What's the hand of the lonely man?












4












$begingroup$


Albert, Fred, Larry, Ron and Patrick are playing cards at Albert’s house with a regular 52 card deck that is missing all the 2s. Patrick has 10 cards, none of which are higher than 6. Ron has 13 cards, but has no royalty or love. In Fred’s hand are 9 cards, none of which are the same number, but all are the same color and nothing is higher than 11. Larry has 15 cards, each of a different shape and spaced 5 apart. Five of his cards equal to 56 and a king can only be found in his hands. Only 2 people have a 7 and 3 have an 8. One person is exclusive and holds all of the same. Lonely is one man with only one card to his name. So, what’s the pattern to the name of this game, that’ll crack the code to reveal the hand of the lonely man, and the owner of the game?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 1 at 11:54










  • $begingroup$
    What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohirl
    Apr 1 at 12:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 1 at 12:48








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohirl
    Apr 1 at 12:57










  • $begingroup$
    Oi. Those tags, though ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 2 at 16:20
















4












$begingroup$


Albert, Fred, Larry, Ron and Patrick are playing cards at Albert’s house with a regular 52 card deck that is missing all the 2s. Patrick has 10 cards, none of which are higher than 6. Ron has 13 cards, but has no royalty or love. In Fred’s hand are 9 cards, none of which are the same number, but all are the same color and nothing is higher than 11. Larry has 15 cards, each of a different shape and spaced 5 apart. Five of his cards equal to 56 and a king can only be found in his hands. Only 2 people have a 7 and 3 have an 8. One person is exclusive and holds all of the same. Lonely is one man with only one card to his name. So, what’s the pattern to the name of this game, that’ll crack the code to reveal the hand of the lonely man, and the owner of the game?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 1 at 11:54










  • $begingroup$
    What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohirl
    Apr 1 at 12:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 1 at 12:48








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohirl
    Apr 1 at 12:57










  • $begingroup$
    Oi. Those tags, though ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 2 at 16:20














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


Albert, Fred, Larry, Ron and Patrick are playing cards at Albert’s house with a regular 52 card deck that is missing all the 2s. Patrick has 10 cards, none of which are higher than 6. Ron has 13 cards, but has no royalty or love. In Fred’s hand are 9 cards, none of which are the same number, but all are the same color and nothing is higher than 11. Larry has 15 cards, each of a different shape and spaced 5 apart. Five of his cards equal to 56 and a king can only be found in his hands. Only 2 people have a 7 and 3 have an 8. One person is exclusive and holds all of the same. Lonely is one man with only one card to his name. So, what’s the pattern to the name of this game, that’ll crack the code to reveal the hand of the lonely man, and the owner of the game?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Albert, Fred, Larry, Ron and Patrick are playing cards at Albert’s house with a regular 52 card deck that is missing all the 2s. Patrick has 10 cards, none of which are higher than 6. Ron has 13 cards, but has no royalty or love. In Fred’s hand are 9 cards, none of which are the same number, but all are the same color and nothing is higher than 11. Larry has 15 cards, each of a different shape and spaced 5 apart. Five of his cards equal to 56 and a king can only be found in his hands. Only 2 people have a 7 and 3 have an 8. One person is exclusive and holds all of the same. Lonely is one man with only one card to his name. So, what’s the pattern to the name of this game, that’ll crack the code to reveal the hand of the lonely man, and the owner of the game?







logical-deduction pattern






share|improve this question







New contributor




Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 1 at 11:22









Rudy MatunicRudy Matunic

655




655




New contributor




Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Rudy Matunic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 1 at 11:54










  • $begingroup$
    What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohirl
    Apr 1 at 12:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 1 at 12:48








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohirl
    Apr 1 at 12:57










  • $begingroup$
    Oi. Those tags, though ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 2 at 16:20


















  • $begingroup$
    What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 1 at 11:54










  • $begingroup$
    What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohirl
    Apr 1 at 12:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 1 at 12:48








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohirl
    Apr 1 at 12:57










  • $begingroup$
    Oi. Those tags, though ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 2 at 16:20
















$begingroup$
What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 11:54




$begingroup$
What does "Five of his cards equal to 56" mean?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 11:54












$begingroup$
What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:41




$begingroup$
What does "each of a different shape" mean for Larry?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:41




2




2




$begingroup$
Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 12:48






$begingroup$
Larry holds 15 cards with all the Kings. His cards are spaced by 5 so he must hold 3-8-13 in four suits and 1-6-11 in one suit. So Larry is holding all the Eights, and there can't be three players holding an Eight. What have I missed or misunderstood?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
Apr 1 at 12:48






1




1




$begingroup$
Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:57




$begingroup$
Larry must also have at least rot13(3 Dhrraf), so the spaced by 5 makes no sense?
$endgroup$
– Mohirl
Apr 1 at 12:57












$begingroup$
Oi. Those tags, though ...
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Apr 2 at 16:20




$begingroup$
Oi. Those tags, though ...
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Apr 2 at 16:20










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$


Albert
Patrick
Ron
In
Larry
Five
Only
One
Lonely
So




Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 2 at 9:23



















2












$begingroup$

Partial



As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is




Albert




since




He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.




