Why is the intercept typed in as a 1 in stats packages (R, python) The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAdvice on a good production level SPC (statistical process control) package?Understanding what Dassault iSight is doing?What languages are commonly used in medical statistics?What statistical software does NOT provide for Classification and Regression modelsHow must one handle ordinal independent variables when modeling interactions?Predicting with GLM using Gaussian distributed dataStandard error for rolling regressionSlope interpretation in simple linear regressionAlternatives to Journal of Statistical Software?Non-straight lines in random intercept random slope plots

What are the unusually-enlarged wing sections on this P-38 Lightning?

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?

Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight

Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?

Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Free fall ellipse or parabola?

Man transported from Alternate World into ours by a Neutrino Detector

(How) Could a medieval fantasy world survive a magic-induced "nuclear winter"?

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

What CSS properties can the br tag have?

Why am I getting "Static method cannot be referenced from a non static context: String String.valueOf(Object)"?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Computationally populating tables with probability data

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

What was Carter Burke's job for "the company" in Aliens?

Vector calculus integration identity problem

What difference does it make using sed with/without whitespaces?

What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?

What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?

It is correct to match light sources with the same color temperature?

Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?

From jafe to El-Guest

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?



Why is the intercept typed in as a 1 in stats packages (R, python)



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAdvice on a good production level SPC (statistical process control) package?Understanding what Dassault iSight is doing?What languages are commonly used in medical statistics?What statistical software does NOT provide for Classification and Regression modelsHow must one handle ordinal independent variables when modeling interactions?Predicting with GLM using Gaussian distributed dataStandard error for rolling regressionSlope interpretation in simple linear regressionAlternatives to Journal of Statistical Software?Non-straight lines in random intercept random slope plots










7












$begingroup$


When using statistics software, When defining your linear models, why is the intercept typed in as a 1, rather than "const" or "intercept" or something. What significance does 1 have?



Is there some historic reason? Or is this logical in some way I am failing to grasp? The intercept could very well be any number.



Example from statsmodels library in python:



model = smf.ols('Height ~ 1', data = height_sample_data)


I know lmer package for R is very similar.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The intercept is the coefficient (which indeed could have any value), but what you enter into the regression program when you fit the model are not the coefficients, but the things you multiply the coefficients by in the regression equation (the $x$'s). What do you multiply the intercept by in the regression equation? (Note that $beta_0 times 1 = beta_0$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 19 at 4:31
















7












$begingroup$


When using statistics software, When defining your linear models, why is the intercept typed in as a 1, rather than "const" or "intercept" or something. What significance does 1 have?



Is there some historic reason? Or is this logical in some way I am failing to grasp? The intercept could very well be any number.



Example from statsmodels library in python:



model = smf.ols('Height ~ 1', data = height_sample_data)


I know lmer package for R is very similar.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The intercept is the coefficient (which indeed could have any value), but what you enter into the regression program when you fit the model are not the coefficients, but the things you multiply the coefficients by in the regression equation (the $x$'s). What do you multiply the intercept by in the regression equation? (Note that $beta_0 times 1 = beta_0$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 19 at 4:31














7












7








7


2



$begingroup$


When using statistics software, When defining your linear models, why is the intercept typed in as a 1, rather than "const" or "intercept" or something. What significance does 1 have?



Is there some historic reason? Or is this logical in some way I am failing to grasp? The intercept could very well be any number.



Example from statsmodels library in python:



model = smf.ols('Height ~ 1', data = height_sample_data)


I know lmer package for R is very similar.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




When using statistics software, When defining your linear models, why is the intercept typed in as a 1, rather than "const" or "intercept" or something. What significance does 1 have?



Is there some historic reason? Or is this logical in some way I am failing to grasp? The intercept could very well be any number.



Example from statsmodels library in python:



model = smf.ols('Height ~ 1', data = height_sample_data)


I know lmer package for R is very similar.







regression software intercept






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 19 at 10:01









kjetil b halvorsen

31.7k984234




31.7k984234










asked Mar 19 at 4:00









Adam BAdam B

21418




21418







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The intercept is the coefficient (which indeed could have any value), but what you enter into the regression program when you fit the model are not the coefficients, but the things you multiply the coefficients by in the regression equation (the $x$'s). What do you multiply the intercept by in the regression equation? (Note that $beta_0 times 1 = beta_0$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 19 at 4:31













  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The intercept is the coefficient (which indeed could have any value), but what you enter into the regression program when you fit the model are not the coefficients, but the things you multiply the coefficients by in the regression equation (the $x$'s). What do you multiply the intercept by in the regression equation? (Note that $beta_0 times 1 = beta_0$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 19 at 4:31








5




5




$begingroup$
The intercept is the coefficient (which indeed could have any value), but what you enter into the regression program when you fit the model are not the coefficients, but the things you multiply the coefficients by in the regression equation (the $x$'s). What do you multiply the intercept by in the regression equation? (Note that $beta_0 times 1 = beta_0$.)
$endgroup$
– Glen_b
Mar 19 at 4:31





$begingroup$
The intercept is the coefficient (which indeed could have any value), but what you enter into the regression program when you fit the model are not the coefficients, but the things you multiply the coefficients by in the regression equation (the $x$'s). What do you multiply the intercept by in the regression equation? (Note that $beta_0 times 1 = beta_0$.)
$endgroup$
– Glen_b
Mar 19 at 4:31











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















16












$begingroup$

It is logical, once you consider the matrix notation that your formula will be translated into internally. In the matrix, the non-constant predictors will be translated into (one or more) columns, and the intercept will be translated into a column consisting entirely of ones.



