Backwards pawns












5












$begingroup$



The position



Part One: Reach the above position from the starting position



Part Two: Find the fastest way to get to this position.




Answering part one will get you an upvote, answering part two gets the checkmark!










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
    $endgroup$
    – Adam
    Mar 13 at 18:28






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Adam - This is called Retrograde analysis, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeff Zeitlin
    Mar 13 at 18:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
    $endgroup$
    – North
    Mar 13 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it is a chess term.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 19:05










  • $begingroup$
    Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 19:12


















5












$begingroup$



The position



Part One: Reach the above position from the starting position



Part Two: Find the fastest way to get to this position.




Answering part one will get you an upvote, answering part two gets the checkmark!










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
    $endgroup$
    – Adam
    Mar 13 at 18:28






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Adam - This is called Retrograde analysis, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeff Zeitlin
    Mar 13 at 18:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
    $endgroup$
    – North
    Mar 13 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it is a chess term.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 19:05










  • $begingroup$
    Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 19:12
















5












5








5





$begingroup$



The position



Part One: Reach the above position from the starting position



Part Two: Find the fastest way to get to this position.




Answering part one will get you an upvote, answering part two gets the checkmark!










share|improve this question









$endgroup$





The position



Part One: Reach the above position from the starting position



Part Two: Find the fastest way to get to this position.




Answering part one will get you an upvote, answering part two gets the checkmark!







no-computers chess






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 13 at 17:56









Brandon_JBrandon_J

2,745236




2,745236












  • $begingroup$
    So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
    $endgroup$
    – Adam
    Mar 13 at 18:28






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Adam - This is called Retrograde analysis, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeff Zeitlin
    Mar 13 at 18:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
    $endgroup$
    – North
    Mar 13 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it is a chess term.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 19:05










  • $begingroup$
    Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 19:12




















  • $begingroup$
    So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
    $endgroup$
    – Adam
    Mar 13 at 18:28






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Adam - This is called Retrograde analysis, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeff Zeitlin
    Mar 13 at 18:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
    $endgroup$
    – North
    Mar 13 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it is a chess term.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 19:05










  • $begingroup$
    Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 19:12


















$begingroup$
So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 13 at 18:28




$begingroup$
So for the record, is both colours allowed to be moved? And does both or only one king need to reach the other side?
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 13 at 18:28




2




2




$begingroup$
@Adam - This is called Retrograde analysis, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Mar 13 at 18:50




$begingroup$
@Adam - This is called Retrograde analysis, and the standard constraint is that you are supposed to figure out how the position was arrived at via the normal rules of Chess - that is, alternating white and black moves, with white moving first, no unannounced checks, no failures to escape check, no illegal moves, and so on.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Zeitlin
Mar 13 at 18:50




1




1




$begingroup$
Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
$endgroup$
– North
Mar 13 at 19:02




$begingroup$
Also isn't the term "backwards pawn" a chess term? Lol
$endgroup$
– North
Mar 13 at 19:02












$begingroup$
Yes it is a chess term.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:05




$begingroup$
Yes it is a chess term.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:05












$begingroup$
Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:12






$begingroup$
Also, why is my replayer text not showing up? I did the same thing one would do on the chess site and all. I know that is is the same here as well.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 13 at 19:12












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Update: 28 moves!



Spoilers:




I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)




For the record: 29 moves.



And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 23:25












  • $begingroup$
    Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
    $endgroup$
    – Amorydai
    Mar 14 at 22:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    Mar 14 at 22:16






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    Mar 14 at 22:23










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 15 at 16:21



















7












$begingroup$

UPDATE: I got it down to




32 moves.




There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    Mar 13 at 21:21












  • $begingroup$
    Looking good, looking good!
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    Mar 14 at 2:06










  • $begingroup$
    My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    Mar 14 at 18:55



















2












$begingroup$

Legally:




34 moves




Illegally:




16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.



    PGN viewer






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      -1












      $begingroup$

      So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.



      PGN viewer



      UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.



      PGN viewer



      UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.



      PGN viewer



      UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.



      PGN viewer






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 19:16










      • $begingroup$
        apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 13 at 19:42










      • $begingroup$
        I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 19:56










      • $begingroup$
        Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 20:53










      • $begingroup$
        @RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
        $endgroup$
        – Arnaud Mortier
        Mar 15 at 8:07











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "559"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80644%2fbackwards-pawns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7












      $begingroup$

      Update: 28 moves!



      Spoilers:




      I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)




      For the record: 29 moves.



