Backwards pawns
$begingroup$
Part One: Reach the above position from the starting position
Part Two: Find the fastest way to get to this position.
Answering part one will get you an upvote, answering part two gets the checkmark!
no-computers chess
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Part One: Reach the above position from the starting position
Part Two: Find the fastest way to get to this position.
Answering part one will get you an upvote, answering part two gets the checkmark!
no-computers chess
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 13 at 18:28
2
$begingroup$
@Adam - This is calledRetrograde analysis
, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Mar 13 at 18:50
1
$begingroup$
Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
$endgroup$
– North
Mar 13 at 19:02
$begingroup$
Yes it is a chess term.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:05
$begingroup$
Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:12
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Part One: Reach the above position from the starting position
Part Two: Find the fastest way to get to this position.
Answering part one will get you an upvote, answering part two gets the checkmark!
no-computers chess
$endgroup$
Part One: Reach the above position from the starting position
Part Two: Find the fastest way to get to this position.
Answering part one will get you an upvote, answering part two gets the checkmark!
no-computers chess
no-computers chess
asked Mar 13 at 17:56
Brandon_JBrandon_J
2,745236
2,745236
$begingroup$
So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 13 at 18:28
2
$begingroup$
@Adam - This is calledRetrograde analysis
, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Mar 13 at 18:50
1
$begingroup$
Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
$endgroup$
– North
Mar 13 at 19:02
$begingroup$
Yes it is a chess term.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:05
$begingroup$
Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:12
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 13 at 18:28
2
$begingroup$
@Adam - This is calledRetrograde analysis
, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Mar 13 at 18:50
1
$begingroup$
Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
$endgroup$
– North
Mar 13 at 19:02
$begingroup$
Yes it is a chess term.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:05
$begingroup$
Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:12
$begingroup$
So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 13 at 18:28
$begingroup$
So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 13 at 18:28
2
2
$begingroup$
@Adam - This is called
Retrograde analysis
, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Mar 13 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@Adam - This is called
Retrograde analysis
, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Mar 13 at 18:50
1
1
$begingroup$
Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
$endgroup$
– North
Mar 13 at 19:02
$begingroup$
Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
$endgroup$
– North
Mar 13 at 19:02
$begingroup$
Yes it is a chess term.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:05
$begingroup$
Yes it is a chess term.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:05
$begingroup$
Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:12
$begingroup$
Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:12
|
show 2 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Update: 28 moves!
Spoilers:
I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)
For the record: 29 moves.
And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 23:25
$begingroup$
Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
$endgroup$
– Amorydai
Mar 14 at 22:12
$begingroup$
@Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 14 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 15 at 16:21
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
UPDATE: I got it down to
32 moves.
There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 21:21
$begingroup$
Looking good, looking good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 2:06
$begingroup$
My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 18:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Legally:
34 moves
Illegally:
16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.
PGN viewer
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.
PGN viewer
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:16
$begingroup$
apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:56
$begingroup$
Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 20:53
$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 15 at 8:07
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80644%2fbackwards-pawns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Update: 28 moves!
Spoilers:
I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)
For the record: 29 moves.
And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 23:25
$begingroup$
Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
$endgroup$
– Amorydai
Mar 14 at 22:12
$begingroup$
@Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 14 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 15 at 16:21
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Update: 28 moves!
Spoilers:
I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)
For the record: 29 moves.
And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 23:25
$begingroup$
Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
$endgroup$
– Amorydai
Mar 14 at 22:12
$begingroup$
@Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 14 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 15 at 16:21
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Update: 28 moves!
Spoilers:
I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)
For the record: 29 moves.
And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).
$endgroup$
Update: 28 moves!
Spoilers:
I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)
For the record: 29 moves.
And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).
edited Mar 15 at 21:23
answered Mar 13 at 21:51
Arnaud MortierArnaud Mortier
1,414420
1,414420
$begingroup$
I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 23:25
$begingroup$
Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
$endgroup$
– Amorydai
Mar 14 at 22:12
$begingroup$
@Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 14 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 15 at 16:21
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 23:25
$begingroup$
Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
$endgroup$
– Amorydai
Mar 14 at 22:12
$begingroup$
@Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 14 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 15 at 16:21
$begingroup$
I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 23:25
$begingroup$
I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 23:25
$begingroup$
Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
$endgroup$
– Amorydai
Mar 14 at 22:12
$begingroup$
Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
$endgroup$
– Amorydai
Mar 14 at 22:12
$begingroup$
@Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 14 at 22:16
$begingroup$
@Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 14 at 22:16
2
2
$begingroup$
Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 15 at 16:21
$begingroup$
Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 15 at 16:21
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
UPDATE: I got it down to
32 moves.
There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 21:21
$begingroup$
Looking good, looking good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 2:06
$begingroup$
My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 18:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
UPDATE: I got it down to
32 moves.
There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 21:21
$begingroup$
Looking good, looking good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 2:06
$begingroup$
My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 18:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
UPDATE: I got it down to
32 moves.
There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link
$endgroup$
UPDATE: I got it down to
32 moves.
There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link
edited Mar 14 at 2:02
answered Mar 13 at 20:35
AmorydaiAmorydai
1,490214
1,490214
2
$begingroup$
I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 21:21
$begingroup$
Looking good, looking good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 2:06
$begingroup$
My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 18:55
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 21:21
$begingroup$
Looking good, looking good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 2:06
$begingroup$
My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 18:55
2
2
$begingroup$
I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 21:21
$begingroup$
I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 21:21
$begingroup$
Looking good, looking good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 2:06
$begingroup$
Looking good, looking good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 2:06
$begingroup$
My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 18:55
$begingroup$
My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 18:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Legally:
34 moves
Illegally:
16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Legally:
34 moves
Illegally:
16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Legally:
34 moves
Illegally:
16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.
$endgroup$
Legally:
34 moves
Illegally:
16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.
answered Mar 14 at 6:03
MukyuuMukyuu
4261113
4261113
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.
PGN viewer
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.
PGN viewer
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.
PGN viewer
$endgroup$
Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.
PGN viewer
edited Mar 14 at 18:54
Brandon_J
2,745236
2,745236
answered Mar 14 at 17:08
Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay
23211
23211
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.
PGN viewer
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:16
$begingroup$
apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:56
$begingroup$
Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 20:53
$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 15 at 8:07
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.
PGN viewer
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:16
$begingroup$
apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:56
$begingroup$
Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 20:53
$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 15 at 8:07
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.
PGN viewer
$endgroup$
So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.
PGN viewer
UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.
PGN viewer
edited Mar 13 at 21:58
Brandon_J
2,745236
2,745236
answered Mar 13 at 18:53
Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay
23211
23211
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:16
$begingroup$
apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:56
$begingroup$
Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 20:53
$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 15 at 8:07
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:16
$begingroup$
apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:56
$begingroup$
Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 20:53
$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 15 at 8:07
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:16
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:16
$begingroup$
apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:56
$begingroup$
I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:56
$begingroup$
Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 20:53
$begingroup$
Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 20:53
$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 15 at 8:07
$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
Mar 15 at 8:07
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80644%2fbackwards-pawns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 13 at 18:28
2
$begingroup$
@Adam - This is called
Retrograde analysis
, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Mar 13 at 18:50
1
$begingroup$
Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
$endgroup$
– North
Mar 13 at 19:02
$begingroup$
Yes it is a chess term.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:05
$begingroup$
Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:12