Why light coming from distant stars is not discrete?












6












$begingroup$


Imaging the light racing out from distant sun, as beam of light shoots aways is a circular pattern (spherical actually), remembering that, light comes in photons or packets of energy.
so how come is that we do not see "gaps" in the light coming from distant stars as these "rays" should have gaps that are getting farther apart as distance grows
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you see any "gaps" in the light for an ordinary light bulb?
    $endgroup$
    – my2cts
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @my2cts I would assume the OP is asking about very far distances and is coming from the point of view that the area that light could reach is not showered by a continuous distribution of photons
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    9 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Photons from stars--how do they fill in such large angular distances?
    $endgroup$
    – Harry Johnston
    3 hours ago
















6












$begingroup$


Imaging the light racing out from distant sun, as beam of light shoots aways is a circular pattern (spherical actually), remembering that, light comes in photons or packets of energy.
so how come is that we do not see "gaps" in the light coming from distant stars as these "rays" should have gaps that are getting farther apart as distance grows
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you see any "gaps" in the light for an ordinary light bulb?
    $endgroup$
    – my2cts
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @my2cts I would assume the OP is asking about very far distances and is coming from the point of view that the area that light could reach is not showered by a continuous distribution of photons
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    9 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Photons from stars--how do they fill in such large angular distances?
    $endgroup$
    – Harry Johnston
    3 hours ago














6












6








6


2



$begingroup$


Imaging the light racing out from distant sun, as beam of light shoots aways is a circular pattern (spherical actually), remembering that, light comes in photons or packets of energy.
so how come is that we do not see "gaps" in the light coming from distant stars as these "rays" should have gaps that are getting farther apart as distance grows
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Imaging the light racing out from distant sun, as beam of light shoots aways is a circular pattern (spherical actually), remembering that, light comes in photons or packets of energy.
so how come is that we do not see "gaps" in the light coming from distant stars as these "rays" should have gaps that are getting farther apart as distance grows
enter image description here







visible-light photons stars vision discrete






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 26 mins ago









ZeroTheHero

21.3k53364




21.3k53364






New contributor




benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









benchukbenchuk

1312




1312




New contributor




benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






benchuk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Do you see any "gaps" in the light for an ordinary light bulb?
    $endgroup$
    – my2cts
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @my2cts I would assume the OP is asking about very far distances and is coming from the point of view that the area that light could reach is not showered by a continuous distribution of photons
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    9 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Photons from stars--how do they fill in such large angular distances?
    $endgroup$
    – Harry Johnston
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you see any "gaps" in the light for an ordinary light bulb?
    $endgroup$
    – my2cts
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @my2cts I would assume the OP is asking about very far distances and is coming from the point of view that the area that light could reach is not showered by a continuous distribution of photons
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    9 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Photons from stars--how do they fill in such large angular distances?
    $endgroup$
    – Harry Johnston
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Do you see any "gaps" in the light for an ordinary light bulb?
$endgroup$
– my2cts
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Do you see any "gaps" in the light for an ordinary light bulb?
$endgroup$
– my2cts
9 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@my2cts I would assume the OP is asking about very far distances and is coming from the point of view that the area that light could reach is not showered by a continuous distribution of photons
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
9 hours ago






$begingroup$
@my2cts I would assume the OP is asking about very far distances and is coming from the point of view that the area that light could reach is not showered by a continuous distribution of photons
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
9 hours ago














$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Photons from stars--how do they fill in such large angular distances?
$endgroup$
– Harry Johnston
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Photons from stars--how do they fill in such large angular distances?
$endgroup$
– Harry Johnston
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

You are right that single photon detection is a discrete event. But you are under the false assumption that these "rays" are discretely distributed.



Ideally, a photon would have an equal probability of being emitted through any solid angle out of the star. i.e. it is a uniform probability distribution with respect to the solid angle. There aren't single rays that are evenly distributed around the star that the photons travel along.



For a water analogy, it is not like the star is a spherical shower head where photons can only be released from discrete locations. So, even if you might have a different random distribution of photon detection events at different angular locations relative to the star, you will still always see photons (this is neglecting stars that are so far away from us that their light never reaches us due to the expanding universe).



