Rubik's cube 4x4 parity moves












5












$begingroup$


Note: since asking this question I've purchased several other twisty puzzles and now regret taking the "look up algorithms online" approach to solving - in the end I get much more enjoyment from the puzzles where I worked out to solve them myself than the ones where I didn't. If you're stuck at this point I would recommend seeking resources to understand the concept of parity and then try to come up with a solution yourself. You won't end up with a super efficient algorithm, but you will understand it, which is ultimately more satisfying. Or it is for me at least. That said, answers to this question are still welcome.



I'm solving my 4x4 Rubik's cube (aka Rubik's revenge) for the first time, and I have the "OLL parity" case:



enter image description here



There are plenty of algorithms for this available online, but different people use different notation and nobody ever says which one they're using, so I risk messing up my cube if I guess wrongly.



So, please give me algorithms for solving the OLL parity, using the following notation:





  • R: turn just the rightmost face clockwise


  • Rw (R wide): turn the rightmost half of the cube clockwise, i.e. the rightmost face and the slice adjacent to it


  • r: turn the rightmost slice clockwise, but not the rightmost face


  • R2, Rw2, r2: as above but turning it twice


  • R', Rw', r': as above but turning it anticlockwise


  • L, F, B, U, D: left, front, back, up, down. (All clockwise by default, can be modified as above)


  • x: if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • - (hyphen): if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • (, ) (parentheses): if you use these, please explain what they mean, as I have no clue.


If you use anything else at all in your notation, please explain what it means. If you prefer a different notation from the above that's fine, but please explain it.



I'm holding my cube with the unsolved cubies facing me at the top. (i.e. the red face would be the front in the diagram above.) If I should start in some other orientation, please say so.



It would be helpful to have an algorithm that leaves all other pieces alone, as my cube is in exactly the almost-solved state above. But if algorithms that don't do this are significantly shorter and/or easier to remember then that would be fine too. (Please tell me which I can expect in your answer!)










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 28 '18 at 13:32
















5












$begingroup$


Note: since asking this question I've purchased several other twisty puzzles and now regret taking the "look up algorithms online" approach to solving - in the end I get much more enjoyment from the puzzles where I worked out to solve them myself than the ones where I didn't. If you're stuck at this point I would recommend seeking resources to understand the concept of parity and then try to come up with a solution yourself. You won't end up with a super efficient algorithm, but you will understand it, which is ultimately more satisfying. Or it is for me at least. That said, answers to this question are still welcome.



I'm solving my 4x4 Rubik's cube (aka Rubik's revenge) for the first time, and I have the "OLL parity" case:



enter image description here



There are plenty of algorithms for this available online, but different people use different notation and nobody ever says which one they're using, so I risk messing up my cube if I guess wrongly.



So, please give me algorithms for solving the OLL parity, using the following notation:





  • R: turn just the rightmost face clockwise


  • Rw (R wide): turn the rightmost half of the cube clockwise, i.e. the rightmost face and the slice adjacent to it


  • r: turn the rightmost slice clockwise, but not the rightmost face


  • R2, Rw2, r2: as above but turning it twice


  • R', Rw', r': as above but turning it anticlockwise


  • L, F, B, U, D: left, front, back, up, down. (All clockwise by default, can be modified as above)


  • x: if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • - (hyphen): if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • (, ) (parentheses): if you use these, please explain what they mean, as I have no clue.


If you use anything else at all in your notation, please explain what it means. If you prefer a different notation from the above that's fine, but please explain it.



I'm holding my cube with the unsolved cubies facing me at the top. (i.e. the red face would be the front in the diagram above.) If I should start in some other orientation, please say so.



It would be helpful to have an algorithm that leaves all other pieces alone, as my cube is in exactly the almost-solved state above. But if algorithms that don't do this are significantly shorter and/or easier to remember then that would be fine too. (Please tell me which I can expect in your answer!)










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 28 '18 at 13:32














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


Note: since asking this question I've purchased several other twisty puzzles and now regret taking the "look up algorithms online" approach to solving - in the end I get much more enjoyment from the puzzles where I worked out to solve them myself than the ones where I didn't. If you're stuck at this point I would recommend seeking resources to understand the concept of parity and then try to come up with a solution yourself. You won't end up with a super efficient algorithm, but you will understand it, which is ultimately more satisfying. Or it is for me at least. That said, answers to this question are still welcome.



I'm solving my 4x4 Rubik's cube (aka Rubik's revenge) for the first time, and I have the "OLL parity" case:



enter image description here



There are plenty of algorithms for this available online, but different people use different notation and nobody ever says which one they're using, so I risk messing up my cube if I guess wrongly.



