Is this Spell Mimic feat balanced?












5












$begingroup$


While working on a character concept around using an opponent's strength against them, I thought of an ability that would make this cool for magic users. Initially, I thought it would be a bard subclass feature, but I don't think I want to make a whole subclass for it. Instead, I made it a feat:




Spell Mimic



Prerequisite: At least one spell slot



You are practiced at imitating the movements and words of other. Refining your skills you gain the following benefits:




  • When a creature that you can see casts a spell of 1st level or higher, you can use your reaction to carefully study their movements and wording. For the next minute, you know the spell and can cast it using your spell slots.

  • On your turn, you can cast the spell as normal. Casting the spells in this way still requires all components of the spell unless you have a way to avoid them.

  • Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's. You use your own corresponding ability score to calculate your spellcasting ability modifier.


Once you use this ability, you cannot use it again until you complete a short or long rest.




This feat is basically a watered-down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability. It is slightly more available and more interesting though.



Is this feat balanced against other available feats?





Potential problems I've identified:




  • Warlocks and clerics teaming up to use the warlock's higher-level slots for healing magic immediately before a short rest.

  • Warlocks upcasting other classes' spells. Basically warlocks in general are a concern.

  • It makes half-casters even weaker as they have fewer slots to spend on mimic spells.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's" reads as though the mimic caster uses the same ability as the original caster, but their own ability score modifier to calculate the spell attack bonus or spell DC. Is that correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Ruse That is correct. It should be if the original caster used int you use your int. How can I adjust the wording to make it clearer?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    4 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin: I've attempted to clarify that wording.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    4 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$


While working on a character concept around using an opponent's strength against them, I thought of an ability that would make this cool for magic users. Initially, I thought it would be a bard subclass feature, but I don't think I want to make a whole subclass for it. Instead, I made it a feat:




Spell Mimic



Prerequisite: At least one spell slot



You are practiced at imitating the movements and words of other. Refining your skills you gain the following benefits:




  • When a creature that you can see casts a spell of 1st level or higher, you can use your reaction to carefully study their movements and wording. For the next minute, you know the spell and can cast it using your spell slots.

  • On your turn, you can cast the spell as normal. Casting the spells in this way still requires all components of the spell unless you have a way to avoid them.

  • Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's. You use your own corresponding ability score to calculate your spellcasting ability modifier.


Once you use this ability, you cannot use it again until you complete a short or long rest.




This feat is basically a watered-down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability. It is slightly more available and more interesting though.



Is this feat balanced against other available feats?





Potential problems I've identified:




  • Warlocks and clerics teaming up to use the warlock's higher-level slots for healing magic immediately before a short rest.

  • Warlocks upcasting other classes' spells. Basically warlocks in general are a concern.

  • It makes half-casters even weaker as they have fewer slots to spend on mimic spells.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's" reads as though the mimic caster uses the same ability as the original caster, but their own ability score modifier to calculate the spell attack bonus or spell DC. Is that correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Ruse That is correct. It should be if the original caster used int you use your int. How can I adjust the wording to make it clearer?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    4 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin: I've attempted to clarify that wording.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    4 hours ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$


While working on a character concept around using an opponent's strength against them, I thought of an ability that would make this cool for magic users. Initially, I thought it would be a bard subclass feature, but I don't think I want to make a whole subclass for it. Instead, I made it a feat:




Spell Mimic



Prerequisite: At least one spell slot



You are practiced at imitating the movements and words of other. Refining your skills you gain the following benefits:




  • When a creature that you can see casts a spell of 1st level or higher, you can use your reaction to carefully study their movements and wording. For the next minute, you know the spell and can cast it using your spell slots.

  • On your turn, you can cast the spell as normal. Casting the spells in this way still requires all components of the spell unless you have a way to avoid them.

  • Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's. You use your own corresponding ability score to calculate your spellcasting ability modifier.


Once you use this ability, you cannot use it again until you complete a short or long rest.




This feat is basically a watered-down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability. It is slightly more available and more interesting though.



