How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-FlightHow could a sail powered airship work?Airship Aircraft Carrier DimensionsFlying Battleship/ Armored Airship CombatAirship weapons, glidersHow could something fly (steampunk tech) without lifting gas?Airship lifeboats, design alternativesHow to sail into the wind on an airship?How could an airship made of magic wood propel itself through the sky without an engine?Smallest possible size for a manned airshipAirship Propulsion System

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

How to use deus ex machina safely?

How to read the value of this capacitor?

Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?

It's a yearly task, alright

What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?

Are all passive ability checks floors for active ability checks?

What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?

Why does Bach not break the rules here?

PTIJ: Who should I vote for? (21st Knesset Edition)

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

My Graph Theory Students

Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?

compactness of a set where am I going wrong

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?

Is there a data structure that only stores hash codes and not the actual objects?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

If curse and magic is two sides of the same coin, why the former is forbidden?

A link redirect to http instead of https: how critical is it?

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

Brexit - No Deal Rejection

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Does Mathematica reuse previous computations?



How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight


How could a sail powered airship work?Airship Aircraft Carrier DimensionsFlying Battleship/ Armored Airship CombatAirship weapons, glidersHow could something fly (steampunk tech) without lifting gas?Airship lifeboats, design alternativesHow to sail into the wind on an airship?How could an airship made of magic wood propel itself through the sky without an engine?Smallest possible size for a manned airshipAirship Propulsion System













10












$begingroup$


In the scene of one of my stories, an airship gets hit by a violent storm. Apart from exploding (which isn't helpful to the main character), what other things could go wrong that would be fixable? Most of the examples I can find online of airship problems almost always resulted in total disaster. Some thoughts I have are: fixing a rudder, hull damage that could be patched, or some other result of high turbulence or lightning. Perhaps a fire? This is an American airship, so it's using helium, and isn't subject to igniting like the hydrogen airships.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Duct tape is the answer. It's always the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    12 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Worldbuilding! - Just a note that your title asks, "How can an airship be repaired mid-flight..." but the body of the question appears to be, "What might go wrong midflight?" This may give rise to different types of answer. Maybe a title like, "What airship disasters can realistically be repaired mid-flight?" might be more accurate. (?)
    $endgroup$
    – chasly from UK
    12 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @SteveS. Duct tape is for everyday. What the OP needs is gaffer's tape. Now that fixes everything.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    11 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Go to airships.net and read. Airships were designed to be repaired in flight. They are ships, after all; travel times were on the order of days (typically two and a half days to cross the Atlantic, five days from Berlin to Rio de Janeiro), not hours.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    10 hours ago







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Airships dont really explode. Even the Hindenburg when it was fully aflame just fell down while flames engulfed it, and it did this so slowly (as it was already landing) that most of the occupants could get out. And while storms are dangerous, Airships are actually extremely resilient to storms and most accidents were human made rather than environmental, such as being so confident in their airship's capabilities that they braved storms too tough to handle and get destroyed from being blown against a Mountain rather than things breaking. Rule of thumb: max speed (100 to 130km) is maximum storm
    $endgroup$
    – Demigan
    10 hours ago















10












$begingroup$


In the scene of one of my stories, an airship gets hit by a violent storm. Apart from exploding (which isn't helpful to the main character), what other things could go wrong that would be fixable? Most of the examples I can find online of airship problems almost always resulted in total disaster. Some thoughts I have are: fixing a rudder, hull damage that could be patched, or some other result of high turbulence or lightning. Perhaps a fire? This is an American airship, so it's using helium, and isn't subject to igniting like the hydrogen airships.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Duct tape is the answer. It's always the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    12 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Worldbuilding! - Just a note that your title asks, "How can an airship be repaired mid-flight..." but the body of the question appears to be, "What might go wrong midflight?" This may give rise to different types of answer. Maybe a title like, "What airship disasters can realistically be repaired mid-flight?" might be more accurate. (?)
    $endgroup$
    – chasly from UK
    12 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @SteveS. Duct tape is for everyday. What the OP needs is gaffer's tape. Now that fixes everything.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    11 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Go to airships.net and read. Airships were designed to be repaired in flight. They are ships, after all; travel times were on the order of days (typically two and a half days to cross the Atlantic, five days from Berlin to Rio de Janeiro), not hours.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    10 hours ago







