Does this AnyDice function accurately calculate the number of ogres you make unconcious with three 4th-level castings of Sleep?Help Calculating Dice Odds for a Unique d6 Dice PoolHow can I execute code depending on a die value in AnyDice?How do I find the highest number rolled in a pool if dice, and the number of times it is rolled using AnyDice?Help Writing an AnyDice Function for a Weird Dice MechanicAnyDice function to use a die as high/low flip and criticalImplementing multiattack in AnyDiceHow do I model the fighter's Great Weapon Fighting fighting style in Anydice?How can I write and compare these formulas using Anydice?Exploding “D9” success-counting pools in anydice?AnyDice formula for rolling 2d20 and dropping farthest value from 10

Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?

Why are the outputs of printf and std::cout different

How Did the Space Junk Stay in Orbit in Wall-E?

How to simplify this time periods definition interface?

Does the statement `int val = (++i > ++j) ? ++i : ++j;` invoke undefined behavior?

How to answer questions about my characters?

Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

PTIJ: Who should pay for Uber rides: the child or the parent?

At what level can a dragon innately cast its spells?

Possible Leak In Concrete

Good allowance savings plan?

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

Can hydraulic brake levers get hot when brakes overheat?

How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?

My story is written in English, but is set in my home country. What language should I use for the dialogue?

An Accountant Seeks the Help of a Mathematician

Why would a flight no longer considered airworthy be redirected like this?

Is having access to past exams cheating and, if yes, could it be proven just by a good grade?

Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?

Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic

Employee lack of ownership

Using "wallow" verb with object

Identifying the interval from A♭ to D♯



Does this AnyDice function accurately calculate the number of ogres you make unconcious with three 4th-level castings of Sleep?


Help Calculating Dice Odds for a Unique d6 Dice PoolHow can I execute code depending on a die value in AnyDice?How do I find the highest number rolled in a pool if dice, and the number of times it is rolled using AnyDice?Help Writing an AnyDice Function for a Weird Dice MechanicAnyDice function to use a die as high/low flip and criticalImplementing multiattack in AnyDiceHow do I model the fighter's Great Weapon Fighting fighting style in Anydice?How can I write and compare these formulas using Anydice?Exploding “D9” success-counting pools in anydice?AnyDice formula for rolling 2d20 and dropping farthest value from 10













6












$begingroup$


Say we have three ogres, and want to put them to sleep as a handful of level 7 casters with the sleep spell. We want to know how many of them, on average, will get put to sleep.



I tried to make an AnyDice function that searches a listing of all of the results of 11d8 for the HP totals that would put to sleep one of the ogres (using the average of 59 HP). Is this AnyDice function accurate to the goal?



output [count 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 in 3d(11d8)]



If not, how would I properly create the function?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$


    Say we have three ogres, and want to put them to sleep as a handful of level 7 casters with the sleep spell. We want to know how many of them, on average, will get put to sleep.



    I tried to make an AnyDice function that searches a listing of all of the results of 11d8 for the HP totals that would put to sleep one of the ogres (using the average of 59 HP). Is this AnyDice function accurate to the goal?



    output [count 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 in 3d(11d8)]



    If not, how would I properly create the function?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      Say we have three ogres, and want to put them to sleep as a handful of level 7 casters with the sleep spell. We want to know how many of them, on average, will get put to sleep.



      I tried to make an AnyDice function that searches a listing of all of the results of 11d8 for the HP totals that would put to sleep one of the ogres (using the average of 59 HP). Is this AnyDice function accurate to the goal?



      output [count 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 in 3d(11d8)]



      If not, how would I properly create the function?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Say we have three ogres, and want to put them to sleep as a handful of level 7 casters with the sleep spell. We want to know how many of them, on average, will get put to sleep.



      I tried to make an AnyDice function that searches a listing of all of the results of 11d8 for the HP totals that would put to sleep one of the ogres (using the average of 59 HP). Is this AnyDice function accurate to the goal?



      output [count 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 in 3d(11d8)]



      If not, how would I properly create the function?







      dnd-5e anydice






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 3 hours ago









      V2Blast

      24.6k383155




      24.6k383155










      asked 6 hours ago









      David CoffronDavid Coffron

      37.6k3129264




      37.6k3129264




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          11












          $begingroup$

          The function is correct but can be made simpler



          The function makes sense from a theoretical point of view (you are counting the number of times one of the listed numbers appears when doing 11d8 three times) and from practical corroboration from Xirema's answer.