Is this feat balanced against other available feats?





Potential problems I've identified:




  • Warlocks and clerics teaming up to use the warlock's higher-level slots for healing magic immediately before a short rest.

  • Warlocks upcasting other classes' spells. Basically warlocks in general are a concern.

  • It makes half-casters even weaker as they have fewer slots to spend on mimic spells.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




While working on a character concept around using an opponent's strength against them, I thought of an ability that would make this cool for magic users. Initially, I thought it would be a bard subclass feature, but I don't think I want to make a whole subclass for it. Instead, I made it a feat:




Spell Mimic



Prerequisite: At least one spell slot



You are practiced at imitating the movements and words of other. Refining your skills you gain the following benefits:




  • When a creature that you can see casts a spell of 1st level or higher, you can use your reaction to carefully study their movements and wording. For the next minute, you know the spell and can cast it using your spell slots.

  • On your turn, you can cast the spell as normal. Casting the spells in this way still requires all components of the spell unless you have a way to avoid them.

  • Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's. You use your own corresponding ability score to calculate your spellcasting ability modifier.


Once you use this ability, you cannot use it again until you complete a short or long rest.




This feat is basically a watered-down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability. It is slightly more available and more interesting though.



Is this feat balanced against other available feats?





Potential problems I've identified:




  • Warlocks and clerics teaming up to use the warlock's higher-level slots for healing magic immediately before a short rest.

  • Warlocks upcasting other classes' spells. Basically warlocks in general are a concern.

  • It makes half-casters even weaker as they have fewer slots to spend on mimic spells.







dnd-5e feats homebrew balance






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









V2Blast

25.7k488158




25.7k488158










asked 4 hours ago









linksassinlinksassin

8,96712967




8,96712967








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's" reads as though the mimic caster uses the same ability as the original caster, but their own ability score modifier to calculate the spell attack bonus or spell DC. Is that correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Ruse That is correct. It should be if the original caster used int you use your int. How can I adjust the wording to make it clearer?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    4 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin: I've attempted to clarify that wording.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    4 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's" reads as though the mimic caster uses the same ability as the original caster, but their own ability score modifier to calculate the spell attack bonus or spell DC. Is that correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Ruse That is correct. It should be if the original caster used int you use your int. How can I adjust the wording to make it clearer?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    4 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin: I've attempted to clarify that wording.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    4 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
"Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's" reads as though the mimic caster uses the same ability as the original caster, but their own ability score modifier to calculate the spell attack bonus or spell DC. Is that correct?
$endgroup$
– Ruse
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
"Your spellcasting ability for this spell is the same as the original caster's" reads as though the mimic caster uses the same ability as the original caster, but their own ability score modifier to calculate the spell attack bonus or spell DC. Is that correct?
$endgroup$
– Ruse
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Ruse That is correct. It should be if the original caster used int you use your int. How can I adjust the wording to make it clearer?
$endgroup$
– linksassin
4 hours ago






$begingroup$
@Ruse That is correct. It should be if the original caster used int you use your int. How can I adjust the wording to make it clearer?
$endgroup$
– linksassin
4 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
@linksassin: I've attempted to clarify that wording.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@linksassin: I've attempted to clarify that wording.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

Spell Mimic is too flexible



I would not say that:




This feat is basically a watered down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability.




Because in many ways the Spell Mimic feat is better than the Spell Thief feature:




  • The Spell Mimic's trigger is less specific than the Spell Thief's.

  • The Spell Mimic cannot fail, whereas the Spell Thief can (and does more often than not).

  • The Spell Thief's ability to reproduce a spell is implicitly limited to 4th level spells slots, whereas the Spell Mimic can even work with 9th level spells.

  • The Spell Mimic recovers on short rests while the Spell Thief does not.


I'll grant you that in some respects Spell Mimic in inferior to Spell Thief:




  • Spell Thief preserves the memory of the new spell for much much longer than Spell Mimic.

