Decimal to roman python





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







6












$begingroup$


I'm a beginner as you can see and I would like to know how I can improve my code. Studying for 6 months now. Thank you.



roman_dict = {1: 'I', 4: 'IV',  5: 'V', 9: 'IX', 10: 'X', 40: 'XL', 50: 'L', 90: 'XC', 100: 'C', 400: 'CD',
500: 'D', 900: 'CM', 1000: 'M'}

divide_list = [1000, 100, 10, 1]

def not_in_dict(fixed_decimal, divide_num):
sub_count = 0
sub_roman_multi = roman_dict[divide_num]
temp_decimal = fixed_decimal
while temp_decimal not in roman_dict:
temp_decimal -= divide_num
sub_count += 1
return roman_dict[temp_decimal]+(sub_count*sub_roman_multi)

def decimal_to_roman(decimal):
original_decimal = decimal
roman = ""
for divide_num in divide_list:
if decimal >= divide_num:
reminder = decimal//divide_num
if(reminder >= 1) and ((reminder*divide_num) in roman_dict):
roman += roman_dict[(reminder*divide_num)]
decimal -= reminder*divide_num
else:
roman += not_in_dict(reminder*divide_num, divide_num)
decimal -= (reminder*divide_num)
return str(original_decimal)+' = '+roman









share|improve this question









New contributor




Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



















    6












    $begingroup$


    I'm a beginner as you can see and I would like to know how I can improve my code. Studying for 6 months now. Thank you.



    roman_dict = {1: 'I', 4: 'IV',  5: 'V', 9: 'IX', 10: 'X', 40: 'XL', 50: 'L', 90: 'XC', 100: 'C', 400: 'CD',
    500: 'D', 900: 'CM', 1000: 'M'}

    divide_list = [1000, 100, 10, 1]

    def not_in_dict(fixed_decimal, divide_num):
    sub_count = 0
    sub_roman_multi = roman_dict[divide_num]
    temp_decimal = fixed_decimal
    while temp_decimal not in roman_dict:
    temp_decimal -= divide_num
    sub_count += 1
    return roman_dict[temp_decimal]+(sub_count*sub_roman_multi)

    def decimal_to_roman(decimal):
    original_decimal = decimal
    roman = ""
    for divide_num in divide_list:
    if decimal >= divide_num:
    reminder = decimal//divide_num
    if(reminder >= 1) and ((reminder*divide_num) in roman_dict):
    roman += roman_dict[(reminder*divide_num)]
    decimal -= reminder*divide_num
    else:
    roman += not_in_dict(reminder*divide_num, divide_num)
    decimal -= (reminder*divide_num)
    return str(original_decimal)+' = '+roman









    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      I'm a beginner as you can see and I would like to know how I can improve my code. Studying for 6 months now. Thank you.



      roman_dict = {1: 'I', 4: 'IV',  5: 'V', 9: 'IX', 10: 'X', 40: 'XL', 50: 'L', 90: 'XC', 100: 'C', 400: 'CD',
      500: 'D', 900: 'CM', 1000: 'M'}

      divide_list = [1000, 100, 10, 1]

      def not_in_dict(fixed_decimal, divide_num):
      sub_count = 0
      sub_roman_multi = roman_dict[divide_num]
      temp_decimal = fixed_decimal
      while temp_decimal not in roman_dict:
      temp_decimal -= divide_num
      sub_count += 1
      return roman_dict[temp_decimal]+(sub_count*sub_roman_multi)

      def decimal_to_roman(decimal):
      original_decimal = decimal
      roman = ""
      for divide_num in divide_list:
      if decimal >= divide_num:
      reminder = decimal//divide_num
      if(reminder >= 1) and ((reminder*divide_num) in roman_dict):
      roman += roman_dict[(reminder*divide_num)]
      decimal -= reminder*divide_num
      else:
      roman += not_in_dict(reminder*divide_num, divide_num)
      decimal -= (reminder*divide_num)
      return str(original_decimal)+' = '+roman









      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I'm a beginner as you can see and I would like to know how I can improve my code. Studying for 6 months now. Thank you.



