Property of summation












0












$begingroup$


Very short question. Could you please explain me why



$$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = na$$
with $a$ a constant?
I know that



$$sum_{i=1}^{n} a = na$$



but in my case the sum starts from zero and finishes for $(n-1)$.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Sorry, I cannot figure out what is difficult to understand here. Can you enlighten me ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 15 at 14:29












  • $begingroup$
    Recognize that ${0,1,2,3,4,dots,n-1}$ has $n$ elements in it. If this is not immediately obvious why, then recognize that it has the $n-1$ positive elements ${1,2,3,dots,n-1}$ and also the one additional zero element ${0}$. It follows that your summation is iterated a total of $n$ times (the one time when the index is zero, and then the following $n-1$ times while the index is positive for a total of $1+(n-1)=n$ times).
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Mar 15 at 14:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks JMoravitz, your rationale was what I needed to convince myself.
    $endgroup$
    – Kolmogorovwannabe
    Mar 15 at 14:40
















0












$begingroup$


Very short question. Could you please explain me why



$$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = na$$
with $a$ a constant?
I know that



$$sum_{i=1}^{n} a = na$$



but in my case the sum starts from zero and finishes for $(n-1)$.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Sorry, I cannot figure out what is difficult to understand here. Can you enlighten me ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 15 at 14:29












  • $begingroup$
    Recognize that ${0,1,2,3,4,dots,n-1}$ has $n$ elements in it. If this is not immediately obvious why, then recognize that it has the $n-1$ positive elements ${1,2,3,dots,n-1}$ and also the one additional zero element ${0}$. It follows that your summation is iterated a total of $n$ times (the one time when the index is zero, and then the following $n-1$ times while the index is positive for a total of $1+(n-1)=n$ times).
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Mar 15 at 14:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks JMoravitz, your rationale was what I needed to convince myself.
    $endgroup$
    – Kolmogorovwannabe
    Mar 15 at 14:40














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Very short question. Could you please explain me why



$$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = na$$
with $a$ a constant?
I know that



$$sum_{i=1}^{n} a = na$$



but in my case the sum starts from zero and finishes for $(n-1)$.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Very short question. Could you please explain me why



$$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = na$$
with $a$ a constant?
I know that



$$sum_{i=1}^{n} a = na$$



but in my case the sum starts from zero and finishes for $(n-1)$.



Thanks.







summation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 15 at 15:04









MarianD

1,4941616




1,4941616










asked Mar 15 at 14:26









KolmogorovwannabeKolmogorovwannabe

257




257








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Sorry, I cannot figure out what is difficult to understand here. Can you enlighten me ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 15 at 14:29












  • $begingroup$
    Recognize that ${0,1,2,3,4,dots,n-1}$ has $n$ elements in it. If this is not immediately obvious why, then recognize that it has the $n-1$ positive elements ${1,2,3,dots,n-1}$ and also the one additional zero element ${0}$. It follows that your summation is iterated a total of $n$ times (the one time when the index is zero, and then the following $n-1$ times while the index is positive for a total of $1+(n-1)=n$ times).
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Mar 15 at 14:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks JMoravitz, your rationale was what I needed to convince myself.
    $endgroup$
    – Kolmogorovwannabe
    Mar 15 at 14:40














  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Sorry, I cannot figure out what is difficult to understand here. Can you enlighten me ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 15 at 14:29












  • $begingroup$
    Recognize that ${0,1,2,3,4,dots,n-1}$ has $n$ elements in it. If this is not immediately obvious why, then recognize that it has the $n-1$ positive elements ${1,2,3,dots,n-1}$ and also the one additional zero element ${0}$. It follows that your summation is iterated a total of $n$ times (the one time when the index is zero, and then the following $n-1$ times while the index is positive for a total of $1+(n-1)=n$ times).
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Mar 15 at 14:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks JMoravitz, your rationale was what I needed to convince myself.
    $endgroup$
    – Kolmogorovwannabe
    Mar 15 at 14:40








7




7




$begingroup$
Sorry, I cannot figure out what is difficult to understand here. Can you enlighten me ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 15 at 14:29