  • Spell Mimic is implicitly useless with spells that have a casting time greater than 1 minute, whereas Spell Thief is not.

  • the Spell Mimic may not use their prefered spellcasting ability, whereas the Spell Thief always uses intelligence.


But Spell Mimic also lacks effects that make Spell Thief better against foes and inefficient with allies:




  • Spell Thief negates the triggering spell, whereas Spell Mimic does not.

  • The target of Spell Thief forgets the triggering spell whereas the target of Spell Mimic does not.


This means Spell Mimic is best suited to reliably double the efforts of your allies instead of "using an opponent's strength against them".



In practice, Spell Mimic gives a caster temporary access to the spells prepared by the rest of the party when they are most needed and effective. This flexibility combined with some teamwork makes Spell Mimic unbalanced.



Whenever the party really needs something (whether it be heals, buffs, control, or raw damage) as long as at least one other caster can provide it, the character with Spell Mimic can double their efforts by mimicking their most suitable spell. Whereas it is much rarer for an opponent to use a spell worth mimicking in any given circumstance.



Then there are also class-specific shenanigans, like:




  • A Warlock can use buffs (especially ones with long duration) and heals they usually don't have access to before a short rest.

  • A Sorcerer can apply their metamagic to spells that may not have been vetted for metamagic

  • A Wizard can create contingencies of mimicked spells.

  • A multiclass of two casters can mimick spells of a higher level than they can learn.

  • A Tempest Cleric can spam a couple max-damage chain lightning.

  • Etc.


My bare minimum recommendation to balance Spell Mimic is to somehow discourage targeting allies and limit it to spells of 5th level or lower.



However, it may be easier to achieve a feat that uses an opponent's strength against them via modifying something less convoluted than Spell Thief. I would explore an effect similar to the Ring of Spell Turning with adjustments like removing the advantage on saves and limiting which spell levels can be turned to match the growth of a half-caster.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great breakdown. One restriction I had concidered was requiring concentration while the spell was mimic'ed. Would this be a good change? (I know this might require another question but if it's a terrible idea I won't bother.)
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Also would adding a skill check of DC10+Spell Level to copy it help the balance?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin concentration would limit the feat in combat, but would not do much to stop the weirder out of combat prepwork that the feat allows for. Adding some chance of failure would help balance the feat, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    2 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144005%2fis-this-spell-mimic-feat-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11












$begingroup$

Spell Mimic is too flexible



I would not say that:




This feat is basically a watered down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability.




Because in many ways the Spell Mimic feat is better than the Spell Thief feature:




  • The Spell Mimic's trigger is less specific than the Spell Thief's.

  • The Spell Mimic cannot fail, whereas the Spell Thief can (and does more often than not).

  • The Spell Thief's ability to reproduce a spell is implicitly limited to 4th level spells slots, whereas the Spell Mimic can even work with 9th level spells.

  • The Spell Mimic recovers on short rests while the Spell Thief does not.


I'll grant you that in some respects Spell Mimic in inferior to Spell Thief:




  • Spell Thief preserves the memory of the new spell for much much longer than Spell Mimic.

  • Spell Mimic is implicitly useless with spells that have a casting time greater than 1 minute, whereas Spell Thief is not.

  • the Spell Mimic may not use their prefered spellcasting ability, whereas the Spell Thief always uses intelligence.


But Spell Mimic also lacks effects that make Spell Thief better against foes and inefficient with allies:




  • Spell Thief negates the triggering spell, whereas Spell Mimic does not.

  • The target of Spell Thief forgets the triggering spell whereas the target of Spell Mimic does not.


This means Spell Mimic is best suited to reliably double the efforts of your allies instead of "using an opponent's strength against them".



In practice, Spell Mimic gives a caster temporary access to the spells prepared by the rest of the party when they are most needed and effective. This flexibility combined with some teamwork makes Spell Mimic unbalanced.



