Mr. Hilbert and the Problem of the Erroneous Equation












32












$begingroup$


Having had just checked into the Grand Hotel, Mr. Hilbert slumped into the hotel room armchair with relief. Finally he could have some peace and quiet and solve the quaint riddle his colleague gave him! He pulled a note out from his breastpocket, and on it was simply scribbled:




Fix this equation by adding three mathematical symbols:

$$2 spacespacespace 2 space = space9$$
NO letters, numbers, or tampering with the equal sign!




Unfortunately, an hour and thousands of incorrect symbols later, Mr. Hilbert remained hopelessly stuck. Can you help Mr. Hilbert?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 22




    $begingroup$
    How can Mr. Hilbert spend an hour working on a problem in a hotel? Wouldn't he be requested to move to another room once in every few minutes?
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    Sep 2 '15 at 9:47






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    @JiK The front desk was busy trying to complete Mr Gödel's check-in.
    $endgroup$
    – David Tonhofer
    Sep 2 '15 at 20:11










  • $begingroup$
    While the Grand Hotel is large, the occupants move slowly =) Summer is also down season for them I suppose?
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 3 '15 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    Does 2 + 2 <= 9 qualify as "tampering with the equal sign"? It's still there, just has a < before it.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    Sep 3 '15 at 15:40












  • $begingroup$
    You mean $leq$? =)
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 3 '15 at 18:35
















32












$begingroup$


Having had just checked into the Grand Hotel, Mr. Hilbert slumped into the hotel room armchair with relief. Finally he could have some peace and quiet and solve the quaint riddle his colleague gave him! He pulled a note out from his breastpocket, and on it was simply scribbled:




Fix this equation by adding three mathematical symbols:

$$2 spacespacespace 2 space = space9$$
NO letters, numbers, or tampering with the equal sign!




Unfortunately, an hour and thousands of incorrect symbols later, Mr. Hilbert remained hopelessly stuck. Can you help Mr. Hilbert?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 22




    $begingroup$
    How can Mr. Hilbert spend an hour working on a problem in a hotel? Wouldn't he be requested to move to another room once in every few minutes?
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    Sep 2 '15 at 9:47






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    @JiK The front desk was busy trying to complete Mr Gödel's check-in.
    $endgroup$
    – David Tonhofer
    Sep 2 '15 at 20:11










  • $begingroup$
    While the Grand Hotel is large, the occupants move slowly =) Summer is also down season for them I suppose?
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 3 '15 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    Does 2 + 2 <= 9 qualify as "tampering with the equal sign"? It's still there, just has a < before it.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    Sep 3 '15 at 15:40












  • $begingroup$
    You mean $leq$? =)
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 3 '15 at 18:35














32












32








32


8



$begingroup$


Having had just checked into the Grand Hotel, Mr. Hilbert slumped into the hotel room armchair with relief. Finally he could have some peace and quiet and solve the quaint riddle his colleague gave him! He pulled a note out from his breastpocket, and on it was simply scribbled:




Fix this equation by adding three mathematical symbols:

$$2 spacespacespace 2 space = space9$$
NO letters, numbers, or tampering with the equal sign!




Unfortunately, an hour and thousands of incorrect symbols later, Mr. Hilbert remained hopelessly stuck. Can you help Mr. Hilbert?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Having had just checked into the Grand Hotel, Mr. Hilbert slumped into the hotel room armchair with relief. Finally he could have some peace and quiet and solve the quaint riddle his colleague gave him! He pulled a note out from his breastpocket, and on it was simply scribbled:




Fix this equation by adding three mathematical symbols:

$$2 spacespacespace 2 space = space9$$
NO letters, numbers, or tampering with the equal sign!




Unfortunately, an hour and thousands of incorrect symbols later, Mr. Hilbert remained hopelessly stuck. Can you help Mr. Hilbert?







mathematics calculation-puzzle construction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 2 '15 at 2:52









McMagister

6,84812357




6,84812357










asked Sep 2 '15 at 2:25









HackiisanHackiisan

1,538624




1,538624








  • 22




    $begingroup$
    How can Mr. Hilbert spend an hour working on a problem in a hotel? Wouldn't he be requested to move to another room once in every few minutes?
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    Sep 2 '15 at 9:47






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    @JiK The front desk was busy trying to complete Mr Gödel's check-in.
    $endgroup$
    – David Tonhofer
    Sep 2 '15 at 20:11










  • $begingroup$
    While the Grand Hotel is large, the occupants move slowly =) Summer is also down season for them I suppose?
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 3 '15 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    Does 2 + 2 <= 9 qualify as "tampering with the equal sign"? It's still there, just has a < before it.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    Sep 3 '15 at 15:40












  • $begingroup$
    You mean $leq$? =)
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 3 '15 at 18:35














  • 22




    $begingroup$
    How can Mr. Hilbert spend an hour working on a problem in a hotel? Wouldn't he be requested to move to another room once in every few minutes?
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    Sep 2 '15 at 9:47






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    @JiK The front desk was busy trying to complete Mr Gödel's check-in.
    $endgroup$
    – David Tonhofer
    Sep 2 '15 at 20:11










  • $begingroup$
    While the Grand Hotel is large, the occupants move slowly =) Summer is also down season for them I suppose?
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 3 '15 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    Does 2 + 2 <= 9 qualify as "tampering with the equal sign"? It's still there, just has a < before it.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    Sep 3 '15 at 15:40












  • $begingroup$
    You mean $leq$? =)
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 3 '15 at 18:35








22




22




$begingroup$
How can Mr. Hilbert spend an hour working on a problem in a hotel? Wouldn't he be requested to move to another room once in every few minutes?
$endgroup$
– JiK
Sep 2 '15 at 9:47




$begingroup$
How can Mr. Hilbert spend an hour working on a problem in a hotel? Wouldn't he be requested to move to another room once in every few minutes?
$endgroup$
– JiK
Sep 2 '15 at 9:47




18




18




$begingroup$
@JiK The front desk was busy trying to complete Mr Gödel's check-in.
$endgroup$
– David Tonhofer
Sep 2 '15 at 20:11




$begingroup$
@JiK The front desk was busy trying to complete Mr Gödel's check-in.
$endgroup$
– David Tonhofer
Sep 2 '15 at 20:11












$begingroup$
While the Grand Hotel is large, the occupants move slowly =) Summer is also down season for them I suppose?
$endgroup$
– Hackiisan
Sep 3 '15 at 0:34




