Can です be used attributively (as a modifier of a noun)?Ending sentence with ～だもの or ～ですものcorrectness of い adjective + ですCan だ ever be used in a question?Sentence ending のを(だ)わけ accompanied by な particleAdnominalisation (Relative clause - noun - copula structure): What does it mean? How can we translate it?Can one say なそうです instead of だそうです when expressing hearsay?未然形 of である and 連用形 of だWhy is verb (plain, dictionary form) + だろう/でしょう/であろう grammatical?どれ as an attribute「です」, what is it really? Is my analysis correct?
Russian cases: A few examples, I'm really confused
2D counterpart of std::array in C++17
Help interpret cancellation charges for hotel booking
It's a yearly task, alright
Is it possible that AIC = BIC?
Prove that this set in the metric space is open
Is Mortgage interest accrued after a December payment tax deductible?
What is Thermal Runaway Protection?
How do anti-virus programs start at Windows boot?
How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?
PTIJ: Coffee stains on Sefarim (holy books)
SQL Server Primary Login Restrictions
Rejected in 4th interview round citing insufficient years of experience
Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god exists
Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?
Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?
How to deal with a cynical class?
Professor being mistaken for a grad student
Pinhole Camera with Instant Film
At what level can a dragon innately cast its spells?
Can anyone tell me why this program fails?
My adviser wants to be the first author
Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?
Variant calling without matched normal sample
Can です be used attributively (as a modifier of a noun)?
Ending sentence with ～だもの or ～ですものcorrectness of い adjective + ですCan だ ever be used in a question?Sentence ending のを(だ)わけ accompanied by な particleAdnominalisation (Relative clause - noun - copula structure): What does it mean? How can we translate it?Can one say なそうです instead of だそうです when expressing hearsay?未然形 of である and 連用形 of だWhy is verb (plain, dictionary form) + だろう/でしょう/であろう grammatical?どれ as an attribute「です」, what is it really? Is my analysis correct?
Goo dictionary lists the 連体形 (attributive) form of copula as です but does not provide an example of an attributive usage. Can です be really used attributively? I have problems finding any example of it.
copula attributive
asked 11 hours ago
user1602user1602
1,5781023
add a comment |
Goo dictionary lists the 連体形 (attributive) form of copula as です but does not provide an example of an attributive usage. Can です be really used attributively? I have problems finding any example of it.
copula attributive
asked 11 hours ago
user1602user1602
1,5781023
1
「です」の連用形っていうと・・「～です+ので」とか？ 「～です+noun」って、なさそうですねぇ‥
– Chocolate♦
10 hours ago
1
Odd really that it can’t be used like that, since 〜ます+noun is fine in formal contexts. 🤔 I don’t think I’ve ever seen 〜であります+noun or 〜でございます+noun, but it feels like they should be possible to use in theory...
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
「中村の弟でございます中村太郎と申します。」って大丈夫ですよね…？「です」にすると文が途中で終わる感じになっちゃいますよね…なんででしょう笑
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
@DariusJahandarie, I think it's because of the way that です is a sort of artificial construct that appeared relatively recently. Although it grew out of でございます and/or であります, it functions differently, more specifically as a kind of 終止形 defective copula that imparts specific register information. ("Defective" in part in that it is analyzable as only functioning as register and not as a copula in [形容詞]いです constructions; hence the invalidity of *[形容詞]いだ.)
– Eiríkr Útlendi
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Goo dictionary lists the 連体形 (attributive) form of copula as です but does not provide an example of an attributive usage. Can です be really used attributively? I have problems finding any example of it.
copula attributive
asked 11 hours ago
user1602user1602
1,5781023
Goo dictionary lists the 連体形 (attributive) form of copula as です but does not provide an example of an attributive usage. Can です be really used attributively? I have problems finding any example of it.
copula attributive
copula attributive
asked 11 hours ago
user1602user1602
1,5781023
asked 11 hours ago
user1602user1602
1,5781023
asked 11 hours ago
user1602user1602
1,5781023
asked 11 hours ago
user1602user1602
1,5781023
asked 11 hours ago
user1602user1602
1,5781023
1,5781023
1
「です」の連用形っていうと・・「～です+ので」とか？ 「～です+noun」って、なさそうですねぇ‥
– Chocolate♦
10 hours ago
1
Odd really that it can’t be used like that, since 〜ます+noun is fine in formal contexts. 🤔 I don’t think I’ve ever seen 〜であります+noun or 〜でございます+noun, but it feels like they should be possible to use in theory...
