Parallel Power Supplies with Ideal DiodesHow do current ratings on barrel connectors work?High Power LED and relay with the same power supplyUsing a barrel jack with higher than rated current but lower voltage?Using battery and USB power at the same timePower Supply Stacking in ParallelHow to determine the max current my USB Charger can safely supplyPowering up grid of 20 Raspberry Pi 3Can I use 2 Power Supplies in series like this?switch mode power supply diodesHelp to clarify the meaning of a power supply's Voltage and Current rating
Has the Hulk always been able to talk?
What is a common way to tell if an academic is "above average," or outstanding in their field? Is their h-index (Hirsh index) one of them?
Is there precedent or are there procedures for a US president refusing to concede to an electoral defeat?
What do I do if my advisor made a mistake?
What do "Sech" and "Vich" mean in this sentence?
GitLab account hacked and repo wiped
Is Benjen dead?
Finding an Explicit Formula for a Geometric Series
Nested loops to process groups of pictures
Which US defense organization would respond to an invasion like this?
Is the book wrong about the Nyquist Sampling Criterion?
How to deal with employer who keeps me at work after working hours
How can I get people to remember my character's gender?
What to use instead of cling film to wrap pastry
Are there terms in German for different skull shapes?
Does XQuartz work on macOS Mojave?
SOQL query WHERE filter by specific months
Has the United States ever had a non-Christian President?
Is it normal for gliders not to have attitude indicators?
Start job from another SQL server instance
My first C++ game (snake console game)
Is there any way to construct a query to return values from all the polygons a line passes through?
Yet another images in tables question alignment. Want text to start at top of cell. Not cetered
Is there a word that describes the unjustified use of a more complex word?
Parallel Power Supplies with Ideal Diodes
How do current ratings on barrel connectors work?High Power LED and relay with the same power supplyUsing a barrel jack with higher than rated current but lower voltage?Using battery and USB power at the same timePower Supply Stacking in ParallelHow to determine the max current my USB Charger can safely supplyPowering up grid of 20 Raspberry Pi 3Can I use 2 Power Supplies in series like this?switch mode power supply diodesHelp to clarify the meaning of a power supply's Voltage and Current rating
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'm working on a project that operates at 5v - and can draw UP to 10 amps. Under normal conditions, it won't be doing that - probably closer to 3 amps, and (if configured for low-power) only 450mA or so.
It's designed to be powered from USB when in low-power mode, but I also want to have 2 barrel jack to add external power supplies (5V, 8A from aliexpress). Obviously I don't want the power supply backfeeding the USB, or the USB backfeeding the power supply. I want the option to plug in two of these power supplies because most of the time, I won't need to activate the 10A mode - so just one power supply would be sufficient.
Considering these power supplies are not designed to be paralleled (no master/slave setup, etc), how effective would an ideal diode be in enabling these various sources to all operate in parallel (to increase max current)?
Note that I don't need the load sharing to be perfect, but I'd like to avoid serious issues. I originally thought I could just use a P-Channel MOSFET, but after some research have learned that when they are "on" they allow current to flow both ways, which makes them non-ideal non-diodes (less than helpful).
power-supply mosfet current diodes parallel
asked Mar 20 at 15:20
HelpfulHelpful
1676
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm working on a project that operates at 5v - and can draw UP to 10 amps. Under normal conditions, it won't be doing that - probably closer to 3 amps, and (if configured for low-power) only 450mA or so.
It's designed to be powered from USB when in low-power mode, but I also want to have 2 barrel jack to add external power supplies (5V, 8A from aliexpress). Obviously I don't want the power supply backfeeding the USB, or the USB backfeeding the power supply. I want the option to plug in two of these power supplies because most of the time, I won't need to activate the 10A mode - so just one power supply would be sufficient.
Considering these power supplies are not designed to be paralleled (no master/slave setup, etc), how effective would an ideal diode be in enabling these various sources to all operate in parallel (to increase max current)?
