Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?How do foci and somatic+material components interact when it comes to occupying a hand?Can you cast spells with a Somatic component if you're holding a two-handed weapon?Crafting an Improvised Spellcasting Focus?Can a multiclass Cleric/Warlock hold a Holy Shield and an Arcane Staff and still cast spells?Where should I report printing errors in Xanathar's Guide to Everything?Where can I purchase a legal Xanathar's Guide to Everything PDF?Can I use a hand holding a focus from one class to cover somatic components for a spell from another class?Do you need a “gameplay-wise” free hand to handle material components?Portent, as it relates to the Gambling downtime rules from Xanathar's Guide to EverythingWhat is the correct interpretation of the Gambling Results table in Xanathar's Guide to Everything?

Why would a flight no longer considered airworthy be redirected like this?

Hacking a Safe Lock after 3 tries

How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

Happy pi day, everyone!

How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?

Are ETF trackers fundamentally better than individual stocks?

What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?

If curse and magic is two sides of the same coin, why the former is forbidden?

Professor being mistaken for a grad student

How to terminate ping <dest> &

A Cautionary Suggestion

Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?

Define, (actually define) the "stability" and "energy" of a compound

In a future war, an old lady is trying to raise a boy but one of the weapons has made everyone deaf

Instead of Universal Basic Income, why not Universal Basic NEEDS?

Opacity of an object in 2.8

A sequence that has integer values for prime indexes only:

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

How to change two letters closest to a string and one letter immediately after a string using notepad++

Can I use USB data pins as power source

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

Identifying the interval from A♭ to D♯



Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?


How do foci and somatic+material components interact when it comes to occupying a hand?Can you cast spells with a Somatic component if you're holding a two-handed weapon?Crafting an Improvised Spellcasting Focus?Can a multiclass Cleric/Warlock hold a Holy Shield and an Arcane Staff and still cast spells?Where should I report printing errors in Xanathar's Guide to Everything?Where can I purchase a legal Xanathar's Guide to Everything PDF?Can I use a hand holding a focus from one class to cover somatic components for a spell from another class?Do you need a “gameplay-wise” free hand to handle material components?Portent, as it relates to the Gambling downtime rules from Xanathar's Guide to EverythingWhat is the correct interpretation of the Gambling Results table in Xanathar's Guide to Everything?













4












$begingroup$


I see that, for example:




A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.




Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.



What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.



Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Blake Steel
    7 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


I see that, for example:




A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.




Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.



What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.



Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Blake Steel
    7 hours ago













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


I see that, for example:




A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.




Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.



What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.



Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I see that, for example:




A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.




Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.



What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.



Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?







dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components






share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









T.J.L.

33.4k5116174




33.4k5116174






New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman

2277




2277




New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Blake Steel
    7 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Blake Steel
    7 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:



  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]




The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143251%2fdo-these-spellcasting-foci-from-xanathars-guide-to-everything-have-to-be-held-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:



  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]




The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago















7












$begingroup$

The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:



  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]




The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago













7












7








7





$begingroup$

The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:



  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]




The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:



  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]




The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago









V2Blast

24.6k383155




24.6k383155










answered 7 hours ago









T.J.L.T.J.L.

33.4k5116174




33.4k5116174







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
6 hours ago










Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143251%2fdo-these-spellcasting-foci-from-xanathars-guide-to-everything-have-to-be-held-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Masuk log Menu navigasi

Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области