Whenever the party really needs something (whether it be heals, buffs, control, or raw damage) as long as at least one other caster can provide it, the character with Spell Mimic can double their efforts by mimicking their most suitable spell. Whereas it is much rarer for an opponent to use a spell worth mimicking in any given circumstance.



Then there are also class-specific shenanigans, like:




  • A Warlock can use buffs (especially ones with long duration) and heals they usually don't have access to before a short rest.

  • A Sorcerer can apply their metamagic to spells that may not have been vetted for metamagic

  • A Wizard can create contingencies of mimicked spells.

  • A multiclass of two casters can mimick spells of a higher level than they can learn.

  • A Tempest Cleric can spam a couple max-damage chain lightning.

  • Etc.


My bare minimum recommendation to balance Spell Mimic is to somehow discourage targeting allies and limit it to spells of 5th level or lower.



However, it may be easier to achieve a feat that uses an opponent's strength against them via modifying something less convoluted than Spell Thief. I would explore an effect similar to the Ring of Spell Turning with adjustments like removing the advantage on saves and limiting which spell levels can be turned to match the growth of a half-caster.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great breakdown. One restriction I had concidered was requiring concentration while the spell was mimic'ed. Would this be a good change? (I know this might require another question but if it's a terrible idea I won't bother.)
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Also would adding a skill check of DC10+Spell Level to copy it help the balance?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin concentration would limit the feat in combat, but would not do much to stop the weirder out of combat prepwork that the feat allows for. Adding some chance of failure would help balance the feat, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    2 hours ago
















11












$begingroup$

Spell Mimic is too flexible



I would not say that:




This feat is basically a watered down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability.




Because in many ways the Spell Mimic feat is better than the Spell Thief feature:




  • The Spell Mimic's trigger is less specific than the Spell Thief's.

  • The Spell Mimic cannot fail, whereas the Spell Thief can (and does more often than not).

  • The Spell Thief's ability to reproduce a spell is implicitly limited to 4th level spells slots, whereas the Spell Mimic can even work with 9th level spells.

  • The Spell Mimic recovers on short rests while the Spell Thief does not.


I'll grant you that in some respects Spell Mimic in inferior to Spell Thief:




  • Spell Thief preserves the memory of the new spell for much much longer than Spell Mimic.

  • Spell Mimic is implicitly useless with spells that have a casting time greater than 1 minute, whereas Spell Thief is not.

  • the Spell Mimic may not use their prefered spellcasting ability, whereas the Spell Thief always uses intelligence.


But Spell Mimic also lacks effects that make Spell Thief better against foes and inefficient with allies:




  • Spell Thief negates the triggering spell, whereas Spell Mimic does not.

  • The target of Spell Thief forgets the triggering spell whereas the target of Spell Mimic does not.


This means Spell Mimic is best suited to reliably double the efforts of your allies instead of "using an opponent's strength against them".



In practice, Spell Mimic gives a caster temporary access to the spells prepared by the rest of the party when they are most needed and effective. This flexibility combined with some teamwork makes Spell Mimic unbalanced.



Whenever the party really needs something (whether it be heals, buffs, control, or raw damage) as long as at least one other caster can provide it, the character with Spell Mimic can double their efforts by mimicking their most suitable spell. Whereas it is much rarer for an opponent to use a spell worth mimicking in any given circumstance.



Then there are also class-specific shenanigans, like:




  • A Warlock can use buffs (especially ones with long duration) and heals they usually don't have access to before a short rest.

  • A Sorcerer can apply their metamagic to spells that may not have been vetted for metamagic

  • A Wizard can create contingencies of mimicked spells.

  • A multiclass of two casters can mimick spells of a higher level than they can learn.

  • A Tempest Cleric can spam a couple max-damage chain lightning.

  • Etc.


My bare minimum recommendation to balance Spell Mimic is to somehow discourage targeting allies and limit it to spells of 5th level or lower.



