Most cost effective thermostat setting: consistent temperature vs. lowest temperature possible
The problem: Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
Here are some specific scenarios I'm trying to figure out:
- If the temperature outside is above freezing, do we need to really keep
the interior heat of the whole house at 50-60 degrees F in order to prevent freezing pipes, like it seems every website suggests? - Is it cost effective to turn off the heating (or turn very low) for the night in Zone B (where we don't sleep) if it's not going to go near freezing that night, then turn it back up to normal room temperature in the morning? Or is it more cost effective to keep it within 10 degrees F of room temperature, so the furnace doesn't need to work as hard in the morning when we want the temperature to come back up?
And are there any other factors to consider?
heating thermostat energy-efficiency cost-effective zoned-heating
|
show 14 more comments
The problem: Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
Here are some specific scenarios I'm trying to figure out:
- If the temperature outside is above freezing, do we need to really keep
the interior heat of the whole house at 50-60 degrees F in order to prevent freezing pipes, like it seems every website suggests? - Is it cost effective to turn off the heating (or turn very low) for the night in Zone B (where we don't sleep) if it's not going to go near freezing that night, then turn it back up to normal room temperature in the morning? Or is it more cost effective to keep it within 10 degrees F of room temperature, so the furnace doesn't need to work as hard in the morning when we want the temperature to come back up?
And are there any other factors to consider?
heating thermostat energy-efficiency cost-effective zoned-heating
8
Mid 50's inside sounds crazy to me. Granted, I live in TX, but is that even remotely common for people to subject themselves to temps that cold in their own homes? That's like sitting on the couch wearing a coat temps.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:41
9
Don't pay too much attention to the average on your bill. You have no idea how that is calculated and also don't know how other homes are heated (maybe they also have space heaters so are paying more in electricity, for example). Look at major air leaks. Seal up your windows with those stretch film kits. Weatherstrip your doors, etc.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:59
23
If you're paying $350-450/mo for heating just to mid-50s F, either you have a gigantic house or your insulation is nowhere near as excellent as you think it is.
– R..
Mar 15 at 15:17
3
For that, 350-450 per month is crazy, especially since energy is much cheaper in the US than in Europe. With halfway reasonable insulation, you should pay half as much (or less). Let alone at that temperature. With good insulation, you can hold 12°C without heating at all, only with living humans inside. So... not sure what you're doing there. That bill would be reasonable for 26-28°C...
– Damon
Mar 15 at 16:03
4
I'd also be looking for torn or broken duct work venting heated air into an unconditioned space (attic, basement).
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 20:18
|
show 14 more comments
The problem: Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
Here are some specific scenarios I'm trying to figure out:
- If the temperature outside is above freezing, do we need to really keep
the interior heat of the whole house at 50-60 degrees F in order to prevent freezing pipes, like it seems every website suggests? - Is it cost effective to turn off the heating (or turn very low) for the night in Zone B (where we don't sleep) if it's not going to go near freezing that night, then turn it back up to normal room temperature in the morning? Or is it more cost effective to keep it within 10 degrees F of room temperature, so the furnace doesn't need to work as hard in the morning when we want the temperature to come back up?
And are there any other factors to consider?
heating thermostat energy-efficiency cost-effective zoned-heating
The problem: Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
Here are some specific scenarios I'm trying to figure out:
- If the temperature outside is above freezing, do we need to really keep
the interior heat of the whole house at 50-60 degrees F in order to prevent freezing pipes, like it seems every website suggests? - Is it cost effective to turn off the heating (or turn very low) for the night in Zone B (where we don't sleep) if it's not going to go near freezing that night, then turn it back up to normal room temperature in the morning? Or is it more cost effective to keep it within 10 degrees F of room temperature, so the furnace doesn't need to work as hard in the morning when we want the temperature to come back up?
And are there any other factors to consider?
heating thermostat energy-efficiency cost-effective zoned-heating
heating thermostat energy-efficiency cost-effective zoned-heating
edited Mar 15 at 15:05
David
asked Mar 15 at 13:29
DavidDavid
1566
1566
8
Mid 50's inside sounds crazy to me. Granted, I live in TX, but is that even remotely common for people to subject themselves to temps that cold in their own homes? That's like sitting on the couch wearing a coat temps.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:41
9
Don't pay too much attention to the average on your bill. You have no idea how that is calculated and also don't know how other homes are heated (maybe they also have space heaters so are paying more in electricity, for example). Look at major air leaks. Seal up your windows with those stretch film kits. Weatherstrip your doors, etc.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:59
23
If you're paying $350-450/mo for heating just to mid-50s F, either you have a gigantic house or your insulation is nowhere near as excellent as you think it is.
– R..
Mar 15 at 15:17
3
For that, 350-450 per month is crazy, especially since energy is much cheaper in the US than in Europe. With halfway reasonable insulation, you should pay half as much (or less). Let alone at that temperature. With good insulation, you can hold 12°C without heating at all, only with living humans inside. So... not sure what you're doing there. That bill would be reasonable for 26-28°C...
– Damon
Mar 15 at 16:03
4
I'd also be looking for torn or broken duct work venting heated air into an unconditioned space (attic, basement).
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 20:18
|
show 14 more comments
8
Mid 50's inside sounds crazy to me. Granted, I live in TX, but is that even remotely common for people to subject themselves to temps that cold in their own homes? That's like sitting on the couch wearing a coat temps.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:41
9
Don't pay too much attention to the average on your bill. You have no idea how that is calculated and also don't know how other homes are heated (maybe they also have space heaters so are paying more in electricity, for example). Look at major air leaks. Seal up your windows with those stretch film kits. Weatherstrip your doors, etc.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:59
23
If you're paying $350-450/mo for heating just to mid-50s F, either you have a gigantic house or your insulation is nowhere near as excellent as you think it is.
– R..
Mar 15 at 15:17
3
For that, 350-450 per month is crazy, especially since energy is much cheaper in the US than in Europe. With halfway reasonable insulation, you should pay half as much (or less). Let alone at that temperature. With good insulation, you can hold 12°C without heating at all, only with living humans inside. So... not sure what you're doing there. That bill would be reasonable for 26-28°C...
– Damon
Mar 15 at 16:03
4
I'd also be looking for torn or broken duct work venting heated air into an unconditioned space (attic, basement).
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 20:18
8
8
Mid 50's inside sounds crazy to me. Granted, I live in TX, but is that even remotely common for people to subject themselves to temps that cold in their own homes? That's like sitting on the couch wearing a coat temps.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:41
Mid 50's inside sounds crazy to me. Granted, I live in TX, but is that even remotely common for people to subject themselves to temps that cold in their own homes? That's like sitting on the couch wearing a coat temps.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:41
9
9
Don't pay too much attention to the average on your bill. You have no idea how that is calculated and also don't know how other homes are heated (maybe they also have space heaters so are paying more in electricity, for example). Look at major air leaks. Seal up your windows with those stretch film kits. Weatherstrip your doors, etc.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:59
Don't pay too much attention to the average on your bill. You have no idea how that is calculated and also don't know how other homes are heated (maybe they also have space heaters so are paying more in electricity, for example). Look at major air leaks. Seal up your windows with those stretch film kits. Weatherstrip your doors, etc.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:59
23
23
If you're paying $350-450/mo for heating just to mid-50s F, either you have a gigantic house or your insulation is nowhere near as excellent as you think it is.
– R..
Mar 15 at 15:17
If you're paying $350-450/mo for heating just to mid-50s F, either you have a gigantic house or your insulation is nowhere near as excellent as you think it is.
– R..
Mar 15 at 15:17
3
3
For that, 350-450 per month is crazy, especially since energy is much cheaper in the US than in Europe. With halfway reasonable insulation, you should pay half as much (or less). Let alone at that temperature. With good insulation, you can hold 12°C without heating at all, only with living humans inside. So... not sure what you're doing there. That bill would be reasonable for 26-28°C...
– Damon
Mar 15 at 16:03
For that, 350-450 per month is crazy, especially since energy is much cheaper in the US than in Europe. With halfway reasonable insulation, you should pay half as much (or less). Let alone at that temperature. With good insulation, you can hold 12°C without heating at all, only with living humans inside. So... not sure what you're doing there. That bill would be reasonable for 26-28°C...
– Damon
Mar 15 at 16:03
4
4
I'd also be looking for torn or broken duct work venting heated air into an unconditioned space (attic, basement).
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 20:18
I'd also be looking for torn or broken duct work venting heated air into an unconditioned space (attic, basement).
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 20:18
|
show 14 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
An Old Debate
There are is a very old debate about whether it's better to leave the thermostat at a constant temperature or to turn the temperature down when unoccupied and up when occupied. I am in the heat-as-needed camp that believes in turning the heat up and down.
One Argument
From a theoretical perspective, I think about it this way: Your furnace runs to replace the heat that escapes your house in cold weather. The greater the difference between the outside temperature and the inside temperature, the faster you lose heat. So with the temperature down when possible, the difference between outside and inside is less at those times, and you lose less heat over the course of the day.
There are those that say the furnace operates less efficiently this way. There are furnaces that run in two modes, one less efficient and faster, another more efficient but slower. I don't think this counters my argument. If this is the case, the right thing to do is start the heat up earlier and run at the slower / more efficient rate, not abandon the idea of changing temperature during unoccupied periods.
Actual Results
From a practical perspective, I have installed many programmable thermostats to lower heat in homes so that the temperature goes down to 60 all day when everyone's at work and up to 70 when everyone's home, with consistent results - lower heating bills. I don't have detailed data matching weather conditions to the bills but I am confident in the results - there are plenty of people with large commercial buildings that have maintenance staff that monitor these things very carefully, and looking at all the data have come to the same conclusion.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
I'd turn set both zones to 55-60 during the day, weekdays, if everyone's out at work or school.
I'd set the living area zone to 68 from an hour before people get home from work or school - maybe 4PM? to bedtime, say 10PM.
If the bedrooms are only occupied overnight, I'd set them to 68 from an hour before bedtime, whatever that is in your household, until 8AM or whenever everyone's up and out. If there are kids using the bedrooms after school before bedtime, you might want them up to 68 from 4PM to 8AM.
Don't forget, it's no big deal to turn up the thermostats for a temporary override if you happen to be in a zone outside of the usual schedule, so it's no big deal if there's a holiday or something.
I'd definitely want thermostats that allow a different program on the weekend unless the household is occupied the same hours on weekends as it is during the week.
How Low Can You Go?
If you want to take this to the extreme you could turn the heat all the way down when unoccupied. That would be a bit extreme for a house you come home to every day, but it's not uncommon for vacation homes. Of course you'd want to heat to a level temperature where the pipes won't freeze, and the temperature at the thermostat is no doubt warmer than the temperature where pipes are in outside walls - so 32°F is not a safe setting. The lowest safe thermostat setting would depend on how your plumbing runs, how your walls are insulated, and the outside temperature. I know in my area many people set the thermostat in their vacation home to 40°F or so off season when they might only be occupied one weekend a month. When there are extreme cold snaps, a few people will find they were a little too aggressive with the setting and wind up with burst pipes.
(Incidentally - if the outside temperature is above freezing, there's no way it can freeze your pipes. At worst, it could get as cold inside the house as the lowest temperature outside, but under normal conditions, even with no heat, it won't get quite as cold inside as it gets outside. There is always some insulation, some greenhouse effect, some appliances running inside, etc.)