In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have




4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Partial solution.




    Assumptions:
    Love means Hearts.
    Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.


    Summarise the direct information:
    Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
    Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
    Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
    Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
    Albert holds 1 card.


    Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.

    If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.

    In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.

    Which means that
    Ace is low.


    Summarise again:
    Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
    Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
    Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
    Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
    Albert holds 1 card.


    Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.

    So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:

    3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

    4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

    3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).

    There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.


    One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.

    This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:

    3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

    4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

    3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).

    but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
    Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
    Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
    Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.


    Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.

    So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.


    Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.

    So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.




    Partial table of cards held






    Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
    Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
    Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
    Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
    Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -



    This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
      $endgroup$
      – user45266
      Apr 2 at 5:15






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
      $endgroup$
      – Weather Vane
      Apr 2 at 9:27














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81263%2fwhats-the-hand-of-the-lonely-man%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$


    Albert
    Patrick
    Ron
    In
    Larry
    Five
    Only
    One
    Lonely
    So




    Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
      $endgroup$
      – Weather Vane
      Apr 2 at 9:23
















    5












    $begingroup$


    Albert
    Patrick
    Ron
    In
    Larry
    Five
    Only
    One
    Lonely
    So




    Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
      $endgroup$
      – Weather Vane
      Apr 2 at 9:23














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$


    Albert
    Patrick
    Ron
    In
    Larry
    Five
    Only
    One
    Lonely
    So




    Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$




    Albert
    Patrick
    Ron
    In
    Larry
    Five
    Only
    One
    Lonely
    So




    Either that's a coincidence or Im guessing that's the pattern that cracks the code? Pretty interesting.







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 2 at 5:01









    JonMark Perry

    20.6k64099




    20.6k64099






    New contributor




    Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered Apr 2 at 4:27









    Mr.Puzzler2000Mr.Puzzler2000

    662




    662




    New contributor




    Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Mr.Puzzler2000 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • $begingroup$
      Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
      $endgroup$
      – Weather Vane
      Apr 2 at 9:23


















    • $begingroup$
      Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
      $endgroup$
      – Weather Vane
      Apr 2 at 9:23
















    $begingroup$
    Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 2 at 9:23




    $begingroup$
    Good spot. I looked for that but didn't see it but in hindsight it's obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    Apr 2 at 9:23











    2












    $begingroup$

    Partial



    As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is




    Albert




    since




    He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.




    In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have




    4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Partial



      As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is




      Albert




      since




      He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.




      In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have




      4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Partial



        As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is




        Albert




        since




        He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.




        In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have




        4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Partial



        As it stands, it seems fairly trivial that the "lonely man" is




        Albert




        since




        He's the only one whose hand isn't listed, and as the others hands total 47 out of a possibly 48, he must have the remaining card.




        In terms of working out the actual hands, Larry must have




        4 Kings (stated), at least 3 Queens (nobody else has higher than 11, except possibly Albert). It's not clear what "spaced 5 apart means"








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 1 at 12:55

























        answered Apr 1 at 12:42









        MohirlMohirl

        2,517719




        2,517719























            2












            $begingroup$

            Partial solution.




            Assumptions:
            Love means Hearts.
            Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.


            Summarise the direct information:
            Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
            Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
            Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
            Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
            Albert holds 1 card.


            Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.

            If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.

            In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.

            Which means that
            Ace is low.


            Summarise again:
            Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
            Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
            Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
            Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
            Albert holds 1 card.


            Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.

            So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:

            3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

            4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

            3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).

            There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.


            One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.

            This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:

            3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

            4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

            3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).

            but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
            Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
            Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
            Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.


            Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.

            So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.


            Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.

            So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.




            Partial table of cards held






            Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
            Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
            Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
            Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
            Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
            Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -



            This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
              $endgroup$
              – user45266
              Apr 2 at 5:15






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              Apr 2 at 9:27


















            2












            $begingroup$

            Partial solution.




            Assumptions:
            Love means Hearts.
            Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.


            Summarise the direct information:
            Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
            Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
            Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
            Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
            Albert holds 1 card.


            Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.

            If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.

            In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.

            Which means that
            Ace is low.


            Summarise again:
            Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
            Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
            Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
            Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
            Albert holds 1 card.


            Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.

            So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:

            3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

            4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

            3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).

            There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.


            One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.

            This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:

            3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

            4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

            3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).

            but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
            Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
            Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
            Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.


            Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.

            So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.


            Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.

            So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.