Of course, if you are far enough away you will experience fewer and fewer photons. However this is not limited to certain "rays". This will be true at any angle at a large enough distance.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The question is being asked by somebody who thinks in terms of light rays that are getting farther apart as they go farther from the source, and it is not a wrong way to think about it. So, very few photons going into a vast space ---> big gaps. And indeed photons from a given star arrive very far spaced out, less than one per second into a human eye.
    $endgroup$
    – Kostas
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Kostas But the sparsity of photons is not due to not being along the correct ray. Nevertheless I have added something to my answer about being far away from a star.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The faintest stars we can see deliver 140 photons per second to our eyes.
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @KiethMcClary Thanks for the info :)
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    2 hours ago



















-1












$begingroup$

Very good question. Here is a more QM explanation. It is almost the same as if you would (only for your case) take the Sun as an atom, that is surrounded by an electron field as per QM.



Now the wavefunction of the electron describes the probability distribution of the electron being at a certain position in space around the nucleus.



You would think that the electron can only be at certain discrete number of positions? Well as per QM, the answer is no. In simple words, the electron is at a certain energy level around the nucleus as per QM, but inside that energy level, the electron could be anywhere.



Since the atomic system (and the electron) emits the photons, and the electron could be anywhere (inside the certain energy level as per QM) how would you tell where the electron is at the moment of emission?



So you would imagine that the electron could only take certain fixed positions around the nucleus, and emit the photon from those positions. In reality the electron's position is described by the wavefunction, and it is continuous. Simply said, the electron could be anywhere (inside that certain energy level as per QM).



So in your case if you look at just one single atom, and the atom emits photons from far away, the photons will be continuously distributed. There will be no gaps between the photons.



Now if you look at the Sun, which is made of a whole lot of atoms, you can take it analogously, the photons will be distributed continuously.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    benchuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473187%2fwhy-light-coming-from-distant-stars-is-not-discrete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    You are right that single photon detection is a discrete event. But you are under the false assumption that these "rays" are discretely distributed.



    Ideally, a photon would have an equal probability of being emitted through any solid angle out of the star. i.e. it is a uniform probability distribution with respect to the solid angle. There aren't single rays that are evenly distributed around the star that the photons travel along.



    For a water analogy, it is not like the star is a spherical shower head where photons can only be released from discrete locations. So, even if you might have a different random distribution of photon detection events at different angular locations relative to the star, you will still always see photons (this is neglecting stars that are so far away from us that their light never reaches us due to the expanding universe).



    Of course, if you are far enough away you will experience fewer and fewer photons. However this is not limited to certain "rays". This will be true at any angle at a large enough distance.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The question is being asked by somebody who thinks in terms of light rays that are getting farther apart as they go farther from the source, and it is not a wrong way to think about it. So, very few photons going into a vast space ---> big gaps. And indeed photons from a given star arrive very far spaced out, less than one per second into a human eye.
      $endgroup$
      – Kostas
      8 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Kostas But the sparsity of photons is not due to not being along the correct ray. Nevertheless I have added something to my answer about being far away from a star.
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      8 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      The faintest stars we can see deliver 140 photons per second to our eyes.
      $endgroup$
      – Keith McClary
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @KiethMcClary Thanks for the info :)
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      2 hours ago
















    6












    $begingroup$

    You are right that single photon detection is a discrete event. But you are under the false assumption that these "rays" are discretely distributed.



    Ideally, a photon would have an equal probability of being emitted through any solid angle out of the star. i.e. it is a uniform probability distribution with respect to the solid angle. There aren't single rays that are evenly distributed around the star that the photons travel along.



    For a water analogy, it is not like the star is a spherical shower head where photons can only be released from discrete locations. So, even if you might have a different random distribution of photon detection events at different angular locations relative to the star, you will still always see photons (this is neglecting stars that are so far away from us that their light never reaches us due to the expanding universe).



    Of course, if you are far enough away you will experience fewer and fewer photons. However this is not limited to certain "rays". This will be true at any angle at a large enough distance.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The question is being asked by somebody who thinks in terms of light rays that are getting farther apart as they go farther from the source, and it is not a wrong way to think about it. So, very few photons going into a vast space ---> big gaps. And indeed photons from a given star arrive very far spaced out, less than one per second into a human eye.
      $endgroup$
      – Kostas
      8 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Kostas But the sparsity of photons is not due to not being along the correct ray. Nevertheless I have added something to my answer about being far away from a star.
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      8 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      The faintest stars we can see deliver 140 photons per second to our eyes.
      $endgroup$
      – Keith McClary
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @KiethMcClary Thanks for the info :)
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      2 hours ago














    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    You are right that single photon detection is a discrete event. But you are under the false assumption that these "rays" are discretely distributed.