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Airships dont really explode. Even the Hindenburg when it was fully aflame just fell down while flames engulfed it, and it did this so slowly (as it was already landing) that most of the occupants could get out. And while storms are dangerous, Airships are actually extremely resilient to storms and most accidents were human made rather than environmental, such as being so confident in their airship's capabilities that they braved storms too tough to handle and get destroyed from being blown against a Mountain rather than things breaking. Rule of thumb: max speed (100 to 130km) is maximum storm
    $endgroup$
    – Demigan
    10 hours ago













10












10








10


2



$begingroup$


In the scene of one of my stories, an airship gets hit by a violent storm. Apart from exploding (which isn't helpful to the main character), what other things could go wrong that would be fixable? Most of the examples I can find online of airship problems almost always resulted in total disaster. Some thoughts I have are: fixing a rudder, hull damage that could be patched, or some other result of high turbulence or lightning. Perhaps a fire? This is an American airship, so it's using helium, and isn't subject to igniting like the hydrogen airships.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




In the scene of one of my stories, an airship gets hit by a violent storm. Apart from exploding (which isn't helpful to the main character), what other things could go wrong that would be fixable? Most of the examples I can find online of airship problems almost always resulted in total disaster. Some thoughts I have are: fixing a rudder, hull damage that could be patched, or some other result of high turbulence or lightning. Perhaps a fire? This is an American airship, so it's using helium, and isn't subject to igniting like the hydrogen airships.







airships steampunk






share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 12 hours ago









AustinAustin

543




543




New contributor




Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Austin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Duct tape is the answer. It's always the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    12 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Worldbuilding! - Just a note that your title asks, "How can an airship be repaired mid-flight..." but the body of the question appears to be, "What might go wrong midflight?" This may give rise to different types of answer. Maybe a title like, "What airship disasters can realistically be repaired mid-flight?" might be more accurate. (?)
    $endgroup$
    – chasly from UK
    12 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @SteveS. Duct tape is for everyday. What the OP needs is gaffer's tape. Now that fixes everything.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    11 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Go to airships.net and read. Airships were designed to be repaired in flight. They are ships, after all; travel times were on the order of days (typically two and a half days to cross the Atlantic, five days from Berlin to Rio de Janeiro), not hours.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    10 hours ago







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Airships dont really explode. Even the Hindenburg when it was fully aflame just fell down while flames engulfed it, and it did this so slowly (as it was already landing) that most of the occupants could get out. And while storms are dangerous, Airships are actually extremely resilient to storms and most accidents were human made rather than environmental, such as being so confident in their airship's capabilities that they braved storms too tough to handle and get destroyed from being blown against a Mountain rather than things breaking. Rule of thumb: max speed (100 to 130km) is maximum storm
    $endgroup$
    – Demigan
    10 hours ago












  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Duct tape is the answer. It's always the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – farmersteve
    12 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Worldbuilding! - Just a note that your title asks, "How can an airship be repaired mid-flight..." but the body of the question appears to be, "What might go wrong midflight?" This may give rise to different types of answer. Maybe a title like, "What airship disasters can realistically be repaired mid-flight?" might be more accurate. (?)
    $endgroup$
    – chasly from UK
    12 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @SteveS. Duct tape is for everyday. What the OP needs is gaffer's tape. Now that fixes everything.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    11 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Go to airships.net and read. Airships were designed to be repaired in flight. They are ships, after all; travel times were on the order of days (typically two and a half days to cross the Atlantic, five days from Berlin to Rio de Janeiro), not hours.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    10 hours ago







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Airships dont really explode. Even the Hindenburg when it was fully aflame just fell down while flames engulfed it, and it did this so slowly (as it was already landing) that most of the occupants could get out. And while storms are dangerous, Airships are actually extremely resilient to storms and most accidents were human made rather than environmental, such as being so confident in their airship's capabilities that they braved storms too tough to handle and get destroyed from being blown against a Mountain rather than things breaking. Rule of thumb: max speed (100 to 130km) is maximum storm
    $endgroup$
    – Demigan
    10 hours ago







12




12




$begingroup$
Duct tape is the answer. It's always the answer.
$endgroup$
– farmersteve
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Duct tape is the answer. It's always the answer.
$endgroup$
– farmersteve
12 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding! - Just a note that your title asks, "How can an airship be repaired mid-flight..." but the body of the question appears to be, "What might go wrong midflight?" This may give rise to different types of answer. Maybe a title like, "What airship disasters can realistically be repaired mid-flight?" might be more accurate. (?)
$endgroup$
– chasly from UK
12 hours ago