$begingroup$
While the Grand Hotel is large, the occupants move slowly =) Summer is also down season for them I suppose?
$endgroup$
– Hackiisan
Sep 3 '15 at 0:34












$begingroup$
Does 2 + 2 <= 9 qualify as "tampering with the equal sign"? It's still there, just has a < before it.
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Sep 3 '15 at 15:40






$begingroup$
Does 2 + 2 <= 9 qualify as "tampering with the equal sign"? It's still there, just has a < before it.
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Sep 3 '15 at 15:40














$begingroup$
You mean $leq$? =)
$endgroup$
– Hackiisan
Sep 3 '15 at 18:35




$begingroup$
You mean $leq$? =)
$endgroup$
– Hackiisan
Sep 3 '15 at 18:35










12 Answers
12






active

oldest

votes


















34












$begingroup$

I don't know how to do the formatting (thanks McMagister for the edit) but the answer is




$ 2spacedivspace .overline{2} = 9 $







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Beautifully solved.
    $endgroup$
    – alexmc
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:09






  • 28




    $begingroup$
    That feel when grade school repeated decimal notation is more foreign to me than the gamma function...
    $endgroup$
    – McMagister
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:12












  • $begingroup$
    Well done, much faster than Mr. Hilbert! I had hidden a hint in the story text to be revealed later, but clearly it is unnecessary now =)
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    The hint is not so much hidden as I was thinking about it just by reading the title of the question. There is not that many reasons why would one name the usually unnamed (or non-existent) protagonist after a mathematician, besides giving a hint :)
    $endgroup$
    – zovits
    Sep 2 '15 at 9:07






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For the uninitiated what does the overbar notation mean? I thought that meant complex conjugate?
    $endgroup$
    – curious_cat
    Sep 2 '15 at 12:21



















24





+100







$begingroup$


$$ 2 div 2 = .overline{9} $$




Simply rearranging the symbols used in the intended solution.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Nice! Mr. Hilbert agrees this could be a valid solution as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 7:19



















17












$begingroup$

Probably fails the no letter criterion.




$-2+2={d over dx} 9$




Or using Lagrange notation as a workaround (thanks to McMagister) we can also write




$-2+2= 9'$







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Use lagrange notation as a work-around?
    $endgroup$
    – McMagister
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:01






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Yes. While technically you can use a "prime" symbol for differentiation, the intended answer is not a simple "cheat". Otherwise, most of similar type questions can be solved by the trivial $a' + b' = c' + d'$
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:01





















14












$begingroup$

I came up with this:




$lceil2sqrt{2}rceil = sqrt{9}$







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    implicit multiplcation - getting that fourth operation without a fourth math symbol - love it!
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 3 '15 at 2:00






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    ...And then losing two math symbols on one math operation (ceil), ending up with one symbol too many...
    $endgroup$
    – namey
    Sep 3 '15 at 21:04





















7












$begingroup$

My answer:




$$Gamma(2) + 2 = sqrt9$$







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Very good attempt, but unfortunately Mr. Hilbert would consider the use of the gamma function as "using letters".
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:51






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Do the brackets count as "mathematical symbols"?
    $endgroup$
    – alexmc
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @alexmc Yes, they do.
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:58



















5












$begingroup$

Assuming that perfect formatting is not required:




$ neg (2 space 2 = 9) $




That is:




not (twenty-two equals nine)




If we count a pair of parentheses as a single unit, then:




$ neg (2 + 2 = 9) $







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A solution in the similar vein: $2+2=9tobot$
    $endgroup$
    – Taemyr
    Sep 2 '15 at 19:29



















5












$begingroup$

While the accepted answer was also the first one I thought of, there's also a nice solution with subfactorials:




$$2;!2 = !sqrt{9}$$







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What does a factorial sign in front of a number mean in math?
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Jan 10 '16 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    @user1717828, see the linked Mathworld page.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Taylor
    Jan 10 '16 at 22:47










  • $begingroup$
    Didn't see that on mobile. My bad.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Jan 10 '16 at 23:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Fascinating. Also $2+!2 = sqrt{9}$.
    $endgroup$
    – GOTO 0
    Jan 12 '16 at 13:29



















4












$begingroup$

What about :




$2div2=#{9}$




In case I got the symbols wrong, what I am trying to say is:




two divided by two equals the cardinality of the set of numbers that just contains the number nine







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Nice! While I can't say this is wrong (similar to Anachor's answer), it goes against the spirit of this puzzle by ignoring the value of the number. Otherwise, many other trivial answers exist, such as $(#(2)+2)! = 9$ or $#(2) + 2 = sqrt{9}$. I would have edited the question to reflect this, but the correct solution has already appeared =P
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 7:15












  • $begingroup$
    This solution also uses 4 symbols - not the allowed 3.
    $endgroup$
    – Eborbob
    Sep 2 '15 at 12:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Eborbob Parentheses and brackets are always used a unit and I would consider them to be one symbol. Based on his comments on other answers, Hackiisan seems to agree with me.
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Sep 2 '15 at 13:00










  • $begingroup$
    @Kevin Fair enough, I'll remember that for future use!
    $endgroup$
    – Eborbob
    Sep 2 '15 at 13:04






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Hackiisan $#(2)+2=sqrt{9}$ isn't trivial, and doesn't ignore the value of any number but the first. One could argue the 'accepted' answer ignores the value of one of the numbers, because any two equal numbers will result in an acceptable result.
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 2 '15 at 16:42





















4












$begingroup$

How about this?




$lfloorsqrt{2}rfloor + 2 = sqrt{9}$




Oops, that is 4 symbols. Thanks @corsiKa.