    Ideally, a photon would have an equal probability of being emitted through any solid angle out of the star. i.e. it is a uniform probability distribution with respect to the solid angle. There aren't single rays that are evenly distributed around the star that the photons travel along.



    For a water analogy, it is not like the star is a spherical shower head where photons can only be released from discrete locations. So, even if you might have a different random distribution of photon detection events at different angular locations relative to the star, you will still always see photons (this is neglecting stars that are so far away from us that their light never reaches us due to the expanding universe).



    Of course, if you are far enough away you will experience fewer and fewer photons. However this is not limited to certain "rays". This will be true at any angle at a large enough distance.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    You are right that single photon detection is a discrete event. But you are under the false assumption that these "rays" are discretely distributed.



    Ideally, a photon would have an equal probability of being emitted through any solid angle out of the star. i.e. it is a uniform probability distribution with respect to the solid angle. There aren't single rays that are evenly distributed around the star that the photons travel along.



    For a water analogy, it is not like the star is a spherical shower head where photons can only be released from discrete locations. So, even if you might have a different random distribution of photon detection events at different angular locations relative to the star, you will still always see photons (this is neglecting stars that are so far away from us that their light never reaches us due to the expanding universe).



    Of course, if you are far enough away you will experience fewer and fewer photons. However this is not limited to certain "rays". This will be true at any angle at a large enough distance.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 8 hours ago

























    answered 9 hours ago









    Aaron StevensAaron Stevens

    15.5k42555




    15.5k42555








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The question is being asked by somebody who thinks in terms of light rays that are getting farther apart as they go farther from the source, and it is not a wrong way to think about it. So, very few photons going into a vast space ---> big gaps. And indeed photons from a given star arrive very far spaced out, less than one per second into a human eye.
      $endgroup$
      – Kostas
      8 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Kostas But the sparsity of photons is not due to not being along the correct ray. Nevertheless I have added something to my answer about being far away from a star.
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      8 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      The faintest stars we can see deliver 140 photons per second to our eyes.
      $endgroup$
      – Keith McClary
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @KiethMcClary Thanks for the info :)
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      2 hours ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The question is being asked by somebody who thinks in terms of light rays that are getting farther apart as they go farther from the source, and it is not a wrong way to think about it. So, very few photons going into a vast space ---> big gaps. And indeed photons from a given star arrive very far spaced out, less than one per second into a human eye.
      $endgroup$
      – Kostas
      8 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Kostas But the sparsity of photons is not due to not being along the correct ray. Nevertheless I have added something to my answer about being far away from a star.
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      8 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      The faintest stars we can see deliver 140 photons per second to our eyes.
      $endgroup$
      – Keith McClary
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @KiethMcClary Thanks for the info :)
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      2 hours ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    The question is being asked by somebody who thinks in terms of light rays that are getting farther apart as they go farther from the source, and it is not a wrong way to think about it. So, very few photons going into a vast space ---> big gaps. And indeed photons from a given star arrive very far spaced out, less than one per second into a human eye.
    $endgroup$
    – Kostas
    8 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    The question is being asked by somebody who thinks in terms of light rays that are getting farther apart as they go farther from the source, and it is not a wrong way to think about it. So, very few photons going into a vast space ---> big gaps. And indeed photons from a given star arrive very far spaced out, less than one per second into a human eye.
    $endgroup$
    – Kostas
    8 hours ago














    $begingroup$
    @Kostas But the sparsity of photons is not due to not being along the correct ray. Nevertheless I have added something to my answer about being far away from a star.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Kostas But the sparsity of photons is not due to not being along the correct ray. Nevertheless I have added something to my answer about being far away from a star.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    8 hours ago




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    The faintest stars we can see deliver 140 photons per second to our eyes.
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    The faintest stars we can see deliver 140 photons per second to our eyes.
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    2 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @KiethMcClary Thanks for the info :)
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @KiethMcClary Thanks for the info :)
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    2 hours ago











    -1












    $begingroup$

    Very good question. Here is a more QM explanation. It is almost the same as if you would (only for your case) take the Sun as an atom, that is surrounded by an electron field as per QM.



    Now the wavefunction of the electron describes the probability distribution of the electron being at a certain position in space around the nucleus.



