How can I automatically replace [[ and ]] with the [LeftDoubleBracket] and [RightDoubleBracket] operators?
$begingroup$
When you type ->
, it is automatically turned into the [Rule]
character. Can we configure our frontends to do the same for the [[
and ]]
characters, which could be turned into [LeftDoubleBracket]
and [RightDoubleBracket]
?
You can easily do this manually by typing <esc>[[<esc>
, but I would like to do this automatically.
This question was originally asked by me in the chat and has answers there; this question is so that those answers can be added and kept for the community.
syntax custom-notation
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
When you type ->
, it is automatically turned into the [Rule]
character. Can we configure our frontends to do the same for the [[
and ]]
characters, which could be turned into [LeftDoubleBracket]
and [RightDoubleBracket]
?
You can easily do this manually by typing <esc>[[<esc>
, but I would like to do this automatically.
This question was originally asked by me in the chat and has answers there; this question is so that those answers can be added and kept for the community.
syntax custom-notation
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Do you really want that when writingfunc[func2[arg]]
? I changed KeyEventTranslations.tr to have<kbd>Alt gr</kbd>+<kbd>i</kbd>/<kbd>o</kbd>
.
$endgroup$
– Coolwater
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, this is part of the problem. Ideally it would only happen after you have typed the matching[[
, but more than likely it needs to be done at shift-enter at the earliest. For[[
the problem is simpler because there is no time when you would type[[
except for as part of aPart
expression.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
closely related: 98175
$endgroup$
– Kuba♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Kuba That's so closely related I suppose you could make an argument for this being a duplicate, what do you think?
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Related using KeyEventTranslations 5221
$endgroup$
– Rohit Namjoshi
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
When you type ->
, it is automatically turned into the [Rule]
character. Can we configure our frontends to do the same for the [[
and ]]
characters, which could be turned into [LeftDoubleBracket]
and [RightDoubleBracket]
?
You can easily do this manually by typing <esc>[[<esc>
, but I would like to do this automatically.
This question was originally asked by me in the chat and has answers there; this question is so that those answers can be added and kept for the community.
syntax custom-notation
$endgroup$
When you type ->
, it is automatically turned into the [Rule]
character. Can we configure our frontends to do the same for the [[
and ]]
characters, which could be turned into [LeftDoubleBracket]
and [RightDoubleBracket]
?
You can easily do this manually by typing <esc>[[<esc>
, but I would like to do this automatically.
This question was originally asked by me in the chat and has answers there; this question is so that those answers can be added and kept for the community.
syntax custom-notation
syntax custom-notation
edited yesterday
Carl Lange
asked yesterday
Carl LangeCarl Lange
5,18411141
5,18411141
2
$begingroup$
Do you really want that when writingfunc[func2[arg]]
? I changed KeyEventTranslations.tr to have<kbd>Alt gr</kbd>+<kbd>i</kbd>/<kbd>o</kbd>
.
$endgroup$
– Coolwater
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, this is part of the problem. Ideally it would only happen after you have typed the matching[[
, but more than likely it needs to be done at shift-enter at the earliest. For[[
the problem is simpler because there is no time when you would type[[
except for as part of aPart
expression.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
closely related: 98175
$endgroup$
– Kuba♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Kuba That's so closely related I suppose you could make an argument for this being a duplicate, what do you think?
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Related using KeyEventTranslations 5221
$endgroup$
– Rohit Namjoshi
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Do you really want that when writingfunc[func2[arg]]
? I changed KeyEventTranslations.tr to have<kbd>Alt gr</kbd>+<kbd>i</kbd>/<kbd>o</kbd>
.
$endgroup$
– Coolwater
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, this is part of the problem. Ideally it would only happen after you have typed the matching[[
, but more than likely it needs to be done at shift-enter at the earliest. For[[
the problem is simpler because there is no time when you would type[[
except for as part of aPart
expression.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
closely related: 98175
$endgroup$
– Kuba♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Kuba That's so closely related I suppose you could make an argument for this being a duplicate, what do you think?