Other Potential Problems
If your heat bills are higher than expected, there are lots of possibilities. If your heat bill is higher than your neighbors with similar homes by 25%, it's not because they have better thermostat schedules than you. There must be some other issue. For example, a common culprit is a hot water leak. Even a drip leak can drain a lot of hot water over the course of a month, and that's heat escaping your house - your water heater will have to run more to make it up. If your water heater and furnace are both natural gas, you may assume the culprit is the furnace, but the real problem is money dripping down a drain all day.
3
With newer systems that have make up air the more they run the more conditioned air gets pumped out so turning down is less run time and less heat pumped outside, I would check the size of the make up air intake and possibly throttle it back some but I agree with the temp differential theory.+
– Ed Beal
Mar 15 at 14:43
Heating is always a 100% efficient process. Cooling efficiency, on the other hand, varies.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 19:20
2
@Nij How can anything operate at better than 100% efficiency? Unless you're talking about a heat pump (which is not what op has) in which case the input is driving a mechanism to move heat from an external source as opposed to providing the heat energy itself.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 21:46
1
@Nij Nothing operates at 100% efficiency ... except for the process of converting energy into heat. What would typically be considered "losses" in other processes (friction etc.) are, by definition, useful output in this case.
– MooseBoys
Mar 16 at 1:03
7
So is this furnace pumping its exhaust into the room too? Because any energy that is carried out by the fumes is total loss, reducing the efficiency. Anything going into grounded pipes is lost to heating stones and dirt, not the house - loss again. This is not useful output, which is what efficiency measures. You're still using the naïve approach of "in = out".
– Nij
Mar 16 at 2:00
|
show 4 more comments
Setting back your thermostat to any reasonable temperature for any reason amount of time will only save 5-10% over the course of a season.
Apples to apples
You can't simply compare your bill to your neighbor's bill. There are very numerous reasons why this is impractical. Different construction, exposure, consumption, equipment and more. Even two houses built by the same builder with the same plans will have a different heat loss profile because construction practices are not perfect nor consistent.
Where's the heat going?
Advertised combustion efficiency for fuel burning heating units ranges from 80% to 98%. That's based on availability of heat energy contained in the fuel being burned. So 98% means for every $1 of gas purchased 98 cents worth gets converted to heat available to heat your house. 2 cents goes outside. That's assuming the equipment is setup properly. The heat in your home then gets lost to the environment through the walls, ceiling, ground and infiltration air.
How to set your thermostat
Set it low and with longer run cycles. The advertised rating is determined under laboratory conditions. It takes 10 - 15 minutes for a furnace or the like to reach steady state. If your furnace/boiler is oversized it will turn on and back off before reaching its optimal efficiency. This is a very common problem because installers and scared of getting the call that the furnace is running all day. An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day and the set point is maintained.
No easy answer
Unfortunately there is nothing to point a finger at given the information provided. Setting back your thermostat will have limited impact on your utility cost. Hopefully this information can help you find the issue and address it.
2
Can you please clarify what you mean when you say "longer run cycles?" All I can do is specify what times of day I want the house to be at certain temperatures. For for example, if I want the house at 70 degrees by 8am, then it might start heating the house a half hour early to achieve that temperature by the desired time.
– David
Mar 15 at 15:49
Let's say hypothetically you wanted the house at 70 for 8 am and leave by 9. I would set it a little higher like 72 from 7:30 until 8:15 so the appliance overshoots the desired temperature a little but only has to run 1 time to achieve a satisfactory result.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 15:55
4
Some thermostats let you set a "temperature swing" value. For example, a swing of 2 degrees with the desired temp set to 70 means the furnace will turn ON when the thermostat reads 69.0 degrees and turn OFF when it reads 71.0 degrees. Change the swing to 0.5 degrees and it will turn ON at 69.75 degrees and OFF at 70.25 degrees. A larger swing value means the furnace will run longer each time it turns on, but it will turn on less often throughout the day. It may be worth upgrading to a slightly nicer thermostat. A decent programmable one can usually be found for under $100 in the US.
– Kyle A
Mar 15 at 16:20
3
And old school word for the "swing value" is the "hysteresis control", so anyone interested in that setting should keep an eye out for both.
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 15 at 16:38
That's the deferential. "Set it ... with longer run cycles." - that raises efficiency. - "An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day" - that, I'm not so sure about (now you're paying to run the blower all day). - - "adjust your thermostat for the widest differential your comfort will tolerate to obtain the best efficiency and equipment service length" – How to Lower the Ouptut of Oversized Furnace
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:42
add a comment |
Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
I'm going to assume we're only comparing heat costs, not Gas vs. Gas costs, which may include other factors like dryers, water heaters, ranges (stoves / ovens).
Do your neighbors have multi-stage systems? If so, do you? Note: multi-zone and multi-stage are two very different things: multi-zone means you can set different areas of the house to different temperatures, multi-stage means the system itself will only draw as much energy as it needs to heat, usually prioritizing using as little as possible.
As an anecdote: I have a multi-stage heating and cooling system. What does this mean? This means, as indicated in another answer, my system runs in one of three modes: low/efficient, medium/efficient, high/inefficient.
If you have single-stage, but your neighbors have two+-stage, you'll probably always have a higher heating bill, all other things being equal.
Effectively, with any given heating/cooling unit, the air in your house is heated up slowly and unevenly. There are parts of the house that will naturally be warmer and parts that will naturally be cooler. Depending on thermostat placement, this can cause a significant change. If your thermostat temp varies wildly, your heat will run inconsistently.
When using a single-stage system, it always puts out the same heat. This means that there are several things that differ between single-/multi-stage systems:
Consistency. A single-stage system has less consistent temperatures in the house, because it can only heat at 1 rate. This means that it always heats at "maximum", even when the variation is very small. Thus, even though most of the house might be comfortable, until the thermostat says "turn off", it still puts out MAX heat. This means that when the thermostat finally does say "turn off", the overall temp will be higher because air is still mixing.
Frequency. Often, a single-stage system runs less frequently than a multi-stage system because of this variation. It overheats the house during each run.
Consumption. As obvious, a single-stage system runs at 100% energy-consumption when it is running. Multi-stage systems do not. This can be good and bad, depending on the weather.
There are lots of articles about the differences, I'll point this one out specifically: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SINGLE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE HEATING
To continue my anecdote: my multi-stage heating system actually costs me about 20% less than my neighbors, whom all have single-stage systems. I live in Toledo, OH, right next to Lake Erie, my weather / seasons are almost identical to yours. The upfront cost was higher, but my overall maintenance and heating costs are lower. (Mine is a 1970's install, all of theirs are 2010's and later, and I still pay less for my heating cost, and I have my temperatures about 3°F higher than them.) Mine is three-stage instead of two, but you should gather that this is a major possible reason for the difference.
So, what do you do?
First: check if they installed a single-/multi-stage system. If they installed multi-stage, verify that your thermostat configuration(s) is/are appropriate. If it's multi-stage, make sure they installed a multi-stage thermostat. Make sure the thermostat is configured to use multi-stage mode. (Many thermostats have support for two-stage, but you have to turn it on, because it uses things very differently. If it's multi-stage, make sure that feature is on.)
Second: if it's a single-stage system, you might always have a higher heating-bill. It's worth evaluating if it's cost-effective to replace the furnace with a multi-stage system. It's also worth exploring further insulation, and any locations that air might be escaping or leaking in.
Third: you may want to explore pressurization systems. Some people report success with reducing bills by pressurizing the house/attic, some don't. It might be another option you can use to see if it helps keep the house more comfortable. (Generally, if the house is at high-pressure, heat will escape, if it's at low-pressure: cold will leak in. Whether or not high/low pressure is beneficial is something that seems to vary highly per-house, per-setup.)
Fourth: check doors / windows. Make sure your doors are well-insulated, make sure the windows themselves are well-insulated. You can try adding curtains on all the windows and closing them to see if you have poor windows. (Old windows were often more poorly insulated. With my anecdote: my windows are literally less than 1 year old, which is a major factor in where heat escapes.)
Fifth: do you have bathroom exhaust fans? If so, try plugging them if you can stand it and see if that helps. (My dad used to lose a lot of heat due to poorly-installed bathroom exhaust fans.)
Sixth: do you have a basement? Are any basement walls exposed? Is your heating system trying to heat the basement? This may be another factor.
Seventh: is your system properly-sized? If you have vaulted / cathedral / high ceilings in the house, make sure those calculations were taken into consideration when the system was installed. (I've seen really bad HVAC installers not take that into consideration and under-size system installation, which resulted in exactly your issue was well as the system running constantly.)
Finally, you asked explicitly about scheduling: I personally don't use (nor recommend) it.
Generally, with scheduling, you would set the house to a more uncomfortable temperature when you're gone (hotter in the summer, cooler in the winter). This can actually do more harm than good, depending.
When you change the temperature like that, your walls, floors, and ceilings are significantly affected. You normally wouldn't notice the effect at a constant heat, because it takes a long time for those areas to change, but 8-10 hours (a typically workday) is plenty-long for those changes.
This means that when the heat comes back up, it'll take much longer for it to get the house to a consistent temperature, because the walls/floors/ceilings have to catch up. This can actually do more harm than good, though it's an experiment to try, I would not be surprised if it went poorly for you. (Again, this varies significantly by insulation / build quality / weather. One answer indicates success with this, so it might be worth exploring.)
add a comment |
And are there any other factors to consider?
There is one factor of note that you have attempted to consider:
we don't have drafty windows
Unfortunately, the idea that windows are a major factor in a house's draftiness (or more technically, air change rate) is a common misconception. The reality is that the vast majority of draftiness is completely hidden, out of sight, in the thousands of feet of seams & gaps hidden behind trim and in unfinished spaces, in holes for utility to pass through. The only way you can really know whether or not a building is losing a lot of heat by leaking conditioned air to the outdoors is by testing it with a blower door (though many of the flaws can be detected with a thermal camera if you have the experience to know where & how to look).
add a comment |
It is a myth that furnaces need to work "harder" if turned off for a while or if the room cools or heats too much. This has been tested and is recommended even by the government:
https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/thermostats
https://blog.powerley.com/mythbuster-using-a-thermostat-setback-for-energy-savings/
You should have your thermostat as cold as possible during winter and hot as possible during summer to minimize energy use. This applies whether you are at home or away.
1
Furnaces don't need to work hard, they need to reach steady state which takes about 10 minutes. Short cycling has other impacts on the system such as cracked heat exchangers. Repeatedly heating metal to 1000°F and back down to 70°F in rapid succession is devastating to the metals integrity. I heat my 2000 sq foot home in Toronto with a 60mbtu 98% modulating furnace which runs pretty much nonstop from November to April. My dryer is gas, my stove is gas and my tankless water heater is gas. There are 7 people living in my house, two of them teens. My gas bill is $120 a month.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 17:54
@JoeFala - Yeah, but when's your RoI on that $40k worth of 98% gas fired appliances? ;p
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:47
1
Note that this is only mythical for fuel-fired heating appliances -- heat pumps have way more trouble recovering from setback!