      roman_dict = {1: 'I', 4: 'IV',  5: 'V', 9: 'IX', 10: 'X', 40: 'XL', 50: 'L', 90: 'XC', 100: 'C', 400: 'CD',
      500: 'D', 900: 'CM', 1000: 'M'}

      divide_list = [1000, 100, 10, 1]

      def not_in_dict(fixed_decimal, divide_num):
      sub_count = 0
      sub_roman_multi = roman_dict[divide_num]
      temp_decimal = fixed_decimal
      while temp_decimal not in roman_dict:
      temp_decimal -= divide_num
      sub_count += 1
      return roman_dict[temp_decimal]+(sub_count*sub_roman_multi)

      def decimal_to_roman(decimal):
      original_decimal = decimal
      roman = ""
      for divide_num in divide_list:
      if decimal >= divide_num:
      reminder = decimal//divide_num
      if(reminder >= 1) and ((reminder*divide_num) in roman_dict):
      roman += roman_dict[(reminder*divide_num)]
      decimal -= reminder*divide_num
      else:
      roman += not_in_dict(reminder*divide_num, divide_num)
      decimal -= (reminder*divide_num)
      return str(original_decimal)+' = '+roman






      python roman-numerals






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 4 at 11:53









      Graipher

      26.8k54396




      26.8k54396






      New contributor




      Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Apr 4 at 10:23









      OfeksOfeks

      333




      333




      New contributor




      Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Ofeks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          If you use a list of tuples instead of a dictionary and reverse the order, you can simply iterate over it. Your while loop also becomes a lot easier to understand and there is no longer any need to outsource it to another function that returns the literal and its count.



          Instead of manually adding strings (something you should basically never do in in Python), use str.join.



          ROMAN_LITERALS = [(1000, 'M'), (900, 'CM'), (500, 'D'), (400, 'CD'), (100, 'C'),
          (90, 'XC'), (50, 'L'), (40, 'XL'), (10, 'X'), (9, 'IX'),
          (5, 'V'), (4, 'IV'), (1, 'I')]

          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          while x >= value:
          x -= value
          out.append(literal)
          return "".join(out)


          Instead of the while loop you can also use integer division like you did:



          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          n = x // value # will be 0 if value is too large
          out.extend([literal] * n) # will not do anything if n == 0
          x -= n * value # will also not do anything if n == 0
          return "".join(out)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            wow. looks so easy now, thank you. that's great.
            $endgroup$
            – Ofeks
            Apr 4 at 13:36












          • $begingroup$
            @Ofeks: If this helped you, consider accepting it as the correct answer (by clicking the checkmark to the left of the answer). It is customary to wait about 24 hours, though, to give everyon on the globe a chance to answer and not discourage other people from commenting.
            $endgroup$
            – Graipher
            Apr 4 at 14:01












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Ofeks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216852%2fdecimal-to-roman-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10












          $begingroup$

          If you use a list of tuples instead of a dictionary and reverse the order, you can simply iterate over it. Your while loop also becomes a lot easier to understand and there is no longer any need to outsource it to another function that returns the literal and its count.



          Instead of manually adding strings (something you should basically never do in in Python), use str.join.



          ROMAN_LITERALS = [(1000, 'M'), (900, 'CM'), (500, 'D'), (400, 'CD'), (100, 'C'),
          (90, 'XC'), (50, 'L'), (40, 'XL'), (10, 'X'), (9, 'IX'),
          (5, 'V'), (4, 'IV'), (1, 'I')]

          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          while x >= value:
          x -= value
          out.append(literal)
          return "".join(out)


          Instead of the while loop you can also use integer division like you did:



          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          n = x // value # will be 0 if value is too large
          out.extend([literal] * n) # will not do anything if n == 0
          x -= n * value # will also not do anything if n == 0
          return "".join(out)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            wow. looks so easy now, thank you. that's great.
            $endgroup$
            – Ofeks
            Apr 4 at 13:36












          • $begingroup$
            @Ofeks: If this helped you, consider accepting it as the correct answer (by clicking the checkmark to the left of the answer). It is customary to wait about 24 hours, though, to give everyon on the globe a chance to answer and not discourage other people from commenting.
            $endgroup$
            – Graipher
            Apr 4 at 14:01
















          10












          $begingroup$

          If you use a list of tuples instead of a dictionary and reverse the order, you can simply iterate over it. Your while loop also becomes a lot easier to understand and there is no longer any need to outsource it to another function that returns the literal and its count.



          Instead of manually adding strings (something you should basically never do in in Python), use str.join.