This one uses three symbols:




$2 - 2 = lfloor9%rfloor$







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That's four - floor, sqrt, plus, sqrt
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 2 '15 at 16:37



















2












$begingroup$

How about




$2'cdot 2' = 9$, where $(,cdot,)'$ denotes the successor function.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    By that logic, I can always define (⋅)′ to always return 3, irrespective of what is inside. (⋅)′ is not standard notation for the successor function, which means you will have to add letters after these 3 operators to explain what you mean.
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:08










  • $begingroup$
    I'm pretty sure that $(,cdot,)'$ is a standard notation for the successor function. At least this is the notation I learned when I was in school. And it is not far fetched to recognise it as such.
    $endgroup$
    – Claudius
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Can you provide any links to text where such a notation is used? (Hopefully one that isn't too obscure)
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:16










  • $begingroup$
    see this question on math.stackexchange: math.stackexchange.com/questions/643374/… There is a reference to Kleene’s Mathematical Logic that uses this notation.
    $endgroup$
    – Claudius
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:28












  • $begingroup$
    I stand corrected. Although this is not as common as you expect, indicated by the accepted answer in the above question pointing out that S(n) is a more common notation.
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:31





















2












$begingroup$

If we can assume these digits are measured we get:




2 + √2 = √9 (true to one significant figure)







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    With 2 mathematical operations:




    $ 2-2={9} $







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$









    • 3




      $begingroup$
      {} is the fractional part of a number. Clarifying because a set is used in another answer
      $endgroup$
      – Artem Lugin
      yesterday










    protected by Aza Sep 3 '15 at 18:46



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    12 Answers
    12






    active

    oldest

    votes








    12 Answers
    12






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    34












    $begingroup$

    I don't know how to do the formatting (thanks McMagister for the edit) but the answer is




    $ 2spacedivspace .overline{2} = 9 $







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Beautifully solved.
      $endgroup$
      – alexmc
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:09






    • 28




      $begingroup$
      That feel when grade school repeated decimal notation is more foreign to me than the gamma function...
      $endgroup$
      – McMagister
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:12












    • $begingroup$
      Well done, much faster than Mr. Hilbert! I had hidden a hint in the story text to be revealed later, but clearly it is unnecessary now =)
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:15










    • $begingroup$
      The hint is not so much hidden as I was thinking about it just by reading the title of the question. There is not that many reasons why would one name the usually unnamed (or non-existent) protagonist after a mathematician, besides giving a hint :)
      $endgroup$
      – zovits
      Sep 2 '15 at 9:07






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      For the uninitiated what does the overbar notation mean? I thought that meant complex conjugate?
      $endgroup$
      – curious_cat
      Sep 2 '15 at 12:21
















    34












    $begingroup$

    I don't know how to do the formatting (thanks McMagister for the edit) but the answer is




    $ 2spacedivspace .overline{2} = 9 $







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Beautifully solved.
      $endgroup$
      – alexmc
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:09






    • 28




      $begingroup$
      That feel when grade school repeated decimal notation is more foreign to me than the gamma function...
      $endgroup$
      – McMagister
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:12












    • $begingroup$
      Well done, much faster than Mr. Hilbert! I had hidden a hint in the story text to be revealed later, but clearly it is unnecessary now =)
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:15










    • $begingroup$
      The hint is not so much hidden as I was thinking about it just by reading the title of the question. There is not that many reasons why would one name the usually unnamed (or non-existent) protagonist after a mathematician, besides giving a hint :)
      $endgroup$
      – zovits
      Sep 2 '15 at 9:07






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      For the uninitiated what does the overbar notation mean? I thought that meant complex conjugate?
      $endgroup$
      – curious_cat
      Sep 2 '15 at 12:21














    34












    34








    34





    $begingroup$

    I don't know how to do the formatting (thanks McMagister for the edit) but the answer is




    $ 2spacedivspace .overline{2} = 9 $







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I don't know how to do the formatting (thanks McMagister for the edit) but the answer is




    $ 2spacedivspace .overline{2} = 9 $








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 2 '15 at 3:12

























    answered Sep 2 '15 at 3:04









    FriedSaucePotsFriedSaucePots

    61656




    61656








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Beautifully solved.
      $endgroup$
      – alexmc
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:09






    • 28




      $begingroup$
      That feel when grade school repeated decimal notation is more foreign to me than the gamma function...
      $endgroup$
      – McMagister
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:12












    • $begingroup$
      Well done, much faster than Mr. Hilbert! I had hidden a hint in the story text to be revealed later, but clearly it is unnecessary now =)
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:15










    • $begingroup$
      The hint is not so much hidden as I was thinking about it just by reading the title of the question. There is not that many reasons why would one name the usually unnamed (or non-existent) protagonist after a mathematician, besides giving a hint :)
      $endgroup$
      – zovits
      Sep 2 '15 at 9:07






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      For the uninitiated what does the overbar notation mean? I thought that meant complex conjugate?
      $endgroup$
      – curious_cat
      Sep 2 '15 at 12:21














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Beautifully solved.
      $endgroup$
      – alexmc
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:09






    • 28




      $begingroup$
      That feel when grade school repeated decimal notation is more foreign to me than the gamma function...
      $endgroup$
      – McMagister
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:12












    • $begingroup$
      Well done, much faster than Mr. Hilbert! I had hidden a hint in the story text to be revealed later, but clearly it is unnecessary now =)
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:15










    • $begingroup$
      The hint is not so much hidden as I was thinking about it just by reading the title of the question. There is not that many reasons why would one name the usually unnamed (or non-existent) protagonist after a mathematician, besides giving a hint :)
      $endgroup$
      – zovits
      Sep 2 '15 at 9:07






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      For the uninitiated what does the overbar notation mean? I thought that meant complex conjugate?
      $endgroup$
      – curious_cat
      Sep 2 '15 at 12:21








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Beautifully solved.
    $endgroup$
    – alexmc
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:09




    $begingroup$
    Beautifully solved.
    $endgroup$
    – alexmc
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:09




    28




    28




    $begingroup$
    That feel when grade school repeated decimal notation is more foreign to me than the gamma function...
    $endgroup$
    – McMagister
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:12






    $begingroup$
    That feel when grade school repeated decimal notation is more foreign to me than the gamma function...
    $endgroup$
    – McMagister
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:12














    $begingroup$
    Well done, much faster than Mr. Hilbert! I had hidden a hint in the story text to be revealed later, but clearly it is unnecessary now =)
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:15




    $begingroup$
    Well done, much faster than Mr. Hilbert! I had hidden a hint in the story text to be revealed later, but clearly it is unnecessary now =)
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:15












    $begingroup$
    The hint is not so much hidden as I was thinking about it just by reading the title of the question. There is not that many reasons why would one name the usually unnamed (or non-existent) protagonist after a mathematician, besides giving a hint :)
    $endgroup$
    – zovits
    Sep 2 '15 at 9:07




    $begingroup$
    The hint is not so much hidden as I was thinking about it just by reading the title of the question. There is not that many reasons why would one name the usually unnamed (or non-existent) protagonist after a mathematician, besides giving a hint :)
    $endgroup$
    – zovits
    Sep 2 '15 at 9:07




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    For the uninitiated what does the overbar notation mean? I thought that meant complex conjugate?
    $endgroup$
    – curious_cat
    Sep 2 '15 at 12:21