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
「中村の弟でございます中村太郎と申します。」って大丈夫ですよね…？「です」にすると文が途中で終わる感じになっちゃいますよね…なんででしょう笑
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
@DariusJahandarie, I think it's because of the way that です is a sort of artificial construct that appeared relatively recently. Although it grew out of でございます and/or であります, it functions differently, more specifically as a kind of 終止形 defective copula that imparts specific register information. ("Defective" in part in that it is analyzable as only functioning as register and not as a copula in [形容詞]いです constructions; hence the invalidity of *[形容詞]いだ.)
– Eiríkr Útlendi
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
「です」の連用形っていうと・・「～です+ので」とか？ 「～です+noun」って、なさそうですねぇ‥
– Chocolate♦
10 hours ago
1
Odd really that it can’t be used like that, since 〜ます+noun is fine in formal contexts. 🤔 I don’t think I’ve ever seen 〜であります+noun or 〜でございます+noun, but it feels like they should be possible to use in theory...
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
「中村の弟でございます中村太郎と申します。」って大丈夫ですよね…？「です」にすると文が途中で終わる感じになっちゃいますよね…なんででしょう笑
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
@DariusJahandarie, I think it's because of the way that です is a sort of artificial construct that appeared relatively recently. Although it grew out of でございます and/or であります, it functions differently, more specifically as a kind of 終止形 defective copula that imparts specific register information. ("Defective" in part in that it is analyzable as only functioning as register and not as a copula in [形容詞]いです constructions; hence the invalidity of *[形容詞]いだ.)
– Eiríkr Útlendi
1 hour ago
1
1
「です」の連用形っていうと・・「～です+ので」とか？ 「～です+noun」って、なさそうですねぇ‥
– Chocolate♦
10 hours ago
「です」の連用形っていうと・・「～です+ので」とか？ 「～です+noun」って、なさそうですねぇ‥
– Chocolate♦
10 hours ago
1
1
Odd really that it can’t be used like that, since 〜ます+noun is fine in formal contexts. 🤔 I don’t think I’ve ever seen 〜であります+noun or 〜でございます+noun, but it feels like they should be possible to use in theory...
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
Odd really that it can’t be used like that, since 〜ます+noun is fine in formal contexts. 🤔 I don’t think I’ve ever seen 〜であります+noun or 〜でございます+noun, but it feels like they should be possible to use in theory...
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
「中村の弟でございます中村太郎と申します。」って大丈夫ですよね…？「です」にすると文が途中で終わる感じになっちゃいますよね…なんででしょう笑
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
「中村の弟でございます中村太郎と申します。」って大丈夫ですよね…？「です」にすると文が途中で終わる感じになっちゃいますよね…なんででしょう笑
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
@DariusJahandarie, I think it's because of the way that です is a sort of artificial construct that appeared relatively recently. Although it grew out of でございます and/or であります, it functions differently, more specifically as a kind of 終止形 defective copula that imparts specific register information. ("Defective" in part in that it is analyzable as only functioning as register and not as a copula in [形容詞]いです constructions; hence the invalidity of *[形容詞]いだ.)
– Eiríkr Útlendi
1 hour ago
@DariusJahandarie, I think it's because of the way that です is a sort of artificial construct that appeared relatively recently. Although it grew out of でございます and/or であります, it functions differently, more specifically as a kind of 終止形 defective copula that imparts specific register information. ("Defective" in part in that it is analyzable as only functioning as register and not as a copula in [形容詞]いです constructions; hence the invalidity of *[形容詞]いだ.)