$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding! - Just a note that your title asks, "How can an airship be repaired mid-flight..." but the body of the question appears to be, "What might go wrong midflight?" This may give rise to different types of answer. Maybe a title like, "What airship disasters can realistically be repaired mid-flight?" might be more accurate. (?)
$endgroup$
– chasly from UK
12 hours ago





4




4




$begingroup$
@SteveS. Duct tape is for everyday. What the OP needs is gaffer's tape. Now that fixes everything.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
@SteveS. Duct tape is for everyday. What the OP needs is gaffer's tape. Now that fixes everything.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
11 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
Go to airships.net and read. Airships were designed to be repaired in flight. They are ships, after all; travel times were on the order of days (typically two and a half days to cross the Atlantic, five days from Berlin to Rio de Janeiro), not hours.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
10 hours ago





$begingroup$
Go to airships.net and read. Airships were designed to be repaired in flight. They are ships, after all; travel times were on the order of days (typically two and a half days to cross the Atlantic, five days from Berlin to Rio de Janeiro), not hours.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
10 hours ago





5




5




$begingroup$
Airships dont really explode. Even the Hindenburg when it was fully aflame just fell down while flames engulfed it, and it did this so slowly (as it was already landing) that most of the occupants could get out. And while storms are dangerous, Airships are actually extremely resilient to storms and most accidents were human made rather than environmental, such as being so confident in their airship's capabilities that they braved storms too tough to handle and get destroyed from being blown against a Mountain rather than things breaking. Rule of thumb: max speed (100 to 130km) is maximum storm
$endgroup$
– Demigan
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Airships dont really explode. Even the Hindenburg when it was fully aflame just fell down while flames engulfed it, and it did this so slowly (as it was already landing) that most of the occupants could get out. And while storms are dangerous, Airships are actually extremely resilient to storms and most accidents were human made rather than environmental, such as being so confident in their airship's capabilities that they braved storms too tough to handle and get destroyed from being blown against a Mountain rather than things breaking. Rule of thumb: max speed (100 to 130km) is maximum storm
$endgroup$
– Demigan
10 hours ago










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

  • The outer skin of a zeppelin could start to rip. Someone would have to go on top to sew it up and stop the rip.

  • Internally, bracing struts might snap and need to be replaced.

  • Many airships had engine pods which were designed for in-flight maintenance.

  • Malfunctions might make it necessary to go to the ballast tanks and manually release them. (First image on this page).





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    10












    $begingroup$

    A failure that's quite likely in a violent storm is damage to fins, rudders, or elevators. Presuming these are built similarly to what they were on the Zeppelins of the 1900-1940 era, turbulence could snap rudder cable, tear off guy attachments, fracture and buckle ribs or spars, even tear fabric covering.



    None of these present a great danger of an immediate crash, just extra drama trying to control pitch by shifting fuel and water ballast, or steer with differential thrust (throttle up starboard engines, idle port side, to turn slowly to port). Even better, all are repairable without landing, at least to the extend of jury rigging something to restore limited control until the ship can land in a safe place.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      8












      $begingroup$

      Photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt: Repairing the Hull of the Graf Zeppelin During the Flight over the Atlantic, 1934



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        :-) Yes, this is proof-of-concept, but a bit more detail (including a list of the types of things that could be fixed this way) would improve this answer substantially.
        $endgroup$
        – JBH
        9 hours ago






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        That photo is awesome and terrifying.
        $endgroup$
        – ceejayoz
        9 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @ceejayoz Now picture the photographer, who wasn't repairing the Zep, but up there only to make the photograph.
        $endgroup$
        – Zeiss Ikon
        8 hours ago






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @ZeissIkon He also probably needs both hands for the camera. 😳
        $endgroup$
        – ceejayoz
        8 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @ceejayoz - No, he was using a tripod with spikes.
        $endgroup$
        – chasly from UK
        8 hours ago



















      7












      $begingroup$

      The engine could break down. If your engine is a steam engine this could be anything from the fire going out to the boiler rupturing/exploding.



      Also if the propellers are driven by chains (or similar) they might break. That might require someone to go outside to affix a new chain.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        There's an answer here that talks about the USS Macon having landed safely after experiencing structural damage. How? Because the entire drivetrain still worked. Dead in the water is one thing. Dead in the air, is dead. +1
        $endgroup$
        – Mazura
        4 hours ago


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Air Balloons



      A zeppellin made of multiple tiny air balloons (with a bigger protection on top) might be more resistant to any event (bullets for instance, or a lightning/hailstorm in your case), because only a few ones will pop.