However, it may be easier to achieve a feat that uses an opponent's strength against them via modifying something less convoluted than Spell Thief. I would explore an effect similar to the Ring of Spell Turning with adjustments like removing the advantage on saves and limiting which spell levels can be turned to match the growth of a half-caster.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great breakdown. One restriction I had concidered was requiring concentration while the spell was mimic'ed. Would this be a good change? (I know this might require another question but if it's a terrible idea I won't bother.)
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Also would adding a skill check of DC10+Spell Level to copy it help the balance?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin concentration would limit the feat in combat, but would not do much to stop the weirder out of combat prepwork that the feat allows for. Adding some chance of failure would help balance the feat, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    2 hours ago














11












11








11





$begingroup$

Spell Mimic is too flexible



I would not say that:




This feat is basically a watered down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability.




Because in many ways the Spell Mimic feat is better than the Spell Thief feature:




  • The Spell Mimic's trigger is less specific than the Spell Thief's.

  • The Spell Mimic cannot fail, whereas the Spell Thief can (and does more often than not).

  • The Spell Thief's ability to reproduce a spell is implicitly limited to 4th level spells slots, whereas the Spell Mimic can even work with 9th level spells.

  • The Spell Mimic recovers on short rests while the Spell Thief does not.


I'll grant you that in some respects Spell Mimic in inferior to Spell Thief:




  • Spell Thief preserves the memory of the new spell for much much longer than Spell Mimic.

  • Spell Mimic is implicitly useless with spells that have a casting time greater than 1 minute, whereas Spell Thief is not.

  • the Spell Mimic may not use their prefered spellcasting ability, whereas the Spell Thief always uses intelligence.


But Spell Mimic also lacks effects that make Spell Thief better against foes and inefficient with allies:




  • Spell Thief negates the triggering spell, whereas Spell Mimic does not.

  • The target of Spell Thief forgets the triggering spell whereas the target of Spell Mimic does not.


This means Spell Mimic is best suited to reliably double the efforts of your allies instead of "using an opponent's strength against them".



In practice, Spell Mimic gives a caster temporary access to the spells prepared by the rest of the party when they are most needed and effective. This flexibility combined with some teamwork makes Spell Mimic unbalanced.



Whenever the party really needs something (whether it be heals, buffs, control, or raw damage) as long as at least one other caster can provide it, the character with Spell Mimic can double their efforts by mimicking their most suitable spell. Whereas it is much rarer for an opponent to use a spell worth mimicking in any given circumstance.



Then there are also class-specific shenanigans, like:




  • A Warlock can use buffs (especially ones with long duration) and heals they usually don't have access to before a short rest.

  • A Sorcerer can apply their metamagic to spells that may not have been vetted for metamagic

  • A Wizard can create contingencies of mimicked spells.

  • A multiclass of two casters can mimick spells of a higher level than they can learn.

  • A Tempest Cleric can spam a couple max-damage chain lightning.

  • Etc.


My bare minimum recommendation to balance Spell Mimic is to somehow discourage targeting allies and limit it to spells of 5th level or lower.



However, it may be easier to achieve a feat that uses an opponent's strength against them via modifying something less convoluted than Spell Thief. I would explore an effect similar to the Ring of Spell Turning with adjustments like removing the advantage on saves and limiting which spell levels can be turned to match the growth of a half-caster.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Spell Mimic is too flexible



I would not say that:




This feat is basically a watered down version of the arcane tricksters 17th level Spell Thief ability.




Because in many ways the Spell Mimic feat is better than the Spell Thief feature:




  • The Spell Mimic's trigger is less specific than the Spell Thief's.

  • The Spell Mimic cannot fail, whereas the Spell Thief can (and does more often than not).

  • The Spell Thief's ability to reproduce a spell is implicitly limited to 4th level spells slots, whereas the Spell Mimic can even work with 9th level spells.

  • The Spell Mimic recovers on short rests while the Spell Thief does not.


I'll grant you that in some respects Spell Mimic in inferior to Spell Thief:




  • Spell Thief preserves the memory of the new spell for much much longer than Spell Mimic.

  • Spell Mimic is implicitly useless with spells that have a casting time greater than 1 minute, whereas Spell Thief is not.