          However, it seems to be a particularly taxing function for anydice. Indeed, when changing it to 4 times instead of 3, anydice refused to provide results because it exceeded the maximum execution time.



          A simpler and faster way to do the same function would be this anydice function:



          output 3d(11d8 > 58)


          Which is equivalent, also helps show that your initial thoughts were correct but is much faster and you can also use it for bigger values without anydice complaining.



          Naturally this is not as versatile as your specific listing of each possible result but since you only care about results bigger than the creature's HP in this case it may work better.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            A slightly more versatile (but still fast) version would be 3d[count 59..88 in 11d8 + 0]. The + 0 makes AnyDice sum the 11d8 roll before passing it to [count VALUES in SEQUENCE]. In any case, the major speedup in both solutions comes from moving the counting / comparison inside the 3d(...).
            $endgroup$
            – Ilmari Karonen
            2 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            Reason #473 I should really learn how AnyDice actually works..... Good answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Xirema
            3 mins ago


















          7












          $begingroup$

          This function appears to be correct



          The output of the function in Anydice is



          beginarray
          hline
          textNumber & textProbability \ hline
          0 & 68.19% \ hline
          1 & 27.85% \ hline
          2 & 3.79% \ hline
          3 & 0.17% \ hline
          endarray



          Using an independent method, I was able to calculate [within an acceptable Margin of Error] identical odds:



          beginarrayl
          hline
          textNumber & textTrials & textProbability \ hline
          0 & 432224441369339628206761607168 (4.322 * 10^29) & 68.1930% \ hline
          1 & 176489190284293025714047057920 (1.765 * 10^29) & 27.8415% \ hline
          2 & 24021805421679657469725081600 (2.402 * 10^28) & 3.7900% \ hline
          3 & 1089863038802389357817856000 (1.090 * 10^27) & 0.1720% \ hline
          endarray



          So because these two methods appear to have identical outcomes, I'm led to conclude that the function you've provided is correct.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143150%2fdoes-this-anydice-function-accurately-calculate-the-number-of-ogres-you-make-unc%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            11












            $begingroup$

            The function is correct but can be made simpler



            The function makes sense from a theoretical point of view (you are counting the number of times one of the listed numbers appears when doing 11d8 three times) and from practical corroboration from Xirema's answer.



            However, it seems to be a particularly taxing function for anydice. Indeed, when changing it to 4 times instead of 3, anydice refused to provide results because it exceeded the maximum execution time.



            A simpler and faster way to do the same function would be this anydice function:



            output 3d(11d8 > 58)


            Which is equivalent, also helps show that your initial thoughts were correct but is much faster and you can also use it for bigger values without anydice complaining.



            Naturally this is not as versatile as your specific listing of each possible result but since you only care about results bigger than the creature's HP in this case it may work better.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              A slightly more versatile (but still fast) version would be 3d[count 59..88 in 11d8 + 0]. The + 0 makes AnyDice sum the 11d8 roll before passing it to [count VALUES in SEQUENCE]. In any case, the major speedup in both solutions comes from moving the counting / comparison inside the 3d(...).
              $endgroup$
              – Ilmari Karonen
              2 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              Reason #473 I should really learn how AnyDice actually works..... Good answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Xirema
              3 mins ago















            11












            $begingroup$

            The function is correct but can be made simpler



            The function makes sense from a theoretical point of view (you are counting the number of times one of the listed numbers appears when doing 11d8 three times) and from practical corroboration from Xirema's answer.



            However, it seems to be a particularly taxing function for anydice. Indeed, when changing it to 4 times instead of 3, anydice refused to provide results because it exceeded the maximum execution time.



            A simpler and faster way to do the same function would be this anydice function:



            output 3d(11d8 > 58)


            Which is equivalent, also helps show that your initial thoughts were correct but is much faster and you can also use it for bigger values without anydice complaining.