    $begingroup$
    For the uninitiated what does the overbar notation mean? I thought that meant complex conjugate?
    $endgroup$
    – curious_cat
    Sep 2 '15 at 12:21











    24





    +100







    $begingroup$


    $$ 2 div 2 = .overline{9} $$




    Simply rearranging the symbols used in the intended solution.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Nice! Mr. Hilbert agrees this could be a valid solution as well.
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 7:19
















    24





    +100







    $begingroup$


    $$ 2 div 2 = .overline{9} $$




    Simply rearranging the symbols used in the intended solution.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Nice! Mr. Hilbert agrees this could be a valid solution as well.
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 7:19














    24





    +100







    24





    +100



    24




    +100



    $begingroup$


    $$ 2 div 2 = .overline{9} $$




    Simply rearranging the symbols used in the intended solution.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




    $$ 2 div 2 = .overline{9} $$




    Simply rearranging the symbols used in the intended solution.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 2 '15 at 7:11









    GOTO 0GOTO 0

    9,85054089




    9,85054089








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Nice! Mr. Hilbert agrees this could be a valid solution as well.
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 7:19














    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Nice! Mr. Hilbert agrees this could be a valid solution as well.
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 7:19








    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    Nice! Mr. Hilbert agrees this could be a valid solution as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 7:19




    $begingroup$
    Nice! Mr. Hilbert agrees this could be a valid solution as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 7:19











    17












    $begingroup$

    Probably fails the no letter criterion.




    $-2+2={d over dx} 9$




    Or using Lagrange notation as a workaround (thanks to McMagister) we can also write




    $-2+2= 9'$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Use lagrange notation as a work-around?
      $endgroup$
      – McMagister
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:01






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Yes. While technically you can use a "prime" symbol for differentiation, the intended answer is not a simple "cheat". Otherwise, most of similar type questions can be solved by the trivial $a' + b' = c' + d'$
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:01


















    17












    $begingroup$

    Probably fails the no letter criterion.




    $-2+2={d over dx} 9$




    Or using Lagrange notation as a workaround (thanks to McMagister) we can also write




    $-2+2= 9'$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Use lagrange notation as a work-around?
      $endgroup$
      – McMagister
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:01






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Yes. While technically you can use a "prime" symbol for differentiation, the intended answer is not a simple "cheat". Otherwise, most of similar type questions can be solved by the trivial $a' + b' = c' + d'$
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:01
















    17












    17








    17





    $begingroup$

    Probably fails the no letter criterion.




    $-2+2={d over dx} 9$




    Or using Lagrange notation as a workaround (thanks to McMagister) we can also write




    $-2+2= 9'$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Probably fails the no letter criterion.




    $-2+2={d over dx} 9$




    Or using Lagrange notation as a workaround (thanks to McMagister) we can also write




    $-2+2= 9'$








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 2 '15 at 3:13

























    answered Sep 2 '15 at 2:56









    RohcanaRohcana

    3,4701447




    3,4701447








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Use lagrange notation as a work-around?
      $endgroup$
      – McMagister
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:01






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Yes. While technically you can use a "prime" symbol for differentiation, the intended answer is not a simple "cheat". Otherwise, most of similar type questions can be solved by the trivial $a' + b' = c' + d'$
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:01
















    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Use lagrange notation as a work-around?
      $endgroup$
      – McMagister
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:01






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Yes. While technically you can use a "prime" symbol for differentiation, the intended answer is not a simple "cheat". Otherwise, most of similar type questions can be solved by the trivial $a' + b' = c' + d'$
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 3:01










    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    Use lagrange notation as a work-around?
    $endgroup$
    – McMagister
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:01




    $begingroup$
    Use lagrange notation as a work-around?
    $endgroup$
    – McMagister
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:01




    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    Yes. While technically you can use a "prime" symbol for differentiation, the intended answer is not a simple "cheat". Otherwise, most of similar type questions can be solved by the trivial $a' + b' = c' + d'$
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:01






    $begingroup$
    Yes. While technically you can use a "prime" symbol for differentiation, the intended answer is not a simple "cheat". Otherwise, most of similar type questions can be solved by the trivial $a' + b' = c' + d'$
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 3:01













    14












    $begingroup$

    I came up with this:




    $lceil2sqrt{2}rceil = sqrt{9}$







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      implicit multiplcation - getting that fourth operation without a fourth math symbol - love it!
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 3 '15 at 2:00






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      ...And then losing two math symbols on one math operation (ceil), ending up with one symbol too many...
      $endgroup$
      – namey
      Sep 3 '15 at 21:04


















    14












    $begingroup$

    I came up with this:




    $lceil2sqrt{2}rceil = sqrt{9}$







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      implicit multiplcation - getting that fourth operation without a fourth math symbol - love it!
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 3 '15 at 2:00






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      ...And then losing two math symbols on one math operation (ceil), ending up with one symbol too many...
      $endgroup$
      – namey
      Sep 3 '15 at 21:04
















    14












    14








    14





    $begingroup$

    I came up with this:




    $lceil2sqrt{2}rceil = sqrt{9}$







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    I came up with this:




    $lceil2sqrt{2}rceil = sqrt{9}$








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 2 '15 at 16:55









    HellionHellion

    1,931819




    1,931819








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      implicit multiplcation - getting that fourth operation without a fourth math symbol - love it!
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 3 '15 at 2:00






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      ...And then losing two math symbols on one math operation (ceil), ending up with one symbol too many...
      $endgroup$
      – namey
      Sep 3 '15 at 21:04
















    • 1




      $begingroup$
      implicit multiplcation - getting that fourth operation without a fourth math symbol - love it!
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 3 '15 at 2:00






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      ...And then losing two math symbols on one math operation (ceil), ending up with one symbol too many...
      $endgroup$
      – namey
      Sep 3 '15 at 21:04










    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    implicit multiplcation - getting that fourth operation without a fourth math symbol - love it!
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 3 '15 at 2:00




    $begingroup$
    implicit multiplcation - getting that fourth operation without a fourth math symbol - love it!
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 3 '15 at 2:00




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    ...And then losing two math symbols on one math operation (ceil), ending up with one symbol too many...
    $endgroup$
    – namey
    Sep 3 '15 at 21:04






    $begingroup$
    ...And then losing two math symbols on one math operation (ceil), ending up with one symbol too many...
    $endgroup$
    – namey
    Sep 3 '15 at 21:04