For instance, in R you would write a very simple OLS as:



lm(z~1+x+y)


In matrix notation, this would be translated into a model



$$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
beginpmatrix 1 & x_1 & y_1 \ 1 & x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots & vdots \ 1 & x_n & y_n endpmatrix
beginpmatrix beta_0 \ beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
+beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
$$



and now you see where the $1$ comes from.




Actually, you could leave the 1+ out, since R will always presume you want to include an intercept, so this is completely equivalent to



lm(z~x+y).


However, if you want to suppress the intercept, you would write something like



lm(z~x+y-1),


which would be translated into a matrix without a 1 column:



$$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
beginpmatrix x_1 & y_1 \ x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots \ x_n & y_n endpmatrix
beginpmatrix beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
+beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398259%2fwhy-is-the-intercept-typed-in-as-a-1-in-stats-packages-r-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    16












    $begingroup$

    It is logical, once you consider the matrix notation that your formula will be translated into internally. In the matrix, the non-constant predictors will be translated into (one or more) columns, and the intercept will be translated into a column consisting entirely of ones.



    For instance, in R you would write a very simple OLS as:



    lm(z~1+x+y)


    In matrix notation, this would be translated into a model



    $$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
    beginpmatrix 1 & x_1 & y_1 \ 1 & x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots & vdots \ 1 & x_n & y_n endpmatrix
    beginpmatrix beta_0 \ beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
    +beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
    $$



    and now you see where the $1$ comes from.




    Actually, you could leave the 1+ out, since R will always presume you want to include an intercept, so this is completely equivalent to



    lm(z~x+y).


    However, if you want to suppress the intercept, you would write something like



    lm(z~x+y-1),


    which would be translated into a matrix without a 1 column:



    $$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
    beginpmatrix x_1 & y_1 \ x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots \ x_n & y_n endpmatrix
    beginpmatrix beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
    +beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      16












      $begingroup$

      It is logical, once you consider the matrix notation that your formula will be translated into internally. In the matrix, the non-constant predictors will be translated into (one or more) columns, and the intercept will be translated into a column consisting entirely of ones.



      For instance, in R you would write a very simple OLS as:



      lm(z~1+x+y)


      In matrix notation, this would be translated into a model



      $$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
      beginpmatrix 1 & x_1 & y_1 \ 1 & x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots & vdots \ 1 & x_n & y_n endpmatrix
      beginpmatrix beta_0 \ beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
      +beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
      $$



      and now you see where the $1$ comes from.




      Actually, you could leave the 1+ out, since R will always presume you want to include an intercept, so this is completely equivalent to



      lm(z~x+y).


      However, if you want to suppress the intercept, you would write something like



      lm(z~x+y-1),


      which would be translated into a matrix without a 1 column:



      $$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
      beginpmatrix x_1 & y_1 \ x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots \ x_n & y_n endpmatrix
      beginpmatrix beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
      +beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        16












        16








        16





        $begingroup$

        It is logical, once you consider the matrix notation that your formula will be translated into internally. In the matrix, the non-constant predictors will be translated into (one or more) columns, and the intercept will be translated into a column consisting entirely of ones.



        For instance, in R you would write a very simple OLS as:



        lm(z~1+x+y)


        In matrix notation, this would be translated into a model



        $$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
        beginpmatrix 1 & x_1 & y_1 \ 1 & x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots & vdots \ 1 & x_n & y_n endpmatrix
        beginpmatrix beta_0 \ beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
        +beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
        $$



        and now you see where the $1$ comes from.




        Actually, you could leave the 1+ out, since R will always presume you want to include an intercept, so this is completely equivalent to



        lm(z~x+y).


        However, if you want to suppress the intercept, you would write something like



        lm(z~x+y-1),


        which would be translated into a matrix without a 1 column:



        $$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
        beginpmatrix x_1 & y_1 \ x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots \ x_n & y_n endpmatrix
        beginpmatrix beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
        +beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        It is logical, once you consider the matrix notation that your formula will be translated into internally. In the matrix, the non-constant predictors will be translated into (one or more) columns, and the intercept will be translated into a column consisting entirely of ones.



        For instance, in R you would write a very simple OLS as:



        lm(z~1+x+y)


        In matrix notation, this would be translated into a model



        $$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
        beginpmatrix 1 & x_1 & y_1 \ 1 & x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots & vdots \ 1 & x_n & y_n endpmatrix
        beginpmatrix beta_0 \ beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
        +beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
        $$



        and now you see where the $1$ comes from.




        Actually, you could leave the 1+ out, since R will always presume you want to include an intercept, so this is completely equivalent to



        lm(z~x+y).


        However, if you want to suppress the intercept, you would write something like



        lm(z~x+y-1),


        which would be translated into a matrix without a 1 column:



        $$ beginpmatrix z_1 \ z_2 \ vdots \ z_n endpmatrix =
        beginpmatrix x_1 & y_1 \ x_2 & y_2 \ vdots & vdots \ x_n & y_n endpmatrix
        beginpmatrix beta_x \ beta_z endpmatrix
        +beginpmatrix epsilon_1 \ epsilon_2 \ vdots \ epsilon_n endpmatrix,
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 19 at 4:27

























        answered Mar 19 at 4:09









        Stephan KolassaStephan Kolassa

        47.2k7100175




        47.2k7100175



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398259%2fwhy-is-the-intercept-typed-in-as-a-1-in-stats-packages-r-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

            Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области