100 prisoners' names in boxes, against smart warden












0












$begingroup$


My question, which I do not know the answer to, concerns the classic 100 prisoners and 100 boxes puzzle, summarized below. The solution to this assumes the names are placed in boxes randomly, and gets a ~30% probability of success.



My question is what happens if the warden can choose how to place the names in the boxes, instead of placing them randomly? Now this is a sort of game theory question. The prisoners can no longer use the same strategy, since the warden can guarantee it fails by placing the names in a long cycle. So, my question is,




What is the best strategy for the prisoners, where the goodness of a strategy is measured as its worst case probability of success against all possible warden strategies, including random ones?




As a warm-up which I cannot solve, what is the prisoner's best strategy if the warden randomly places the names in boxes so the resulting permutation is one of the $99!$ possible cycles of length $100$?



Original puzzle:




100 Prisoners and Boxes



A warden explains to 100 prisoners that he will bring them one by one into a room with 100 boxes. Each prisoners' name will be written on a piece of paper, then the slips will be randomly be placed in the boxes, one name per box. When the prisoner is brought into the room, they may open up to 50 boxes. Afterwards, they leave the room without getting to talk to any of the other prisoners, and the warden closes all the opened boxes (and generally resets the room).



The prisoners win only if every prisoner opens the box containing their name. Before the trial begins, the prisoners may confer and decide on a strategy. How can they win with a fairly good probability? You can do much better than the random strategy, with probability $1/2^{100}$.











share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    My question, which I do not know the answer to, concerns the classic 100 prisoners and 100 boxes puzzle, summarized below. The solution to this assumes the names are placed in boxes randomly, and gets a ~30% probability of success.



    My question is what happens if the warden can choose how to place the names in the boxes, instead of placing them randomly? Now this is a sort of game theory question. The prisoners can no longer use the same strategy, since the warden can guarantee it fails by placing the names in a long cycle. So, my question is,




    What is the best strategy for the prisoners, where the goodness of a strategy is measured as its worst case probability of success against all possible warden strategies, including random ones?




    As a warm-up which I cannot solve, what is the prisoner's best strategy if the warden randomly places the names in boxes so the resulting permutation is one of the $99!$ possible cycles of length $100$?



    Original puzzle:




    100 Prisoners and Boxes



    A warden explains to 100 prisoners that he will bring them one by one into a room with 100 boxes. Each prisoners' name will be written on a piece of paper, then the slips will be randomly be placed in the boxes, one name per box. When the prisoner is brought into the room, they may open up to 50 boxes. Afterwards, they leave the room without getting to talk to any of the other prisoners, and the warden closes all the opened boxes (and generally resets the room).



    The prisoners win only if every prisoner opens the box containing their name. Before the trial begins, the prisoners may confer and decide on a strategy. How can they win with a fairly good probability? You can do much better than the random strategy, with probability $1/2^{100}$.











    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      My question, which I do not know the answer to, concerns the classic 100 prisoners and 100 boxes puzzle, summarized below. The solution to this assumes the names are placed in boxes randomly, and gets a ~30% probability of success.



      My question is what happens if the warden can choose how to place the names in the boxes, instead of placing them randomly? Now this is a sort of game theory question. The prisoners can no longer use the same strategy, since the warden can guarantee it fails by placing the names in a long cycle. So, my question is,




      What is the best strategy for the prisoners, where the goodness of a strategy is measured as its worst case probability of success against all possible warden strategies, including random ones?




      As a warm-up which I cannot solve, what is the prisoner's best strategy if the warden randomly places the names in boxes so the resulting permutation is one of the $99!$ possible cycles of length $100$?



      Original puzzle:




      100 Prisoners and Boxes



      A warden explains to 100 prisoners that he will bring them one by one into a room with 100 boxes. Each prisoners' name will be written on a piece of paper, then the slips will be randomly be placed in the boxes, one name per box. When the prisoner is brought into the room, they may open up to 50 boxes. Afterwards, they leave the room without getting to talk to any of the other prisoners, and the warden closes all the opened boxes (and generally resets the room).



      The prisoners win only if every prisoner opens the box containing their name. Before the trial begins, the prisoners may confer and decide on a strategy. How can they win with a fairly good probability? You can do much better than the random strategy, with probability $1/2^{100}$.











      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      My question, which I do not know the answer to, concerns the classic 100 prisoners and 100 boxes puzzle, summarized below. The solution to this assumes the names are placed in boxes randomly, and gets a ~30% probability of success.



      My question is what happens if the warden can choose how to place the names in the boxes, instead of placing them randomly? Now this is a sort of game theory question. The prisoners can no longer use the same strategy, since the warden can guarantee it fails by placing the names in a long cycle. So, my question is,




      What is the best strategy for the prisoners, where the goodness of a strategy is measured as its worst case probability of success against all possible warden strategies, including random ones?




      As a warm-up which I cannot solve, what is the prisoner's best strategy if the warden randomly places the names in boxes so the resulting permutation is one of the $99!$ possible cycles of length $100$?



      Original puzzle:




      100 Prisoners and Boxes



      A warden explains to 100 prisoners that he will bring them one by one into a room with 100 boxes. Each prisoners' name will be written on a piece of paper, then the slips will be randomly be placed in the boxes, one name per box. When the prisoner is brought into the room, they may open up to 50 boxes. Afterwards, they leave the room without getting to talk to any of the other prisoners, and the warden closes all the opened boxes (and generally resets the room).



      The prisoners win only if every prisoner opens the box containing their name. Before the trial begins, the prisoners may confer and decide on a strategy. How can they win with a fairly good probability? You can do much better than the random strategy, with probability $1/2^{100}$.








      mathematics strategy probability game-theory






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 24 mins ago









      Mike EarnestMike Earnest

      20.9k574213




      20.9k574213






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81832%2f100-prisoners-names-in-boxes-against-smart-warden%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81832%2f100-prisoners-names-in-boxes-against-smart-warden%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Masuk log Menu navigasi

          Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

          Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области