So, please give me algorithms for solving the OLL parity, using the following notation:





  • R: turn just the rightmost face clockwise


  • Rw (R wide): turn the rightmost half of the cube clockwise, i.e. the rightmost face and the slice adjacent to it


  • r: turn the rightmost slice clockwise, but not the rightmost face


  • R2, Rw2, r2: as above but turning it twice


  • R', Rw', r': as above but turning it anticlockwise


  • L, F, B, U, D: left, front, back, up, down. (All clockwise by default, can be modified as above)


  • x: if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • - (hyphen): if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • (, ) (parentheses): if you use these, please explain what they mean, as I have no clue.


If you use anything else at all in your notation, please explain what it means. If you prefer a different notation from the above that's fine, but please explain it.



I'm holding my cube with the unsolved cubies facing me at the top. (i.e. the red face would be the front in the diagram above.) If I should start in some other orientation, please say so.



It would be helpful to have an algorithm that leaves all other pieces alone, as my cube is in exactly the almost-solved state above. But if algorithms that don't do this are significantly shorter and/or easier to remember then that would be fine too. (Please tell me which I can expect in your answer!)










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Note: since asking this question I've purchased several other twisty puzzles and now regret taking the "look up algorithms online" approach to solving - in the end I get much more enjoyment from the puzzles where I worked out to solve them myself than the ones where I didn't. If you're stuck at this point I would recommend seeking resources to understand the concept of parity and then try to come up with a solution yourself. You won't end up with a super efficient algorithm, but you will understand it, which is ultimately more satisfying. Or it is for me at least. That said, answers to this question are still welcome.



I'm solving my 4x4 Rubik's cube (aka Rubik's revenge) for the first time, and I have the "OLL parity" case:



enter image description here



There are plenty of algorithms for this available online, but different people use different notation and nobody ever says which one they're using, so I risk messing up my cube if I guess wrongly.



So, please give me algorithms for solving the OLL parity, using the following notation:





  • R: turn just the rightmost face clockwise


  • Rw (R wide): turn the rightmost half of the cube clockwise, i.e. the rightmost face and the slice adjacent to it


  • r: turn the rightmost slice clockwise, but not the rightmost face


  • R2, Rw2, r2: as above but turning it twice


  • R', Rw', r': as above but turning it anticlockwise


  • L, F, B, U, D: left, front, back, up, down. (All clockwise by default, can be modified as above)


  • x: if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • - (hyphen): if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • (, ) (parentheses): if you use these, please explain what they mean, as I have no clue.


If you use anything else at all in your notation, please explain what it means. If you prefer a different notation from the above that's fine, but please explain it.



I'm holding my cube with the unsolved cubies facing me at the top. (i.e. the red face would be the front in the diagram above.) If I should start in some other orientation, please say so.



It would be helpful to have an algorithm that leaves all other pieces alone, as my cube is in exactly the almost-solved state above. But if algorithms that don't do this are significantly shorter and/or easier to remember then that would be fine too. (Please tell me which I can expect in your answer!)







rubiks-cube






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 7:40







Nathaniel

















asked Apr 21 '18 at 4:22









NathanielNathaniel

454619




454619








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 28 '18 at 13:32














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 28 '18 at 13:32








2




2




$begingroup$
Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Apr 28 '18 at 13:32




$begingroup$
Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Apr 28 '18 at 13:32










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
    $endgroup$
    – Nathaniel
    May 13 '18 at 9:12












  • $begingroup$
    I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
    $endgroup$
    – StevenWhite
    May 14 '18 at 5:27



















2












$begingroup$

I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




r U2 r

U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

U2 r U2 r' U2 l

r'

r' U2 r'







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    I can never remember any clean parity fix for this case, but there is a very easy to remember dirty one, which leaves only about 6 edge pieces out of place. Of course this is no good for speed solving, but it is so simple that I'll never forget it.



    It is: R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2



    What this does is move the u layer, while the R2 moves will swap out the centre pieces from that layer and put them back in a different place. The net effect is that the u layer has been given one quarter turn, but the centre pieces have been restored. This is an odd permutation on the affected edge pieces.



    If you start with the flipped pair at the FR location, you then only have to perform a few 3-cycles to fix the last 6 edges.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



      x, y, z :




      These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




      -:



      I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



      ( )




      These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "559"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64536%2frubiks-cube-4x4-parity-moves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




        Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




        So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



        The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
          $endgroup$
          – Nathaniel
          May 13 '18 at 9:12












        • $begingroup$
          I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
          $endgroup$
          – StevenWhite
          May 14 '18 at 5:27
















        3












        $begingroup$

        Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




        Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




        So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



        The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
          $endgroup$
          – Nathaniel
          May 13 '18 at 9:12












        • $begingroup$
          I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
          $endgroup$
          – StevenWhite
          May 14 '18 at 5:27














        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




        Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




        So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



        The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




        Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




        So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



        The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 25 '18 at 22:58









        StevenWhiteStevenWhite

        347110




        347110












        • $begingroup$
          It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
          $endgroup$
          – Nathaniel
          May 13 '18 at 9:12