Note that I don't need the load sharing to be perfect, but I'd like to avoid serious issues. I originally thought I could just use a P-Channel MOSFET, but after some research have learned that when they are "on" they allow current to flow both ways, which makes them non-ideal non-diodes (less than helpful).
power-supply mosfet current diodes parallel
asked Mar 20 at 15:20
HelpfulHelpful
1676
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Ideal diode" is usually a mosfet of some kind any way, so unless you can't switch with infinite speed you will have the same problem with backfeed
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:30
$begingroup$
"Unless you can't switch with infinite speed" - I'm not sure I'm following? Really I just need to, when I plug in one of the external power supplies, have it add it's available current to the mix. If I unplug something (and doing so should turn "off" the diode) I don't care about backfeeding any longer.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:31
$begingroup$
to get as much balance as possible between the supplies I would go with a diode with common cathode, to have temperature balance and let the current over Vf balance out.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:32
1
$begingroup$
physically the mosfet barrier takes some time to close, so what I mean to say is that it will always be some backfeed unless it's perfectly balanced.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:37
1
$begingroup$
Not necessarily silly, since there are circuits designed for these situations, though the design isn't great. I've read a couple of Linear Tech appnotes describing ideal current-sharing circuits etc. Anything with such a low voltage shouldn't really draw that much current because the voltage drops will be large relative to the nominal voltage.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Mar 20 at 15:57
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm working on a project that operates at 5v - and can draw UP to 10 amps. Under normal conditions, it won't be doing that - probably closer to 3 amps, and (if configured for low-power) only 450mA or so.
It's designed to be powered from USB when in low-power mode, but I also want to have 2 barrel jack to add external power supplies (5V, 8A from aliexpress). Obviously I don't want the power supply backfeeding the USB, or the USB backfeeding the power supply. I want the option to plug in two of these power supplies because most of the time, I won't need to activate the 10A mode - so just one power supply would be sufficient.
Considering these power supplies are not designed to be paralleled (no master/slave setup, etc), how effective would an ideal diode be in enabling these various sources to all operate in parallel (to increase max current)?
Note that I don't need the load sharing to be perfect, but I'd like to avoid serious issues. I originally thought I could just use a P-Channel MOSFET, but after some research have learned that when they are "on" they allow current to flow both ways, which makes them non-ideal non-diodes (less than helpful).
power-supply mosfet current diodes parallel
asked Mar 20 at 15:20
HelpfulHelpful
1676
$endgroup$
I'm working on a project that operates at 5v - and can draw UP to 10 amps. Under normal conditions, it won't be doing that - probably closer to 3 amps, and (if configured for low-power) only 450mA or so.
It's designed to be powered from USB when in low-power mode, but I also want to have 2 barrel jack to add external power supplies (5V, 8A from aliexpress). Obviously I don't want the power supply backfeeding the USB, or the USB backfeeding the power supply. I want the option to plug in two of these power supplies because most of the time, I won't need to activate the 10A mode - so just one power supply would be sufficient.
Considering these power supplies are not designed to be paralleled (no master/slave setup, etc), how effective would an ideal diode be in enabling these various sources to all operate in parallel (to increase max current)?
Note that I don't need the load sharing to be perfect, but I'd like to avoid serious issues. I originally thought I could just use a P-Channel MOSFET, but after some research have learned that when they are "on" they allow current to flow both ways, which makes them non-ideal non-diodes (less than helpful).
power-supply mosfet current diodes parallel
power-supply mosfet current diodes parallel
asked Mar 20 at 15:20
HelpfulHelpful
1676
asked Mar 20 at 15:20
HelpfulHelpful
1676
asked Mar 20 at 15:20
HelpfulHelpful
1676
asked Mar 20 at 15:20
HelpfulHelpful
1676
asked Mar 20 at 15:20
HelpfulHelpful
1676
1676
$begingroup$
"Ideal diode" is usually a mosfet of some kind any way, so unless you can't switch with infinite speed you will have the same problem with backfeed
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:30
$begingroup$
"Unless you can't switch with infinite speed" - I'm not sure I'm following? Really I just need to, when I plug in one of the external power supplies, have it add it's available current to the mix. If I unplug something (and doing so should turn "off" the diode) I don't care about backfeeding any longer.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:31
$begingroup$
to get as much balance as possible between the supplies I would go with a diode with common cathode, to have temperature balance and let the current over Vf balance out.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:32
1
$begingroup$
physically the mosfet barrier takes some time to close, so what I mean to say is that it will always be some backfeed unless it's perfectly balanced.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:37
1
$begingroup$
Not necessarily silly, since there are circuits designed for these situations, though the design isn't great. I've read a couple of Linear Tech appnotes describing ideal current-sharing circuits etc. Anything with such a low voltage shouldn't really draw that much current because the voltage drops will be large relative to the nominal voltage.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Mar 20 at 15:57
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
"Ideal diode" is usually a mosfet of some kind any way, so unless you can't switch with infinite speed you will have the same problem with backfeed
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:30
$begingroup$
"Unless you can't switch with infinite speed" - I'm not sure I'm following? Really I just need to, when I plug in one of the external power supplies, have it add it's available current to the mix. If I unplug something (and doing so should turn "off" the diode) I don't care about backfeeding any longer.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:31
$begingroup$