      And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 23:25












      • $begingroup$
        Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
        $endgroup$
        – Amorydai
        Mar 14 at 22:12










      • $begingroup$
        @Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
        $endgroup$
        – Arnaud Mortier
        Mar 14 at 22:16






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 22:23










      • $begingroup$
        Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 15 at 16:21
















      7












      $begingroup$

      Update: 28 moves!



      Spoilers:




      I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)




      For the record: 29 moves.



      And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 23:25












      • $begingroup$
        Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
        $endgroup$
        – Amorydai
        Mar 14 at 22:12










      • $begingroup$
        @Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
        $endgroup$
        – Arnaud Mortier
        Mar 14 at 22:16






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 22:23










      • $begingroup$
        Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 15 at 16:21














      7












      7








      7





      $begingroup$

      Update: 28 moves!



      Spoilers:




      I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)




      For the record: 29 moves.



      And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Update: 28 moves!



      Spoilers:




      I couldn't solve the issue of wasted moves by W, so I reversed the polarity ;)




      For the record: 29 moves.



      And another 29, where W is more efficient but in the end has to wait for B to catch up (W wastes 3 moves waiting).







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 15 at 21:23

























      answered Mar 13 at 21:51









      Arnaud MortierArnaud Mortier

      1,414420




      1,414420












      • $begingroup$
        I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 23:25












      • $begingroup$
        Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
        $endgroup$
        – Amorydai
        Mar 14 at 22:12










      • $begingroup$
        @Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
        $endgroup$
        – Arnaud Mortier
        Mar 14 at 22:16






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 22:23










      • $begingroup$
        Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 15 at 16:21


















      • $begingroup$
        I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 23:25












      • $begingroup$
        Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
        $endgroup$
        – Amorydai
        Mar 14 at 22:12










      • $begingroup$
        @Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
        $endgroup$
        – Arnaud Mortier
        Mar 14 at 22:16






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 22:23










      • $begingroup$
        Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 15 at 16:21
















      $begingroup$
      I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      Mar 13 at 23:25






      $begingroup$
      I honestly think that this may be the fastest way. It looks too perfect for it be able to be taken any faster.
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      Mar 13 at 23:25














      $begingroup$
      Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
      $endgroup$
      – Amorydai
      Mar 14 at 22:12




      $begingroup$
      Great! Each pawn and knight only move twice, each bishop once three rooks twice and one rook once and the black queen only four times. That's as close to optimal as it is likely to get. I certainly can't see any wasted moves there.
      $endgroup$
      – Amorydai
      Mar 14 at 22:12












      $begingroup$
      @Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      Mar 14 at 22:16




      $begingroup$
      @Amorydai Actually I was unhappy with the three useless white Queen moves, and focusing on that I could get half a move better.
      $endgroup$
      – Arnaud Mortier
      Mar 14 at 22:16




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon_J
      Mar 14 at 22:23




      $begingroup$
      Ah-ha! The improvement keeps coming.
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon_J
      Mar 14 at 22:23












      $begingroup$
      Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      Mar 15 at 16:21




      $begingroup$
      Perhaps 3 moves shall always be wasted no matter what?
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      Mar 15 at 16:21











      7












      $begingroup$

      UPDATE: I got it down to




      32 moves.




      There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 21:21












      • $begingroup$
        Looking good, looking good!
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 2:06










      • $begingroup$
        My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 18:55
















      7












      $begingroup$

      UPDATE: I got it down to




      32 moves.




      There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 21:21












      • $begingroup$
        Looking good, looking good!
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 2:06










      • $begingroup$
        My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 18:55














      7












      7








      7





      $begingroup$

      UPDATE: I got it down to




      32 moves.




      There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      UPDATE: I got it down to




      32 moves.




      There's still some room for improvement, but it's the shortest one so far. Here's the link







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 14 at 2:02

























      answered Mar 13 at 20:35









      AmorydaiAmorydai

      1,490214




      1,490214








      • 2




        $begingroup$
        I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 21:21












      • $begingroup$
        Looking good, looking good!
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 2:06










      • $begingroup$
        My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 18:55














      • 2




        $begingroup$
        I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
        $endgroup$
        – Rewan Demontay
        Mar 13 at 21:21












      • $begingroup$
        Looking good, looking good!
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 2:06










      • $begingroup$
        My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
        $endgroup$
        – Brandon_J
        Mar 14 at 18:55








      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      Mar 13 at 21:21






      $begingroup$
      I got it down by half a move using some simple removing in the end. apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/…
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      Mar 13 at 21:21














      $begingroup$
      Looking good, looking good!
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon_J
      Mar 14 at 2:06




      $begingroup$
      Looking good, looking good!
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon_J
      Mar 14 at 2:06












      $begingroup$
      My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon_J
      Mar 14 at 18:55