        • $begingroup$
          I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
          $endgroup$
          – StevenWhite
          May 14 '18 at 5:27


















        • $begingroup$
          It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
          $endgroup$
          – Nathaniel
          May 13 '18 at 9:12












        • $begingroup$
          I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
          $endgroup$
          – StevenWhite
          May 14 '18 at 5:27
















        $begingroup$
        It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
        $endgroup$
        – Nathaniel
        May 13 '18 at 9:12






        $begingroup$
        It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
        $endgroup$
        – Nathaniel
        May 13 '18 at 9:12














        $begingroup$
        I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
        $endgroup$
        – StevenWhite
        May 14 '18 at 5:27




        $begingroup$
        I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
        $endgroup$
        – StevenWhite
        May 14 '18 at 5:27











        2












        $begingroup$

        I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




        r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




        If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




        r U2 r

        U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

        U2 r U2 r' U2 l

        r'

        r' U2 r'







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




          r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




          If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




          r U2 r

          U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

          U2 r U2 r' U2 l

          r'

          r' U2 r'







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




            r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




            If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




            r U2 r

            U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

            U2 r U2 r' U2 l

            r'

            r' U2 r'







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




            r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




            If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




            r U2 r

            U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

            U2 r U2 r' U2 l

            r'

            r' U2 r'








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 12 '18 at 8:32









            AHKieran

            5,5241143




            5,5241143










            answered Nov 12 '18 at 5:33









            Bradley ReedBradley Reed

            211




            211























                1












                $begingroup$

                I can never remember any clean parity fix for this case, but there is a very easy to remember dirty one, which leaves only about 6 edge pieces out of place. Of course this is no good for speed solving, but it is so simple that I'll never forget it.



                It is: R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2



                What this does is move the u layer, while the R2 moves will swap out the centre pieces from that layer and put them back in a different place. The net effect is that the u layer has been given one quarter turn, but the centre pieces have been restored. This is an odd permutation on the affected edge pieces.



                If you start with the flipped pair at the FR location, you then only have to perform a few 3-cycles to fix the last 6 edges.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  I can never remember any clean parity fix for this case, but there is a very easy to remember dirty one, which leaves only about 6 edge pieces out of place. Of course this is no good for speed solving, but it is so simple that I'll never forget it.



                  It is: R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2



                  What this does is move the u layer, while the R2 moves will swap out the centre pieces from that layer and put them back in a different place. The net effect is that the u layer has been given one quarter turn, but the centre pieces have been restored. This is an odd permutation on the affected edge pieces.



                  If you start with the flipped pair at the FR location, you then only have to perform a few 3-cycles to fix the last 6 edges.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    I can never remember any clean parity fix for this case, but there is a very easy to remember dirty one, which leaves only about 6 edge pieces out of place. Of course this is no good for speed solving, but it is so simple that I'll never forget it.



                    It is: R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2



                    What this does is move the u layer, while the R2 moves will swap out the centre pieces from that layer and put them back in a different place. The net effect is that the u layer has been given one quarter turn, but the centre pieces have been restored. This is an odd permutation on the affected edge pieces.



                    If you start with the flipped pair at the FR location, you then only have to perform a few 3-cycles to fix the last 6 edges.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    I can never remember any clean parity fix for this case, but there is a very easy to remember dirty one, which leaves only about 6 edge pieces out of place. Of course this is no good for speed solving, but it is so simple that I'll never forget it.



                    It is: R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2 u R2



                    What this does is move the u layer, while the R2 moves will swap out the centre pieces from that layer and put them back in a different place. The net effect is that the u layer has been given one quarter turn, but the centre pieces have been restored. This is an odd permutation on the affected edge pieces.



                    If you start with the flipped pair at the FR location, you then only have to perform a few 3-cycles to fix the last 6 edges.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    Jaap ScherphuisJaap Scherphuis

                    16.4k12772




                    16.4k12772























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



                        x, y, z :




                        These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




                        -:



                        I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



                        ( )




                        These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')







                        share|improve this answer










                        New contributor




                        FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



                          x, y, z :




                          These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




                          -:



                          I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



                          ( )




                          These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')







                          share|improve this answer










                          New contributor




                          FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



                            x, y, z :




                            These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




                            -:



                            I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



                            ( )




                            These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')







                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            $endgroup$



                            Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



                            x, y, z :




                            These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




                            -:



                            I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



                            ( )




                            These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')








                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited yesterday









                            Omega Krypton

                            4,9452544




                            4,9452544






                            New contributor




                            FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered yesterday









                            FluxDigital1FluxDigital1

                            211




                            211




                            New contributor




                            FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64536%2frubiks-cube-4x4-parity-moves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Masuk log Menu navigasi

                                Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                                Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области