– ThreePhaseEel
Mar 16 at 1:22
1
@Mazura modulating furnaces aren't that expensive they are about 1000 dollars more than a 2 stage. Plus they automatically come with an electronically commutated motor which saves on the hydro bill as well. Return on investment in my climate and house is around 3 years.
– Joe Fala
Mar 16 at 3:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "73"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f159833%2fmost-cost-effective-thermostat-setting-consistent-temperature-vs-lowest-temper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
An Old Debate
There are is a very old debate about whether it's better to leave the thermostat at a constant temperature or to turn the temperature down when unoccupied and up when occupied. I am in the heat-as-needed camp that believes in turning the heat up and down.
One Argument
From a theoretical perspective, I think about it this way: Your furnace runs to replace the heat that escapes your house in cold weather. The greater the difference between the outside temperature and the inside temperature, the faster you lose heat. So with the temperature down when possible, the difference between outside and inside is less at those times, and you lose less heat over the course of the day.
There are those that say the furnace operates less efficiently this way. There are furnaces that run in two modes, one less efficient and faster, another more efficient but slower. I don't think this counters my argument. If this is the case, the right thing to do is start the heat up earlier and run at the slower / more efficient rate, not abandon the idea of changing temperature during unoccupied periods.
Actual Results
From a practical perspective, I have installed many programmable thermostats to lower heat in homes so that the temperature goes down to 60 all day when everyone's at work and up to 70 when everyone's home, with consistent results - lower heating bills. I don't have detailed data matching weather conditions to the bills but I am confident in the results - there are plenty of people with large commercial buildings that have maintenance staff that monitor these things very carefully, and looking at all the data have come to the same conclusion.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
I'd turn set both zones to 55-60 during the day, weekdays, if everyone's out at work or school.
I'd set the living area zone to 68 from an hour before people get home from work or school - maybe 4PM? to bedtime, say 10PM.
If the bedrooms are only occupied overnight, I'd set them to 68 from an hour before bedtime, whatever that is in your household, until 8AM or whenever everyone's up and out. If there are kids using the bedrooms after school before bedtime, you might want them up to 68 from 4PM to 8AM.
Don't forget, it's no big deal to turn up the thermostats for a temporary override if you happen to be in a zone outside of the usual schedule, so it's no big deal if there's a holiday or something.
I'd definitely want thermostats that allow a different program on the weekend unless the household is occupied the same hours on weekends as it is during the week.
How Low Can You Go?
If you want to take this to the extreme you could turn the heat all the way down when unoccupied. That would be a bit extreme for a house you come home to every day, but it's not uncommon for vacation homes. Of course you'd want to heat to a level temperature where the pipes won't freeze, and the temperature at the thermostat is no doubt warmer than the temperature where pipes are in outside walls - so 32°F is not a safe setting. The lowest safe thermostat setting would depend on how your plumbing runs, how your walls are insulated, and the outside temperature. I know in my area many people set the thermostat in their vacation home to 40°F or so off season when they might only be occupied one weekend a month. When there are extreme cold snaps, a few people will find they were a little too aggressive with the setting and wind up with burst pipes.
(Incidentally - if the outside temperature is above freezing, there's no way it can freeze your pipes. At worst, it could get as cold inside the house as the lowest temperature outside, but under normal conditions, even with no heat, it won't get quite as cold inside as it gets outside. There is always some insulation, some greenhouse effect, some appliances running inside, etc.)
Other Potential Problems
If your heat bills are higher than expected, there are lots of possibilities. If your heat bill is higher than your neighbors with similar homes by 25%, it's not because they have better thermostat schedules than you. There must be some other issue. For example, a common culprit is a hot water leak. Even a drip leak can drain a lot of hot water over the course of a month, and that's heat escaping your house - your water heater will have to run more to make it up. If your water heater and furnace are both natural gas, you may assume the culprit is the furnace, but the real problem is money dripping down a drain all day.
3
With newer systems that have make up air the more they run the more conditioned air gets pumped out so turning down is less run time and less heat pumped outside, I would check the size of the make up air intake and possibly throttle it back some but I agree with the temp differential theory.+
– Ed Beal
Mar 15 at 14:43
Heating is always a 100% efficient process. Cooling efficiency, on the other hand, varies.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 19:20
2
@Nij How can anything operate at better than 100% efficiency? Unless you're talking about a heat pump (which is not what op has) in which case the input is driving a mechanism to move heat from an external source as opposed to providing the heat energy itself.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 21:46
1
@Nij Nothing operates at 100% efficiency ... except for the process of converting energy into heat. What would typically be considered "losses" in other processes (friction etc.) are, by definition, useful output in this case.
– MooseBoys
Mar 16 at 1:03
7
So is this furnace pumping its exhaust into the room too? Because any energy that is carried out by the fumes is total loss, reducing the efficiency. Anything going into grounded pipes is lost to heating stones and dirt, not the house - loss again. This is not useful output, which is what efficiency measures. You're still using the naïve approach of "in = out".
– Nij
Mar 16 at 2:00
|
show 4 more comments
An Old Debate
There are is a very old debate about whether it's better to leave the thermostat at a constant temperature or to turn the temperature down when unoccupied and up when occupied. I am in the heat-as-needed camp that believes in turning the heat up and down.
One Argument
From a theoretical perspective, I think about it this way: Your furnace runs to replace the heat that escapes your house in cold weather. The greater the difference between the outside temperature and the inside temperature, the faster you lose heat. So with the temperature down when possible, the difference between outside and inside is less at those times, and you lose less heat over the course of the day.
There are those that say the furnace operates less efficiently this way. There are furnaces that run in two modes, one less efficient and faster, another more efficient but slower. I don't think this counters my argument. If this is the case, the right thing to do is start the heat up earlier and run at the slower / more efficient rate, not abandon the idea of changing temperature during unoccupied periods.
Actual Results
From a practical perspective, I have installed many programmable thermostats to lower heat in homes so that the temperature goes down to 60 all day when everyone's at work and up to 70 when everyone's home, with consistent results - lower heating bills. I don't have detailed data matching weather conditions to the bills but I am confident in the results - there are plenty of people with large commercial buildings that have maintenance staff that monitor these things very carefully, and looking at all the data have come to the same conclusion.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
I'd turn set both zones to 55-60 during the day, weekdays, if everyone's out at work or school.
I'd set the living area zone to 68 from an hour before people get home from work or school - maybe 4PM? to bedtime, say 10PM.
If the bedrooms are only occupied overnight, I'd set them to 68 from an hour before bedtime, whatever that is in your household, until 8AM or whenever everyone's up and out. If there are kids using the bedrooms after school before bedtime, you might want them up to 68 from 4PM to 8AM.
Don't forget, it's no big deal to turn up the thermostats for a temporary override if you happen to be in a zone outside of the usual schedule, so it's no big deal if there's a holiday or something.
I'd definitely want thermostats that allow a different program on the weekend unless the household is occupied the same hours on weekends as it is during the week.
How Low Can You Go?
If you want to take this to the extreme you could turn the heat all the way down when unoccupied. That would be a bit extreme for a house you come home to every day, but it's not uncommon for vacation homes. Of course you'd want to heat to a level temperature where the pipes won't freeze, and the temperature at the thermostat is no doubt warmer than the temperature where pipes are in outside walls - so 32°F is not a safe setting. The lowest safe thermostat setting would depend on how your plumbing runs, how your walls are insulated, and the outside temperature. I know in my area many people set the thermostat in their vacation home to 40°F or so off season when they might only be occupied one weekend a month. When there are extreme cold snaps, a few people will find they were a little too aggressive with the setting and wind up with burst pipes.
(Incidentally - if the outside temperature is above freezing, there's no way it can freeze your pipes. At worst, it could get as cold inside the house as the lowest temperature outside, but under normal conditions, even with no heat, it won't get quite as cold inside as it gets outside. There is always some insulation, some greenhouse effect, some appliances running inside, etc.)
Other Potential Problems
If your heat bills are higher than expected, there are lots of possibilities. If your heat bill is higher than your neighbors with similar homes by 25%, it's not because they have better thermostat schedules than you. There must be some other issue. For example, a common culprit is a hot water leak. Even a drip leak can drain a lot of hot water over the course of a month, and that's heat escaping your house - your water heater will have to run more to make it up. If your water heater and furnace are both natural gas, you may assume the culprit is the furnace, but the real problem is money dripping down a drain all day.
3
With newer systems that have make up air the more they run the more conditioned air gets pumped out so turning down is less run time and less heat pumped outside, I would check the size of the make up air intake and possibly throttle it back some but I agree with the temp differential theory.+
– Ed Beal
Mar 15 at 14:43
Heating is always a 100% efficient process. Cooling efficiency, on the other hand, varies.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 19:20
2
@Nij How can anything operate at better than 100% efficiency? Unless you're talking about a heat pump (which is not what op has) in which case the input is driving a mechanism to move heat from an external source as opposed to providing the heat energy itself.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 21:46
1
@Nij Nothing operates at 100% efficiency ... except for the process of converting energy into heat. What would typically be considered "losses" in other processes (friction etc.) are, by definition, useful output in this case.
– MooseBoys
Mar 16 at 1:03
7
So is this furnace pumping its exhaust into the room too? Because any energy that is carried out by the fumes is total loss, reducing the efficiency. Anything going into grounded pipes is lost to heating stones and dirt, not the house - loss again. This is not useful output, which is what efficiency measures. You're still using the naïve approach of "in = out".
– Nij
Mar 16 at 2:00
|
show 4 more comments
An Old Debate
There are is a very old debate about whether it's better to leave the thermostat at a constant temperature or to turn the temperature down when unoccupied and up when occupied. I am in the heat-as-needed camp that believes in turning the heat up and down.
One Argument
From a theoretical perspective, I think about it this way: Your furnace runs to replace the heat that escapes your house in cold weather. The greater the difference between the outside temperature and the inside temperature, the faster you lose heat. So with the temperature down when possible, the difference between outside and inside is less at those times, and you lose less heat over the course of the day.
There are those that say the furnace operates less efficiently this way. There are furnaces that run in two modes, one less efficient and faster, another more efficient but slower. I don't think this counters my argument. If this is the case, the right thing to do is start the heat up earlier and run at the slower / more efficient rate, not abandon the idea of changing temperature during unoccupied periods.
Actual Results
From a practical perspective, I have installed many programmable thermostats to lower heat in homes so that the temperature goes down to 60 all day when everyone's at work and up to 70 when everyone's home, with consistent results - lower heating bills. I don't have detailed data matching weather conditions to the bills but I am confident in the results - there are plenty of people with large commercial buildings that have maintenance staff that monitor these things very carefully, and looking at all the data have come to the same conclusion.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
I'd turn set both zones to 55-60 during the day, weekdays, if everyone's out at work or school.
I'd set the living area zone to 68 from an hour before people get home from work or school - maybe 4PM? to bedtime, say 10PM.
If the bedrooms are only occupied overnight, I'd set them to 68 from an hour before bedtime, whatever that is in your household, until 8AM or whenever everyone's up and out. If there are kids using the bedrooms after school before bedtime, you might want them up to 68 from 4PM to 8AM.
Don't forget, it's no big deal to turn up the thermostats for a temporary override if you happen to be in a zone outside of the usual schedule, so it's no big deal if there's a holiday or something.
I'd definitely want thermostats that allow a different program on the weekend unless the household is occupied the same hours on weekends as it is during the week.