to get as much balance as possible between the supplies I would go with a diode with common cathode, to have temperature balance and let the current over Vf balance out.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:32
1
$begingroup$
physically the mosfet barrier takes some time to close, so what I mean to say is that it will always be some backfeed unless it's perfectly balanced.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:37
1
$begingroup$
Not necessarily silly, since there are circuits designed for these situations, though the design isn't great. I've read a couple of Linear Tech appnotes describing ideal current-sharing circuits etc. Anything with such a low voltage shouldn't really draw that much current because the voltage drops will be large relative to the nominal voltage.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Mar 20 at 15:57
$begingroup$
"Ideal diode" is usually a mosfet of some kind any way, so unless you can't switch with infinite speed you will have the same problem with backfeed
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:30
$begingroup$
"Ideal diode" is usually a mosfet of some kind any way, so unless you can't switch with infinite speed you will have the same problem with backfeed
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:30
$begingroup$
"Unless you can't switch with infinite speed" - I'm not sure I'm following? Really I just need to, when I plug in one of the external power supplies, have it add it's available current to the mix. If I unplug something (and doing so should turn "off" the diode) I don't care about backfeeding any longer.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:31
$begingroup$
"Unless you can't switch with infinite speed" - I'm not sure I'm following? Really I just need to, when I plug in one of the external power supplies, have it add it's available current to the mix. If I unplug something (and doing so should turn "off" the diode) I don't care about backfeeding any longer.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:31
$begingroup$
to get as much balance as possible between the supplies I would go with a diode with common cathode, to have temperature balance and let the current over Vf balance out.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:32
$begingroup$
to get as much balance as possible between the supplies I would go with a diode with common cathode, to have temperature balance and let the current over Vf balance out.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:32
1
1
$begingroup$
physically the mosfet barrier takes some time to close, so what I mean to say is that it will always be some backfeed unless it's perfectly balanced.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:37
$begingroup$
physically the mosfet barrier takes some time to close, so what I mean to say is that it will always be some backfeed unless it's perfectly balanced.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:37
1
1
$begingroup$
Not necessarily silly, since there are circuits designed for these situations, though the design isn't great. I've read a couple of Linear Tech appnotes describing ideal current-sharing circuits etc. Anything with such a low voltage shouldn't really draw that much current because the voltage drops will be large relative to the nominal voltage.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Mar 20 at 15:57
$begingroup$
Not necessarily silly, since there are circuits designed for these situations, though the design isn't great. I've read a couple of Linear Tech appnotes describing ideal current-sharing circuits etc. Anything with such a low voltage shouldn't really draw that much current because the voltage drops will be large relative to the nominal voltage.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Mar 20 at 15:57
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You need two back-to-back P-channel MOSFETs for each power input. Here is an example from an Atmel eval board, though you'll want to scale up the MOSFETs considerably, and maybe reduce the resistor values to something like 10K:
The VCC_USB input is dominant if both are present (in other words, if only one supply is present, that one will be used, if both are present, then VCC_USB is used).
The back-to-back MOSFETs are "ON" when the common gate connection is at ground (assuming the left source is high) and are off with the gate connection equal in voltage to the source.
Because of the intrinsic body diodes you need two MOSFETs to be able to block in either direction. This is the common configuration you'll see in hot-swap controllers and similar devices.
The connection to R613 turns Q109A/B on if VCC_USB_EDBG is low. If both supplies are present Q110A/B are off (because their gates are high) and Q109A/B are on.
answered Mar 20 at 15:33
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
216k5165440
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks! I'm not sure what you mean by "dominant" in this context - as in, it will be the primary source of current (up to its max)? Additionally, I'm not entirely sure I understand the principles on which this is operating. Do you have a minute to explain?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:36
$begingroup$
Dominant means that if both supplies are present the power is to the output is supplied by VCC_USB, and the other one is disconnected.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Ah. Hmm. The main problem with that idea is that I have ANOTHER external power supply, and I would want to be able to connect both of them at once (with out disabling one or the other). I don't suppose this circuit would enable me to do that (if I added another stage)?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:43
$begingroup$
If you want to share the current form the two external supplies you could combine them with Schottky diodes but unless they're specifically designed to share current gracefully the results may not be ideal (or usable). For example, one may hog the current and go into foldback shutdown. That's really a separate question, I think.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Thank you for adding the explanation! Upvoted, but waiting to hear a few more answers before I select one.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:52
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428174%2fparallel-power-supplies-with-ideal-diodes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You need two back-to-back P-channel MOSFETs for each power input. Here is an example from an Atmel eval board, though you'll want to scale up the MOSFETs considerably, and maybe reduce the resistor values to something like 10K:
The VCC_USB input is dominant if both are present (in other words, if only one supply is present, that one will be used, if both are present, then VCC_USB is used).
