Issue with type force PATH search





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







3















This is Bash. The behavior is similar in fish.



$ which python
/usr/bin/python
$ alias py=python
$ type py
py is aliased to `python'


​And then, running type -P py prints nothing, where as I expected to print /usr/bin/pyton in a similar fashion to what is seen below.​



$ type ls
ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'
$ type -P ls
/bin/ls


The documentation for the -P option reads



  -P        force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,
builtin, or function, and returns the name of the disk file
that would be executed


I've confirmed that /usr/bin (the directory where python is located) is in PATH.



What is going on here?










share|improve this question































    3















    This is Bash. The behavior is similar in fish.



    $ which python
    /usr/bin/python
    $ alias py=python
    $ type py
    py is aliased to `python'


    ​And then, running type -P py prints nothing, where as I expected to print /usr/bin/pyton in a similar fashion to what is seen below.​



    $ type ls
    ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'
    $ type -P ls
    /bin/ls


    The documentation for the -P option reads



      -P        force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,
    builtin, or function, and returns the name of the disk file
    that would be executed


    I've confirmed that /usr/bin (the directory where python is located) is in PATH.



    What is going on here?










    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3


      1






      This is Bash. The behavior is similar in fish.



      $ which python
      /usr/bin/python
      $ alias py=python
      $ type py
      py is aliased to `python'


      ​And then, running type -P py prints nothing, where as I expected to print /usr/bin/pyton in a similar fashion to what is seen below.​



      $ type ls
      ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'
      $ type -P ls
      /bin/ls


      The documentation for the -P option reads



        -P        force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,
      builtin, or function, and returns the name of the disk file
      that would be executed


      I've confirmed that /usr/bin (the directory where python is located) is in PATH.



      What is going on here?










      share|improve this question
















      This is Bash. The behavior is similar in fish.



      $ which python
      /usr/bin/python
      $ alias py=python
      $ type py
      py is aliased to `python'


      ​And then, running type -P py prints nothing, where as I expected to print /usr/bin/pyton in a similar fashion to what is seen below.​



      $ type ls
      ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'
      $ type -P ls
      /bin/ls


      The documentation for the -P option reads



        -P        force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,
      builtin, or function, and returns the name of the disk file
      that would be executed


      I've confirmed that /usr/bin (the directory where python is located) is in PATH.



      What is going on here?







      bash fish shell-builtin






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 4 at 9:08







      Git Gud

















      asked Apr 4 at 8:50









      Git GudGit Gud

      1375




      1375






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          This:




          force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,




          does not mean that bash will expand the alias and then search for the expanded command. It means that, if there were a command foo, and also an alias foo, the type -P foo will still look for the command named foo, even though there's an alias masking it. So bash isn't expanding py in type -P py to be python, and it won't show /usr/bin/python.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Well, this could be clearer. Thanks.

            – Git Gud
            Apr 4 at 8:56











          • Seems clear enough. NAME is the argument to type, not an alias expansion of the argument.

            – chepner
            Apr 4 at 18:42





















          4














          What’s going on is that your shell is looking for a binary named py in each directory on your PATH, and not finding any.



          type -P doesn’t interpret aliases or functions; it forces the given name to be searched on the path, ignoring any other available command not of type “file” with the same name.



          (There’s an added subtlety with type -p and type -P: they take hashes into account, so they will show a hashed value if one exists, without looking in the PATH. But that’s not involved here.)






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510450%2fissue-with-type-force-path-search%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            9














            This:




            force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,




            does not mean that bash will expand the alias and then search for the expanded command. It means that, if there were a command foo, and also an alias foo, the type -P foo will still look for the command named foo, even though there's an alias masking it. So bash isn't expanding py in type -P py to be python, and it won't show /usr/bin/python.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Well, this could be clearer. Thanks.

              – Git Gud
              Apr 4 at 8:56











            • Seems clear enough. NAME is the argument to type, not an alias expansion of the argument.

              – chepner
              Apr 4 at 18:42


















            9














            This:




            force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,




            does not mean that bash will expand the alias and then search for the expanded command. It means that, if there were a command foo, and also an alias foo, the type -P foo will still look for the command named foo, even though there's an alias masking it. So bash isn't expanding py in type -P py to be python, and it won't show /usr/bin/python.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Well, this could be clearer. Thanks.

