What's the hand of the lonely man?
$begingroup$
Albert, Fred, Larry, Ron and Patrick are playing cards at Albert’s house with a regular 52 card deck that is missing all the 2s. Patrick has 10 cards, none of which are higher than 6. Ron has 13 cards, but has no royalty or love. In Fred’s hand are 9 cards, none of which are the same number, but all are the same color and nothing is higher than 11. Larry has 15 cards, each of a different shape and spaced 5 apart. Five of his cards equal to 56 and a king can only be found in his hands. Only 2 people have a 7 and 3 have an 8. One person is exclusive and holds all of the same. Lonely is one man with only one card to his name. So, what’s the pattern to the name of this game, that’ll crack the code to reveal the hand of the lonely man, and the owner of the game?
logical-deduction pattern
New contributor
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Albert, Fred, Larry, Ron and Patrick are playing cards at Albert’s house with a regular 52 card deck that is missing all the 2s. Patrick has 10 cards, none of which are higher than 6. Ron has 13 cards, but has no royalty or love. In Fred’s hand are 9 cards, none of which are the same number, but all are the same color and nothing is higher than 11. Larry has 15 cards, each of a different shape and spaced 5 apart. Five of his cards equal to 56 and a king can only be found in his hands. Only 2 people have a 7 and 3 have an 8. One person is exclusive and holds all of the same. Lonely is one man with only one card to his name. So, what’s the pattern to the name of this game, that’ll crack the code to reveal the hand of the lonely man, and the owner of the game?
logical-deduction pattern
New contributor
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 11:54
$begingroup$
What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:41
2
$begingroup$
Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 12:48
1
$begingroup$
Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Oi. Those tags, though ...
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Apr 2 at 16:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Albert, Fred, Larry, Ron and Patrick are playing cards at Albert’s house with a regular 52 card deck that is missing all the 2s. Patrick has 10 cards, none of which are higher than 6. Ron has 13 cards, but has no royalty or love. In Fred’s hand are 9 cards, none of which are the same number, but all are the same color and nothing is higher than 11. Larry has 15 cards, each of a different shape and spaced 5 apart. Five of his cards equal to 56 and a king can only be found in his hands. Only 2 people have a 7 and 3 have an 8. One person is exclusive and holds all of the same. Lonely is one man with only one card to his name. So, what’s the pattern to the name of this game, that’ll crack the code to reveal the hand of the lonely man, and the owner of the game?
logical-deduction pattern
New contributor
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Albert, Fred, Larry, Ron and Patrick are playing cards at Albert’s house with a regular 52 card deck that is missing all the 2s. Patrick has 10 cards, none of which are higher than 6. Ron has 13 cards, but has no royalty or love. In Fred’s hand are 9 cards, none of which are the same number, but all are the same color and nothing is higher than 11. Larry has 15 cards, each of a different shape and spaced 5 apart. Five of his cards equal to 56 and a king can only be found in his hands. Only 2 people have a 7 and 3 have an 8. One person is exclusive and holds all of the same. Lonely is one man with only one card to his name. So, what’s the pattern to the name of this game, that’ll crack the code to reveal the hand of the lonely man, and the owner of the game?
logical-deduction pattern
logical-deduction pattern
New contributor
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 1 at 11:22
Rudy MatunicRudy Matunic
655
655
New contributor
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 11:54
$begingroup$
What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:41
2
$begingroup$
Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 12:48
1
$begingroup$
Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Oi. Those tags, though ...
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Apr 2 at 16:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 11:54
$begingroup$
What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:41
2
$begingroup$
Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 12:48
1
$begingroup$
Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Oi. Those tags, though ...
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Apr 2 at 16:20
$begingroup$
What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 11:54
$begingroup$
What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 11:54
$begingroup$
What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:41
$begingroup$
What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:41
2
2
$begingroup$
Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 12:48
$begingroup$
Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 12:48
1
1
$begingroup$
Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Oi. Those tags, though ...
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Apr 2 at 16:20
$begingroup$
Oi. Those tags, though ...