The back-to-back MOSFETs are "ON" when the common gate connection is at ground (assuming the left source is high) and are off with the gate connection equal in voltage to the source.
Because of the intrinsic body diodes you need two MOSFETs to be able to block in either direction. This is the common configuration you'll see in hot-swap controllers and similar devices.
The connection to R613 turns Q109A/B on if VCC_USB_EDBG is low. If both supplies are present Q110A/B are off (because their gates are high) and Q109A/B are on.
answered Mar 20 at 15:33
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
216k5165440
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks! I'm not sure what you mean by "dominant" in this context - as in, it will be the primary source of current (up to its max)? Additionally, I'm not entirely sure I understand the principles on which this is operating. Do you have a minute to explain?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:36
$begingroup$
Dominant means that if both supplies are present the power is to the output is supplied by VCC_USB, and the other one is disconnected.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Ah. Hmm. The main problem with that idea is that I have ANOTHER external power supply, and I would want to be able to connect both of them at once (with out disabling one or the other). I don't suppose this circuit would enable me to do that (if I added another stage)?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:43
$begingroup$
If you want to share the current form the two external supplies you could combine them with Schottky diodes but unless they're specifically designed to share current gracefully the results may not be ideal (or usable). For example, one may hog the current and go into foldback shutdown. That's really a separate question, I think.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Thank you for adding the explanation! Upvoted, but waiting to hear a few more answers before I select one.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:52
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You need two back-to-back P-channel MOSFETs for each power input. Here is an example from an Atmel eval board, though you'll want to scale up the MOSFETs considerably, and maybe reduce the resistor values to something like 10K:
The VCC_USB input is dominant if both are present (in other words, if only one supply is present, that one will be used, if both are present, then VCC_USB is used).
The back-to-back MOSFETs are "ON" when the common gate connection is at ground (assuming the left source is high) and are off with the gate connection equal in voltage to the source.
Because of the intrinsic body diodes you need two MOSFETs to be able to block in either direction. This is the common configuration you'll see in hot-swap controllers and similar devices.
The connection to R613 turns Q109A/B on if VCC_USB_EDBG is low. If both supplies are present Q110A/B are off (because their gates are high) and Q109A/B are on.
answered Mar 20 at 15:33
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
216k5165440
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks! I'm not sure what you mean by "dominant" in this context - as in, it will be the primary source of current (up to its max)? Additionally, I'm not entirely sure I understand the principles on which this is operating. Do you have a minute to explain?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:36
$begingroup$
Dominant means that if both supplies are present the power is to the output is supplied by VCC_USB, and the other one is disconnected.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Ah. Hmm. The main problem with that idea is that I have ANOTHER external power supply, and I would want to be able to connect both of them at once (with out disabling one or the other). I don't suppose this circuit would enable me to do that (if I added another stage)?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:43
$begingroup$
If you want to share the current form the two external supplies you could combine them with Schottky diodes but unless they're specifically designed to share current gracefully the results may not be ideal (or usable). For example, one may hog the current and go into foldback shutdown. That's really a separate question, I think.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Thank you for adding the explanation! Upvoted, but waiting to hear a few more answers before I select one.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:52
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You need two back-to-back P-channel MOSFETs for each power input. Here is an example from an Atmel eval board, though you'll want to scale up the MOSFETs considerably, and maybe reduce the resistor values to something like 10K:
The VCC_USB input is dominant if both are present (in other words, if only one supply is present, that one will be used, if both are present, then VCC_USB is used).
The back-to-back MOSFETs are "ON" when the common gate connection is at ground (assuming the left source is high) and are off with the gate connection equal in voltage to the source.
Because of the intrinsic body diodes you need two MOSFETs to be able to block in either direction. This is the common configuration you'll see in hot-swap controllers and similar devices.
The connection to R613 turns Q109A/B on if VCC_USB_EDBG is low. If both supplies are present Q110A/B are off (because their gates are high) and Q109A/B are on.
answered Mar 20 at 15:33
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
216k5165440
$endgroup$
You need two back-to-back P-channel MOSFETs for each power input. Here is an example from an Atmel eval board, though you'll want to scale up the MOSFETs considerably, and maybe reduce the resistor values to something like 10K:
The VCC_USB input is dominant if both are present (in other words, if only one supply is present, that one will be used, if both are present, then VCC_USB is used).
