Quoting Keynes in a lecture












29















I am teaching mathematical statistics and part of this is large sample theory. I would like to discuss some methods that do not focus on asymptotics and refer to J. M. Keynes quote




In the long run, we are all dead.




I am a bit afraid some students might find this quote a bit too strong.
Could this quote be considered a bit too strong to be presented to 3rd year undergraduate students in the UK?










share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 72





    If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

    – Dan Romik
    Mar 20 at 18:32






  • 22





    @emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 21 at 9:51






  • 23





    Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

    – Szabolcs
    Mar 21 at 10:17






  • 22





    A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

    – rath
    Mar 21 at 15:18






  • 9





    3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

    – Stumbler
    Mar 21 at 19:09
















29















I am teaching mathematical statistics and part of this is large sample theory. I would like to discuss some methods that do not focus on asymptotics and refer to J. M. Keynes quote




In the long run, we are all dead.




I am a bit afraid some students might find this quote a bit too strong.
Could this quote be considered a bit too strong to be presented to 3rd year undergraduate students in the UK?










share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 72





    If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

    – Dan Romik
    Mar 20 at 18:32






  • 22





    @emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 21 at 9:51






  • 23





    Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

    – Szabolcs
    Mar 21 at 10:17






  • 22





    A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

    – rath
    Mar 21 at 15:18






  • 9





    3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

    – Stumbler
    Mar 21 at 19:09














29












29








29


4






I am teaching mathematical statistics and part of this is large sample theory. I would like to discuss some methods that do not focus on asymptotics and refer to J. M. Keynes quote




In the long run, we are all dead.




I am a bit afraid some students might find this quote a bit too strong.
Could this quote be considered a bit too strong to be presented to 3rd year undergraduate students in the UK?










share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am teaching mathematical statistics and part of this is large sample theory. I would like to discuss some methods that do not focus on asymptotics and refer to J. M. Keynes quote




In the long run, we are all dead.




I am a bit afraid some students might find this quote a bit too strong.
Could this quote be considered a bit too strong to be presented to 3rd year undergraduate students in the UK?







teaching lecture-teaching-method quotation






share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 20 at 12:50









TSETSE

15724




15724




New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 72





    If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

    – Dan Romik
    Mar 20 at 18:32






  • 22





    @emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 21 at 9:51






  • 23





    Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

    – Szabolcs
    Mar 21 at 10:17






  • 22





    A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

    – rath
    Mar 21 at 15:18






  • 9





    3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

    – Stumbler
    Mar 21 at 19:09














  • 72





    If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

    – Dan Romik
    Mar 20 at 18:32






  • 22





    @emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 21 at 9:51






  • 23





    Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

    – Szabolcs
    Mar 21 at 10:17






  • 22





    A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

    – rath
    Mar 21 at 15:18






  • 9





    3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

    – Stumbler
    Mar 21 at 19:09








72




72





If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

– Dan Romik
Mar 20 at 18:32





If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

– Dan Romik
Mar 20 at 18:32




22




22





@emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 9:51





@emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

– David Richerby
Mar 21 at 9:51




23




23





Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

– Szabolcs
Mar 21 at 10:17





Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

– Szabolcs
Mar 21 at 10:17




22




22





A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

– rath
Mar 21 at 15:18





A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

– rath
Mar 21 at 15:18




9




9





3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

– Stumbler
Mar 21 at 19:09





3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

– Stumbler
Mar 21 at 19:09










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















83














Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.






share|improve this answer



















  • 23





    "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

    – Akshat Mahajan
    Mar 20 at 20:05








  • 1





    Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

    – Aaron Hall
    Mar 21 at 14:53






  • 2





    @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

    – Chieron
    Mar 21 at 15:23






  • 2





    I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

    – only_pro
    Mar 21 at 15:34








  • 4





    @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 21 at 17:12



















52














As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.






share|improve this answer































    25














    Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



    Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 15





      I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

      – user2705196
      Mar 20 at 15:54






    • 1





      The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      Mar 21 at 20:55



















    13














    Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




























      5














      Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















      • 3





        No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

        – Luaan
        Mar 21 at 12:18






      • 1





        To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

        – Luaan
        Mar 21 at 12:20





















      5














      I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



      However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "415"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126760%2fquoting-keynes-in-a-lecture%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        83














        Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



        It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.






        share|improve this answer



















        • 23





          "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

          – Akshat Mahajan
          Mar 20 at 20:05








        • 1





          Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

          – Aaron Hall
          Mar 21 at 14:53






        • 2





          @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

          – Chieron
          Mar 21 at 15:23






        • 2





          I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

          – only_pro
          Mar 21 at 15:34








        • 4





          @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

          – David Richerby
          Mar 21 at 17:12
















        83














        Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



        It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.






        share|improve this answer



















        • 23





          "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

          – Akshat Mahajan
          Mar 20 at 20:05








        • 1





          Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

          – Aaron Hall
          Mar 21 at 14:53






        • 2





          @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

          – Chieron
          Mar 21 at 15:23






        • 2





          I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

          – only_pro
          Mar 21 at 15:34








        • 4





          @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

          – David Richerby
          Mar 21 at 17:12














        83












        83








        83







        Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



        It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.






