Why's the Graph of $y = sin (cos (e^x))$ so Wonky?












1












$begingroup$


I was recently messing around with desmos by plotting random graphs.
I came across this peculiar function, namely $y = sin (cos (e^x))$.
I noticed that the graph is basically a sine wave whose period gets shorter and shorter. However, at a few $x$ values, this trend falters for a bit.
The points I'm referring to are near <span class=$x = 8$, where there are white specks instead of the expected red.">



The points I'm referring to are near $x = 8,$ where there are white specks instead of the expected red. Can someone give me an insight into why this may be happening?



Any help would be greatly appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you also tried plotting the thing you are plugging into $sin$ (i.e. plotting $y=cosleft(e^xright)$)?
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MinusOne-Twelfth How is that supposed to help? It's a function that oscillates faster and faster between $-1$ and $1$, just like this one should oscillate faster and faster between $-sin1$ and $sin1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Maybe by visualising what you're plugging in to sine, you could better visualise the output. Anyway, doesn't hurt to try when exploring this.
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


I was recently messing around with desmos by plotting random graphs.
I came across this peculiar function, namely $y = sin (cos (e^x))$.
I noticed that the graph is basically a sine wave whose period gets shorter and shorter. However, at a few $x$ values, this trend falters for a bit.
The points I'm referring to are near <span class=$x = 8$, where there are white specks instead of the expected red.">



The points I'm referring to are near $x = 8,$ where there are white specks instead of the expected red. Can someone give me an insight into why this may be happening?



Any help would be greatly appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you also tried plotting the thing you are plugging into $sin$ (i.e. plotting $y=cosleft(e^xright)$)?
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MinusOne-Twelfth How is that supposed to help? It's a function that oscillates faster and faster between $-1$ and $1$, just like this one should oscillate faster and faster between $-sin1$ and $sin1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Maybe by visualising what you're plugging in to sine, you could better visualise the output. Anyway, doesn't hurt to try when exploring this.
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I was recently messing around with desmos by plotting random graphs.
I came across this peculiar function, namely $y = sin (cos (e^x))$.
I noticed that the graph is basically a sine wave whose period gets shorter and shorter. However, at a few $x$ values, this trend falters for a bit.
The points I'm referring to are near <span class=$x = 8$, where there are white specks instead of the expected red.">



The points I'm referring to are near $x = 8,$ where there are white specks instead of the expected red. Can someone give me an insight into why this may be happening?



Any help would be greatly appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was recently messing around with desmos by plotting random graphs.
I came across this peculiar function, namely $y = sin (cos (e^x))$.
I noticed that the graph is basically a sine wave whose period gets shorter and shorter. However, at a few $x$ values, this trend falters for a bit.
The points I'm referring to are near <span class=$x = 8$, where there are white specks instead of the expected red.">



The points I'm referring to are near $x = 8,$ where there are white specks instead of the expected red. Can someone give me an insight into why this may be happening?



Any help would be greatly appreciated!







graphing-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 min ago









YuiTo Cheng

2,40641037




2,40641037










asked 3 hours ago









John A. John A.

301213




301213












  • $begingroup$
    Have you also tried plotting the thing you are plugging into $sin$ (i.e. plotting $y=cosleft(e^xright)$)?
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MinusOne-Twelfth How is that supposed to help? It's a function that oscillates faster and faster between $-1$ and $1$, just like this one should oscillate faster and faster between $-sin1$ and $sin1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Maybe by visualising what you're plugging in to sine, you could better visualise the output. Anyway, doesn't hurt to try when exploring this.
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Have you also tried plotting the thing you are plugging into $sin$ (i.e. plotting $y=cosleft(e^xright)$)?
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MinusOne-Twelfth How is that supposed to help? It's a function that oscillates faster and faster between $-1$ and $1$, just like this one should oscillate faster and faster between $-sin1$ and $sin1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Maybe by visualising what you're plugging in to sine, you could better visualise the output. Anyway, doesn't hurt to try when exploring this.
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Have you also tried plotting the thing you are plugging into $sin$ (i.e. plotting $y=cosleft(e^xright)$)?
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Have you also tried plotting the thing you are plugging into $sin$ (i.e. plotting $y=cosleft(e^xright)$)?
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@MinusOne-Twelfth How is that supposed to help? It's a function that oscillates faster and faster between $-1$ and $1$, just like this one should oscillate faster and faster between $-sin1$ and $sin1$.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@MinusOne-Twelfth How is that supposed to help? It's a function that oscillates faster and faster between $-1$ and $1$, just like this one should oscillate faster and faster between $-sin1$ and $sin1$.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Maybe by visualising what you're plugging in to sine, you could better visualise the output. Anyway, doesn't hurt to try when exploring this.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Maybe by visualising what you're plugging in to sine, you could better visualise the output. Anyway, doesn't hurt to try when exploring this.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The software may be performing some sampling on $x$ values to plot your function.