    7












    $begingroup$

    My answer:




    $$Gamma(2) + 2 = sqrt9$$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Very good attempt, but unfortunately Mr. Hilbert would consider the use of the gamma function as "using letters".
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:51






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Do the brackets count as "mathematical symbols"?
      $endgroup$
      – alexmc
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:53






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @alexmc Yes, they do.
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:58
















    7












    $begingroup$

    My answer:




    $$Gamma(2) + 2 = sqrt9$$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Very good attempt, but unfortunately Mr. Hilbert would consider the use of the gamma function as "using letters".
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:51






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Do the brackets count as "mathematical symbols"?
      $endgroup$
      – alexmc
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:53






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @alexmc Yes, they do.
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:58














    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    My answer:




    $$Gamma(2) + 2 = sqrt9$$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    My answer:




    $$Gamma(2) + 2 = sqrt9$$








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 2 '15 at 2:48

























    answered Sep 2 '15 at 2:41









    McMagisterMcMagister

    6,84812357




    6,84812357








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Very good attempt, but unfortunately Mr. Hilbert would consider the use of the gamma function as "using letters".
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:51






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Do the brackets count as "mathematical symbols"?
      $endgroup$
      – alexmc
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:53






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @alexmc Yes, they do.
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:58














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Very good attempt, but unfortunately Mr. Hilbert would consider the use of the gamma function as "using letters".
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:51






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Do the brackets count as "mathematical symbols"?
      $endgroup$
      – alexmc
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:53






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @alexmc Yes, they do.
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 2:58








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Very good attempt, but unfortunately Mr. Hilbert would consider the use of the gamma function as "using letters".
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:51




    $begingroup$
    Very good attempt, but unfortunately Mr. Hilbert would consider the use of the gamma function as "using letters".
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:51




    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    Do the brackets count as "mathematical symbols"?
    $endgroup$
    – alexmc
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:53




    $begingroup$
    Do the brackets count as "mathematical symbols"?
    $endgroup$
    – alexmc
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:53




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @alexmc Yes, they do.
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:58




    $begingroup$
    @alexmc Yes, they do.
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 2:58











    5












    $begingroup$

    Assuming that perfect formatting is not required:




    $ neg (2 space 2 = 9) $




    That is:




    not (twenty-two equals nine)




    If we count a pair of parentheses as a single unit, then:




    $ neg (2 + 2 = 9) $







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A solution in the similar vein: $2+2=9tobot$
      $endgroup$
      – Taemyr
      Sep 2 '15 at 19:29
















    5












    $begingroup$

    Assuming that perfect formatting is not required:




    $ neg (2 space 2 = 9) $




    That is:




    not (twenty-two equals nine)




    If we count a pair of parentheses as a single unit, then:




    $ neg (2 + 2 = 9) $







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A solution in the similar vein: $2+2=9tobot$
      $endgroup$
      – Taemyr
      Sep 2 '15 at 19:29














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Assuming that perfect formatting is not required:




    $ neg (2 space 2 = 9) $




    That is:




    not (twenty-two equals nine)




    If we count a pair of parentheses as a single unit, then:




    $ neg (2 + 2 = 9) $







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Assuming that perfect formatting is not required:




    $ neg (2 space 2 = 9) $




    That is:




    not (twenty-two equals nine)




    If we count a pair of parentheses as a single unit, then:




    $ neg (2 + 2 = 9) $








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 2 '15 at 18:09









    YpnypnYpnypn

    284111




    284111








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A solution in the similar vein: $2+2=9tobot$
      $endgroup$
      – Taemyr
      Sep 2 '15 at 19:29














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A solution in the similar vein: $2+2=9tobot$
      $endgroup$
      – Taemyr
      Sep 2 '15 at 19:29








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    A solution in the similar vein: $2+2=9tobot$
    $endgroup$
    – Taemyr
    Sep 2 '15 at 19:29




    $begingroup$
    A solution in the similar vein: $2+2=9tobot$
    $endgroup$
    – Taemyr
    Sep 2 '15 at 19:29











    5












    $begingroup$

    While the accepted answer was also the first one I thought of, there's also a nice solution with subfactorials:




    $$2;!2 = !sqrt{9}$$







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      What does a factorial sign in front of a number mean in math?
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Jan 10 '16 at 22:26










    • $begingroup$
      @user1717828, see the linked Mathworld page.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Taylor
      Jan 10 '16 at 22:47










    • $begingroup$
      Didn't see that on mobile. My bad.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Jan 10 '16 at 23:40






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Fascinating. Also $2+!2 = sqrt{9}$.
      $endgroup$
      – GOTO 0
      Jan 12 '16 at 13:29
















    5












    $begingroup$

    While the accepted answer was also the first one I thought of, there's also a nice solution with subfactorials:




    $$2;!2 = !sqrt{9}$$







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      What does a factorial sign in front of a number mean in math?
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Jan 10 '16 at 22:26










    • $begingroup$
      @user1717828, see the linked Mathworld page.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Taylor
      Jan 10 '16 at 22:47










    • $begingroup$
      Didn't see that on mobile. My bad.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Jan 10 '16 at 23:40






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Fascinating. Also $2+!2 = sqrt{9}$.
      $endgroup$
      – GOTO 0
      Jan 12 '16 at 13:29














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    While the accepted answer was also the first one I thought of, there's also a nice solution with subfactorials:




    $$2;!2 = !sqrt{9}$$







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    While the accepted answer was also the first one I thought of, there's also a nice solution with subfactorials:




    $$2;!2 = !sqrt{9}$$








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 10 '16 at 21:57









    Peter TaylorPeter Taylor

    3,9761330




    3,9761330












    • $begingroup$
      What does a factorial sign in front of a number mean in math?
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Jan 10 '16 at 22:26










    • $begingroup$
      @user1717828, see the linked Mathworld page.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Taylor
      Jan 10 '16 at 22:47










    • $begingroup$
      Didn't see that on mobile. My bad.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Jan 10 '16 at 23:40






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Fascinating. Also $2+!2 = sqrt{9}$.
      $endgroup$
      – GOTO 0
      Jan 12 '16 at 13:29


















    • $begingroup$
      What does a factorial sign in front of a number mean in math?
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Jan 10 '16 at 22:26










    • $begingroup$
      @user1717828, see the linked Mathworld page.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Taylor
      Jan 10 '16 at 22:47










    • $begingroup$
      Didn't see that on mobile. My bad.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      Jan 10 '16 at 23:40