        share|improve this answer













        Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



        It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 20 at 13:04









        BuffyBuffy

        54.4k16175268




        54.4k16175268








        • 23





          "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

          – Akshat Mahajan
          Mar 20 at 20:05








        • 1





          Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

          – Aaron Hall
          Mar 21 at 14:53






        • 2





          @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

          – Chieron
          Mar 21 at 15:23






        • 2





          I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

          – only_pro
          Mar 21 at 15:34








        • 4





          @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

          – David Richerby
          Mar 21 at 17:12














        • 23





          "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

          – Akshat Mahajan
          Mar 20 at 20:05








        • 1





          Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

          – Aaron Hall
          Mar 21 at 14:53






        • 2





          @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

          – Chieron
          Mar 21 at 15:23






        • 2





          I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

          – only_pro
          Mar 21 at 15:34








        • 4





          @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

          – David Richerby
          Mar 21 at 17:12








        23




        23





        "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

        – Akshat Mahajan
        Mar 20 at 20:05







        "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

        – Akshat Mahajan
        Mar 20 at 20:05






        1




        1





        Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

        – Aaron Hall
        Mar 21 at 14:53





        Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

        – Aaron Hall
        Mar 21 at 14:53




        2




        2





        @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

        – Chieron
        Mar 21 at 15:23





        @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

        – Chieron
        Mar 21 at 15:23




        2




        2





        I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

        – only_pro
        Mar 21 at 15:34







        I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

        – only_pro
        Mar 21 at 15:34






        4




        4





        @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

        – David Richerby
        Mar 21 at 17:12





        @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

        – David Richerby
        Mar 21 at 17:12











        52














        As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.






        share|improve this answer




























          52














          As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.






          share|improve this answer


























            52












            52








            52







            As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.






            share|improve this answer













            As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 20 at 14:27









            David RicherbyDavid Richerby

            30.3k662126




            30.3k662126























                25














                Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



                Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.






                share|improve this answer



















                • 15





                  I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

                  – user2705196
                  Mar 20 at 15:54






                • 1





                  The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

                  – Konrad Rudolph
                  Mar 21 at 20:55
















                25














                Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



                Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.






                share|improve this answer



















                • 15





                  I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

                  – user2705196
                  Mar 20 at 15:54






                • 1





                  The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

                  – Konrad Rudolph
                  Mar 21 at 20:55














                25












                25








                25







                Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



                Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.






                share|improve this answer













                Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



                Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 20 at 13:07









                jakebealjakebeal

                148k31533776




                148k31533776








                • 15





                  I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

                  – user2705196
                  Mar 20 at 15:54






                • 1





                  The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

                  – Konrad Rudolph
                  Mar 21 at 20:55














                • 15





                  I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

                  – user2705196
                  Mar 20 at 15:54






                • 1





                  The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

                  – Konrad Rudolph
                  Mar 21 at 20:55








                15




                15





                I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

                – user2705196
                Mar 20 at 15:54





                I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

                – user2705196
                Mar 20 at 15:54




                1




                1





                The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

                – Konrad Rudolph
                Mar 21 at 20:55





                The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

                – Konrad Rudolph
                Mar 21 at 20:55











                13














                Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                  13














                  Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                    13












                    13








                    13







                    Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.










                    Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer






                    New contributor




                    user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered Mar 21 at 7:43









                    user105844user105844

                    1312




                    1312




                    New contributor




                    user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                        5














                        Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                        • 3





                          No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                          – Luaan
                          Mar 21 at 12:18






                        • 1





                          To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                          – Luaan
                          Mar 21 at 12:20


















                        5














                        Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                        • 3





                          No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                          – Luaan
                          Mar 21 at 12:18






                        • 1





                          To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                          – Luaan
                          Mar 21 at 12:20
















                        5












                        5








                        5







                        Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.










                        Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")







                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer






                        New contributor




                        Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        answered Mar 20 at 18:45









                        FoonFoon

                        1512




                        1512




                        New contributor




                        Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                        New contributor





                        Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                        Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.








                        • 3





                          No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                          – Luaan
                          Mar 21 at 12:18






                        • 1





                          To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                          – Luaan
                          Mar 21 at 12:20
















                        • 3





                          No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                          – Luaan
                          Mar 21 at 12:18






                        • 1





                          To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                          – Luaan
                          Mar 21 at 12:20










                        3




                        3





                        No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                        – Luaan
                        Mar 21 at 12:18





                        No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                        – Luaan
                        Mar 21 at 12:18




                        1




                        1





                        To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                        – Luaan
                        Mar 21 at 12:20







                        To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                        – Luaan
                        Mar 21 at 12:20













                        5














                        I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



                        However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          5














                          I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



                          However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.






                          share|improve this answer


























                            5












                            5








                            5







                            I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



                            However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.






                            share|improve this answer













                            I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



                            However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Mar 20 at 22:01









                            dothyphendotdothyphendot

                            665159




                            665159






















                                TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126760%2fquoting-keynes-in-a-lecture%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Masuk log Menu navigasi

                                Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                                Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области