How Low Can You Go?
If you want to take this to the extreme you could turn the heat all the way down when unoccupied. That would be a bit extreme for a house you come home to every day, but it's not uncommon for vacation homes. Of course you'd want to heat to a level temperature where the pipes won't freeze, and the temperature at the thermostat is no doubt warmer than the temperature where pipes are in outside walls - so 32°F is not a safe setting. The lowest safe thermostat setting would depend on how your plumbing runs, how your walls are insulated, and the outside temperature. I know in my area many people set the thermostat in their vacation home to 40°F or so off season when they might only be occupied one weekend a month. When there are extreme cold snaps, a few people will find they were a little too aggressive with the setting and wind up with burst pipes.
(Incidentally - if the outside temperature is above freezing, there's no way it can freeze your pipes. At worst, it could get as cold inside the house as the lowest temperature outside, but under normal conditions, even with no heat, it won't get quite as cold inside as it gets outside. There is always some insulation, some greenhouse effect, some appliances running inside, etc.)
Other Potential Problems
If your heat bills are higher than expected, there are lots of possibilities. If your heat bill is higher than your neighbors with similar homes by 25%, it's not because they have better thermostat schedules than you. There must be some other issue. For example, a common culprit is a hot water leak. Even a drip leak can drain a lot of hot water over the course of a month, and that's heat escaping your house - your water heater will have to run more to make it up. If your water heater and furnace are both natural gas, you may assume the culprit is the furnace, but the real problem is money dripping down a drain all day.
An Old Debate
There are is a very old debate about whether it's better to leave the thermostat at a constant temperature or to turn the temperature down when unoccupied and up when occupied. I am in the heat-as-needed camp that believes in turning the heat up and down.
One Argument
From a theoretical perspective, I think about it this way: Your furnace runs to replace the heat that escapes your house in cold weather. The greater the difference between the outside temperature and the inside temperature, the faster you lose heat. So with the temperature down when possible, the difference between outside and inside is less at those times, and you lose less heat over the course of the day.
There are those that say the furnace operates less efficiently this way. There are furnaces that run in two modes, one less efficient and faster, another more efficient but slower. I don't think this counters my argument. If this is the case, the right thing to do is start the heat up earlier and run at the slower / more efficient rate, not abandon the idea of changing temperature during unoccupied periods.
Actual Results
From a practical perspective, I have installed many programmable thermostats to lower heat in homes so that the temperature goes down to 60 all day when everyone's at work and up to 70 when everyone's home, with consistent results - lower heating bills. I don't have detailed data matching weather conditions to the bills but I am confident in the results - there are plenty of people with large commercial buildings that have maintenance staff that monitor these things very carefully, and looking at all the data have come to the same conclusion.
The Set Up: We have a natural gas forced air heating system, set up with two zones. Zone 1 is where we sleep. Zone 2 is the rest of the house. We live in New England, so we do have freezing temperatures in winter.
The Question: What would you suggest as our timed pre-sets for Zone 1 and Zone 2, especially in the winter?
I'd turn set both zones to 55-60 during the day, weekdays, if everyone's out at work or school.
I'd set the living area zone to 68 from an hour before people get home from work or school - maybe 4PM? to bedtime, say 10PM.
If the bedrooms are only occupied overnight, I'd set them to 68 from an hour before bedtime, whatever that is in your household, until 8AM or whenever everyone's up and out. If there are kids using the bedrooms after school before bedtime, you might want them up to 68 from 4PM to 8AM.
Don't forget, it's no big deal to turn up the thermostats for a temporary override if you happen to be in a zone outside of the usual schedule, so it's no big deal if there's a holiday or something.
I'd definitely want thermostats that allow a different program on the weekend unless the household is occupied the same hours on weekends as it is during the week.
How Low Can You Go?
If you want to take this to the extreme you could turn the heat all the way down when unoccupied. That would be a bit extreme for a house you come home to every day, but it's not uncommon for vacation homes. Of course you'd want to heat to a level temperature where the pipes won't freeze, and the temperature at the thermostat is no doubt warmer than the temperature where pipes are in outside walls - so 32°F is not a safe setting. The lowest safe thermostat setting would depend on how your plumbing runs, how your walls are insulated, and the outside temperature. I know in my area many people set the thermostat in their vacation home to 40°F or so off season when they might only be occupied one weekend a month. When there are extreme cold snaps, a few people will find they were a little too aggressive with the setting and wind up with burst pipes.
(Incidentally - if the outside temperature is above freezing, there's no way it can freeze your pipes. At worst, it could get as cold inside the house as the lowest temperature outside, but under normal conditions, even with no heat, it won't get quite as cold inside as it gets outside. There is always some insulation, some greenhouse effect, some appliances running inside, etc.)
Other Potential Problems
If your heat bills are higher than expected, there are lots of possibilities. If your heat bill is higher than your neighbors with similar homes by 25%, it's not because they have better thermostat schedules than you. There must be some other issue. For example, a common culprit is a hot water leak. Even a drip leak can drain a lot of hot water over the course of a month, and that's heat escaping your house - your water heater will have to run more to make it up. If your water heater and furnace are both natural gas, you may assume the culprit is the furnace, but the real problem is money dripping down a drain all day.
edited Mar 16 at 10:00
answered Mar 15 at 13:58
batsplatstersonbatsplatsterson
13.6k11742
13.6k11742
3
With newer systems that have make up air the more they run the more conditioned air gets pumped out so turning down is less run time and less heat pumped outside, I would check the size of the make up air intake and possibly throttle it back some but I agree with the temp differential theory.+
– Ed Beal
Mar 15 at 14:43
Heating is always a 100% efficient process. Cooling efficiency, on the other hand, varies.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 19:20
2
@Nij How can anything operate at better than 100% efficiency? Unless you're talking about a heat pump (which is not what op has) in which case the input is driving a mechanism to move heat from an external source as opposed to providing the heat energy itself.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 21:46
1
@Nij Nothing operates at 100% efficiency ... except for the process of converting energy into heat. What would typically be considered "losses" in other processes (friction etc.) are, by definition, useful output in this case.
– MooseBoys
Mar 16 at 1:03
7
So is this furnace pumping its exhaust into the room too? Because any energy that is carried out by the fumes is total loss, reducing the efficiency. Anything going into grounded pipes is lost to heating stones and dirt, not the house - loss again. This is not useful output, which is what efficiency measures. You're still using the naïve approach of "in = out".
– Nij
Mar 16 at 2:00
|
show 4 more comments
3
With newer systems that have make up air the more they run the more conditioned air gets pumped out so turning down is less run time and less heat pumped outside, I would check the size of the make up air intake and possibly throttle it back some but I agree with the temp differential theory.+
– Ed Beal
Mar 15 at 14:43
Heating is always a 100% efficient process. Cooling efficiency, on the other hand, varies.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 19:20
2
@Nij How can anything operate at better than 100% efficiency? Unless you're talking about a heat pump (which is not what op has) in which case the input is driving a mechanism to move heat from an external source as opposed to providing the heat energy itself.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 21:46
1
@Nij Nothing operates at 100% efficiency ... except for the process of converting energy into heat. What would typically be considered "losses" in other processes (friction etc.) are, by definition, useful output in this case.
– MooseBoys
Mar 16 at 1:03
7
So is this furnace pumping its exhaust into the room too? Because any energy that is carried out by the fumes is total loss, reducing the efficiency. Anything going into grounded pipes is lost to heating stones and dirt, not the house - loss again. This is not useful output, which is what efficiency measures. You're still using the naïve approach of "in = out".
– Nij
Mar 16 at 2:00
3
3
With newer systems that have make up air the more they run the more conditioned air gets pumped out so turning down is less run time and less heat pumped outside, I would check the size of the make up air intake and possibly throttle it back some but I agree with the temp differential theory.+
– Ed Beal
Mar 15 at 14:43
With newer systems that have make up air the more they run the more conditioned air gets pumped out so turning down is less run time and less heat pumped outside, I would check the size of the make up air intake and possibly throttle it back some but I agree with the temp differential theory.+
– Ed Beal
Mar 15 at 14:43
Heating is always a 100% efficient process. Cooling efficiency, on the other hand, varies.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 19:20
Heating is always a 100% efficient process. Cooling efficiency, on the other hand, varies.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 19:20
2
2
@Nij How can anything operate at better than 100% efficiency? Unless you're talking about a heat pump (which is not what op has) in which case the input is driving a mechanism to move heat from an external source as opposed to providing the heat energy itself.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 21:46
@Nij How can anything operate at better than 100% efficiency? Unless you're talking about a heat pump (which is not what op has) in which case the input is driving a mechanism to move heat from an external source as opposed to providing the heat energy itself.
– MooseBoys
Mar 15 at 21:46
1
1
@Nij Nothing operates at 100% efficiency ... except for the process of converting energy into heat. What would typically be considered "losses" in other processes (friction etc.) are, by definition, useful output in this case.
– MooseBoys
Mar 16 at 1:03
@Nij Nothing operates at 100% efficiency ... except for the process of converting energy into heat. What would typically be considered "losses" in other processes (friction etc.) are, by definition, useful output in this case.
– MooseBoys
Mar 16 at 1:03
7
7
So is this furnace pumping its exhaust into the room too? Because any energy that is carried out by the fumes is total loss, reducing the efficiency. Anything going into grounded pipes is lost to heating stones and dirt, not the house - loss again. This is not useful output, which is what efficiency measures. You're still using the naïve approach of "in = out".
– Nij
Mar 16 at 2:00
So is this furnace pumping its exhaust into the room too? Because any energy that is carried out by the fumes is total loss, reducing the efficiency. Anything going into grounded pipes is lost to heating stones and dirt, not the house - loss again. This is not useful output, which is what efficiency measures. You're still using the naïve approach of "in = out".
– Nij
Mar 16 at 2:00
|
show 4 more comments
Setting back your thermostat to any reasonable temperature for any reason amount of time will only save 5-10% over the course of a season.
Apples to apples
You can't simply compare your bill to your neighbor's bill. There are very numerous reasons why this is impractical. Different construction, exposure, consumption, equipment and more. Even two houses built by the same builder with the same plans will have a different heat loss profile because construction practices are not perfect nor consistent.
Where's the heat going?
Advertised combustion efficiency for fuel burning heating units ranges from 80% to 98%. That's based on availability of heat energy contained in the fuel being burned. So 98% means for every $1 of gas purchased 98 cents worth gets converted to heat available to heat your house. 2 cents goes outside. That's assuming the equipment is setup properly. The heat in your home then gets lost to the environment through the walls, ceiling, ground and infiltration air.
How to set your thermostat
Set it low and with longer run cycles. The advertised rating is determined under laboratory conditions. It takes 10 - 15 minutes for a furnace or the like to reach steady state. If your furnace/boiler is oversized it will turn on and back off before reaching its optimal efficiency. This is a very common problem because installers and scared of getting the call that the furnace is running all day. An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day and the set point is maintained.
No easy answer
Unfortunately there is nothing to point a finger at given the information provided. Setting back your thermostat will have limited impact on your utility cost. Hopefully this information can help you find the issue and address it.
2
Can you please clarify what you mean when you say "longer run cycles?" All I can do is specify what times of day I want the house to be at certain temperatures. For for example, if I want the house at 70 degrees by 8am, then it might start heating the house a half hour early to achieve that temperature by the desired time.