  • the Spell Mimic may not use their prefered spellcasting ability, whereas the Spell Thief always uses intelligence.


But Spell Mimic also lacks effects that make Spell Thief better against foes and inefficient with allies:




  • Spell Thief negates the triggering spell, whereas Spell Mimic does not.

  • The target of Spell Thief forgets the triggering spell whereas the target of Spell Mimic does not.


This means Spell Mimic is best suited to reliably double the efforts of your allies instead of "using an opponent's strength against them".



In practice, Spell Mimic gives a caster temporary access to the spells prepared by the rest of the party when they are most needed and effective. This flexibility combined with some teamwork makes Spell Mimic unbalanced.



Whenever the party really needs something (whether it be heals, buffs, control, or raw damage) as long as at least one other caster can provide it, the character with Spell Mimic can double their efforts by mimicking their most suitable spell. Whereas it is much rarer for an opponent to use a spell worth mimicking in any given circumstance.



Then there are also class-specific shenanigans, like:




  • A Warlock can use buffs (especially ones with long duration) and heals they usually don't have access to before a short rest.

  • A Sorcerer can apply their metamagic to spells that may not have been vetted for metamagic

  • A Wizard can create contingencies of mimicked spells.

  • A multiclass of two casters can mimick spells of a higher level than they can learn.

  • A Tempest Cleric can spam a couple max-damage chain lightning.

  • Etc.


My bare minimum recommendation to balance Spell Mimic is to somehow discourage targeting allies and limit it to spells of 5th level or lower.



However, it may be easier to achieve a feat that uses an opponent's strength against them via modifying something less convoluted than Spell Thief. I would explore an effect similar to the Ring of Spell Turning with adjustments like removing the advantage on saves and limiting which spell levels can be turned to match the growth of a half-caster.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 16 mins ago

























answered 2 hours ago









RuseRuse

6,79111556




6,79111556












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great breakdown. One restriction I had concidered was requiring concentration while the spell was mimic'ed. Would this be a good change? (I know this might require another question but if it's a terrible idea I won't bother.)
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Also would adding a skill check of DC10+Spell Level to copy it help the balance?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin concentration would limit the feat in combat, but would not do much to stop the weirder out of combat prepwork that the feat allows for. Adding some chance of failure would help balance the feat, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    2 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great breakdown. One restriction I had concidered was requiring concentration while the spell was mimic'ed. Would this be a good change? (I know this might require another question but if it's a terrible idea I won't bother.)
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Also would adding a skill check of DC10+Spell Level to copy it help the balance?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @linksassin concentration would limit the feat in combat, but would not do much to stop the weirder out of combat prepwork that the feat allows for. Adding some chance of failure would help balance the feat, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Thanks for a great breakdown. One restriction I had concidered was requiring concentration while the spell was mimic'ed. Would this be a good change? (I know this might require another question but if it's a terrible idea I won't bother.)
$endgroup$
– linksassin
2 hours ago






$begingroup$
Thanks for a great breakdown. One restriction I had concidered was requiring concentration while the spell was mimic'ed. Would this be a good change? (I know this might require another question but if it's a terrible idea I won't bother.)
$endgroup$
– linksassin
2 hours ago














$begingroup$
Also would adding a skill check of DC10+Spell Level to copy it help the balance?
$endgroup$
– linksassin
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Also would adding a skill check of DC10+Spell Level to copy it help the balance?
$endgroup$
– linksassin
2 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@linksassin concentration would limit the feat in combat, but would not do much to stop the weirder out of combat prepwork that the feat allows for. Adding some chance of failure would help balance the feat, yes.
$endgroup$
– Ruse
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@linksassin concentration would limit the feat in combat, but would not do much to stop the weirder out of combat prepwork that the feat allows for. Adding some chance of failure would help balance the feat, yes.
$endgroup$
– Ruse
2 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144005%2fis-this-spell-mimic-feat-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Masuk log Menu navigasi

Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области