    You would think that the electron can only be at certain discrete number of positions? Well as per QM, the answer is no. In simple words, the electron is at a certain energy level around the nucleus as per QM, but inside that energy level, the electron could be anywhere.



    Since the atomic system (and the electron) emits the photons, and the electron could be anywhere (inside the certain energy level as per QM) how would you tell where the electron is at the moment of emission?



    So you would imagine that the electron could only take certain fixed positions around the nucleus, and emit the photon from those positions. In reality the electron's position is described by the wavefunction, and it is continuous. Simply said, the electron could be anywhere (inside that certain energy level as per QM).



    So in your case if you look at just one single atom, and the atom emits photons from far away, the photons will be continuously distributed. There will be no gaps between the photons.



    Now if you look at the Sun, which is made of a whole lot of atoms, you can take it analogously, the photons will be distributed continuously.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      -1












      $begingroup$

      Very good question. Here is a more QM explanation. It is almost the same as if you would (only for your case) take the Sun as an atom, that is surrounded by an electron field as per QM.



      Now the wavefunction of the electron describes the probability distribution of the electron being at a certain position in space around the nucleus.



      You would think that the electron can only be at certain discrete number of positions? Well as per QM, the answer is no. In simple words, the electron is at a certain energy level around the nucleus as per QM, but inside that energy level, the electron could be anywhere.



      Since the atomic system (and the electron) emits the photons, and the electron could be anywhere (inside the certain energy level as per QM) how would you tell where the electron is at the moment of emission?



      So you would imagine that the electron could only take certain fixed positions around the nucleus, and emit the photon from those positions. In reality the electron's position is described by the wavefunction, and it is continuous. Simply said, the electron could be anywhere (inside that certain energy level as per QM).



      So in your case if you look at just one single atom, and the atom emits photons from far away, the photons will be continuously distributed. There will be no gaps between the photons.



      Now if you look at the Sun, which is made of a whole lot of atoms, you can take it analogously, the photons will be distributed continuously.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        -1












        -1








        -1





        $begingroup$

        Very good question. Here is a more QM explanation. It is almost the same as if you would (only for your case) take the Sun as an atom, that is surrounded by an electron field as per QM.



        Now the wavefunction of the electron describes the probability distribution of the electron being at a certain position in space around the nucleus.



        You would think that the electron can only be at certain discrete number of positions? Well as per QM, the answer is no. In simple words, the electron is at a certain energy level around the nucleus as per QM, but inside that energy level, the electron could be anywhere.



        Since the atomic system (and the electron) emits the photons, and the electron could be anywhere (inside the certain energy level as per QM) how would you tell where the electron is at the moment of emission?



        So you would imagine that the electron could only take certain fixed positions around the nucleus, and emit the photon from those positions. In reality the electron's position is described by the wavefunction, and it is continuous. Simply said, the electron could be anywhere (inside that certain energy level as per QM).



        So in your case if you look at just one single atom, and the atom emits photons from far away, the photons will be continuously distributed. There will be no gaps between the photons.



        Now if you look at the Sun, which is made of a whole lot of atoms, you can take it analogously, the photons will be distributed continuously.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Very good question. Here is a more QM explanation. It is almost the same as if you would (only for your case) take the Sun as an atom, that is surrounded by an electron field as per QM.



        Now the wavefunction of the electron describes the probability distribution of the electron being at a certain position in space around the nucleus.



        You would think that the electron can only be at certain discrete number of positions? Well as per QM, the answer is no. In simple words, the electron is at a certain energy level around the nucleus as per QM, but inside that energy level, the electron could be anywhere.



        Since the atomic system (and the electron) emits the photons, and the electron could be anywhere (inside the certain energy level as per QM) how would you tell where the electron is at the moment of emission?



        So you would imagine that the electron could only take certain fixed positions around the nucleus, and emit the photon from those positions. In reality the electron's position is described by the wavefunction, and it is continuous. Simply said, the electron could be anywhere (inside that certain energy level as per QM).



        So in your case if you look at just one single atom, and the atom emits photons from far away, the photons will be continuously distributed. There will be no gaps between the photons.



        Now if you look at the Sun, which is made of a whole lot of atoms, you can take it analogously, the photons will be distributed continuously.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 9 hours ago









        Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei

        4,2941624




        4,2941624






















            benchuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            benchuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            benchuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            benchuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473187%2fwhy-light-coming-from-distant-stars-is-not-discrete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

            Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области