– David
Mar 15 at 15:49
Let's say hypothetically you wanted the house at 70 for 8 am and leave by 9. I would set it a little higher like 72 from 7:30 until 8:15 so the appliance overshoots the desired temperature a little but only has to run 1 time to achieve a satisfactory result.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 15:55
4
Some thermostats let you set a "temperature swing" value. For example, a swing of 2 degrees with the desired temp set to 70 means the furnace will turn ON when the thermostat reads 69.0 degrees and turn OFF when it reads 71.0 degrees. Change the swing to 0.5 degrees and it will turn ON at 69.75 degrees and OFF at 70.25 degrees. A larger swing value means the furnace will run longer each time it turns on, but it will turn on less often throughout the day. It may be worth upgrading to a slightly nicer thermostat. A decent programmable one can usually be found for under $100 in the US.
– Kyle A
Mar 15 at 16:20
3
And old school word for the "swing value" is the "hysteresis control", so anyone interested in that setting should keep an eye out for both.
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 15 at 16:38
That's the deferential. "Set it ... with longer run cycles." - that raises efficiency. - "An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day" - that, I'm not so sure about (now you're paying to run the blower all day). - - "adjust your thermostat for the widest differential your comfort will tolerate to obtain the best efficiency and equipment service length" – How to Lower the Ouptut of Oversized Furnace
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:42
add a comment |
Setting back your thermostat to any reasonable temperature for any reason amount of time will only save 5-10% over the course of a season.
Apples to apples
You can't simply compare your bill to your neighbor's bill. There are very numerous reasons why this is impractical. Different construction, exposure, consumption, equipment and more. Even two houses built by the same builder with the same plans will have a different heat loss profile because construction practices are not perfect nor consistent.
Where's the heat going?
Advertised combustion efficiency for fuel burning heating units ranges from 80% to 98%. That's based on availability of heat energy contained in the fuel being burned. So 98% means for every $1 of gas purchased 98 cents worth gets converted to heat available to heat your house. 2 cents goes outside. That's assuming the equipment is setup properly. The heat in your home then gets lost to the environment through the walls, ceiling, ground and infiltration air.
How to set your thermostat
Set it low and with longer run cycles. The advertised rating is determined under laboratory conditions. It takes 10 - 15 minutes for a furnace or the like to reach steady state. If your furnace/boiler is oversized it will turn on and back off before reaching its optimal efficiency. This is a very common problem because installers and scared of getting the call that the furnace is running all day. An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day and the set point is maintained.
No easy answer
Unfortunately there is nothing to point a finger at given the information provided. Setting back your thermostat will have limited impact on your utility cost. Hopefully this information can help you find the issue and address it.
2
Can you please clarify what you mean when you say "longer run cycles?" All I can do is specify what times of day I want the house to be at certain temperatures. For for example, if I want the house at 70 degrees by 8am, then it might start heating the house a half hour early to achieve that temperature by the desired time.
– David
Mar 15 at 15:49
Let's say hypothetically you wanted the house at 70 for 8 am and leave by 9. I would set it a little higher like 72 from 7:30 until 8:15 so the appliance overshoots the desired temperature a little but only has to run 1 time to achieve a satisfactory result.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 15:55
4
Some thermostats let you set a "temperature swing" value. For example, a swing of 2 degrees with the desired temp set to 70 means the furnace will turn ON when the thermostat reads 69.0 degrees and turn OFF when it reads 71.0 degrees. Change the swing to 0.5 degrees and it will turn ON at 69.75 degrees and OFF at 70.25 degrees. A larger swing value means the furnace will run longer each time it turns on, but it will turn on less often throughout the day. It may be worth upgrading to a slightly nicer thermostat. A decent programmable one can usually be found for under $100 in the US.
– Kyle A
Mar 15 at 16:20
3
And old school word for the "swing value" is the "hysteresis control", so anyone interested in that setting should keep an eye out for both.
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 15 at 16:38
That's the deferential. "Set it ... with longer run cycles." - that raises efficiency. - "An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day" - that, I'm not so sure about (now you're paying to run the blower all day). - - "adjust your thermostat for the widest differential your comfort will tolerate to obtain the best efficiency and equipment service length" – How to Lower the Ouptut of Oversized Furnace
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:42
add a comment |
Setting back your thermostat to any reasonable temperature for any reason amount of time will only save 5-10% over the course of a season.
Apples to apples
You can't simply compare your bill to your neighbor's bill. There are very numerous reasons why this is impractical. Different construction, exposure, consumption, equipment and more. Even two houses built by the same builder with the same plans will have a different heat loss profile because construction practices are not perfect nor consistent.
Where's the heat going?
Advertised combustion efficiency for fuel burning heating units ranges from 80% to 98%. That's based on availability of heat energy contained in the fuel being burned. So 98% means for every $1 of gas purchased 98 cents worth gets converted to heat available to heat your house. 2 cents goes outside. That's assuming the equipment is setup properly. The heat in your home then gets lost to the environment through the walls, ceiling, ground and infiltration air.
How to set your thermostat
Set it low and with longer run cycles. The advertised rating is determined under laboratory conditions. It takes 10 - 15 minutes for a furnace or the like to reach steady state. If your furnace/boiler is oversized it will turn on and back off before reaching its optimal efficiency. This is a very common problem because installers and scared of getting the call that the furnace is running all day. An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day and the set point is maintained.
No easy answer
Unfortunately there is nothing to point a finger at given the information provided. Setting back your thermostat will have limited impact on your utility cost. Hopefully this information can help you find the issue and address it.
Setting back your thermostat to any reasonable temperature for any reason amount of time will only save 5-10% over the course of a season.
Apples to apples
You can't simply compare your bill to your neighbor's bill. There are very numerous reasons why this is impractical. Different construction, exposure, consumption, equipment and more. Even two houses built by the same builder with the same plans will have a different heat loss profile because construction practices are not perfect nor consistent.
Where's the heat going?
Advertised combustion efficiency for fuel burning heating units ranges from 80% to 98%. That's based on availability of heat energy contained in the fuel being burned. So 98% means for every $1 of gas purchased 98 cents worth gets converted to heat available to heat your house. 2 cents goes outside. That's assuming the equipment is setup properly. The heat in your home then gets lost to the environment through the walls, ceiling, ground and infiltration air.
How to set your thermostat
Set it low and with longer run cycles. The advertised rating is determined under laboratory conditions. It takes 10 - 15 minutes for a furnace or the like to reach steady state. If your furnace/boiler is oversized it will turn on and back off before reaching its optimal efficiency. This is a very common problem because installers and scared of getting the call that the furnace is running all day. An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day and the set point is maintained.
No easy answer
Unfortunately there is nothing to point a finger at given the information provided. Setting back your thermostat will have limited impact on your utility cost. Hopefully this information can help you find the issue and address it.
edited Mar 17 at 12:46
Jerry_Contrary
3,085322
3,085322
answered Mar 15 at 15:38
Joe FalaJoe Fala
4,313227
4,313227
2
Can you please clarify what you mean when you say "longer run cycles?" All I can do is specify what times of day I want the house to be at certain temperatures. For for example, if I want the house at 70 degrees by 8am, then it might start heating the house a half hour early to achieve that temperature by the desired time.
– David
Mar 15 at 15:49
Let's say hypothetically you wanted the house at 70 for 8 am and leave by 9. I would set it a little higher like 72 from 7:30 until 8:15 so the appliance overshoots the desired temperature a little but only has to run 1 time to achieve a satisfactory result.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 15:55
4
Some thermostats let you set a "temperature swing" value. For example, a swing of 2 degrees with the desired temp set to 70 means the furnace will turn ON when the thermostat reads 69.0 degrees and turn OFF when it reads 71.0 degrees. Change the swing to 0.5 degrees and it will turn ON at 69.75 degrees and OFF at 70.25 degrees. A larger swing value means the furnace will run longer each time it turns on, but it will turn on less often throughout the day. It may be worth upgrading to a slightly nicer thermostat. A decent programmable one can usually be found for under $100 in the US.
– Kyle A
Mar 15 at 16:20
3
And old school word for the "swing value" is the "hysteresis control", so anyone interested in that setting should keep an eye out for both.
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 15 at 16:38
That's the deferential. "Set it ... with longer run cycles." - that raises efficiency. - "An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day" - that, I'm not so sure about (now you're paying to run the blower all day). - - "adjust your thermostat for the widest differential your comfort will tolerate to obtain the best efficiency and equipment service length" – How to Lower the Ouptut of Oversized Furnace
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:42
add a comment |
2
Can you please clarify what you mean when you say "longer run cycles?" All I can do is specify what times of day I want the house to be at certain temperatures. For for example, if I want the house at 70 degrees by 8am, then it might start heating the house a half hour early to achieve that temperature by the desired time.
– David
Mar 15 at 15:49
Let's say hypothetically you wanted the house at 70 for 8 am and leave by 9. I would set it a little higher like 72 from 7:30 until 8:15 so the appliance overshoots the desired temperature a little but only has to run 1 time to achieve a satisfactory result.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 15:55
4
Some thermostats let you set a "temperature swing" value. For example, a swing of 2 degrees with the desired temp set to 70 means the furnace will turn ON when the thermostat reads 69.0 degrees and turn OFF when it reads 71.0 degrees. Change the swing to 0.5 degrees and it will turn ON at 69.75 degrees and OFF at 70.25 degrees. A larger swing value means the furnace will run longer each time it turns on, but it will turn on less often throughout the day. It may be worth upgrading to a slightly nicer thermostat. A decent programmable one can usually be found for under $100 in the US.
– Kyle A
Mar 15 at 16:20
3
And old school word for the "swing value" is the "hysteresis control", so anyone interested in that setting should keep an eye out for both.
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 15 at 16:38
That's the deferential. "Set it ... with longer run cycles." - that raises efficiency. - "An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day" - that, I'm not so sure about (now you're paying to run the blower all day). - - "adjust your thermostat for the widest differential your comfort will tolerate to obtain the best efficiency and equipment service length" – How to Lower the Ouptut of Oversized Furnace
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:42
2
2
Can you please clarify what you mean when you say "longer run cycles?" All I can do is specify what times of day I want the house to be at certain temperatures. For for example, if I want the house at 70 degrees by 8am, then it might start heating the house a half hour early to achieve that temperature by the desired time.
– David
Mar 15 at 15:49
Can you please clarify what you mean when you say "longer run cycles?" All I can do is specify what times of day I want the house to be at certain temperatures. For for example, if I want the house at 70 degrees by 8am, then it might start heating the house a half hour early to achieve that temperature by the desired time.
– David
Mar 15 at 15:49
Let's say hypothetically you wanted the house at 70 for 8 am and leave by 9. I would set it a little higher like 72 from 7:30 until 8:15 so the appliance overshoots the desired temperature a little but only has to run 1 time to achieve a satisfactory result.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 15:55
Let's say hypothetically you wanted the house at 70 for 8 am and leave by 9. I would set it a little higher like 72 from 7:30 until 8:15 so the appliance overshoots the desired temperature a little but only has to run 1 time to achieve a satisfactory result.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 15:55
4
4
Some thermostats let you set a "temperature swing" value. For example, a swing of 2 degrees with the desired temp set to 70 means the furnace will turn ON when the thermostat reads 69.0 degrees and turn OFF when it reads 71.0 degrees. Change the swing to 0.5 degrees and it will turn ON at 69.75 degrees and OFF at 70.25 degrees. A larger swing value means the furnace will run longer each time it turns on, but it will turn on less often throughout the day. It may be worth upgrading to a slightly nicer thermostat. A decent programmable one can usually be found for under $100 in the US.