$begingroup$
Sorry, I cannot figure out what is difficult to understand here. Can you enlighten me ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 15 at 14:29














$begingroup$
Recognize that ${0,1,2,3,4,dots,n-1}$ has $n$ elements in it. If this is not immediately obvious why, then recognize that it has the $n-1$ positive elements ${1,2,3,dots,n-1}$ and also the one additional zero element ${0}$. It follows that your summation is iterated a total of $n$ times (the one time when the index is zero, and then the following $n-1$ times while the index is positive for a total of $1+(n-1)=n$ times).
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
Mar 15 at 14:29




$begingroup$
Recognize that ${0,1,2,3,4,dots,n-1}$ has $n$ elements in it. If this is not immediately obvious why, then recognize that it has the $n-1$ positive elements ${1,2,3,dots,n-1}$ and also the one additional zero element ${0}$. It follows that your summation is iterated a total of $n$ times (the one time when the index is zero, and then the following $n-1$ times while the index is positive for a total of $1+(n-1)=n$ times).
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
Mar 15 at 14:29












$begingroup$
Thanks JMoravitz, your rationale was what I needed to convince myself.
$endgroup$
– Kolmogorovwannabe
Mar 15 at 14:40




$begingroup$
Thanks JMoravitz, your rationale was what I needed to convince myself.
$endgroup$
– Kolmogorovwannabe
Mar 15 at 14:40










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Since you are allready convinced that $sum_{i=1}^{n}a=na$ this might help:



$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n}a-a=sum_{i=1}^{n}a$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    22












    $begingroup$

    In both cases - $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}aquad text { and }quadsum_{i=1}^{n}a$$



    - there are exactly $n$ summands.



    enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      3












      $begingroup$

      Since $a$ is not $i$-depending one can write: $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{a}=asum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}$$
      And $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}=1+1+cdots+1$ $n$ times which obviously is $n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$





















        2












        $begingroup$

        What is the definition of $sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x_i$? It is exactly $x_0+x_1+...x_{n-1}$. If $x_0=x_1=...x_{n-1}=a$ then it means you just sum $a$ $n$ times. And that gives $na$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$





















          1












          $begingroup$

          You are summing $n$ terms, all equal to $a$. So
          $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = a+ a+dotsb + a = na.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Hint:



            $a$ times the number of terms.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149368%2fproperty-of-summation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              6 Answers
              6






              active

              oldest

              votes








              6 Answers
              6






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              8












              $begingroup$

              Since you are allready convinced that $sum_{i=1}^{n}a=na$ this might help:



              $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n}a-a=sum_{i=1}^{n}a$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                8












                $begingroup$

                Since you are allready convinced that $sum_{i=1}^{n}a=na$ this might help:



                $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n}a-a=sum_{i=1}^{n}a$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  8












                  8








                  8





                  $begingroup$

                  Since you are allready convinced that $sum_{i=1}^{n}a=na$ this might help:



                  $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n}a-a=sum_{i=1}^{n}a$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Since you are allready convinced that $sum_{i=1}^{n}a=na$ this might help:



                  $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a=a+sum_{i=1}^{n}a-a=sum_{i=1}^{n}a$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 15 at 14:30









                  drhabdrhab

                  103k545136




                  103k545136























                      22












                      $begingroup$

                      In both cases - $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}aquad text { and }quadsum_{i=1}^{n}a$$



                      - there are exactly $n$ summands.



                      enter image description here






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        22












                        $begingroup$

                        In both cases - $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}aquad text { and }quadsum_{i=1}^{n}a$$



                        - there are exactly $n$ summands.



                        enter image description here






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          22












                          22








                          22





                          $begingroup$

                          In both cases - $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}aquad text { and }quadsum_{i=1}^{n}a$$



                          - there are exactly $n$ summands.



                          enter image description here






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          In both cases - $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}aquad text { and }quadsum_{i=1}^{n}a$$



                          - there are exactly $n$ summands.



                          enter image description here







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 15 at 15:07









                          MarianDMarianD

                          1,4941616




                          1,4941616























                              3












                              $begingroup$

                              Since $a$ is not $i$-depending one can write: $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{a}=asum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}$$
                              And $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}=1+1+cdots+1$ $n$ times which obviously is $n$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$


















                                3












                                $begingroup$

                                Since $a$ is not $i$-depending one can write: $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{a}=asum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}$$
                                And $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}=1+1+cdots+1$ $n$ times which obviously is $n$.