      However, after an accident, the crew will have to repair/use new ones, and inflate them, then replace them.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        A zeppelin's gas bags aren't pressurized (and they're rather large). Putting a bullet-sized hole in one will cause a slow leak that will need to be repaired sometime in the next few months. Putting an entire fighter airplane's-worth of machine-gun bullet holes in one will still only be a minor nuisance, as the British found out when they tried to shoot down German zeppelin bombers during World War I.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        7 hours ago


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Loss of structural integrity in the inner truss system:



      The USS Macon, a rigid airship of the US Navy, was badly damaged while transiting through mountains of Arizona. Among other failures, mechanical failures of the rigid truss structure were repaired in flight:




      Following a severe drop, a diagonal girder in ring 17.5, which supported the forward fin attachment points, failed. Rapid damage control by Chief Boatswain's Mate Robert Davis repaired the girders before further failures could occur. The Macon completed the journey safely but the buckled ring and all four tailfins were judged to be in need of strengthening. (Wikipedia)




      The failure of the Navy to heed advice and have design flaws mitigated lead to the crash of the airship Macon on February 12, 1935.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        I don't know what other complications there might have been, but they both crashed due to bad weather.
        $endgroup$
        – Mazura
        4 hours ago


















      0












      $begingroup$

      First, read: Airship R505



      Here are some of the things that can go wrong:



      • Damaged engines

      • Damaged propellers

      • Leaking fuel

      • Damaged fuel lines

      • Leaking gas

      • Low gas and low ballast from maneuvers during the storm

      • Ripped gas bags

      • Damaged skin of the airship

      • Damaged control surfaces of the airship

      • Damaged cables going to said control surfaces

      • Damaged structural members (beams, supports)

      • Loss of the gondola





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "579"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Austin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141545%2fhow-could-an-airship-be-repaired-mid-flight%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes








        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        11












        $begingroup$

        • The outer skin of a zeppelin could start to rip. Someone would have to go on top to sew it up and stop the rip.

        • Internally, bracing struts might snap and need to be replaced.

        • Many airships had engine pods which were designed for in-flight maintenance.

        • Malfunctions might make it necessary to go to the ballast tanks and manually release them. (First image on this page).





        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          11












          $begingroup$

          • The outer skin of a zeppelin could start to rip. Someone would have to go on top to sew it up and stop the rip.

          • Internally, bracing struts might snap and need to be replaced.

          • Many airships had engine pods which were designed for in-flight maintenance.

          • Malfunctions might make it necessary to go to the ballast tanks and manually release them. (First image on this page).





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            11












            11








            11





            $begingroup$

            • The outer skin of a zeppelin could start to rip. Someone would have to go on top to sew it up and stop the rip.

            • Internally, bracing struts might snap and need to be replaced.

            • Many airships had engine pods which were designed for in-flight maintenance.

            • Malfunctions might make it necessary to go to the ballast tanks and manually release them. (First image on this page).





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            • The outer skin of a zeppelin could start to rip. Someone would have to go on top to sew it up and stop the rip.

            • Internally, bracing struts might snap and need to be replaced.

            • Many airships had engine pods which were designed for in-flight maintenance.

            • Malfunctions might make it necessary to go to the ballast tanks and manually release them. (First image on this page).






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 11 hours ago









            o.m.o.m.

            61.8k789201




            61.8k789201





















                10












                $begingroup$

                A failure that's quite likely in a violent storm is damage to fins, rudders, or elevators. Presuming these are built similarly to what they were on the Zeppelins of the 1900-1940 era, turbulence could snap rudder cable, tear off guy attachments, fracture and buckle ribs or spars, even tear fabric covering.



                None of these present a great danger of an immediate crash, just extra drama trying to control pitch by shifting fuel and water ballast, or steer with differential thrust (throttle up starboard engines, idle port side, to turn slowly to port). Even better, all are repairable without landing, at least to the extend of jury rigging something to restore limited control until the ship can land in a safe place.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  10












                  $begingroup$

                  A failure that's quite likely in a violent storm is damage to fins, rudders, or elevators. Presuming these are built similarly to what they were on the Zeppelins of the 1900-1940 era, turbulence could snap rudder cable, tear off guy attachments, fracture and buckle ribs or spars, even tear fabric covering.



                  None of these present a great danger of an immediate crash, just extra drama trying to control pitch by shifting fuel and water ballast, or steer with differential thrust (throttle up starboard engines, idle port side, to turn slowly to port). Even better, all are repairable without landing, at least to the extend of jury rigging something to restore limited control until the ship can land in a safe place.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    10












                    10








                    10





                    $begingroup$

                    A failure that's quite likely in a violent storm is damage to fins, rudders, or elevators. Presuming these are built similarly to what they were on the Zeppelins of the 1900-1940 era, turbulence could snap rudder cable, tear off guy attachments, fracture and buckle ribs or spars, even tear fabric covering.