– Kyle A
Mar 15 at 16:20
Some thermostats let you set a "temperature swing" value. For example, a swing of 2 degrees with the desired temp set to 70 means the furnace will turn ON when the thermostat reads 69.0 degrees and turn OFF when it reads 71.0 degrees. Change the swing to 0.5 degrees and it will turn ON at 69.75 degrees and OFF at 70.25 degrees. A larger swing value means the furnace will run longer each time it turns on, but it will turn on less often throughout the day. It may be worth upgrading to a slightly nicer thermostat. A decent programmable one can usually be found for under $100 in the US.
– Kyle A
Mar 15 at 16:20
3
3
And old school word for the "swing value" is the "hysteresis control", so anyone interested in that setting should keep an eye out for both.
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 15 at 16:38
And old school word for the "swing value" is the "hysteresis control", so anyone interested in that setting should keep an eye out for both.
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 15 at 16:38
That's the deferential. "Set it ... with longer run cycles." - that raises efficiency. - "An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day" - that, I'm not so sure about (now you're paying to run the blower all day). - - "adjust your thermostat for the widest differential your comfort will tolerate to obtain the best efficiency and equipment service length" – How to Lower the Ouptut of Oversized Furnace
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:42
That's the deferential. "Set it ... with longer run cycles." - that raises efficiency. - "An optimal configuration is one where the furnace runs all day" - that, I'm not so sure about (now you're paying to run the blower all day). - - "adjust your thermostat for the widest differential your comfort will tolerate to obtain the best efficiency and equipment service length" – How to Lower the Ouptut of Oversized Furnace
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:42
add a comment |
Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
I'm going to assume we're only comparing heat costs, not Gas vs. Gas costs, which may include other factors like dryers, water heaters, ranges (stoves / ovens).
Do your neighbors have multi-stage systems? If so, do you? Note: multi-zone and multi-stage are two very different things: multi-zone means you can set different areas of the house to different temperatures, multi-stage means the system itself will only draw as much energy as it needs to heat, usually prioritizing using as little as possible.
As an anecdote: I have a multi-stage heating and cooling system. What does this mean? This means, as indicated in another answer, my system runs in one of three modes: low/efficient, medium/efficient, high/inefficient.
If you have single-stage, but your neighbors have two+-stage, you'll probably always have a higher heating bill, all other things being equal.
Effectively, with any given heating/cooling unit, the air in your house is heated up slowly and unevenly. There are parts of the house that will naturally be warmer and parts that will naturally be cooler. Depending on thermostat placement, this can cause a significant change. If your thermostat temp varies wildly, your heat will run inconsistently.
When using a single-stage system, it always puts out the same heat. This means that there are several things that differ between single-/multi-stage systems:
Consistency. A single-stage system has less consistent temperatures in the house, because it can only heat at 1 rate. This means that it always heats at "maximum", even when the variation is very small. Thus, even though most of the house might be comfortable, until the thermostat says "turn off", it still puts out MAX heat. This means that when the thermostat finally does say "turn off", the overall temp will be higher because air is still mixing.
Frequency. Often, a single-stage system runs less frequently than a multi-stage system because of this variation. It overheats the house during each run.
Consumption. As obvious, a single-stage system runs at 100% energy-consumption when it is running. Multi-stage systems do not. This can be good and bad, depending on the weather.
There are lots of articles about the differences, I'll point this one out specifically: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SINGLE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE HEATING
To continue my anecdote: my multi-stage heating system actually costs me about 20% less than my neighbors, whom all have single-stage systems. I live in Toledo, OH, right next to Lake Erie, my weather / seasons are almost identical to yours. The upfront cost was higher, but my overall maintenance and heating costs are lower. (Mine is a 1970's install, all of theirs are 2010's and later, and I still pay less for my heating cost, and I have my temperatures about 3°F higher than them.) Mine is three-stage instead of two, but you should gather that this is a major possible reason for the difference.
So, what do you do?
First: check if they installed a single-/multi-stage system. If they installed multi-stage, verify that your thermostat configuration(s) is/are appropriate. If it's multi-stage, make sure they installed a multi-stage thermostat. Make sure the thermostat is configured to use multi-stage mode. (Many thermostats have support for two-stage, but you have to turn it on, because it uses things very differently. If it's multi-stage, make sure that feature is on.)
Second: if it's a single-stage system, you might always have a higher heating-bill. It's worth evaluating if it's cost-effective to replace the furnace with a multi-stage system. It's also worth exploring further insulation, and any locations that air might be escaping or leaking in.
Third: you may want to explore pressurization systems. Some people report success with reducing bills by pressurizing the house/attic, some don't. It might be another option you can use to see if it helps keep the house more comfortable. (Generally, if the house is at high-pressure, heat will escape, if it's at low-pressure: cold will leak in. Whether or not high/low pressure is beneficial is something that seems to vary highly per-house, per-setup.)
Fourth: check doors / windows. Make sure your doors are well-insulated, make sure the windows themselves are well-insulated. You can try adding curtains on all the windows and closing them to see if you have poor windows. (Old windows were often more poorly insulated. With my anecdote: my windows are literally less than 1 year old, which is a major factor in where heat escapes.)
Fifth: do you have bathroom exhaust fans? If so, try plugging them if you can stand it and see if that helps. (My dad used to lose a lot of heat due to poorly-installed bathroom exhaust fans.)
Sixth: do you have a basement? Are any basement walls exposed? Is your heating system trying to heat the basement? This may be another factor.
Seventh: is your system properly-sized? If you have vaulted / cathedral / high ceilings in the house, make sure those calculations were taken into consideration when the system was installed. (I've seen really bad HVAC installers not take that into consideration and under-size system installation, which resulted in exactly your issue was well as the system running constantly.)
Finally, you asked explicitly about scheduling: I personally don't use (nor recommend) it.
Generally, with scheduling, you would set the house to a more uncomfortable temperature when you're gone (hotter in the summer, cooler in the winter). This can actually do more harm than good, depending.
When you change the temperature like that, your walls, floors, and ceilings are significantly affected. You normally wouldn't notice the effect at a constant heat, because it takes a long time for those areas to change, but 8-10 hours (a typically workday) is plenty-long for those changes.
This means that when the heat comes back up, it'll take much longer for it to get the house to a consistent temperature, because the walls/floors/ceilings have to catch up. This can actually do more harm than good, though it's an experiment to try, I would not be surprised if it went poorly for you. (Again, this varies significantly by insulation / build quality / weather. One answer indicates success with this, so it might be worth exploring.)
add a comment |
Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
I'm going to assume we're only comparing heat costs, not Gas vs. Gas costs, which may include other factors like dryers, water heaters, ranges (stoves / ovens).
Do your neighbors have multi-stage systems? If so, do you? Note: multi-zone and multi-stage are two very different things: multi-zone means you can set different areas of the house to different temperatures, multi-stage means the system itself will only draw as much energy as it needs to heat, usually prioritizing using as little as possible.
As an anecdote: I have a multi-stage heating and cooling system. What does this mean? This means, as indicated in another answer, my system runs in one of three modes: low/efficient, medium/efficient, high/inefficient.
If you have single-stage, but your neighbors have two+-stage, you'll probably always have a higher heating bill, all other things being equal.
Effectively, with any given heating/cooling unit, the air in your house is heated up slowly and unevenly. There are parts of the house that will naturally be warmer and parts that will naturally be cooler. Depending on thermostat placement, this can cause a significant change. If your thermostat temp varies wildly, your heat will run inconsistently.
When using a single-stage system, it always puts out the same heat. This means that there are several things that differ between single-/multi-stage systems:
Consistency. A single-stage system has less consistent temperatures in the house, because it can only heat at 1 rate. This means that it always heats at "maximum", even when the variation is very small. Thus, even though most of the house might be comfortable, until the thermostat says "turn off", it still puts out MAX heat. This means that when the thermostat finally does say "turn off", the overall temp will be higher because air is still mixing.
Frequency. Often, a single-stage system runs less frequently than a multi-stage system because of this variation. It overheats the house during each run.
Consumption. As obvious, a single-stage system runs at 100% energy-consumption when it is running. Multi-stage systems do not. This can be good and bad, depending on the weather.
There are lots of articles about the differences, I'll point this one out specifically: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SINGLE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE HEATING
To continue my anecdote: my multi-stage heating system actually costs me about 20% less than my neighbors, whom all have single-stage systems. I live in Toledo, OH, right next to Lake Erie, my weather / seasons are almost identical to yours. The upfront cost was higher, but my overall maintenance and heating costs are lower. (Mine is a 1970's install, all of theirs are 2010's and later, and I still pay less for my heating cost, and I have my temperatures about 3°F higher than them.) Mine is three-stage instead of two, but you should gather that this is a major possible reason for the difference.
So, what do you do?
First: check if they installed a single-/multi-stage system. If they installed multi-stage, verify that your thermostat configuration(s) is/are appropriate. If it's multi-stage, make sure they installed a multi-stage thermostat. Make sure the thermostat is configured to use multi-stage mode. (Many thermostats have support for two-stage, but you have to turn it on, because it uses things very differently. If it's multi-stage, make sure that feature is on.)
Second: if it's a single-stage system, you might always have a higher heating-bill. It's worth evaluating if it's cost-effective to replace the furnace with a multi-stage system. It's also worth exploring further insulation, and any locations that air might be escaping or leaking in.
Third: you may want to explore pressurization systems. Some people report success with reducing bills by pressurizing the house/attic, some don't. It might be another option you can use to see if it helps keep the house more comfortable. (Generally, if the house is at high-pressure, heat will escape, if it's at low-pressure: cold will leak in. Whether or not high/low pressure is beneficial is something that seems to vary highly per-house, per-setup.)
Fourth: check doors / windows. Make sure your doors are well-insulated, make sure the windows themselves are well-insulated. You can try adding curtains on all the windows and closing them to see if you have poor windows. (Old windows were often more poorly insulated. With my anecdote: my windows are literally less than 1 year old, which is a major factor in where heat escapes.)
Fifth: do you have bathroom exhaust fans? If so, try plugging them if you can stand it and see if that helps. (My dad used to lose a lot of heat due to poorly-installed bathroom exhaust fans.)
Sixth: do you have a basement? Are any basement walls exposed? Is your heating system trying to heat the basement? This may be another factor.
Seventh: is your system properly-sized? If you have vaulted / cathedral / high ceilings in the house, make sure those calculations were taken into consideration when the system was installed. (I've seen really bad HVAC installers not take that into consideration and under-size system installation, which resulted in exactly your issue was well as the system running constantly.)
Finally, you asked explicitly about scheduling: I personally don't use (nor recommend) it.
Generally, with scheduling, you would set the house to a more uncomfortable temperature when you're gone (hotter in the summer, cooler in the winter). This can actually do more harm than good, depending.