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Apr 2 at 16:20
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Albert
Patrick
Ron
In
Larry
Five
Only
One
Lonely
So
Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.
New contributor
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial
As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is
Albert
since
He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.
In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have
4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial solution.
Assumptions:
Love means Hearts.
Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.
Summarise the direct information:
Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
Albert holds 1 card.
Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.
If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.
In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.
Which means that
Ace is low.
Summarise again:
Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
Albert holds 1 card.
Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.
So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).
There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.
One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.
This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).
but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.
Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.
So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.
Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.
So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.
Partial table of cards held
Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
$endgroup$
– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:15
1
$begingroup$
@user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81263%2fwhats-the-hand-of-the-lonely-man%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Albert
Patrick
Ron
In
Larry
Five
Only
One
Lonely
So
Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.
New contributor
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Albert
Patrick
Ron
In
Larry
Five
Only
One
Lonely
So
Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.
New contributor
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Albert
Patrick
Ron
In
Larry
Five
Only
One
Lonely
So
Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.
New contributor
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Albert
Patrick
Ron
In
Larry
Five
Only
One
Lonely
So
Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.
New contributor
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 2 at 5:01
JonMark Perry
20.6k64099
20.6k64099
New contributor
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Apr 2 at 4:27
Mr.Puzzler2000Mr.Puzzler2000
662
662
New contributor
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:23
$begingroup$
Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:23
$begingroup$
Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial
As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is
Albert
since
He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.
In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have
4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial
As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is
Albert
since
He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.
In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have
4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial
As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is
Albert
since
He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.
In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have
4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"
$endgroup$
Partial
As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is
Albert
since
He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.
In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have
4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"
edited Apr 1 at 12:55
answered Apr 1 at 12:42
MohirlMohirl
2,517719
2,517719
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial solution.
Assumptions:
Love means Hearts.
Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.
Summarise the direct information:
Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
Albert holds 1 card.
Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.
If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.
In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.
Which means that
Ace is low.
Summarise again:
Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
Albert holds 1 card.
Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.
So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).
There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.
One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.
This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).
but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.
Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.
So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.
Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.
So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.
Partial table of cards held
Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
$endgroup$
– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:15
1
$begingroup$
@user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial solution.
Assumptions:
Love means Hearts.
Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.
Summarise the direct information:
Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
Albert holds 1 card.
Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.
If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.
In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.
Which means that
Ace is low.
Summarise again:
Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
Albert holds 1 card.
Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.
So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).
There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.
One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.
This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).
but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.
Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.
So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.
Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.
So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.
Partial table of cards held
Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
$endgroup$
– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:15
1
$begingroup$
@user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial solution.
Assumptions:
Love means Hearts.
Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.
Summarise the direct information:
Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
Albert holds 1 card.
Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.
If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.
In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.
Which means that
Ace is low.
Summarise again:
Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
Albert holds 1 card.
Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.
So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).
There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.
One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.
This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).
but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.
Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.
So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.
Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.
So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.
Partial table of cards held
Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.
$endgroup$
Partial solution.
Assumptions:
Love means Hearts.
Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.
Summarise the direct information:
Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
Albert holds 1 card.
Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.
If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.
In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.
Which means that
Ace is low.
Summarise again:
Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
Albert holds 1 card.
Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.
So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).
There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.
One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.
This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:
3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or
3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).
but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.
Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.
So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.
Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.
So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.
Partial table of cards held
Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.
edited Apr 2 at 0:17
answered Apr 1 at 12:16
Weather VaneWeather Vane
2,117112
2,117112
1
$begingroup$
I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
$endgroup$
– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:15
1
$begingroup$
@user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:27
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
$endgroup$
– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:15
1
$begingroup$
@user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:27
1
1
$begingroup$
I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
$endgroup$
– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:15
$begingroup$
I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
$endgroup$
– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:15
1
1
$begingroup$
@user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:27
$begingroup$
@user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 2 at 9:27
add a comment |
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81263%2fwhats-the-hand-of-the-lonely-man%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 11:54
$begingroup$
What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:41
2
$begingroup$
Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 12:48
1
$begingroup$
Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Oi. Those tags, though ...
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Apr 2 at 16:20