                    None of these present a great danger of an immediate crash, just extra drama trying to control pitch by shifting fuel and water ballast, or steer with differential thrust (throttle up starboard engines, idle port side, to turn slowly to port). Even better, all are repairable without landing, at least to the extend of jury rigging something to restore limited control until the ship can land in a safe place.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    A failure that's quite likely in a violent storm is damage to fins, rudders, or elevators. Presuming these are built similarly to what they were on the Zeppelins of the 1900-1940 era, turbulence could snap rudder cable, tear off guy attachments, fracture and buckle ribs or spars, even tear fabric covering.



                    None of these present a great danger of an immediate crash, just extra drama trying to control pitch by shifting fuel and water ballast, or steer with differential thrust (throttle up starboard engines, idle port side, to turn slowly to port). Even better, all are repairable without landing, at least to the extend of jury rigging something to restore limited control until the ship can land in a safe place.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 12 hours ago









                    Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon

                    1,583114




                    1,583114





















                        8












                        $begingroup$

                        Photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt: Repairing the Hull of the Graf Zeppelin During the Flight over the Atlantic, 1934



                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          :-) Yes, this is proof-of-concept, but a bit more detail (including a list of the types of things that could be fixed this way) would improve this answer substantially.
                          $endgroup$
                          – JBH
                          9 hours ago






                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          That photo is awesome and terrifying.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ceejayoz
                          9 hours ago






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          @ceejayoz Now picture the photographer, who wasn't repairing the Zep, but up there only to make the photograph.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Zeiss Ikon
                          8 hours ago






                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          @ZeissIkon He also probably needs both hands for the camera. 😳
                          $endgroup$
                          – ceejayoz
                          8 hours ago






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          @ceejayoz - No, he was using a tripod with spikes.
                          $endgroup$
                          – chasly from UK
                          8 hours ago
















                        8












                        $begingroup$

                        Photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt: Repairing the Hull of the Graf Zeppelin During the Flight over the Atlantic, 1934



                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          :-) Yes, this is proof-of-concept, but a bit more detail (including a list of the types of things that could be fixed this way) would improve this answer substantially.
                          $endgroup$
                          – JBH
                          9 hours ago






                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          That photo is awesome and terrifying.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ceejayoz
                          9 hours ago






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          @ceejayoz Now picture the photographer, who wasn't repairing the Zep, but up there only to make the photograph.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Zeiss Ikon
                          8 hours ago






                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          @ZeissIkon He also probably needs both hands for the camera. 😳
                          $endgroup$
                          – ceejayoz
                          8 hours ago






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          @ceejayoz - No, he was using a tripod with spikes.
                          $endgroup$
                          – chasly from UK
                          8 hours ago














                        8












                        8








                        8





                        $begingroup$

                        Photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt: Repairing the Hull of the Graf Zeppelin During the Flight over the Atlantic, 1934



                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        Photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt: Repairing the Hull of the Graf Zeppelin During the Flight over the Atlantic, 1934



                        enter image description here







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 10 hours ago









                        RogerRoger

                        3,185418




                        3,185418











                        • $begingroup$
                          :-) Yes, this is proof-of-concept, but a bit more detail (including a list of the types of things that could be fixed this way) would improve this answer substantially.
                          $endgroup$
                          – JBH
                          9 hours ago






                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          That photo is awesome and terrifying.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ceejayoz
                          9 hours ago






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          @ceejayoz Now picture the photographer, who wasn't repairing the Zep, but up there only to make the photograph.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Zeiss Ikon
                          8 hours ago






                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          @ZeissIkon He also probably needs both hands for the camera. 😳
                          $endgroup$
                          – ceejayoz
                          8 hours ago






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          @ceejayoz - No, he was using a tripod with spikes.
                          $endgroup$
                          – chasly from UK
                          8 hours ago

















                        • $begingroup$
                          :-) Yes, this is proof-of-concept, but a bit more detail (including a list of the types of things that could be fixed this way) would improve this answer substantially.
                          $endgroup$
                          – JBH
                          9 hours ago






                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          That photo is awesome and terrifying.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ceejayoz
                          9 hours ago






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          @ceejayoz Now picture the photographer, who wasn't repairing the Zep, but up there only to make the photograph.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Zeiss Ikon
                          8 hours ago