      $begingroup$
      My best was 34. I'll wait a while to see if any better answers show up. If not, you have a check-mark coming your way!
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon_J
      Mar 14 at 18:55











      2












      $begingroup$

      Legally:




      34 moves




      Illegally:




      16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        Legally:




        34 moves




        Illegally:




        16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Legally:




          34 moves




          Illegally:




          16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Legally:




          34 moves




          Illegally:




          16 moves if counted normally: 31 moves from standard set-up position into the layout in question (14 pawns to destination + 2 pawns outside, 12 other piece outside + 2 queens to position + 1 king out of check). Which is move each side both pawn except 2 (1 of each side to the outside of the board) and all other pieces except king and queen outside the board.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 14 at 6:03









          MukyuuMukyuu

          4261113




          4261113























              1












              $begingroup$

              Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.



              PGN viewer






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.



                PGN viewer






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.



                  PGN viewer






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Credit to @Mukyuu for making the original game. I managed to get it down by half a move.



                  PGN viewer







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 14 at 18:54









                  Brandon_J

                  2,745236




                  2,745236










                  answered Mar 14 at 17:08









                  Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay

                  23211




                  23211























                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.



                      PGN viewer






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 19:16










                      • $begingroup$
                        apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Brandon_J
                        Mar 13 at 19:42










                      • $begingroup$
                        I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 19:56










                      • $begingroup$
                        Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 20:53










                      • $begingroup$
                        @RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Arnaud Mortier
                        Mar 15 at 8:07
















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.



                      PGN viewer






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 19:16










                      • $begingroup$
                        apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Brandon_J
                        Mar 13 at 19:42










                      • $begingroup$
                        I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 19:56










                      • $begingroup$
                        Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 20:53










                      • $begingroup$
                        @RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Arnaud Mortier
                        Mar 15 at 8:07














                      -1












                      -1








                      -1





                      $begingroup$

                      So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.



                      PGN viewer






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      So, far, I have been able to get MOST of the pawns in their place. It’s just that the center is so full of pawns that it’s nigh near impossible to switch them. I will look into other ways such as going around the center in some convoluted way.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 1: From what I can tell, the wanted position is actually impossible t get. But you can have a very SIMILAR position, as seen in this game. I will work on getting to be as fast as possible.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 2: I have found an even more similar position whilst finding an even quicker version. This version is faster, yes.



                      PGN viewer



                      UPDATE 3: Another attempt, without the annoying spaces in the above game, and only a few moves longer.



                      PGN viewer







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Mar 13 at 21:58









                      Brandon_J

                      2,745236




                      2,745236










                      answered Mar 13 at 18:53









                      Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay

                      23211




                      23211












                      • $begingroup$
                        Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 19:16










                      • $begingroup$
                        apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Brandon_J
                        Mar 13 at 19:42










                      • $begingroup$
                        I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 19:56










                      • $begingroup$
                        Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 20:53










                      • $begingroup$
                        @RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Arnaud Mortier
                        Mar 15 at 8:07


















                      • $begingroup$
                        Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 19:16










                      • $begingroup$
                        apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Brandon_J
                        Mar 13 at 19:42










                      • $begingroup$
                        I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 19:56










                      • $begingroup$
                        Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rewan Demontay
                        Mar 13 at 20:53










                      • $begingroup$
                        @RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Arnaud Mortier
                        Mar 15 at 8:07
















                      $begingroup$
                      Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rewan Demontay
                      Mar 13 at 19:16




                      $begingroup$
                      Yeah I know, this answer is a bit sloppy in organization atm. Is you can edit it to get a working replayer in for both games, please do do that.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rewan Demontay
                      Mar 13 at 19:16












                      $begingroup$
                      apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Brandon_J
                      Mar 13 at 19:42




                      $begingroup$
                      apronus.com is not the best choice for SE sites. Try this for putting a replayer in your post.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Brandon_J
                      Mar 13 at 19:42












                      $begingroup$
                      I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rewan Demontay
                      Mar 13 at 19:56




                      $begingroup$
                      I did try that. It didn’t work for some reason.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rewan Demontay
                      Mar 13 at 19:56












                      $begingroup$
                      Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rewan Demontay
                      Mar 13 at 20:53




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes, I put 4 spaces in front of the FEN and the game record.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rewan Demontay
                      Mar 13 at 20:53












                      $begingroup$
                      @RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Arnaud Mortier
                      Mar 15 at 8:07




                      $begingroup$
                      @RewanDemontay It was implemented in Chess SE only apparently.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Arnaud Mortier
                      Mar 15 at 8:07


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80644%2fbackwards-pawns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Masuk log Menu navigasi

                      Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                      Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области