Chess with symmetric move-square












5












$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?







chess checkerboard knight-moves







share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    yesterday
















5












$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?







chess checkerboard knight-moves







share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    yesterday














5












5








5





$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?







chess checkerboard knight-moves







share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?







chess checkerboard knight-moves




chess checkerboard knight-moves






share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Brandon_J

3,573244




3,573244






New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Artem LuginArtem Lugin

536




536




New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
yesterday




$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




2




2




$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
yesterday




$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (3rd attempt)




I got it! 5 moves:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rh3 Rh6 4. d3 d6 5. Rxh6 Apronus link

The h3 square is covered by the black bishop.

Note that 5 is the absolute minimum number of moves needed, since it takes at least 3 moves to make the rooks attack each other, and they can’t directly take each other on the 4th move.




R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked was the inspiration. Thought I'd spice it up. a-Rook takes h-rook looks very interesting as well
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t see any alternative for black here....help please.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Great job! Marked as correct
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @ArtemLugin While you're free to Accept whichever answer you think best addresses the puzzle, it's a bit unclear why you would select one that only answers one of the three parts of your question. Did you mean to pick this one?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    yesterday



















5












$begingroup$

Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The shortest is 5 white moves
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81507%2fchess-with-symmetric-move-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (3rd attempt)




I got it! 5 moves:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rh3 Rh6 4. d3 d6 5. Rxh6 Apronus link

The h3 square is covered by the black bishop.

Note that 5 is the absolute minimum number of moves needed, since it takes at least 3 moves to make the rooks attack each other, and they can’t directly take each other on the 4th move.




R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked was the inspiration. Thought I'd spice it up. a-Rook takes h-rook looks very interesting as well
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t see any alternative for black here....help please.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Great job! Marked as correct
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @ArtemLugin While you're free to Accept whichever answer you think best addresses the puzzle, it's a bit unclear why you would select one that only answers one of the three parts of your question. Did you mean to pick this one?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    yesterday
















5












$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (3rd attempt)




I got it! 5 moves:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rh3 Rh6 4. d3 d6 5. Rxh6 Apronus link

The h3 square is covered by the black bishop.

Note that 5 is the absolute minimum number of moves needed, since it takes at least 3 moves to make the rooks attack each other, and they can’t directly take each other on the 4th move.




R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked was the inspiration. Thought I'd spice it up. a-Rook takes h-rook looks very interesting as well
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t see any alternative for black here....help please.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Great job! Marked as correct
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @ArtemLugin While you're free to Accept whichever answer you think best addresses the puzzle, it's a bit unclear why you would select one that only answers one of the three parts of your question. Did you mean to pick this one?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    yesterday














5












5








5





$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (3rd attempt)




I got it! 5 moves:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rh3 Rh6 4. d3 d6 5. Rxh6 Apronus link

The h3 square is covered by the black bishop.

Note that 5 is the absolute minimum number of moves needed, since it takes at least 3 moves to make the rooks attack each other, and they can’t directly take each other on the 4th move.




R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (3rd attempt)




I got it! 5 moves:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rh3 Rh6 4. d3 d6 5. Rxh6 Apronus link

The h3 square is covered by the black bishop.

Note that 5 is the absolute minimum number of moves needed, since it takes at least 3 moves to make the rooks attack each other, and they can’t directly take each other on the 4th move.




R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









PiIsNot3PiIsNot3

2,005329




2,005329












  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked was the inspiration. Thought I'd spice it up. a-Rook takes h-rook looks very interesting as well
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t see any alternative for black here....help please.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Great job! Marked as correct
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @ArtemLugin While you're free to Accept whichever answer you think best addresses the puzzle, it's a bit unclear why you would select one that only answers one of the three parts of your question. Did you mean to pick this one?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked was the inspiration. Thought I'd spice it up. a-Rook takes h-rook looks very interesting as well
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t see any alternative for black here....help please.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Great job! Marked as correct
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @ArtemLugin While you're free to Accept whichever answer you think best addresses the puzzle, it's a bit unclear why you would select one that only answers one of the three parts of your question. Did you mean to pick this one?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




$begingroup$
You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday












$begingroup$
The question you linked was the inspiration. Thought I'd spice it up. a-Rook takes h-rook looks very interesting as well
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




$begingroup$
The question you linked was the inspiration. Thought I'd spice it up. a-Rook takes h-rook looks very interesting as well
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday












$begingroup$
I don’t see any alternative for black here....help please.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday






$begingroup$
I don’t see any alternative for black here....help please.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday














$begingroup$
Great job! Marked as correct
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




$begingroup$
Great job! Marked as correct
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday












$begingroup$
@ArtemLugin While you're free to Accept whichever answer you think best addresses the puzzle, it's a bit unclear why you would select one that only answers one of the three parts of your question. Did you mean to pick this one?
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
yesterday




$begingroup$
@ArtemLugin While you're free to Accept whichever answer you think best addresses the puzzle, it's a bit unclear why you would select one that only answers one of the three parts of your question. Did you mean to pick this one?
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
yesterday











5












$begingroup$

Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The shortest is 5 white moves
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday
















5












$begingroup$

Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The shortest is 5 white moves
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday














5












5








5





$begingroup$

Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay

64815




64815












  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The shortest is 5 white moves
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The shortest is 5 white moves
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday




$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday






$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday














$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday




$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
yesterday




$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
yesterday




2




2




$begingroup$
The shortest is 5 white moves
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday




$begingroup$
The shortest is 5 white moves
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
yesterday










Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81507%2fchess-with-symmetric-move-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Masuk log Menu navigasi

Image
JawaSundaBanyumasanBugisAcehBanjarMinangMelayuDeutschEnglishEspañolFrançaisItalianoNederlands (function()var node=document.getElementById("mw-dismissablenotice-anonplace");if(node)node.outerHTML="u003Cdiv class="mw-dismissable-notice"u003Eu003Cdiv class="mw-dismissable-notice-close"u003E[u003Ca tabindex="0" role="button"u003Etutupu003C/au003E]u003C/divu003Eu003Cdiv class="mw-dismissable-notice-body"u003Eu003Cdiv id="localNotice" lang="id" dir="ltr"u003Eu003C/divu003Eu003C/divu003Eu003C/divu003E";()); Masuk log Loncat ke navigasi Loncat ke pencarian Bahasa: Jawa | Sunda | Banyumasan | Bugis | Aceh | Banjar | Minang | Melayu | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands Nama pengguna Kata sandi   Biarkan saya tetap masuk Masuk log Bantuan masuk log Lupa kata sandi? Belum punya akun?Gabung Wikipedia Diperoleh dari "https:/...
Read more

Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

Image
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up? Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium? gnu parallel how to use with ffmpeg Has any spacecraft ever had the ability to directly communicate with civilian air traffic control? Reverse the word in a string with the same order in javascript Is creating your own "experiment" considered cheating during a physics exam? How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian? What is a Recurrent Neural Network? Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears? Confusion about capacitors TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes? Does a creature that is immune to a condition still make a saving throw? How to verbalise code in Mathematica? Upright [...] in italics quotation Cannot populate data in lightning data table Stark VS Thanos Binary Numbers Magic Trick In gnome-terminal only 2 out of 3 zoom keys work You look catfish vs You look like a...
Read more

Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области

Image
Населённые пункты по алфавитуНаселённые пункты Волосовского районаМызы Ингрии Беседском сельском поселенииВолосовского районаЛенинградской областиПисцово...
Read more