Logistic function with a slope but no asymptotes?












8












$begingroup$


The logistic function has an output range 0 to 1, and asymptotic slope is zero on both sides.



What is an alternative to a logistic function that doesn't flatten out completely at its ends? Whose asymptotic slopes are approaching zero but not zero, and the range is infinite?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    Mar 20 at 16:17










  • $begingroup$
    Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 20 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    Right, a sigmoid like shape that doesn’t completely flatten, e.g. log function doesn’t completely flatten
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 20 at 16:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    $operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
    $endgroup$
    – steveo'america
    Mar 20 at 16:42








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    Mar 20 at 21:39


















8












$begingroup$


The logistic function has an output range 0 to 1, and asymptotic slope is zero on both sides.



What is an alternative to a logistic function that doesn't flatten out completely at its ends? Whose asymptotic slopes are approaching zero but not zero, and the range is infinite?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    Mar 20 at 16:17










  • $begingroup$
    Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 20 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    Right, a sigmoid like shape that doesn’t completely flatten, e.g. log function doesn’t completely flatten
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 20 at 16:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    $operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
    $endgroup$
    – steveo'america
    Mar 20 at 16:42








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    Mar 20 at 21:39
















8












8








8





$begingroup$


The logistic function has an output range 0 to 1, and asymptotic slope is zero on both sides.



What is an alternative to a logistic function that doesn't flatten out completely at its ends? Whose asymptotic slopes are approaching zero but not zero, and the range is infinite?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The logistic function has an output range 0 to 1, and asymptotic slope is zero on both sides.



What is an alternative to a logistic function that doesn't flatten out completely at its ends? Whose asymptotic slopes are approaching zero but not zero, and the range is infinite?







sigmoid-curve






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 6:33









Neil G

9,84013070




9,84013070










asked Mar 20 at 15:44









AksakalAksakal

39k452120




39k452120








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    Mar 20 at 16:17










  • $begingroup$
    Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 20 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    Right, a sigmoid like shape that doesn’t completely flatten, e.g. log function doesn’t completely flatten
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 20 at 16:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    $operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
    $endgroup$
    – steveo'america
    Mar 20 at 16:42








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    Mar 20 at 21:39
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    Mar 20 at 16:17










  • $begingroup$
    Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 20 at 16:24










  • $begingroup$
    Right, a sigmoid like shape that doesn’t completely flatten, e.g. log function doesn’t completely flatten
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 20 at 16:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    $operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
    $endgroup$
    – steveo'america
    Mar 20 at 16:42








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    Mar 20 at 21:39










2




2




$begingroup$
The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
$endgroup$
– jld
Mar 20 at 16:17




$begingroup$
The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
$endgroup$
– jld
Mar 20 at 16:17












$begingroup$
Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
Mar 20 at 16:24




$begingroup$
Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
Mar 20 at 16:24












$begingroup$
Right, a sigmoid like shape that doesn’t completely flatten, e.g. log function doesn’t completely flatten
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
Mar 20 at 16:31




$begingroup$
Right, a sigmoid like shape that doesn’t completely flatten, e.g. log function doesn’t completely flatten
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
Mar 20 at 16:31




6




6




$begingroup$
$operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
$endgroup$
– steveo'america
Mar 20 at 16:42






$begingroup$
$operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
$endgroup$
– steveo'america
Mar 20 at 16:42






4




4




$begingroup$
Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
$endgroup$
– usεr11852
Mar 20 at 21:39






$begingroup$
Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
$endgroup$
– usεr11852
Mar 20 at 21:39












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

You could just add a term to a logistic function:



$$
f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
$$



The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



Sigmoid






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Mar 21 at 1:30










  • $begingroup$
    this seemed to work for my dataset, and I picked it, but the solution is not ideal since the asymptotic slope doesn't decrease
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 22 at 10:46



















11












$begingroup$

Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
$$
text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
$$



This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
asinh



I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.