When the frequency of your function is low, for this case when $x$ is small, the effect of sampling is not noticeable.



But when the frequency of your function is too high relative to the sampling frequency, precisely when your function's frequency is higher than half the sampling frequency, aliasing occurs and your function is replaced by a lower-frequency function that has the same sample values.



In the extreme case, when the frequency of your function is around a multiple of the sampling frequency, the alias from the samples can appear to be a constant function, a function with lower frequency.



This may give the effect of the missing red around $x=8$, when the displayed frequency of the function is lower than expected.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    That’s simply a rendering error with the software. The graph continues to oscillate as you’d expect. Zoom in and the problem should resolve itself.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186818%2fwhys-the-graph-of-y-sin-cos-ex-so-wonky%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      The software may be performing some sampling on $x$ values to plot your function.



      When the frequency of your function is low, for this case when $x$ is small, the effect of sampling is not noticeable.



      But when the frequency of your function is too high relative to the sampling frequency, precisely when your function's frequency is higher than half the sampling frequency, aliasing occurs and your function is replaced by a lower-frequency function that has the same sample values.



      In the extreme case, when the frequency of your function is around a multiple of the sampling frequency, the alias from the samples can appear to be a constant function, a function with lower frequency.



      This may give the effect of the missing red around $x=8$, when the displayed frequency of the function is lower than expected.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        The software may be performing some sampling on $x$ values to plot your function.



        When the frequency of your function is low, for this case when $x$ is small, the effect of sampling is not noticeable.



        But when the frequency of your function is too high relative to the sampling frequency, precisely when your function's frequency is higher than half the sampling frequency, aliasing occurs and your function is replaced by a lower-frequency function that has the same sample values.



        In the extreme case, when the frequency of your function is around a multiple of the sampling frequency, the alias from the samples can appear to be a constant function, a function with lower frequency.



        This may give the effect of the missing red around $x=8$, when the displayed frequency of the function is lower than expected.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The software may be performing some sampling on $x$ values to plot your function.



          When the frequency of your function is low, for this case when $x$ is small, the effect of sampling is not noticeable.



          But when the frequency of your function is too high relative to the sampling frequency, precisely when your function's frequency is higher than half the sampling frequency, aliasing occurs and your function is replaced by a lower-frequency function that has the same sample values.



          In the extreme case, when the frequency of your function is around a multiple of the sampling frequency, the alias from the samples can appear to be a constant function, a function with lower frequency.



          This may give the effect of the missing red around $x=8$, when the displayed frequency of the function is lower than expected.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The software may be performing some sampling on $x$ values to plot your function.



          When the frequency of your function is low, for this case when $x$ is small, the effect of sampling is not noticeable.



          But when the frequency of your function is too high relative to the sampling frequency, precisely when your function's frequency is higher than half the sampling frequency, aliasing occurs and your function is replaced by a lower-frequency function that has the same sample values.



          In the extreme case, when the frequency of your function is around a multiple of the sampling frequency, the alias from the samples can appear to be a constant function, a function with lower frequency.



          This may give the effect of the missing red around $x=8$, when the displayed frequency of the function is lower than expected.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          peterwhypeterwhy

          12.1k21229




          12.1k21229























              3












              $begingroup$

              That’s simply a rendering error with the software. The graph continues to oscillate as you’d expect. Zoom in and the problem should resolve itself.






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                That’s simply a rendering error with the software. The graph continues to oscillate as you’d expect. Zoom in and the problem should resolve itself.






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  That’s simply a rendering error with the software. The graph continues to oscillate as you’d expect. Zoom in and the problem should resolve itself.






                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  That’s simply a rendering error with the software. The graph continues to oscillate as you’d expect. Zoom in and the problem should resolve itself.







                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 3 hours ago









                  Bruno EBruno E

                  312




                  312




                  New contributor




                  Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Bruno E is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186818%2fwhys-the-graph-of-y-sin-cos-ex-so-wonky%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Masuk log Menu navigasi

                      Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                      Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области