                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          @ZeissIkon He also probably needs both hands for the camera. 😳
                          $endgroup$
                          – ceejayoz
                          8 hours ago






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          @ceejayoz - No, he was using a tripod with spikes.
                          $endgroup$
                          – chasly from UK
                          8 hours ago
















                        $begingroup$
                        :-) Yes, this is proof-of-concept, but a bit more detail (including a list of the types of things that could be fixed this way) would improve this answer substantially.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        9 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        :-) Yes, this is proof-of-concept, but a bit more detail (including a list of the types of things that could be fixed this way) would improve this answer substantially.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        9 hours ago




                        3




                        3




                        $begingroup$
                        That photo is awesome and terrifying.
                        $endgroup$
                        – ceejayoz
                        9 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        That photo is awesome and terrifying.
                        $endgroup$
                        – ceejayoz
                        9 hours ago




                        1




                        1




                        $begingroup$
                        @ceejayoz Now picture the photographer, who wasn't repairing the Zep, but up there only to make the photograph.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        8 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        @ceejayoz Now picture the photographer, who wasn't repairing the Zep, but up there only to make the photograph.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zeiss Ikon
                        8 hours ago




                        3




                        3




                        $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon He also probably needs both hands for the camera. 😳
                        $endgroup$
                        – ceejayoz
                        8 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        @ZeissIkon He also probably needs both hands for the camera. 😳
                        $endgroup$
                        – ceejayoz
                        8 hours ago




                        1




                        1




                        $begingroup$
                        @ceejayoz - No, he was using a tripod with spikes.
                        $endgroup$
                        – chasly from UK
                        8 hours ago





                        $begingroup$
                        @ceejayoz - No, he was using a tripod with spikes.
                        $endgroup$
                        – chasly from UK
                        8 hours ago












                        7












                        $begingroup$

                        The engine could break down. If your engine is a steam engine this could be anything from the fire going out to the boiler rupturing/exploding.



                        Also if the propellers are driven by chains (or similar) they might break. That might require someone to go outside to affix a new chain.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          There's an answer here that talks about the USS Macon having landed safely after experiencing structural damage. How? Because the entire drivetrain still worked. Dead in the water is one thing. Dead in the air, is dead. +1
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mazura
                          4 hours ago















                        7












                        $begingroup$

                        The engine could break down. If your engine is a steam engine this could be anything from the fire going out to the boiler rupturing/exploding.



                        Also if the propellers are driven by chains (or similar) they might break. That might require someone to go outside to affix a new chain.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          There's an answer here that talks about the USS Macon having landed safely after experiencing structural damage. How? Because the entire drivetrain still worked. Dead in the water is one thing. Dead in the air, is dead. +1
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mazura
                          4 hours ago













                        7












                        7








                        7





                        $begingroup$

                        The engine could break down. If your engine is a steam engine this could be anything from the fire going out to the boiler rupturing/exploding.



                        Also if the propellers are driven by chains (or similar) they might break. That might require someone to go outside to affix a new chain.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        The engine could break down. If your engine is a steam engine this could be anything from the fire going out to the boiler rupturing/exploding.



                        Also if the propellers are driven by chains (or similar) they might break. That might require someone to go outside to affix a new chain.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 12 hours ago









                        mwarrenmwarren

                        1292




                        1292











                        • $begingroup$
                          There's an answer here that talks about the USS Macon having landed safely after experiencing structural damage. How? Because the entire drivetrain still worked. Dead in the water is one thing. Dead in the air, is dead. +1
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mazura
                          4 hours ago
















                        • $begingroup$
                          There's an answer here that talks about the USS Macon having landed safely after experiencing structural damage. How? Because the entire drivetrain still worked. Dead in the water is one thing. Dead in the air, is dead. +1
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mazura
                          4 hours ago















                        $begingroup$
                        There's an answer here that talks about the USS Macon having landed safely after experiencing structural damage. How? Because the entire drivetrain still worked. Dead in the water is one thing. Dead in the air, is dead. +1
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mazura
                        4 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        There's an answer here that talks about the USS Macon having landed safely after experiencing structural damage. How? Because the entire drivetrain still worked. Dead in the water is one thing. Dead in the air, is dead. +1
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mazura
                        4 hours ago











                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Air Balloons



                        A zeppellin made of multiple tiny air balloons (with a bigger protection on top) might be more resistant to any event (bullets for instance, or a lightning/hailstorm in your case), because only a few ones will pop.