              – Git Gud
              Apr 4 at 8:56











            • Seems clear enough. NAME is the argument to type, not an alias expansion of the argument.

              – chepner
              Apr 4 at 18:42
















            9












            9








            9







            This:




            force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,




            does not mean that bash will expand the alias and then search for the expanded command. It means that, if there were a command foo, and also an alias foo, the type -P foo will still look for the command named foo, even though there's an alias masking it. So bash isn't expanding py in type -P py to be python, and it won't show /usr/bin/python.






            share|improve this answer













            This:




            force a PATH search for each NAME, even if it is an alias,




            does not mean that bash will expand the alias and then search for the expanded command. It means that, if there were a command foo, and also an alias foo, the type -P foo will still look for the command named foo, even though there's an alias masking it. So bash isn't expanding py in type -P py to be python, and it won't show /usr/bin/python.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Apr 4 at 8:55









            murumuru

            37.2k589164




            37.2k589164













            • Well, this could be clearer. Thanks.

              – Git Gud
              Apr 4 at 8:56











            • Seems clear enough. NAME is the argument to type, not an alias expansion of the argument.

              – chepner
              Apr 4 at 18:42





















            • Well, this could be clearer. Thanks.

              – Git Gud
              Apr 4 at 8:56











            • Seems clear enough. NAME is the argument to type, not an alias expansion of the argument.

              – chepner
              Apr 4 at 18:42



















            Well, this could be clearer. Thanks.

            – Git Gud
            Apr 4 at 8:56





            Well, this could be clearer. Thanks.

            – Git Gud
            Apr 4 at 8:56













            Seems clear enough. NAME is the argument to type, not an alias expansion of the argument.

            – chepner
            Apr 4 at 18:42







            Seems clear enough. NAME is the argument to type, not an alias expansion of the argument.

            – chepner
            Apr 4 at 18:42















            4














            What’s going on is that your shell is looking for a binary named py in each directory on your PATH, and not finding any.



            type -P doesn’t interpret aliases or functions; it forces the given name to be searched on the path, ignoring any other available command not of type “file” with the same name.



            (There’s an added subtlety with type -p and type -P: they take hashes into account, so they will show a hashed value if one exists, without looking in the PATH. But that’s not involved here.)






            share|improve this answer




























              4














              What’s going on is that your shell is looking for a binary named py in each directory on your PATH, and not finding any.



              type -P doesn’t interpret aliases or functions; it forces the given name to be searched on the path, ignoring any other available command not of type “file” with the same name.



              (There’s an added subtlety with type -p and type -P: they take hashes into account, so they will show a hashed value if one exists, without looking in the PATH. But that’s not involved here.)






              share|improve this answer


























                4












                4








                4







                What’s going on is that your shell is looking for a binary named py in each directory on your PATH, and not finding any.



                type -P doesn’t interpret aliases or functions; it forces the given name to be searched on the path, ignoring any other available command not of type “file” with the same name.



                (There’s an added subtlety with type -p and type -P: they take hashes into account, so they will show a hashed value if one exists, without looking in the PATH. But that’s not involved here.)






                share|improve this answer













                What’s going on is that your shell is looking for a binary named py in each directory on your PATH, and not finding any.



                type -P doesn’t interpret aliases or functions; it forces the given name to be searched on the path, ignoring any other available command not of type “file” with the same name.



                (There’s an added subtlety with type -p and type -P: they take hashes into account, so they will show a hashed value if one exists, without looking in the PATH. But that’s not involved here.)







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Apr 4 at 8:54









                Stephen KittStephen Kitt

                180k25409488




                180k25409488






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510450%2fissue-with-type-force-path-search%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                    Masuk log Menu navigasi

                    อาณาจักร (ชีววิทยา) ดูเพิ่ม อ้างอิง รายการเลือกการนำทาง10.1086/39456810.5962/bhl.title.447410.1126/science.163.3863.150576276010.1007/BF01796092408502"Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms"10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088432104270744"Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya"1990PNAS...87.4576W10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576541592112744PubMedJump the queueexpand by handPubMedJump the queueexpand by handPubMedJump the queueexpand by hand"A revised six-kingdom system of life"10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.x9809012"Only six kingdoms of life"10.1098/rspb.2004.2705169172415306349"Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree"10.1098/rsbl.2009.0948288006020031978เพิ่มข้อมูล