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Related using KeyEventTranslations 5221
$endgroup$
– Rohit Namjoshi
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Do you really want that when writing
func[func2[arg]]
? I changed KeyEventTranslations.tr to have <kbd>Alt gr</kbd>+<kbd>i</kbd>/<kbd>o</kbd>
.$endgroup$
– Coolwater
yesterday
$begingroup$
Do you really want that when writing
func[func2[arg]]
? I changed KeyEventTranslations.tr to have <kbd>Alt gr</kbd>+<kbd>i</kbd>/<kbd>o</kbd>
.$endgroup$
– Coolwater
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, this is part of the problem. Ideally it would only happen after you have typed the matching
[[
, but more than likely it needs to be done at shift-enter at the earliest. For [[
the problem is simpler because there is no time when you would type [[
except for as part of a Part
expression.$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, this is part of the problem. Ideally it would only happen after you have typed the matching
[[
, but more than likely it needs to be done at shift-enter at the earliest. For [[
the problem is simpler because there is no time when you would type [[
except for as part of a Part
expression.$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
closely related: 98175
$endgroup$
– Kuba♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
closely related: 98175
$endgroup$
– Kuba♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Kuba That's so closely related I suppose you could make an argument for this being a duplicate, what do you think?
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Kuba That's so closely related I suppose you could make an argument for this being a duplicate, what do you think?
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Related using KeyEventTranslations 5221
$endgroup$
– Rohit Namjoshi
yesterday
$begingroup$
Related using KeyEventTranslations 5221
$endgroup$
– Rohit Namjoshi
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can use CellEpilog
to modify the contents of the cell upon evaluation:
SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook,
CellEpilog :> If[
! TrueQ[
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes] <=
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}]
],
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}] =
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes];
NotebookWrite[
EvaluationCell,
Replace[NotebookRead[EvaluationCell],
RowBox@{head_, "[", RowBox@{"[", part_, "]"}, "]"} :>
RowBox@{head, "[LeftDoubleBracket]", part, "[RightDoubleBracket]"}, All]
]
]
]
Demonstration:
This could of course be extended to do similar replacements for <|…|>
etc. To minimize the performance hit, we keep track of the last CellChangeTimes
value and only rerun the replacement code when it changed.
The nice thing about an approach like this (i.e. manipulation of the cell's box structure) is that it's rather straightforward to identify the bracket pairs to replace, since the front-end does all the necessary parsing for us.
An alternative to putting the code into CellEpilog
might be to create a menu item for it, one could also modify the "Evaluate cells" menu item to run this code on all selected cells first.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194775%2fhow-can-i-automatically-replace-and-with-the-leftdoublebracket-and-ri%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can use CellEpilog
to modify the contents of the cell upon evaluation:
SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook,
CellEpilog :> If[
! TrueQ[
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes] <=
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}]
],
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}] =
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes];
NotebookWrite[
EvaluationCell,
Replace[NotebookRead[EvaluationCell],
RowBox@{head_, "[", RowBox@{"[", part_, "]"}, "]"} :>
RowBox@{head, "[LeftDoubleBracket]", part, "[RightDoubleBracket]"}, All]
]
]
]
Demonstration:
This could of course be extended to do similar replacements for <|…|>
etc. To minimize the performance hit, we keep track of the last CellChangeTimes
value and only rerun the replacement code when it changed.
The nice thing about an approach like this (i.e. manipulation of the cell's box structure) is that it's rather straightforward to identify the bracket pairs to replace, since the front-end does all the necessary parsing for us.