            Naturally this is not as versatile as your specific listing of each possible result but since you only care about results bigger than the creature's HP in this case it may work better.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              A slightly more versatile (but still fast) version would be 3d[count 59..88 in 11d8 + 0]. The + 0 makes AnyDice sum the 11d8 roll before passing it to [count VALUES in SEQUENCE]. In any case, the major speedup in both solutions comes from moving the counting / comparison inside the 3d(...).
              $endgroup$
              – Ilmari Karonen
              2 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              Reason #473 I should really learn how AnyDice actually works..... Good answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Xirema
              3 mins ago













            11












            11








            11





            $begingroup$

            The function is correct but can be made simpler



            The function makes sense from a theoretical point of view (you are counting the number of times one of the listed numbers appears when doing 11d8 three times) and from practical corroboration from Xirema's answer.



            However, it seems to be a particularly taxing function for anydice. Indeed, when changing it to 4 times instead of 3, anydice refused to provide results because it exceeded the maximum execution time.



            A simpler and faster way to do the same function would be this anydice function:



            output 3d(11d8 > 58)


            Which is equivalent, also helps show that your initial thoughts were correct but is much faster and you can also use it for bigger values without anydice complaining.



            Naturally this is not as versatile as your specific listing of each possible result but since you only care about results bigger than the creature's HP in this case it may work better.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The function is correct but can be made simpler



            The function makes sense from a theoretical point of view (you are counting the number of times one of the listed numbers appears when doing 11d8 three times) and from practical corroboration from Xirema's answer.



            However, it seems to be a particularly taxing function for anydice. Indeed, when changing it to 4 times instead of 3, anydice refused to provide results because it exceeded the maximum execution time.



            A simpler and faster way to do the same function would be this anydice function:



            output 3d(11d8 > 58)


            Which is equivalent, also helps show that your initial thoughts were correct but is much faster and you can also use it for bigger values without anydice complaining.



            Naturally this is not as versatile as your specific listing of each possible result but since you only care about results bigger than the creature's HP in this case it may work better.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 5 hours ago









            SdjzSdjz

            13.1k462107




            13.1k462107







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              A slightly more versatile (but still fast) version would be 3d[count 59..88 in 11d8 + 0]. The + 0 makes AnyDice sum the 11d8 roll before passing it to [count VALUES in SEQUENCE]. In any case, the major speedup in both solutions comes from moving the counting / comparison inside the 3d(...).
              $endgroup$
              – Ilmari Karonen
              2 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              Reason #473 I should really learn how AnyDice actually works..... Good answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Xirema
              3 mins ago












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              A slightly more versatile (but still fast) version would be 3d[count 59..88 in 11d8 + 0]. The + 0 makes AnyDice sum the 11d8 roll before passing it to [count VALUES in SEQUENCE]. In any case, the major speedup in both solutions comes from moving the counting / comparison inside the 3d(...).
              $endgroup$
              – Ilmari Karonen
              2 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              Reason #473 I should really learn how AnyDice actually works..... Good answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Xirema
              3 mins ago







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            A slightly more versatile (but still fast) version would be 3d[count 59..88 in 11d8 + 0]. The + 0 makes AnyDice sum the 11d8 roll before passing it to [count VALUES in SEQUENCE]. In any case, the major speedup in both solutions comes from moving the counting / comparison inside the 3d(...).
            $endgroup$
            – Ilmari Karonen
            2 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            A slightly more versatile (but still fast) version would be 3d[count 59..88 in 11d8 + 0]. The + 0 makes AnyDice sum the 11d8 roll before passing it to [count VALUES in SEQUENCE]. In any case, the major speedup in both solutions comes from moving the counting / comparison inside the 3d(...).
            $endgroup$
            – Ilmari Karonen
            2 hours ago













            $begingroup$
            Reason #473 I should really learn how AnyDice actually works..... Good answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Xirema
            3 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Reason #473 I should really learn how AnyDice actually works..... Good answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Xirema
            3 mins ago