          ROMAN_LITERALS = [(1000, 'M'), (900, 'CM'), (500, 'D'), (400, 'CD'), (100, 'C'),
          (90, 'XC'), (50, 'L'), (40, 'XL'), (10, 'X'), (9, 'IX'),
          (5, 'V'), (4, 'IV'), (1, 'I')]

          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          while x >= value:
          x -= value
          out.append(literal)
          return "".join(out)


          Instead of the while loop you can also use integer division like you did:



          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          n = x // value # will be 0 if value is too large
          out.extend([literal] * n) # will not do anything if n == 0
          x -= n * value # will also not do anything if n == 0
          return "".join(out)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            wow. looks so easy now, thank you. that's great.
            $endgroup$
            – Ofeks
            Apr 4 at 13:36












          • $begingroup$
            @Ofeks: If this helped you, consider accepting it as the correct answer (by clicking the checkmark to the left of the answer). It is customary to wait about 24 hours, though, to give everyon on the globe a chance to answer and not discourage other people from commenting.
            $endgroup$
            – Graipher
            Apr 4 at 14:01














          10












          10








          10





          $begingroup$

          If you use a list of tuples instead of a dictionary and reverse the order, you can simply iterate over it. Your while loop also becomes a lot easier to understand and there is no longer any need to outsource it to another function that returns the literal and its count.



          Instead of manually adding strings (something you should basically never do in in Python), use str.join.



          ROMAN_LITERALS = [(1000, 'M'), (900, 'CM'), (500, 'D'), (400, 'CD'), (100, 'C'),
          (90, 'XC'), (50, 'L'), (40, 'XL'), (10, 'X'), (9, 'IX'),
          (5, 'V'), (4, 'IV'), (1, 'I')]

          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          while x >= value:
          x -= value
          out.append(literal)
          return "".join(out)


          Instead of the while loop you can also use integer division like you did:



          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          n = x // value # will be 0 if value is too large
          out.extend([literal] * n) # will not do anything if n == 0
          x -= n * value # will also not do anything if n == 0
          return "".join(out)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If you use a list of tuples instead of a dictionary and reverse the order, you can simply iterate over it. Your while loop also becomes a lot easier to understand and there is no longer any need to outsource it to another function that returns the literal and its count.



          Instead of manually adding strings (something you should basically never do in in Python), use str.join.



          ROMAN_LITERALS = [(1000, 'M'), (900, 'CM'), (500, 'D'), (400, 'CD'), (100, 'C'),
          (90, 'XC'), (50, 'L'), (40, 'XL'), (10, 'X'), (9, 'IX'),
          (5, 'V'), (4, 'IV'), (1, 'I')]

          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          while x >= value:
          x -= value
          out.append(literal)
          return "".join(out)


          Instead of the while loop you can also use integer division like you did:



          def decimal_to_roman(x):
          out =
          for value, literal in ROMAN_LITERALS:
          n = x // value # will be 0 if value is too large
          out.extend([literal] * n) # will not do anything if n == 0
          x -= n * value # will also not do anything if n == 0
          return "".join(out)






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 4 at 14:44

























          answered Apr 4 at 12:01









          GraipherGraipher

          26.8k54396




          26.8k54396












          • $begingroup$
            wow. looks so easy now, thank you. that's great.
            $endgroup$
            – Ofeks
            Apr 4 at 13:36












          • $begingroup$
            @Ofeks: If this helped you, consider accepting it as the correct answer (by clicking the checkmark to the left of the answer). It is customary to wait about 24 hours, though, to give everyon on the globe a chance to answer and not discourage other people from commenting.
            $endgroup$
            – Graipher
            Apr 4 at 14:01


















          • $begingroup$
            wow. looks so easy now, thank you. that's great.
            $endgroup$
            – Ofeks
            Apr 4 at 13:36












          • $begingroup$
            @Ofeks: If this helped you, consider accepting it as the correct answer (by clicking the checkmark to the left of the answer). It is customary to wait about 24 hours, though, to give everyon on the globe a chance to answer and not discourage other people from commenting.
            $endgroup$
            – Graipher
            Apr 4 at 14:01
















          $begingroup$
          wow. looks so easy now, thank you. that's great.
          $endgroup$
          – Ofeks
          Apr 4 at 13:36






          $begingroup$
          wow. looks so easy now, thank you. that's great.
          $endgroup$
          – Ofeks
          Apr 4 at 13:36














          $begingroup$
          @Ofeks: If this helped you, consider accepting it as the correct answer (by clicking the checkmark to the left of the answer). It is customary to wait about 24 hours, though, to give everyon on the globe a chance to answer and not discourage other people from commenting.
          $endgroup$
          – Graipher
          Apr 4 at 14:01




          $begingroup$
          @Ofeks: If this helped you, consider accepting it as the correct answer (by clicking the checkmark to the left of the answer). It is customary to wait about 24 hours, though, to give everyon on the globe a chance to answer and not discourage other people from commenting.
          $endgroup$
          – Graipher
          Apr 4 at 14:01










          Ofeks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Ofeks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Ofeks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Ofeks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216852%2fdecimal-to-roman-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Masuk log Menu navigasi

          Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

          Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области