– Eiríkr Útlendi
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
According to this page, the attributive です connects to only ので and のに.
上の活用表で連体形の「です」が丸かっこで囲んであります。
これは、連体形の「です」が用いられるのは、助詞の「ので」「のに」が付く場合だけにかぎられるということを意味しています。つまり、連体形であっても、体言（名詞）は付きません。「雨です日」という言い方はしませんね。
It's also possible to say ですこと and ですもの at the end of a sentence, but this こと/もの is usually categorized as a sentence-end particle rather than a noun.
answered 8 hours ago
narutonaruto
161k8154301
I must disagree with that page on one count -- the 連体形 by definition is the form that attaches to a 体言. Since です never attaches to a 体言, by definition, it cannot be the 連体形. である could be, but not です. Considering also the historical development of です, it is kind of an artificial construct that functions a little differently than earlier であります, so this lack of a real 連体形 functionality is not all that surprising. Trying to force です into the full verb-paradigm model is a mistake, in my opinion.
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
(To clarify: I have no argument with naruto's post, just with the linked kokugobunpou.com/助動詞/です page. :) )
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66006%2fcan-%25e3%2581%25a7%25e3%2581%2599-be-used-attributively-as-a-modifier-of-a-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
According to this page, the attributive です connects to only ので and のに.
上の活用表で連体形の「です」が丸かっこで囲んであります。
これは、連体形の「です」が用いられるのは、助詞の「ので」「のに」が付く場合だけにかぎられるということを意味しています。つまり、連体形であっても、体言（名詞）は付きません。「雨です日」という言い方はしませんね。
It's also possible to say ですこと and ですもの at the end of a sentence, but this こと/もの is usually categorized as a sentence-end particle rather than a noun.
answered 8 hours ago
narutonaruto
161k8154301
I must disagree with that page on one count -- the 連体形 by definition is the form that attaches to a 体言. Since です never attaches to a 体言, by definition, it cannot be the 連体形. である could be, but not です. Considering also the historical development of です, it is kind of an artificial construct that functions a little differently than earlier であります, so this lack of a real 連体形 functionality is not all that surprising. Trying to force です into the full verb-paradigm model is a mistake, in my opinion.
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
(To clarify: I have no argument with naruto's post, just with the linked kokugobunpou.com/助動詞/です page. :) )
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
add a comment |
According to this page, the attributive です connects to only ので and のに.
上の活用表で連体形の「です」が丸かっこで囲んであります。
これは、連体形の「です」が用いられるのは、助詞の「ので」「のに」が付く場合だけにかぎられるということを意味しています。つまり、連体形であっても、体言（名詞）は付きません。「雨です日」という言い方はしませんね。
It's also possible to say ですこと and ですもの at the end of a sentence, but this こと/もの is usually categorized as a sentence-end particle rather than a noun.
answered 8 hours ago
narutonaruto
161k8154301
I must disagree with that page on one count -- the 連体形 by definition is the form that attaches to a 体言. Since です never attaches to a 体言, by definition, it cannot be the 連体形. である could be, but not です. Considering also the historical development of です, it is kind of an artificial construct that functions a little differently than earlier であります, so this lack of a real 連体形 functionality is not all that surprising. Trying to force です into the full verb-paradigm model is a mistake, in my opinion.
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
(To clarify: I have no argument with naruto's post, just with the linked kokugobunpou.com/助動詞/です page. :) )
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
add a comment |
According to this page, the attributive です connects to only ので and のに.
上の活用表で連体形の「です」が丸かっこで囲んであります。
これは、連体形の「です」が用いられるのは、助詞の「ので」「のに」が付く場合だけにかぎられるということを意味しています。つまり、連体形であっても、体言（名詞）は付きません。「雨です日」という言い方はしませんね。
It's also possible to say ですこと and ですもの at the end of a sentence, but this こと/もの is usually categorized as a sentence-end particle rather than a noun.
answered 8 hours ago
narutonaruto
161k8154301
According to this page, the attributive です connects to only ので and のに.