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Fascinating. Also $2+!2 = sqrt{9}$.
      $endgroup$
      – GOTO 0
      Jan 12 '16 at 13:29
















    $begingroup$
    What does a factorial sign in front of a number mean in math?
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Jan 10 '16 at 22:26




    $begingroup$
    What does a factorial sign in front of a number mean in math?
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Jan 10 '16 at 22:26












    $begingroup$
    @user1717828, see the linked Mathworld page.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Taylor
    Jan 10 '16 at 22:47




    $begingroup$
    @user1717828, see the linked Mathworld page.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Taylor
    Jan 10 '16 at 22:47












    $begingroup$
    Didn't see that on mobile. My bad.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Jan 10 '16 at 23:40




    $begingroup$
    Didn't see that on mobile. My bad.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    Jan 10 '16 at 23:40




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Fascinating. Also $2+!2 = sqrt{9}$.
    $endgroup$
    – GOTO 0
    Jan 12 '16 at 13:29




    $begingroup$
    Fascinating. Also $2+!2 = sqrt{9}$.
    $endgroup$
    – GOTO 0
    Jan 12 '16 at 13:29











    4












    $begingroup$

    What about :




    $2div2=#{9}$




    In case I got the symbols wrong, what I am trying to say is:




    two divided by two equals the cardinality of the set of numbers that just contains the number nine







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Nice! While I can't say this is wrong (similar to Anachor's answer), it goes against the spirit of this puzzle by ignoring the value of the number. Otherwise, many other trivial answers exist, such as $(#(2)+2)! = 9$ or $#(2) + 2 = sqrt{9}$. I would have edited the question to reflect this, but the correct solution has already appeared =P
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 7:15












    • $begingroup$
      This solution also uses 4 symbols - not the allowed 3.
      $endgroup$
      – Eborbob
      Sep 2 '15 at 12:50










    • $begingroup$
      @Eborbob Parentheses and brackets are always used a unit and I would consider them to be one symbol. Based on his comments on other answers, Hackiisan seems to agree with me.
      $endgroup$
      – Kevin
      Sep 2 '15 at 13:00










    • $begingroup$
      @Kevin Fair enough, I'll remember that for future use!
      $endgroup$
      – Eborbob
      Sep 2 '15 at 13:04






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Hackiisan $#(2)+2=sqrt{9}$ isn't trivial, and doesn't ignore the value of any number but the first. One could argue the 'accepted' answer ignores the value of one of the numbers, because any two equal numbers will result in an acceptable result.
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 2 '15 at 16:42


















    4












    $begingroup$

    What about :




    $2div2=#{9}$




    In case I got the symbols wrong, what I am trying to say is:




    two divided by two equals the cardinality of the set of numbers that just contains the number nine







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Nice! While I can't say this is wrong (similar to Anachor's answer), it goes against the spirit of this puzzle by ignoring the value of the number. Otherwise, many other trivial answers exist, such as $(#(2)+2)! = 9$ or $#(2) + 2 = sqrt{9}$. I would have edited the question to reflect this, but the correct solution has already appeared =P
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 7:15












    • $begingroup$
      This solution also uses 4 symbols - not the allowed 3.
      $endgroup$
      – Eborbob
      Sep 2 '15 at 12:50










    • $begingroup$
      @Eborbob Parentheses and brackets are always used a unit and I would consider them to be one symbol. Based on his comments on other answers, Hackiisan seems to agree with me.
      $endgroup$
      – Kevin
      Sep 2 '15 at 13:00










    • $begingroup$
      @Kevin Fair enough, I'll remember that for future use!
      $endgroup$
      – Eborbob
      Sep 2 '15 at 13:04






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Hackiisan $#(2)+2=sqrt{9}$ isn't trivial, and doesn't ignore the value of any number but the first. One could argue the 'accepted' answer ignores the value of one of the numbers, because any two equal numbers will result in an acceptable result.
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 2 '15 at 16:42
















    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    What about :




    $2div2=#{9}$




    In case I got the symbols wrong, what I am trying to say is:




    two divided by two equals the cardinality of the set of numbers that just contains the number nine







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    What about :




    $2div2=#{9}$




    In case I got the symbols wrong, what I am trying to say is:




    two divided by two equals the cardinality of the set of numbers that just contains the number nine








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 2 '15 at 4:39









    GentlePurpleRain

    17.1k569137




    17.1k569137










    answered Sep 2 '15 at 4:31









    KevinKevin

    1,634419




    1,634419












    • $begingroup$
      Nice! While I can't say this is wrong (similar to Anachor's answer), it goes against the spirit of this puzzle by ignoring the value of the number. Otherwise, many other trivial answers exist, such as $(#(2)+2)! = 9$ or $#(2) + 2 = sqrt{9}$. I would have edited the question to reflect this, but the correct solution has already appeared =P
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 7:15












    • $begingroup$
      This solution also uses 4 symbols - not the allowed 3.
      $endgroup$
      – Eborbob
      Sep 2 '15 at 12:50










    • $begingroup$
      @Eborbob Parentheses and brackets are always used a unit and I would consider them to be one symbol. Based on his comments on other answers, Hackiisan seems to agree with me.
      $endgroup$
      – Kevin
      Sep 2 '15 at 13:00










    • $begingroup$
      @Kevin Fair enough, I'll remember that for future use!
      $endgroup$
      – Eborbob
      Sep 2 '15 at 13:04






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Hackiisan $#(2)+2=sqrt{9}$ isn't trivial, and doesn't ignore the value of any number but the first. One could argue the 'accepted' answer ignores the value of one of the numbers, because any two equal numbers will result in an acceptable result.
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 2 '15 at 16:42




















    • $begingroup$
      Nice! While I can't say this is wrong (similar to Anachor's answer), it goes against the spirit of this puzzle by ignoring the value of the number. Otherwise, many other trivial answers exist, such as $(#(2)+2)! = 9$ or $#(2) + 2 = sqrt{9}$. I would have edited the question to reflect this, but the correct solution has already appeared =P
      $endgroup$
      – Hackiisan
      Sep 2 '15 at 7:15












    • $begingroup$
      This solution also uses 4 symbols - not the allowed 3.
      $endgroup$
      – Eborbob
      Sep 2 '15 at 12:50










    • $begingroup$
      @Eborbob Parentheses and brackets are always used a unit and I would consider them to be one symbol. Based on his comments on other answers, Hackiisan seems to agree with me.
      $endgroup$
      – Kevin
      Sep 2 '15 at 13:00