            7












            $begingroup$

            This function appears to be correct



            The output of the function in Anydice is



            beginarray
            hline
            textNumber & textProbability \ hline
            0 & 68.19% \ hline
            1 & 27.85% \ hline
            2 & 3.79% \ hline
            3 & 0.17% \ hline
            endarray



            Using an independent method, I was able to calculate [within an acceptable Margin of Error] identical odds:



            beginarrayl
            hline
            textNumber & textTrials & textProbability \ hline
            0 & 432224441369339628206761607168 (4.322 * 10^29) & 68.1930% \ hline
            1 & 176489190284293025714047057920 (1.765 * 10^29) & 27.8415% \ hline
            2 & 24021805421679657469725081600 (2.402 * 10^28) & 3.7900% \ hline
            3 & 1089863038802389357817856000 (1.090 * 10^27) & 0.1720% \ hline
            endarray



            So because these two methods appear to have identical outcomes, I'm led to conclude that the function you've provided is correct.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              7












              $begingroup$

              This function appears to be correct



              The output of the function in Anydice is



              beginarray
              hline
              textNumber & textProbability \ hline
              0 & 68.19% \ hline
              1 & 27.85% \ hline
              2 & 3.79% \ hline
              3 & 0.17% \ hline
              endarray



              Using an independent method, I was able to calculate [within an acceptable Margin of Error] identical odds:



              beginarrayl
              hline
              textNumber & textTrials & textProbability \ hline
              0 & 432224441369339628206761607168 (4.322 * 10^29) & 68.1930% \ hline
              1 & 176489190284293025714047057920 (1.765 * 10^29) & 27.8415% \ hline
              2 & 24021805421679657469725081600 (2.402 * 10^28) & 3.7900% \ hline
              3 & 1089863038802389357817856000 (1.090 * 10^27) & 0.1720% \ hline
              endarray



              So because these two methods appear to have identical outcomes, I'm led to conclude that the function you've provided is correct.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                7












                7








                7





                $begingroup$

                This function appears to be correct



                The output of the function in Anydice is



                beginarray
                hline
                textNumber & textProbability \ hline
                0 & 68.19% \ hline
                1 & 27.85% \ hline
                2 & 3.79% \ hline
                3 & 0.17% \ hline
                endarray



                Using an independent method, I was able to calculate [within an acceptable Margin of Error] identical odds:



                beginarrayl
                hline
                textNumber & textTrials & textProbability \ hline
                0 & 432224441369339628206761607168 (4.322 * 10^29) & 68.1930% \ hline
                1 & 176489190284293025714047057920 (1.765 * 10^29) & 27.8415% \ hline
                2 & 24021805421679657469725081600 (2.402 * 10^28) & 3.7900% \ hline
                3 & 1089863038802389357817856000 (1.090 * 10^27) & 0.1720% \ hline
                endarray



                So because these two methods appear to have identical outcomes, I'm led to conclude that the function you've provided is correct.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                This function appears to be correct



                The output of the function in Anydice is



                beginarray
                hline
                textNumber & textProbability \ hline
                0 & 68.19% \ hline
                1 & 27.85% \ hline
                2 & 3.79% \ hline
                3 & 0.17% \ hline
                endarray



                Using an independent method, I was able to calculate [within an acceptable Margin of Error] identical odds:



                beginarrayl
                hline
                textNumber & textTrials & textProbability \ hline
                0 & 432224441369339628206761607168 (4.322 * 10^29) & 68.1930% \ hline
                1 & 176489190284293025714047057920 (1.765 * 10^29) & 27.8415% \ hline
                2 & 24021805421679657469725081600 (2.402 * 10^28) & 3.7900% \ hline
                3 & 1089863038802389357817856000 (1.090 * 10^27) & 0.1720% \ hline
                endarray



                So because these two methods appear to have identical outcomes, I'm led to conclude that the function you've provided is correct.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 5 hours ago

























                answered 6 hours ago









                XiremaXirema

                21.3k263126




                21.3k263126



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143150%2fdoes-this-anydice-function-accurately-calculate-the-number-of-ogres-you-make-unc%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Masuk log Menu navigasi

                    Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                    Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области