When you change the temperature like that, your walls, floors, and ceilings are significantly affected. You normally wouldn't notice the effect at a constant heat, because it takes a long time for those areas to change, but 8-10 hours (a typically workday) is plenty-long for those changes.
This means that when the heat comes back up, it'll take much longer for it to get the house to a consistent temperature, because the walls/floors/ceilings have to catch up. This can actually do more harm than good, though it's an experiment to try, I would not be surprised if it went poorly for you. (Again, this varies significantly by insulation / build quality / weather. One answer indicates success with this, so it might be worth exploring.)
add a comment |
Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
I'm going to assume we're only comparing heat costs, not Gas vs. Gas costs, which may include other factors like dryers, water heaters, ranges (stoves / ovens).
Do your neighbors have multi-stage systems? If so, do you? Note: multi-zone and multi-stage are two very different things: multi-zone means you can set different areas of the house to different temperatures, multi-stage means the system itself will only draw as much energy as it needs to heat, usually prioritizing using as little as possible.
As an anecdote: I have a multi-stage heating and cooling system. What does this mean? This means, as indicated in another answer, my system runs in one of three modes: low/efficient, medium/efficient, high/inefficient.
If you have single-stage, but your neighbors have two+-stage, you'll probably always have a higher heating bill, all other things being equal.
Effectively, with any given heating/cooling unit, the air in your house is heated up slowly and unevenly. There are parts of the house that will naturally be warmer and parts that will naturally be cooler. Depending on thermostat placement, this can cause a significant change. If your thermostat temp varies wildly, your heat will run inconsistently.
When using a single-stage system, it always puts out the same heat. This means that there are several things that differ between single-/multi-stage systems:
Consistency. A single-stage system has less consistent temperatures in the house, because it can only heat at 1 rate. This means that it always heats at "maximum", even when the variation is very small. Thus, even though most of the house might be comfortable, until the thermostat says "turn off", it still puts out MAX heat. This means that when the thermostat finally does say "turn off", the overall temp will be higher because air is still mixing.
Frequency. Often, a single-stage system runs less frequently than a multi-stage system because of this variation. It overheats the house during each run.
Consumption. As obvious, a single-stage system runs at 100% energy-consumption when it is running. Multi-stage systems do not. This can be good and bad, depending on the weather.
There are lots of articles about the differences, I'll point this one out specifically: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SINGLE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE HEATING
To continue my anecdote: my multi-stage heating system actually costs me about 20% less than my neighbors, whom all have single-stage systems. I live in Toledo, OH, right next to Lake Erie, my weather / seasons are almost identical to yours. The upfront cost was higher, but my overall maintenance and heating costs are lower. (Mine is a 1970's install, all of theirs are 2010's and later, and I still pay less for my heating cost, and I have my temperatures about 3°F higher than them.) Mine is three-stage instead of two, but you should gather that this is a major possible reason for the difference.
So, what do you do?
First: check if they installed a single-/multi-stage system. If they installed multi-stage, verify that your thermostat configuration(s) is/are appropriate. If it's multi-stage, make sure they installed a multi-stage thermostat. Make sure the thermostat is configured to use multi-stage mode. (Many thermostats have support for two-stage, but you have to turn it on, because it uses things very differently. If it's multi-stage, make sure that feature is on.)
Second: if it's a single-stage system, you might always have a higher heating-bill. It's worth evaluating if it's cost-effective to replace the furnace with a multi-stage system. It's also worth exploring further insulation, and any locations that air might be escaping or leaking in.
Third: you may want to explore pressurization systems. Some people report success with reducing bills by pressurizing the house/attic, some don't. It might be another option you can use to see if it helps keep the house more comfortable. (Generally, if the house is at high-pressure, heat will escape, if it's at low-pressure: cold will leak in. Whether or not high/low pressure is beneficial is something that seems to vary highly per-house, per-setup.)
Fourth: check doors / windows. Make sure your doors are well-insulated, make sure the windows themselves are well-insulated. You can try adding curtains on all the windows and closing them to see if you have poor windows. (Old windows were often more poorly insulated. With my anecdote: my windows are literally less than 1 year old, which is a major factor in where heat escapes.)
Fifth: do you have bathroom exhaust fans? If so, try plugging them if you can stand it and see if that helps. (My dad used to lose a lot of heat due to poorly-installed bathroom exhaust fans.)
Sixth: do you have a basement? Are any basement walls exposed? Is your heating system trying to heat the basement? This may be another factor.
Seventh: is your system properly-sized? If you have vaulted / cathedral / high ceilings in the house, make sure those calculations were taken into consideration when the system was installed. (I've seen really bad HVAC installers not take that into consideration and under-size system installation, which resulted in exactly your issue was well as the system running constantly.)
Finally, you asked explicitly about scheduling: I personally don't use (nor recommend) it.
Generally, with scheduling, you would set the house to a more uncomfortable temperature when you're gone (hotter in the summer, cooler in the winter). This can actually do more harm than good, depending.
When you change the temperature like that, your walls, floors, and ceilings are significantly affected. You normally wouldn't notice the effect at a constant heat, because it takes a long time for those areas to change, but 8-10 hours (a typically workday) is plenty-long for those changes.
This means that when the heat comes back up, it'll take much longer for it to get the house to a consistent temperature, because the walls/floors/ceilings have to catch up. This can actually do more harm than good, though it's an experiment to try, I would not be surprised if it went poorly for you. (Again, this varies significantly by insulation / build quality / weather. One answer indicates success with this, so it might be worth exploring.)
Our heating bills are about 25% higher than our average neighbors according to our bill, yet our temperature is always as low as we can stand it (mid 50's), we have excellent insulation throughout the house, we don't have drafty windows, and our furnace is a brand new natural gas system. The WAY we are heating is one of the last variables to explore.
I'm going to assume we're only comparing heat costs, not Gas vs. Gas costs, which may include other factors like dryers, water heaters, ranges (stoves / ovens).
Do your neighbors have multi-stage systems? If so, do you? Note: multi-zone and multi-stage are two very different things: multi-zone means you can set different areas of the house to different temperatures, multi-stage means the system itself will only draw as much energy as it needs to heat, usually prioritizing using as little as possible.
As an anecdote: I have a multi-stage heating and cooling system. What does this mean? This means, as indicated in another answer, my system runs in one of three modes: low/efficient, medium/efficient, high/inefficient.
If you have single-stage, but your neighbors have two+-stage, you'll probably always have a higher heating bill, all other things being equal.
Effectively, with any given heating/cooling unit, the air in your house is heated up slowly and unevenly. There are parts of the house that will naturally be warmer and parts that will naturally be cooler. Depending on thermostat placement, this can cause a significant change. If your thermostat temp varies wildly, your heat will run inconsistently.
When using a single-stage system, it always puts out the same heat. This means that there are several things that differ between single-/multi-stage systems:
Consistency. A single-stage system has less consistent temperatures in the house, because it can only heat at 1 rate. This means that it always heats at "maximum", even when the variation is very small. Thus, even though most of the house might be comfortable, until the thermostat says "turn off", it still puts out MAX heat. This means that when the thermostat finally does say "turn off", the overall temp will be higher because air is still mixing.
Frequency. Often, a single-stage system runs less frequently than a multi-stage system because of this variation. It overheats the house during each run.
Consumption. As obvious, a single-stage system runs at 100% energy-consumption when it is running. Multi-stage systems do not. This can be good and bad, depending on the weather.
There are lots of articles about the differences, I'll point this one out specifically: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SINGLE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE HEATING
To continue my anecdote: my multi-stage heating system actually costs me about 20% less than my neighbors, whom all have single-stage systems. I live in Toledo, OH, right next to Lake Erie, my weather / seasons are almost identical to yours. The upfront cost was higher, but my overall maintenance and heating costs are lower. (Mine is a 1970's install, all of theirs are 2010's and later, and I still pay less for my heating cost, and I have my temperatures about 3°F higher than them.) Mine is three-stage instead of two, but you should gather that this is a major possible reason for the difference.
So, what do you do?
First: check if they installed a single-/multi-stage system. If they installed multi-stage, verify that your thermostat configuration(s) is/are appropriate. If it's multi-stage, make sure they installed a multi-stage thermostat. Make sure the thermostat is configured to use multi-stage mode. (Many thermostats have support for two-stage, but you have to turn it on, because it uses things very differently. If it's multi-stage, make sure that feature is on.)
Second: if it's a single-stage system, you might always have a higher heating-bill. It's worth evaluating if it's cost-effective to replace the furnace with a multi-stage system. It's also worth exploring further insulation, and any locations that air might be escaping or leaking in.
Third: you may want to explore pressurization systems. Some people report success with reducing bills by pressurizing the house/attic, some don't. It might be another option you can use to see if it helps keep the house more comfortable. (Generally, if the house is at high-pressure, heat will escape, if it's at low-pressure: cold will leak in. Whether or not high/low pressure is beneficial is something that seems to vary highly per-house, per-setup.)
Fourth: check doors / windows. Make sure your doors are well-insulated, make sure the windows themselves are well-insulated. You can try adding curtains on all the windows and closing them to see if you have poor windows. (Old windows were often more poorly insulated. With my anecdote: my windows are literally less than 1 year old, which is a major factor in where heat escapes.)
Fifth: do you have bathroom exhaust fans? If so, try plugging them if you can stand it and see if that helps. (My dad used to lose a lot of heat due to poorly-installed bathroom exhaust fans.)
Sixth: do you have a basement? Are any basement walls exposed? Is your heating system trying to heat the basement? This may be another factor.
Seventh: is your system properly-sized? If you have vaulted / cathedral / high ceilings in the house, make sure those calculations were taken into consideration when the system was installed. (I've seen really bad HVAC installers not take that into consideration and under-size system installation, which resulted in exactly your issue was well as the system running constantly.)
Finally, you asked explicitly about scheduling: I personally don't use (nor recommend) it.
Generally, with scheduling, you would set the house to a more uncomfortable temperature when you're gone (hotter in the summer, cooler in the winter). This can actually do more harm than good, depending.
When you change the temperature like that, your walls, floors, and ceilings are significantly affected. You normally wouldn't notice the effect at a constant heat, because it takes a long time for those areas to change, but 8-10 hours (a typically workday) is plenty-long for those changes.
This means that when the heat comes back up, it'll take much longer for it to get the house to a consistent temperature, because the walls/floors/ceilings have to catch up. This can actually do more harm than good, though it's an experiment to try, I would not be surprised if it went poorly for you. (Again, this varies significantly by insulation / build quality / weather. One answer indicates success with this, so it might be worth exploring.)
edited Mar 15 at 19:30
answered Mar 15 at 16:05
Der KommissarDer Kommissar
45635
45635
add a comment |
add a comment |
And are there any other factors to consider?
There is one factor of note that you have attempted to consider:
we don't have drafty windows
Unfortunately, the idea that windows are a major factor in a house's draftiness (or more technically, air change rate) is a common misconception. The reality is that the vast majority of draftiness is completely hidden, out of sight, in the thousands of feet of seams & gaps hidden behind trim and in unfinished spaces, in holes for utility to pass through. The only way you can really know whether or not a building is losing a lot of heat by leaking conditioned air to the outdoors is by testing it with a blower door (though many of the flaws can be detected with a thermal camera if you have the experience to know where & how to look).
add a comment |
And are there any other factors to consider?