Original answer



$newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
$$
lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
$$



Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
$$
exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
$$

and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
$$
f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
$$
work?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 20 at 18:52












  • $begingroup$
    My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
    $endgroup$
    – Ingolifs
    Mar 20 at 23:41










  • $begingroup$
    how could you parameterize this function to change it's shape? in particular, to regulate the slope at the inflection point
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 22 at 10:48










  • $begingroup$
    @Aksakal if $a > 0$ then just doing $acdottext{asinh}$ would keep the shape and asymptotics the same and the derivative is $frac{a}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so the slope at zero is just $a$
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Aksakal more generally we could consider the antiderivative of $frac{a}{sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}}$ which is $$frac ab logleft(bleft(bx + sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}right)right)$$ and allows more ability to change the shape, or just something like $acdottext{asinh}(bx)$
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    2 days ago





















6












$begingroup$

I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
$$
f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
$$

which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.



edit by popular demand, a plot, for $|x|le 30$:
enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398551%2flogistic-function-with-a-slope-but-no-asymptotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10












    $begingroup$

    You could just add a term to a logistic function:



    $$
    f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
    $$



    The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



    Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



    Sigmoid






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Mar 21 at 1:30










    • $begingroup$
      this seemed to work for my dataset, and I picked it, but the solution is not ideal since the asymptotic slope doesn't decrease
      $endgroup$
      – Aksakal
      Mar 22 at 10:46
















    10












    $begingroup$

    You could just add a term to a logistic function:



    $$
    f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
    $$



    The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



    Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



    Sigmoid






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Mar 21 at 1:30










    • $begingroup$
      this seemed to work for my dataset, and I picked it, but the solution is not ideal since the asymptotic slope doesn't decrease
      $endgroup$
      – Aksakal
      Mar 22 at 10:46














    10












    10








    10





    $begingroup$

    You could just add a term to a logistic function:



    $$
    f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
    $$



    The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



    Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



    Sigmoid






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    You could just add a term to a logistic function:



    $$
    f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
    $$



    The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



    Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



    Sigmoid







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Mar 20 at 17:02









    COOLSerdashCOOLSerdash

    16.5k75294




    16.5k75294








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Mar 21 at 1:30










    • $begingroup$
      this seemed to work for my dataset, and I picked it, but the solution is not ideal since the asymptotic slope doesn't decrease
      $endgroup$
      – Aksakal
      Mar 22 at 10:46














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Mar 21 at 1:30










    • $begingroup$
      this seemed to work for my dataset, and I picked it, but the solution is not ideal since the asymptotic slope doesn't decrease
      $endgroup$
      – Aksakal
      Mar 22 at 10:46








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Mar 21 at 1:30




    $begingroup$
    I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Mar 21 at 1:30












    $begingroup$
    this seemed to work for my dataset, and I picked it, but the solution is not ideal since the asymptotic slope doesn't decrease
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 22 at 10:46




    $begingroup$
    this seemed to work for my dataset, and I picked it, but the solution is not ideal since the asymptotic slope doesn't decrease
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 22 at 10:46













    11












    $begingroup$

    Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
    $$
    text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
    $$



    This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
    asinh



    I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



    Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.





    Original answer



    $newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
    $$
    lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
    $$



    Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
    $$
    exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
    $$

    and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



    This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
    $$
    work?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      Mar 20 at 18:52












    • $begingroup$
      My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
      $endgroup$
      – Ingolifs
      Mar 20 at 23:41










    • $begingroup$
      how could you parameterize this function to change it's shape? in particular, to regulate the slope at the inflection point
      $endgroup$
      – Aksakal
      Mar 22 at 10:48










    • $begingroup$
      @Aksakal if $a > 0$ then just doing $acdottext{asinh}$ would keep the shape and asymptotics the same and the derivative is $frac{a}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so the slope at zero is just $a$
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      2 days ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Aksakal more generally we could consider the antiderivative of $frac{a}{sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}}$ which is $$frac ab logleft(bleft(bx + sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}right)right)$$ and allows more ability to change the shape, or just something like $acdottext{asinh}(bx)$
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      2 days ago


















    11












    $begingroup$

    Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
    $$
    text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
    $$



    This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
    asinh



    I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



    Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.





    Original answer



    $newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
    $$
    lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
    $$



    Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
    $$
    exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
    $$

    and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



    This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
    $$
    work?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      Mar 20 at 18:52












    • $begingroup$
      My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
      $endgroup$
      – Ingolifs
      Mar 20 at 23:41










    • $begingroup$
      how could you parameterize this function to change it's shape? in particular, to regulate the slope at the inflection point
      $endgroup$
      – Aksakal
      Mar 22 at 10:48










    • $begingroup$
      @Aksakal if $a > 0$ then just doing $acdottext{asinh}$ would keep the shape and asymptotics the same and the derivative is $frac{a}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so the slope at zero is just $a$
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      2 days ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Aksakal more generally we could consider the antiderivative of $frac{a}{sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}}$ which is $$frac ab logleft(bleft(bx + sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}right)right)$$ and allows more ability to change the shape, or just something like $acdottext{asinh}(bx)$
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      2 days ago
















    11












    11








    11





    $begingroup$

    Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
    $$
    text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
    $$



    This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
    asinh



    I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



    Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.