            Partial table of cards held






            Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
            Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
            Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
            Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
            Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
            Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -



            This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
              $endgroup$
              – user45266
              Apr 2 at 5:15






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              Apr 2 at 9:27
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Partial solution.




            Assumptions:
            Love means Hearts.
            Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.


            Summarise the direct information:
            Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
            Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
            Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
            Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
            Albert holds 1 card.


            Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.

            If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.

            In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.

            Which means that
            Ace is low.


            Summarise again:
            Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
            Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
            Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
            Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
            Albert holds 1 card.


            Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.

            So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:

            3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

            4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

            3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).

            There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.


            One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.

            This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:

            3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

            4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

            3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).

            but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
            Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
            Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
            Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.


            Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.

            So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.


            Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.

            So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.




            Partial table of cards held






            Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
            Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
            Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
            Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
            Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
            Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -



            This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Partial solution.




            Assumptions:
            Love means Hearts.
            Royalty means 10-11-12-13-1 as in Royal Flush and not 11-12-13 which are called Court Cards.


            Summarise the direct information:
            Patrick holds 10 cards up to $6$ in all suits.
            Ron holds 13 cards up to $9$ but no Hearts.
            Fred holds 9 cards up to $11$, no duplicate rank in Red or Black.
            Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings.
            Albert holds 1 card.


            Is Ace high or low? That matters because of "higher than $6$" etc.

            If Ace is high, then Patrick, Ron and Fred hold none, Albert perhaps one, so Larry has 3 or 4.

            In that case Larry must be holding at least 3x$1$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ which is 17 cards, less one that Albert might hold, which is still more than 15.

            Which means that
            Ace is low.


            Summarise again:
            Patrick holds 10 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6$. All suits.
            Ron holds 13 cards from $3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9$. No Hearts.
            Fred holds 9 cards from $1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11$. No duplicates. Red or Black.
            Larry holds 15 cards including 4 Kings. All suits.
            Albert holds 1 card.


            Fred must hold at least one of the $10$ and $11$, because he has 9 out of 10 possibilities.

            So Larry holds - all possibly one less because of Alberts's card:

            3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

            4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 or 15 cards), or

            3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (13 or 14 cards).

            There is a strange clue about Larry "spaced 5 apart", so let's assume that his highest other card is ($10$ - $5$) = $5$.


            One clue is "only 3 people have a $8$", who now must be Ron, Fred and Albert.

            This changes Larry's high-value cards to one out of:

            3x$10$, 4x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

            4x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (15 cards), or

            3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$ (14 cards).

            but since Larry has at least one lower card, it must be the last one:
            Larry holds 1x$5$, 3x$10$, 3x$11$, 4x$12$ and 4x$13$. Some unknown suits.
            Albert holds an $8$. Unknown suit.
            Fred holds both the $10$ and $11$.


            Now look at the $9$s, it must be Ron who holds 3x$9$ and Fred holds $9$ of Hearts.

            So Fred's two suits are Hearts and Diamonds.


            Another clue is "only 2 people have a $7$", who are Ron and Fred.

            So it must be Ron who holds 3x$7$ and Fred holds $7$ of Hearts.




            Partial table of cards held






            Cards 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
            Patrick 10 3 - - - - - - -
            Ron 13 - 3 2 3 - - - - No Hearts
            Fred 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - Hearts & Diamonds
            Larry 15 - - - 1 - - - - 3 3 4 4
            Albert 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - -



            This is as far as I have got, and there are some unsolved clues still.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 2 at 0:17

























            answered Apr 1 at 12:16









            Weather VaneWeather Vane

            2,117112




            2,117112








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
              $endgroup$
              – user45266
              Apr 2 at 5:15






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              Apr 2 at 9:27
















            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
              $endgroup$
              – user45266
              Apr 2 at 5:15






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              Apr 2 at 9:27










            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
            $endgroup$
            – user45266
            Apr 2 at 5:15




            $begingroup$
            I think it would be logical to assume that the "royalty" are K, Q, and J, rather than AKQJT. After all, the "count cards" have the royalty depicted on the actual card, which tens and aces do not. They are part of a royal flush, but still.
            $endgroup$
            – user45266
            Apr 2 at 5:15




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
            $endgroup$
            – Weather Vane
            Apr 2 at 9:27






            $begingroup$
            @user45266 I wondered that but I could only find references to "royalty" in respect of poker. Restricting them to J, Q, K makes the puzzle even more impossible to solve, but as another answer suggests, it could be foolish to take it any further. They are "court cards" and the Jack isn't royalty anyway.
            $endgroup$
            – Weather Vane
            Apr 2 at 9:27












            Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Rudy Matunic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81263%2fwhats-the-hand-of-the-lonely-man%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            16 Maret Daftar isi Peristiwa | Kelahiran | Meninggal | Hari raya dan peringatan | Menu navigasis

            ジョン・ファウルズ