                        However, after an accident, the crew will have to repair/use new ones, and inflate them, then replace them.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          A zeppelin's gas bags aren't pressurized (and they're rather large). Putting a bullet-sized hole in one will cause a slow leak that will need to be repaired sometime in the next few months. Putting an entire fighter airplane's-worth of machine-gun bullet holes in one will still only be a minor nuisance, as the British found out when they tried to shoot down German zeppelin bombers during World War I.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mark
                          7 hours ago















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Air Balloons



                        A zeppellin made of multiple tiny air balloons (with a bigger protection on top) might be more resistant to any event (bullets for instance, or a lightning/hailstorm in your case), because only a few ones will pop.



                        However, after an accident, the crew will have to repair/use new ones, and inflate them, then replace them.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          A zeppelin's gas bags aren't pressurized (and they're rather large). Putting a bullet-sized hole in one will cause a slow leak that will need to be repaired sometime in the next few months. Putting an entire fighter airplane's-worth of machine-gun bullet holes in one will still only be a minor nuisance, as the British found out when they tried to shoot down German zeppelin bombers during World War I.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mark
                          7 hours ago













                        1












                        1








                        1





                        $begingroup$

                        Air Balloons



                        A zeppellin made of multiple tiny air balloons (with a bigger protection on top) might be more resistant to any event (bullets for instance, or a lightning/hailstorm in your case), because only a few ones will pop.



                        However, after an accident, the crew will have to repair/use new ones, and inflate them, then replace them.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        Air Balloons



                        A zeppellin made of multiple tiny air balloons (with a bigger protection on top) might be more resistant to any event (bullets for instance, or a lightning/hailstorm in your case), because only a few ones will pop.



                        However, after an accident, the crew will have to repair/use new ones, and inflate them, then replace them.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 12 hours ago









                        AsoubAsoub

                        357312




                        357312











                        • $begingroup$
                          A zeppelin's gas bags aren't pressurized (and they're rather large). Putting a bullet-sized hole in one will cause a slow leak that will need to be repaired sometime in the next few months. Putting an entire fighter airplane's-worth of machine-gun bullet holes in one will still only be a minor nuisance, as the British found out when they tried to shoot down German zeppelin bombers during World War I.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mark
                          7 hours ago
















                        • $begingroup$
                          A zeppelin's gas bags aren't pressurized (and they're rather large). Putting a bullet-sized hole in one will cause a slow leak that will need to be repaired sometime in the next few months. Putting an entire fighter airplane's-worth of machine-gun bullet holes in one will still only be a minor nuisance, as the British found out when they tried to shoot down German zeppelin bombers during World War I.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mark
                          7 hours ago















                        $begingroup$
                        A zeppelin's gas bags aren't pressurized (and they're rather large). Putting a bullet-sized hole in one will cause a slow leak that will need to be repaired sometime in the next few months. Putting an entire fighter airplane's-worth of machine-gun bullet holes in one will still only be a minor nuisance, as the British found out when they tried to shoot down German zeppelin bombers during World War I.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mark
                        7 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        A zeppelin's gas bags aren't pressurized (and they're rather large). Putting a bullet-sized hole in one will cause a slow leak that will need to be repaired sometime in the next few months. Putting an entire fighter airplane's-worth of machine-gun bullet holes in one will still only be a minor nuisance, as the British found out when they tried to shoot down German zeppelin bombers during World War I.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mark
                        7 hours ago











                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Loss of structural integrity in the inner truss system:



                        The USS Macon, a rigid airship of the US Navy, was badly damaged while transiting through mountains of Arizona. Among other failures, mechanical failures of the rigid truss structure were repaired in flight:




                        Following a severe drop, a diagonal girder in ring 17.5, which supported the forward fin attachment points, failed. Rapid damage control by Chief Boatswain's Mate Robert Davis repaired the girders before further failures could occur. The Macon completed the journey safely but the buckled ring and all four tailfins were judged to be in need of strengthening. (Wikipedia)




                        The failure of the Navy to heed advice and have design flaws mitigated lead to the crash of the airship Macon on February 12, 1935.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know what other complications there might have been, but they both crashed due to bad weather.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mazura
                          4 hours ago















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Loss of structural integrity in the inner truss system:



                        The USS Macon, a rigid airship of the US Navy, was badly damaged while transiting through mountains of Arizona. Among other failures, mechanical failures of the rigid truss structure were repaired in flight:




                        Following a severe drop, a diagonal girder in ring 17.5, which supported the forward fin attachment points, failed. Rapid damage control by Chief Boatswain's Mate Robert Davis repaired the girders before further failures could occur. The Macon completed the journey safely but the buckled ring and all four tailfins were judged to be in need of strengthening. (Wikipedia)