    • $begingroup$
      @Kevin Fair enough, I'll remember that for future use!
      $endgroup$
      – Eborbob
      Sep 2 '15 at 13:04






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Hackiisan $#(2)+2=sqrt{9}$ isn't trivial, and doesn't ignore the value of any number but the first. One could argue the 'accepted' answer ignores the value of one of the numbers, because any two equal numbers will result in an acceptable result.
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 2 '15 at 16:42


















    $begingroup$
    Nice! While I can't say this is wrong (similar to Anachor's answer), it goes against the spirit of this puzzle by ignoring the value of the number. Otherwise, many other trivial answers exist, such as $(#(2)+2)! = 9$ or $#(2) + 2 = sqrt{9}$. I would have edited the question to reflect this, but the correct solution has already appeared =P
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 7:15






    $begingroup$
    Nice! While I can't say this is wrong (similar to Anachor's answer), it goes against the spirit of this puzzle by ignoring the value of the number. Otherwise, many other trivial answers exist, such as $(#(2)+2)! = 9$ or $#(2) + 2 = sqrt{9}$. I would have edited the question to reflect this, but the correct solution has already appeared =P
    $endgroup$
    – Hackiisan
    Sep 2 '15 at 7:15














    $begingroup$
    This solution also uses 4 symbols - not the allowed 3.
    $endgroup$
    – Eborbob
    Sep 2 '15 at 12:50




    $begingroup$
    This solution also uses 4 symbols - not the allowed 3.
    $endgroup$
    – Eborbob
    Sep 2 '15 at 12:50












    $begingroup$
    @Eborbob Parentheses and brackets are always used a unit and I would consider them to be one symbol. Based on his comments on other answers, Hackiisan seems to agree with me.
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Sep 2 '15 at 13:00




    $begingroup$
    @Eborbob Parentheses and brackets are always used a unit and I would consider them to be one symbol. Based on his comments on other answers, Hackiisan seems to agree with me.
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Sep 2 '15 at 13:00












    $begingroup$
    @Kevin Fair enough, I'll remember that for future use!
    $endgroup$
    – Eborbob
    Sep 2 '15 at 13:04




    $begingroup$
    @Kevin Fair enough, I'll remember that for future use!
    $endgroup$
    – Eborbob
    Sep 2 '15 at 13:04




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @Hackiisan $#(2)+2=sqrt{9}$ isn't trivial, and doesn't ignore the value of any number but the first. One could argue the 'accepted' answer ignores the value of one of the numbers, because any two equal numbers will result in an acceptable result.
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 2 '15 at 16:42






    $begingroup$
    @Hackiisan $#(2)+2=sqrt{9}$ isn't trivial, and doesn't ignore the value of any number but the first. One could argue the 'accepted' answer ignores the value of one of the numbers, because any two equal numbers will result in an acceptable result.
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 2 '15 at 16:42













    4












    $begingroup$

    How about this?




    $lfloorsqrt{2}rfloor + 2 = sqrt{9}$




    Oops, that is 4 symbols. Thanks @corsiKa.



    This one uses three symbols:




    $2 - 2 = lfloor9%rfloor$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That's four - floor, sqrt, plus, sqrt
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 2 '15 at 16:37
















    4












    $begingroup$

    How about this?




    $lfloorsqrt{2}rfloor + 2 = sqrt{9}$




    Oops, that is 4 symbols. Thanks @corsiKa.



    This one uses three symbols:




    $2 - 2 = lfloor9%rfloor$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That's four - floor, sqrt, plus, sqrt
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 2 '15 at 16:37














    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    How about this?




    $lfloorsqrt{2}rfloor + 2 = sqrt{9}$




    Oops, that is 4 symbols. Thanks @corsiKa.



    This one uses three symbols:




    $2 - 2 = lfloor9%rfloor$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    How about this?




    $lfloorsqrt{2}rfloor + 2 = sqrt{9}$




    Oops, that is 4 symbols. Thanks @corsiKa.



    This one uses three symbols:




    $2 - 2 = lfloor9%rfloor$








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 2 '15 at 17:24

























    answered Sep 2 '15 at 14:24









    user2023861user2023861

    76249




    76249








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That's four - floor, sqrt, plus, sqrt
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 2 '15 at 16:37














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That's four - floor, sqrt, plus, sqrt
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Sep 2 '15 at 16:37








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    That's four - floor, sqrt, plus, sqrt
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 2 '15 at 16:37




    $begingroup$
    That's four - floor, sqrt, plus, sqrt
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Sep 2 '15 at 16:37











    2












    $begingroup$

    How about




    $2'cdot 2' = 9$, where $(,cdot,)'$ denotes the successor function.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      By that logic, I can always define (⋅)′ to always return 3, irrespective of what is inside. (⋅)′ is not standard notation for the successor function, which means you will have to add letters after these 3 operators to explain what you mean.
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:08










    • $begingroup$
      I'm pretty sure that $(,cdot,)'$ is a standard notation for the successor function. At least this is the notation I learned when I was in school. And it is not far fetched to recognise it as such.
      $endgroup$
      – Claudius
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:11










    • $begingroup$
      Can you provide any links to text where such a notation is used? (Hopefully one that isn't too obscure)
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:16










    • $begingroup$
      see this question on math.stackexchange: math.stackexchange.com/questions/643374/… There is a reference to Kleene’s Mathematical Logic that uses this notation.
      $endgroup$
      – Claudius
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:28












    • $begingroup$
      I stand corrected. Although this is not as common as you expect, indicated by the accepted answer in the above question pointing out that S(n) is a more common notation.
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:31


















    2












    $begingroup$

    How about




    $2'cdot 2' = 9$, where $(,cdot,)'$ denotes the successor function.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      By that logic, I can always define (⋅)′ to always return 3, irrespective of what is inside. (⋅)′ is not standard notation for the successor function, which means you will have to add letters after these 3 operators to explain what you mean.
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:08










    • $begingroup$
      I'm pretty sure that $(,cdot,)'$ is a standard notation for the successor function. At least this is the notation I learned when I was in school. And it is not far fetched to recognise it as such.
      $endgroup$
      – Claudius
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:11










    • $begingroup$
      Can you provide any links to text where such a notation is used? (Hopefully one that isn't too obscure)
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:16










    • $begingroup$
      see this question on math.stackexchange: math.stackexchange.com/questions/643374/… There is a reference to Kleene’s Mathematical Logic that uses this notation.
      $endgroup$
      – Claudius
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:28