An alternative to putting the code into CellEpilog
might be to create a menu item for it, one could also modify the "Evaluate cells" menu item to run this code on all selected cells first.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can use CellEpilog
to modify the contents of the cell upon evaluation:
SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook,
CellEpilog :> If[
! TrueQ[
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes] <=
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}]
],
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}] =
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes];
NotebookWrite[
EvaluationCell,
Replace[NotebookRead[EvaluationCell],
RowBox@{head_, "[", RowBox@{"[", part_, "]"}, "]"} :>
RowBox@{head, "[LeftDoubleBracket]", part, "[RightDoubleBracket]"}, All]
]
]
]
Demonstration:
This could of course be extended to do similar replacements for <|…|>
etc. To minimize the performance hit, we keep track of the last CellChangeTimes
value and only rerun the replacement code when it changed.
The nice thing about an approach like this (i.e. manipulation of the cell's box structure) is that it's rather straightforward to identify the bracket pairs to replace, since the front-end does all the necessary parsing for us.
An alternative to putting the code into CellEpilog
might be to create a menu item for it, one could also modify the "Evaluate cells" menu item to run this code on all selected cells first.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can use CellEpilog
to modify the contents of the cell upon evaluation:
SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook,
CellEpilog :> If[
! TrueQ[
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes] <=
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}]
],
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}] =
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes];
NotebookWrite[
EvaluationCell,
Replace[NotebookRead[EvaluationCell],
RowBox@{head_, "[", RowBox@{"[", part_, "]"}, "]"} :>
RowBox@{head, "[LeftDoubleBracket]", part, "[RightDoubleBracket]"}, All]
]
]
]
Demonstration:
This could of course be extended to do similar replacements for <|…|>
etc. To minimize the performance hit, we keep track of the last CellChangeTimes
value and only rerun the replacement code when it changed.
The nice thing about an approach like this (i.e. manipulation of the cell's box structure) is that it's rather straightforward to identify the bracket pairs to replace, since the front-end does all the necessary parsing for us.
An alternative to putting the code into CellEpilog
might be to create a menu item for it, one could also modify the "Evaluate cells" menu item to run this code on all selected cells first.
$endgroup$
You can use CellEpilog
to modify the contents of the cell upon evaluation:
SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook,
CellEpilog :> If[
! TrueQ[
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes] <=
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}]
],
CurrentValue[EvaluationCell, {TaggingRules, "autoreplaceTime"}] =
Max@CurrentValue[CellChangeTimes];
NotebookWrite[
EvaluationCell,
Replace[NotebookRead[EvaluationCell],
RowBox@{head_, "[", RowBox@{"[", part_, "]"}, "]"} :>
RowBox@{head, "[LeftDoubleBracket]", part, "[RightDoubleBracket]"}, All]
]
]
]
Demonstration:
This could of course be extended to do similar replacements for <|…|>
etc. To minimize the performance hit, we keep track of the last CellChangeTimes
value and only rerun the replacement code when it changed.
The nice thing about an approach like this (i.e. manipulation of the cell's box structure) is that it's rather straightforward to identify the bracket pairs to replace, since the front-end does all the necessary parsing for us.
An alternative to putting the code into CellEpilog
might be to create a menu item for it, one could also modify the "Evaluate cells" menu item to run this code on all selected cells first.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Lukas LangLukas Lang
7,0301931
7,0301931
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194775%2fhow-can-i-automatically-replace-and-with-the-leftdoublebracket-and-ri%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Do you really want that when writing
func[func2[arg]]
? I changed KeyEventTranslations.tr to have<kbd>Alt gr</kbd>+<kbd>i</kbd>/<kbd>o</kbd>
.$endgroup$
– Coolwater
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, this is part of the problem. Ideally it would only happen after you have typed the matching
[[
, but more than likely it needs to be done at shift-enter at the earliest. For[[
the problem is simpler because there is no time when you would type[[
except for as part of aPart
expression.$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
closely related: 98175
$endgroup$
– Kuba♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Kuba That's so closely related I suppose you could make an argument for this being a duplicate, what do you think?
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Related using KeyEventTranslations 5221
$endgroup$
– Rohit Namjoshi
yesterday