                        The failure of the Navy to heed advice and have design flaws mitigated lead to the crash of the airship Macon on February 12, 1935.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know what other complications there might have been, but they both crashed due to bad weather.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mazura
                          4 hours ago













                        1












                        1








                        1





                        $begingroup$

                        Loss of structural integrity in the inner truss system:



                        The USS Macon, a rigid airship of the US Navy, was badly damaged while transiting through mountains of Arizona. Among other failures, mechanical failures of the rigid truss structure were repaired in flight:




                        Following a severe drop, a diagonal girder in ring 17.5, which supported the forward fin attachment points, failed. Rapid damage control by Chief Boatswain's Mate Robert Davis repaired the girders before further failures could occur. The Macon completed the journey safely but the buckled ring and all four tailfins were judged to be in need of strengthening. (Wikipedia)




                        The failure of the Navy to heed advice and have design flaws mitigated lead to the crash of the airship Macon on February 12, 1935.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        Loss of structural integrity in the inner truss system:



                        The USS Macon, a rigid airship of the US Navy, was badly damaged while transiting through mountains of Arizona. Among other failures, mechanical failures of the rigid truss structure were repaired in flight:




                        Following a severe drop, a diagonal girder in ring 17.5, which supported the forward fin attachment points, failed. Rapid damage control by Chief Boatswain's Mate Robert Davis repaired the girders before further failures could occur. The Macon completed the journey safely but the buckled ring and all four tailfins were judged to be in need of strengthening. (Wikipedia)




                        The failure of the Navy to heed advice and have design flaws mitigated lead to the crash of the airship Macon on February 12, 1935.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 7 hours ago









                        JimJim

                        1615




                        1615











                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know what other complications there might have been, but they both crashed due to bad weather.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mazura
                          4 hours ago
















                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know what other complications there might have been, but they both crashed due to bad weather.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mazura
                          4 hours ago















                        $begingroup$
                        I don't know what other complications there might have been, but they both crashed due to bad weather.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mazura
                        4 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        I don't know what other complications there might have been, but they both crashed due to bad weather.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mazura
                        4 hours ago











                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        First, read: Airship R505



                        Here are some of the things that can go wrong:



                        • Damaged engines

                        • Damaged propellers

                        • Leaking fuel

                        • Damaged fuel lines

                        • Leaking gas

                        • Low gas and low ballast from maneuvers during the storm

                        • Ripped gas bags

                        • Damaged skin of the airship

                        • Damaged control surfaces of the airship

                        • Damaged cables going to said control surfaces

                        • Damaged structural members (beams, supports)

                        • Loss of the gondola





                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          First, read: Airship R505



                          Here are some of the things that can go wrong:



                          • Damaged engines

                          • Damaged propellers

                          • Leaking fuel

                          • Damaged fuel lines

                          • Leaking gas

                          • Low gas and low ballast from maneuvers during the storm

                          • Ripped gas bags

                          • Damaged skin of the airship

                          • Damaged control surfaces of the airship

                          • Damaged cables going to said control surfaces

                          • Damaged structural members (beams, supports)

                          • Loss of the gondola





                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            First, read: Airship R505



                            Here are some of the things that can go wrong:



                            • Damaged engines

                            • Damaged propellers

                            • Leaking fuel

                            • Damaged fuel lines

                            • Leaking gas

                            • Low gas and low ballast from maneuvers during the storm

                            • Ripped gas bags

                            • Damaged skin of the airship

                            • Damaged control surfaces of the airship

                            • Damaged cables going to said control surfaces

                            • Damaged structural members (beams, supports)

                            • Loss of the gondola





                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            First, read: Airship R505



                            Here are some of the things that can go wrong:



                            • Damaged engines

                            • Damaged propellers

                            • Leaking fuel

                            • Damaged fuel lines

                            • Leaking gas

                            • Low gas and low ballast from maneuvers during the storm

                            • Ripped gas bags

                            • Damaged skin of the airship

                            • Damaged control surfaces of the airship

                            • Damaged cables going to said control surfaces

                            • Damaged structural members (beams, supports)

                            • Loss of the gondola






                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 8 hours ago









                            ShadoCatShadoCat

                            15.3k2052




                            15.3k2052




















                                Austin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Austin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Austin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Austin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141545%2fhow-could-an-airship-be-repaired-mid-flight%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Masuk log Menu navigasi

                                Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                                Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области