上の活用表で連体形の「です」が丸かっこで囲んであります。
これは、連体形の「です」が用いられるのは、助詞の「ので」「のに」が付く場合だけにかぎられるということを意味しています。つまり、連体形であっても、体言（名詞）は付きません。「雨です日」という言い方はしませんね。
It's also possible to say ですこと and ですもの at the end of a sentence, but this こと/もの is usually categorized as a sentence-end particle rather than a noun.
answered 8 hours ago
narutonaruto
161k8154301
answered 8 hours ago
narutonaruto
161k8154301
answered 8 hours ago
narutonaruto
161k8154301
answered 8 hours ago
narutonaruto
161k8154301
161k8154301
I must disagree with that page on one count -- the 連体形 by definition is the form that attaches to a 体言. Since です never attaches to a 体言, by definition, it cannot be the 連体形. である could be, but not です. Considering also the historical development of です, it is kind of an artificial construct that functions a little differently than earlier であります, so this lack of a real 連体形 functionality is not all that surprising. Trying to force です into the full verb-paradigm model is a mistake, in my opinion.
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
(To clarify: I have no argument with naruto's post, just with the linked kokugobunpou.com/助動詞/です page. :) )
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I must disagree with that page on one count -- the 連体形 by definition is the form that attaches to a 体言. Since です never attaches to a 体言, by definition, it cannot be the 連体形. である could be, but not です. Considering also the historical development of です, it is kind of an artificial construct that functions a little differently than earlier であります, so this lack of a real 連体形 functionality is not all that surprising. Trying to force です into the full verb-paradigm model is a mistake, in my opinion.
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
(To clarify: I have no argument with naruto's post, just with the linked kokugobunpou.com/助動詞/です page. :) )
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
I must disagree with that page on one count -- the 連体形 by definition is the form that attaches to a 体言. Since です never attaches to a 体言, by definition, it cannot be the 連体形. である could be, but not です. Considering also the historical development of です, it is kind of an artificial construct that functions a little differently than earlier であります, so this lack of a real 連体形 functionality is not all that surprising. Trying to force です into the full verb-paradigm model is a mistake, in my opinion.
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
I must disagree with that page on one count -- the 連体形 by definition is the form that attaches to a 体言. Since です never attaches to a 体言, by definition, it cannot be the 連体形. である could be, but not です. Considering also the historical development of です, it is kind of an artificial construct that functions a little differently than earlier であります, so this lack of a real 連体形 functionality is not all that surprising. Trying to force です into the full verb-paradigm model is a mistake, in my opinion.
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
(To clarify: I have no argument with naruto's post, just with the linked kokugobunpou.com/助動詞/です page. :) )
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
(To clarify: I have no argument with naruto's post, just with the linked kokugobunpou.com/助動詞/です page. :) )
– Eiríkr Útlendi
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66006%2fcan-%25e3%2581%25a7%25e3%2581%2599-be-used-attributively-as-a-modifier-of-a-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
「です」の連用形っていうと・・「～です+ので」とか？ 「～です+noun」って、なさそうですねぇ‥
– Chocolate♦
10 hours ago
1
Odd really that it can’t be used like that, since 〜ます+noun is fine in formal contexts. 🤔 I don’t think I’ve ever seen 〜であります+noun or 〜でございます+noun, but it feels like they should be possible to use in theory...
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
「中村の弟でございます中村太郎と申します。」って大丈夫ですよね…？「です」にすると文が途中で終わる感じになっちゃいますよね…なんででしょう笑
– Darius Jahandarie
3 hours ago
@DariusJahandarie, I think it's because of the way that です is a sort of artificial construct that appeared relatively recently. Although it grew out of でございます and/or であります, it functions differently, more specifically as a kind of 終止形 defective copula that imparts specific register information. ("Defective" in part in that it is analyzable as only functioning as register and not as a copula in [形容詞]いです constructions; hence the invalidity of *[形容詞]いだ.)
– Eiríkr Útlendi
1 hour ago