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$
















                                  3












                                  3








                                  3





                                  $begingroup$

                                  Since $a$ is not $i$-depending one can write: $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{a}=asum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}$$
                                  And $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}=1+1+cdots+1$ $n$ times which obviously is $n$.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$



                                  Since $a$ is not $i$-depending one can write: $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{a}=asum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}$$
                                  And $sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{1}=1+1+cdots+1$ $n$ times which obviously is $n$.







                                  share|cite|improve this answer














                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                  share|cite|improve this answer








                                  edited Mar 15 at 14:54









                                  MarianD

                                  1,4941616




                                  1,4941616










                                  answered Mar 15 at 14:33









                                  HAMIDINE SOUMAREHAMIDINE SOUMARE

                                  1,20729




                                  1,20729























                                      2












                                      $begingroup$

                                      What is the definition of $sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x_i$? It is exactly $x_0+x_1+...x_{n-1}$. If $x_0=x_1=...x_{n-1}=a$ then it means you just sum $a$ $n$ times. And that gives $na$.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$


















                                        2












                                        $begingroup$

                                        What is the definition of $sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x_i$? It is exactly $x_0+x_1+...x_{n-1}$. If $x_0=x_1=...x_{n-1}=a$ then it means you just sum $a$ $n$ times. And that gives $na$.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$
















                                          2












                                          2








                                          2





                                          $begingroup$

                                          What is the definition of $sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x_i$? It is exactly $x_0+x_1+...x_{n-1}$. If $x_0=x_1=...x_{n-1}=a$ then it means you just sum $a$ $n$ times. And that gives $na$.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$



                                          What is the definition of $sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x_i$? It is exactly $x_0+x_1+...x_{n-1}$. If $x_0=x_1=...x_{n-1}=a$ then it means you just sum $a$ $n$ times. And that gives $na$.







                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                          share|cite|improve this answer








                                          edited Mar 15 at 15:33

























                                          answered Mar 15 at 14:29









                                          MarkMark

                                          10.4k1622




                                          10.4k1622























                                              1












                                              $begingroup$

                                              You are summing $n$ terms, all equal to $a$. So
                                              $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = a+ a+dotsb + a = na.$$






                                              share|cite|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$


















                                                1












                                                $begingroup$

                                                You are summing $n$ terms, all equal to $a$. So
                                                $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = a+ a+dotsb + a = na.$$






                                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$
















                                                  1












                                                  1








                                                  1





                                                  $begingroup$

                                                  You are summing $n$ terms, all equal to $a$. So
                                                  $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = a+ a+dotsb + a = na.$$






                                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                                  $endgroup$



                                                  You are summing $n$ terms, all equal to $a$. So
                                                  $$sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a = a+ a+dotsb + a = na.$$







                                                  share|cite|improve this answer












                                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                                  answered Mar 15 at 14:29









                                                  HugoHugo

                                                  8206




                                                  8206























                                                      0












                                                      $begingroup$

                                                      Hint:



                                                      $a$ times the number of terms.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                                      $endgroup$


















                                                        0












                                                        $begingroup$

                                                        Hint:



                                                        $a$ times the number of terms.






                                                        share|cite|improve this answer









                                                        $endgroup$
















                                                          0












                                                          0








                                                          0





                                                          $begingroup$

                                                          Hint:



                                                          $a$ times the number of terms.






                                                          share|cite|improve this answer









                                                          $endgroup$



                                                          Hint:



                                                          $a$ times the number of terms.







                                                          share|cite|improve this answer












                                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                                          share|cite|improve this answer










                                                          answered Mar 15 at 14:30









                                                          Yves DaoustYves Daoust

                                                          131k676229




                                                          131k676229






























                                                              draft saved

                                                              draft discarded




















































                                                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function () {
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149368%2fproperty-of-summation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                              }
                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Popular posts from this blog

                                                              Masuk log Menu navigasi

                                                              Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                                                              Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области