There is one factor of note that you have attempted to consider:
we don't have drafty windows
Unfortunately, the idea that windows are a major factor in a house's draftiness (or more technically, air change rate) is a common misconception. The reality is that the vast majority of draftiness is completely hidden, out of sight, in the thousands of feet of seams & gaps hidden behind trim and in unfinished spaces, in holes for utility to pass through. The only way you can really know whether or not a building is losing a lot of heat by leaking conditioned air to the outdoors is by testing it with a blower door (though many of the flaws can be detected with a thermal camera if you have the experience to know where & how to look).
add a comment |
And are there any other factors to consider?
There is one factor of note that you have attempted to consider:
we don't have drafty windows
Unfortunately, the idea that windows are a major factor in a house's draftiness (or more technically, air change rate) is a common misconception. The reality is that the vast majority of draftiness is completely hidden, out of sight, in the thousands of feet of seams & gaps hidden behind trim and in unfinished spaces, in holes for utility to pass through. The only way you can really know whether or not a building is losing a lot of heat by leaking conditioned air to the outdoors is by testing it with a blower door (though many of the flaws can be detected with a thermal camera if you have the experience to know where & how to look).
And are there any other factors to consider?
There is one factor of note that you have attempted to consider:
we don't have drafty windows
Unfortunately, the idea that windows are a major factor in a house's draftiness (or more technically, air change rate) is a common misconception. The reality is that the vast majority of draftiness is completely hidden, out of sight, in the thousands of feet of seams & gaps hidden behind trim and in unfinished spaces, in holes for utility to pass through. The only way you can really know whether or not a building is losing a lot of heat by leaking conditioned air to the outdoors is by testing it with a blower door (though many of the flaws can be detected with a thermal camera if you have the experience to know where & how to look).
edited Mar 16 at 4:10
answered Mar 15 at 22:55
ZhentarZhentar
1,11247
1,11247
add a comment |
add a comment |
It is a myth that furnaces need to work "harder" if turned off for a while or if the room cools or heats too much. This has been tested and is recommended even by the government:
https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/thermostats
https://blog.powerley.com/mythbuster-using-a-thermostat-setback-for-energy-savings/
You should have your thermostat as cold as possible during winter and hot as possible during summer to minimize energy use. This applies whether you are at home or away.
1
Furnaces don't need to work hard, they need to reach steady state which takes about 10 minutes. Short cycling has other impacts on the system such as cracked heat exchangers. Repeatedly heating metal to 1000°F and back down to 70°F in rapid succession is devastating to the metals integrity. I heat my 2000 sq foot home in Toronto with a 60mbtu 98% modulating furnace which runs pretty much nonstop from November to April. My dryer is gas, my stove is gas and my tankless water heater is gas. There are 7 people living in my house, two of them teens. My gas bill is $120 a month.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 17:54
@JoeFala - Yeah, but when's your RoI on that $40k worth of 98% gas fired appliances? ;p
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:47
1
Note that this is only mythical for fuel-fired heating appliances -- heat pumps have way more trouble recovering from setback!
– ThreePhaseEel
Mar 16 at 1:22
1
@Mazura modulating furnaces aren't that expensive they are about 1000 dollars more than a 2 stage. Plus they automatically come with an electronically commutated motor which saves on the hydro bill as well. Return on investment in my climate and house is around 3 years.
– Joe Fala
Mar 16 at 3:38
add a comment |
It is a myth that furnaces need to work "harder" if turned off for a while or if the room cools or heats too much. This has been tested and is recommended even by the government:
https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/thermostats
https://blog.powerley.com/mythbuster-using-a-thermostat-setback-for-energy-savings/
You should have your thermostat as cold as possible during winter and hot as possible during summer to minimize energy use. This applies whether you are at home or away.
1
Furnaces don't need to work hard, they need to reach steady state which takes about 10 minutes. Short cycling has other impacts on the system such as cracked heat exchangers. Repeatedly heating metal to 1000°F and back down to 70°F in rapid succession is devastating to the metals integrity. I heat my 2000 sq foot home in Toronto with a 60mbtu 98% modulating furnace which runs pretty much nonstop from November to April. My dryer is gas, my stove is gas and my tankless water heater is gas. There are 7 people living in my house, two of them teens. My gas bill is $120 a month.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 17:54
@JoeFala - Yeah, but when's your RoI on that $40k worth of 98% gas fired appliances? ;p
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:47
1
Note that this is only mythical for fuel-fired heating appliances -- heat pumps have way more trouble recovering from setback!
– ThreePhaseEel
Mar 16 at 1:22
1
@Mazura modulating furnaces aren't that expensive they are about 1000 dollars more than a 2 stage. Plus they automatically come with an electronically commutated motor which saves on the hydro bill as well. Return on investment in my climate and house is around 3 years.
– Joe Fala
Mar 16 at 3:38
add a comment |
It is a myth that furnaces need to work "harder" if turned off for a while or if the room cools or heats too much. This has been tested and is recommended even by the government:
https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/thermostats
https://blog.powerley.com/mythbuster-using-a-thermostat-setback-for-energy-savings/
You should have your thermostat as cold as possible during winter and hot as possible during summer to minimize energy use. This applies whether you are at home or away.
It is a myth that furnaces need to work "harder" if turned off for a while or if the room cools or heats too much. This has been tested and is recommended even by the government:
https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/thermostats
https://blog.powerley.com/mythbuster-using-a-thermostat-setback-for-energy-savings/
You should have your thermostat as cold as possible during winter and hot as possible during summer to minimize energy use. This applies whether you are at home or away.
edited Mar 15 at 18:42
answered Mar 15 at 17:04
BehacadBehacad
1212
1212
1
Furnaces don't need to work hard, they need to reach steady state which takes about 10 minutes. Short cycling has other impacts on the system such as cracked heat exchangers. Repeatedly heating metal to 1000°F and back down to 70°F in rapid succession is devastating to the metals integrity. I heat my 2000 sq foot home in Toronto with a 60mbtu 98% modulating furnace which runs pretty much nonstop from November to April. My dryer is gas, my stove is gas and my tankless water heater is gas. There are 7 people living in my house, two of them teens. My gas bill is $120 a month.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 17:54
@JoeFala - Yeah, but when's your RoI on that $40k worth of 98% gas fired appliances? ;p
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:47
1
Note that this is only mythical for fuel-fired heating appliances -- heat pumps have way more trouble recovering from setback!
– ThreePhaseEel
Mar 16 at 1:22
1
@Mazura modulating furnaces aren't that expensive they are about 1000 dollars more than a 2 stage. Plus they automatically come with an electronically commutated motor which saves on the hydro bill as well. Return on investment in my climate and house is around 3 years.
– Joe Fala
Mar 16 at 3:38
add a comment |
1
Furnaces don't need to work hard, they need to reach steady state which takes about 10 minutes. Short cycling has other impacts on the system such as cracked heat exchangers. Repeatedly heating metal to 1000°F and back down to 70°F in rapid succession is devastating to the metals integrity. I heat my 2000 sq foot home in Toronto with a 60mbtu 98% modulating furnace which runs pretty much nonstop from November to April. My dryer is gas, my stove is gas and my tankless water heater is gas. There are 7 people living in my house, two of them teens. My gas bill is $120 a month.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 17:54
@JoeFala - Yeah, but when's your RoI on that $40k worth of 98% gas fired appliances? ;p
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:47
1
Note that this is only mythical for fuel-fired heating appliances -- heat pumps have way more trouble recovering from setback!
– ThreePhaseEel
Mar 16 at 1:22
1
@Mazura modulating furnaces aren't that expensive they are about 1000 dollars more than a 2 stage. Plus they automatically come with an electronically commutated motor which saves on the hydro bill as well. Return on investment in my climate and house is around 3 years.
– Joe Fala
Mar 16 at 3:38
1
1
Furnaces don't need to work hard, they need to reach steady state which takes about 10 minutes. Short cycling has other impacts on the system such as cracked heat exchangers. Repeatedly heating metal to 1000°F and back down to 70°F in rapid succession is devastating to the metals integrity. I heat my 2000 sq foot home in Toronto with a 60mbtu 98% modulating furnace which runs pretty much nonstop from November to April. My dryer is gas, my stove is gas and my tankless water heater is gas. There are 7 people living in my house, two of them teens. My gas bill is $120 a month.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 17:54
Furnaces don't need to work hard, they need to reach steady state which takes about 10 minutes. Short cycling has other impacts on the system such as cracked heat exchangers. Repeatedly heating metal to 1000°F and back down to 70°F in rapid succession is devastating to the metals integrity. I heat my 2000 sq foot home in Toronto with a 60mbtu 98% modulating furnace which runs pretty much nonstop from November to April. My dryer is gas, my stove is gas and my tankless water heater is gas. There are 7 people living in my house, two of them teens. My gas bill is $120 a month.
– Joe Fala
Mar 15 at 17:54
@JoeFala - Yeah, but when's your RoI on that $40k worth of 98% gas fired appliances? ;p
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:47
@JoeFala - Yeah, but when's your RoI on that $40k worth of 98% gas fired appliances? ;p
– Mazura
Mar 15 at 22:47
1
1
Note that this is only mythical for fuel-fired heating appliances -- heat pumps have way more trouble recovering from setback!
– ThreePhaseEel
Mar 16 at 1:22
Note that this is only mythical for fuel-fired heating appliances -- heat pumps have way more trouble recovering from setback!
– ThreePhaseEel
Mar 16 at 1:22
1
1
@Mazura modulating furnaces aren't that expensive they are about 1000 dollars more than a 2 stage. Plus they automatically come with an electronically commutated motor which saves on the hydro bill as well. Return on investment in my climate and house is around 3 years.
– Joe Fala
Mar 16 at 3:38
@Mazura modulating furnaces aren't that expensive they are about 1000 dollars more than a 2 stage. Plus they automatically come with an electronically commutated motor which saves on the hydro bill as well. Return on investment in my climate and house is around 3 years.
– Joe Fala
Mar 16 at 3:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f159833%2fmost-cost-effective-thermostat-setting-consistent-temperature-vs-lowest-temper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
8
Mid 50's inside sounds crazy to me. Granted, I live in TX, but is that even remotely common for people to subject themselves to temps that cold in their own homes? That's like sitting on the couch wearing a coat temps.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:41
9
Don't pay too much attention to the average on your bill. You have no idea how that is calculated and also don't know how other homes are heated (maybe they also have space heaters so are paying more in electricity, for example). Look at major air leaks. Seal up your windows with those stretch film kits. Weatherstrip your doors, etc.
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 14:59
23
If you're paying $350-450/mo for heating just to mid-50s F, either you have a gigantic house or your insulation is nowhere near as excellent as you think it is.
– R..
Mar 15 at 15:17
3
For that, 350-450 per month is crazy, especially since energy is much cheaper in the US than in Europe. With halfway reasonable insulation, you should pay half as much (or less). Let alone at that temperature. With good insulation, you can hold 12°C without heating at all, only with living humans inside. So... not sure what you're doing there. That bill would be reasonable for 26-28°C...
– Damon
Mar 15 at 16:03
4
I'd also be looking for torn or broken duct work venting heated air into an unconditioned space (attic, basement).
– JPhi1618
Mar 15 at 20:18