    • $begingroup$
      I stand corrected. Although this is not as common as you expect, indicated by the accepted answer in the above question pointing out that S(n) is a more common notation.
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:31
















    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    How about




    $2'cdot 2' = 9$, where $(,cdot,)'$ denotes the successor function.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    How about




    $2'cdot 2' = 9$, where $(,cdot,)'$ denotes the successor function.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 3 '15 at 12:51









    ClaudiusClaudius

    1211




    1211












    • $begingroup$
      By that logic, I can always define (⋅)′ to always return 3, irrespective of what is inside. (⋅)′ is not standard notation for the successor function, which means you will have to add letters after these 3 operators to explain what you mean.
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:08










    • $begingroup$
      I'm pretty sure that $(,cdot,)'$ is a standard notation for the successor function. At least this is the notation I learned when I was in school. And it is not far fetched to recognise it as such.
      $endgroup$
      – Claudius
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:11










    • $begingroup$
      Can you provide any links to text where such a notation is used? (Hopefully one that isn't too obscure)
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:16










    • $begingroup$
      see this question on math.stackexchange: math.stackexchange.com/questions/643374/… There is a reference to Kleene’s Mathematical Logic that uses this notation.
      $endgroup$
      – Claudius
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:28












    • $begingroup$
      I stand corrected. Although this is not as common as you expect, indicated by the accepted answer in the above question pointing out that S(n) is a more common notation.
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:31




















    • $begingroup$
      By that logic, I can always define (⋅)′ to always return 3, irrespective of what is inside. (⋅)′ is not standard notation for the successor function, which means you will have to add letters after these 3 operators to explain what you mean.
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:08










    • $begingroup$
      I'm pretty sure that $(,cdot,)'$ is a standard notation for the successor function. At least this is the notation I learned when I was in school. And it is not far fetched to recognise it as such.
      $endgroup$
      – Claudius
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:11










    • $begingroup$
      Can you provide any links to text where such a notation is used? (Hopefully one that isn't too obscure)
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:16










    • $begingroup$
      see this question on math.stackexchange: math.stackexchange.com/questions/643374/… There is a reference to Kleene’s Mathematical Logic that uses this notation.
      $endgroup$
      – Claudius
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:28












    • $begingroup$
      I stand corrected. Although this is not as common as you expect, indicated by the accepted answer in the above question pointing out that S(n) is a more common notation.
      $endgroup$
      – CodeNewbie
      Sep 3 '15 at 13:31


















    $begingroup$
    By that logic, I can always define (⋅)′ to always return 3, irrespective of what is inside. (⋅)′ is not standard notation for the successor function, which means you will have to add letters after these 3 operators to explain what you mean.
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:08




    $begingroup$
    By that logic, I can always define (⋅)′ to always return 3, irrespective of what is inside. (⋅)′ is not standard notation for the successor function, which means you will have to add letters after these 3 operators to explain what you mean.
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:08












    $begingroup$
    I'm pretty sure that $(,cdot,)'$ is a standard notation for the successor function. At least this is the notation I learned when I was in school. And it is not far fetched to recognise it as such.
    $endgroup$
    – Claudius
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:11




    $begingroup$
    I'm pretty sure that $(,cdot,)'$ is a standard notation for the successor function. At least this is the notation I learned when I was in school. And it is not far fetched to recognise it as such.
    $endgroup$
    – Claudius
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:11












    $begingroup$
    Can you provide any links to text where such a notation is used? (Hopefully one that isn't too obscure)
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:16




    $begingroup$
    Can you provide any links to text where such a notation is used? (Hopefully one that isn't too obscure)
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:16












    $begingroup$
    see this question on math.stackexchange: math.stackexchange.com/questions/643374/… There is a reference to Kleene’s Mathematical Logic that uses this notation.
    $endgroup$
    – Claudius
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:28






    $begingroup$
    see this question on math.stackexchange: math.stackexchange.com/questions/643374/… There is a reference to Kleene’s Mathematical Logic that uses this notation.
    $endgroup$
    – Claudius
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:28














    $begingroup$
    I stand corrected. Although this is not as common as you expect, indicated by the accepted answer in the above question pointing out that S(n) is a more common notation.
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:31






    $begingroup$
    I stand corrected. Although this is not as common as you expect, indicated by the accepted answer in the above question pointing out that S(n) is a more common notation.
    $endgroup$
    – CodeNewbie
    Sep 3 '15 at 13:31













    2












    $begingroup$

    If we can assume these digits are measured we get:




    2 + √2 = √9 (true to one significant figure)







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      If we can assume these digits are measured we get:




      2 + √2 = √9 (true to one significant figure)







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        If we can assume these digits are measured we get:




        2 + √2 = √9 (true to one significant figure)







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If we can assume these digits are measured we get:




        2 + √2 = √9 (true to one significant figure)








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 8 '16 at 7:27









        Paul EvansPaul Evans

        8,50821946




        8,50821946























            2












            $begingroup$

            With 2 mathematical operations:




            $ 2-2={9} $







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$









            • 3




              $begingroup$
              {} is the fractional part of a number. Clarifying because a set is used in another answer
              $endgroup$
              – Artem Lugin
              yesterday
















            2












            $begingroup$

            With 2 mathematical operations:




            $ 2-2={9} $







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$









            • 3




              $begingroup$
              {} is the fractional part of a number. Clarifying because a set is used in another answer
              $endgroup$
              – Artem Lugin
              yesterday














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            With 2 mathematical operations:




            $ 2-2={9} $







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            With 2 mathematical operations:




            $ 2-2={9} $








            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited yesterday









            PiIsNot3

            2,005329




            2,005329






            New contributor




            Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered yesterday









            Artem LuginArtem Lugin

            536




            536




            New contributor




            Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            • 3




              $begingroup$
              {} is the fractional part of a number. Clarifying because a set is used in another answer
              $endgroup$
              – Artem Lugin
              yesterday














            • 3




              $begingroup$
              {} is the fractional part of a number. Clarifying because a set is used in another answer
              $endgroup$
              – Artem Lugin
              yesterday








            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            {} is the fractional part of a number. Clarifying because a set is used in another answer
            $endgroup$
            – Artem Lugin
            yesterday




            $begingroup$
            {} is the fractional part of a number. Clarifying because a set is used in another answer
            $endgroup$
            – Artem Lugin
            yesterday





            protected by Aza Sep 3 '15 at 18:46



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

            Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области