignedat}{2}
                &text{for} &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
                &text{for} & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^{l+1},\
                &text{for} & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^{l+1}.
                end{alignedat}
                ]
                end{document}


                The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.



                enter image description here





                share


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{amsmath}

                  newcommand{pder}[2]{frac{partial #1}{partial #2}}

                  begin{document}

                  [
                  left.
                  begin{aligned}
                  g_{ij}^l &= pder{e}{w_{ij}^l} = mathcal{A}(I_i^l)delta_i^{l+1}
                  \[2ex]
                  w_{ij}^l &= w_{ij}^l-rg_{ij}^l
                  end{aligned}
                  right}
                  qquad
                  begin{alignedat}{2}
                  &text{for} &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
                  &text{for} & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^{l+1},\
                  &text{for} & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^{l+1}.
                  end{alignedat}
                  ]
                  end{document}


                  The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.



                  enter image description here





                  share













                  A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{amsmath}

                  newcommand{pder}[2]{frac{partial #1}{partial #2}}

                  begin{document}

                  [
                  left.
                  begin{aligned}
                  g_{ij}^l &= pder{e}{w_{ij}^l} = mathcal{A}(I_i^l)delta_i^{l+1}
                  \[2ex]
                  w_{ij}^l &= w_{ij}^l-rg_{ij}^l
                  end{aligned}
                  right}
                  qquad
                  begin{alignedat}{2}
                  &text{for} &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
                  &text{for} & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^{l+1},\
                  &text{for} & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^{l+1}.
                  end{alignedat}
                  ]
                  end{document}


                  The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.



                  enter image description here






                  share











                  share


                  share










                  answered 1 min ago









                  egregegreg

                  735k8919343257




                  735k8919343257






















                      Debotush Dam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Debotush Dam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Debotush Dam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Debotush Dam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485405%2fhow-to-write-this-math-term-with-cases-it-isnt-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                      Masuk log Menu navigasi

                      อาณาจักร (ชีววิทยา) ดูเพิ่ม อ้างอิง รายการเลือกการนำทาง10.1086/39456810.5962/bhl.title.447410.1126/science.163.3863.150576276010.1007/BF01796092408502"Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms"10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088432104270744"Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya"1990PNAS...87.4576W10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576541592112744PubMedJump the queueexpand by handPubMedJump the queueexpand by handPubMedJump the queueexpand by hand"A revised six-kingdom system of life"10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.x9809012"Only six kingdoms of life"10.1098/rspb.2004.2705169172415306349"Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree"10.1098/rsbl.2009.0948288006020031978เพิ่มข้อมูล