    Original answer



    $newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
    $$
    lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
    $$



    Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
    $$
    exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
    $$

    and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



    This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
    $$
    work?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
    $$
    text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
    $$



    This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
    asinh



    I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



    Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.





    Original answer



    $newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
    $$
    lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
    $$



    Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
    $$
    exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
    $$

    and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



    This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
    $$
    work?







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 20 at 18:19

























    answered Mar 20 at 16:15









    jldjld

    12.3k23353




    12.3k23353








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      Mar 20 at 18:52












    • $begingroup$
      My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
      $endgroup$
      – Ingolifs
      Mar 20 at 23:41










    • $begingroup$
      how could you parameterize this function to change it's shape? in particular, to regulate the slope at the inflection point
      $endgroup$
      – Aksakal
      Mar 22 at 10:48










    • $begingroup$
      @Aksakal if $a > 0$ then just doing $acdottext{asinh}$ would keep the shape and asymptotics the same and the derivative is $frac{a}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so the slope at zero is just $a$
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      2 days ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Aksakal more generally we could consider the antiderivative of $frac{a}{sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}}$ which is $$frac ab logleft(bleft(bx + sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}right)right)$$ and allows more ability to change the shape, or just something like $acdottext{asinh}(bx)$
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      2 days ago
















    • 2




      $begingroup$
      The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      Mar 20 at 18:52












    • $begingroup$
      My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
      $endgroup$
      – Ingolifs
      Mar 20 at 23:41










    • $begingroup$
      how could you parameterize this function to change it's shape? in particular, to regulate the slope at the inflection point
      $endgroup$
      – Aksakal
      Mar 22 at 10:48










    • $begingroup$
      @Aksakal if $a > 0$ then just doing $acdottext{asinh}$ would keep the shape and asymptotics the same and the derivative is $frac{a}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so the slope at zero is just $a$
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      2 days ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Aksakal more generally we could consider the antiderivative of $frac{a}{sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}}$ which is $$frac ab logleft(bleft(bx + sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}right)right)$$ and allows more ability to change the shape, or just something like $acdottext{asinh}(bx)$
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      2 days ago










    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 20 at 18:52






    $begingroup$
    The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 20 at 18:52














    $begingroup$
    My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
    $endgroup$
    – Ingolifs
    Mar 20 at 23:41




    $begingroup$
    My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
    $endgroup$
    – Ingolifs
    Mar 20 at 23:41












    $begingroup$
    how could you parameterize this function to change it's shape? in particular, to regulate the slope at the inflection point
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 22 at 10:48




    $begingroup$
    how could you parameterize this function to change it's shape? in particular, to regulate the slope at the inflection point
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    Mar 22 at 10:48












    $begingroup$
    @Aksakal if $a > 0$ then just doing $acdottext{asinh}$ would keep the shape and asymptotics the same and the derivative is $frac{a}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so the slope at zero is just $a$
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    2 days ago






    $begingroup$
    @Aksakal if $a > 0$ then just doing $acdottext{asinh}$ would keep the shape and asymptotics the same and the derivative is $frac{a}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so the slope at zero is just $a$
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    2 days ago














    $begingroup$
    @Aksakal more generally we could consider the antiderivative of $frac{a}{sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}}$ which is $$frac ab logleft(bleft(bx + sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}right)right)$$ and allows more ability to change the shape, or just something like $acdottext{asinh}(bx)$
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    2 days ago






    $begingroup$
    @Aksakal more generally we could consider the antiderivative of $frac{a}{sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}}$ which is $$frac ab logleft(bleft(bx + sqrt{c^2 + (bx)^2}right)right)$$ and allows more ability to change the shape, or just something like $acdottext{asinh}(bx)$
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    2 days ago













    6












    $begingroup$

    I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
    $$
    f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
    $$

    which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.



    edit by popular demand, a plot, for $|x|le 30$:
    enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      6












      $begingroup$

      I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
      $$
      f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
      $$

      which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.



      edit by popular demand, a plot, for $|x|le 30$:
      enter image description here






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
        $$
        f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
        $$

        which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.



        edit by popular demand, a plot, for $|x|le 30$:
        enter image description here






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
        $$
        f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
        $$

        which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.



        edit by popular demand, a plot, for $|x|le 30$:
        enter image description here







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 21 at 22:04

























        answered Mar 20 at 18:49









        steveo'americasteveo'america

        24319




        24319






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398551%2flogistic-function-with-a-slope-but-no-asymptotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

            Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области