The back-to-back MOSFETs are "ON" when the common gate connection is at ground (assuming the left source is high) and are off with the gate connection equal in voltage to the source.
Because of the intrinsic body diodes you need two MOSFETs to be able to block in either direction. This is the common configuration you'll see in hot-swap controllers and similar devices.
The connection to R613 turns Q109A/B on if VCC_USB_EDBG is low. If both supplies are present Q110A/B are off (because their gates are high) and Q109A/B are on.
answered Mar 20 at 15:33
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
216k5165440
edited Mar 20 at 15:50
answered Mar 20 at 15:33
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
216k5165440
answered Mar 20 at 15:33
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
216k5165440
answered Mar 20 at 15:33
Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany
216k5165440
216k5165440
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks! I'm not sure what you mean by "dominant" in this context - as in, it will be the primary source of current (up to its max)? Additionally, I'm not entirely sure I understand the principles on which this is operating. Do you have a minute to explain?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:36
$begingroup$
Dominant means that if both supplies are present the power is to the output is supplied by VCC_USB, and the other one is disconnected.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Ah. Hmm. The main problem with that idea is that I have ANOTHER external power supply, and I would want to be able to connect both of them at once (with out disabling one or the other). I don't suppose this circuit would enable me to do that (if I added another stage)?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:43
$begingroup$
If you want to share the current form the two external supplies you could combine them with Schottky diodes but unless they're specifically designed to share current gracefully the results may not be ideal (or usable). For example, one may hog the current and go into foldback shutdown. That's really a separate question, I think.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Thank you for adding the explanation! Upvoted, but waiting to hear a few more answers before I select one.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:52
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks! I'm not sure what you mean by "dominant" in this context - as in, it will be the primary source of current (up to its max)? Additionally, I'm not entirely sure I understand the principles on which this is operating. Do you have a minute to explain?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:36
$begingroup$
Dominant means that if both supplies are present the power is to the output is supplied by VCC_USB, and the other one is disconnected.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Ah. Hmm. The main problem with that idea is that I have ANOTHER external power supply, and I would want to be able to connect both of them at once (with out disabling one or the other). I don't suppose this circuit would enable me to do that (if I added another stage)?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:43
$begingroup$
If you want to share the current form the two external supplies you could combine them with Schottky diodes but unless they're specifically designed to share current gracefully the results may not be ideal (or usable). For example, one may hog the current and go into foldback shutdown. That's really a separate question, I think.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Thank you for adding the explanation! Upvoted, but waiting to hear a few more answers before I select one.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks! I'm not sure what you mean by "dominant" in this context - as in, it will be the primary source of current (up to its max)? Additionally, I'm not entirely sure I understand the principles on which this is operating. Do you have a minute to explain?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:36
$begingroup$
Wow, thanks! I'm not sure what you mean by "dominant" in this context - as in, it will be the primary source of current (up to its max)? Additionally, I'm not entirely sure I understand the principles on which this is operating. Do you have a minute to explain?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:36
$begingroup$
Dominant means that if both supplies are present the power is to the output is supplied by VCC_USB, and the other one is disconnected.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Dominant means that if both supplies are present the power is to the output is supplied by VCC_USB, and the other one is disconnected.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Ah. Hmm. The main problem with that idea is that I have ANOTHER external power supply, and I would want to be able to connect both of them at once (with out disabling one or the other). I don't suppose this circuit would enable me to do that (if I added another stage)?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:43
$begingroup$
Ah. Hmm. The main problem with that idea is that I have ANOTHER external power supply, and I would want to be able to connect both of them at once (with out disabling one or the other). I don't suppose this circuit would enable me to do that (if I added another stage)?
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:43
$begingroup$
If you want to share the current form the two external supplies you could combine them with Schottky diodes but unless they're specifically designed to share current gracefully the results may not be ideal (or usable). For example, one may hog the current and go into foldback shutdown. That's really a separate question, I think.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
If you want to share the current form the two external supplies you could combine them with Schottky diodes but unless they're specifically designed to share current gracefully the results may not be ideal (or usable). For example, one may hog the current and go into foldback shutdown. That's really a separate question, I think.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Thank you for adding the explanation! Upvoted, but waiting to hear a few more answers before I select one.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Thank you for adding the explanation! Upvoted, but waiting to hear a few more answers before I select one.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:52
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428174%2fparallel-power-supplies-with-ideal-diodes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
"Ideal diode" is usually a mosfet of some kind any way, so unless you can't switch with infinite speed you will have the same problem with backfeed
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:30
$begingroup$
"Unless you can't switch with infinite speed" - I'm not sure I'm following? Really I just need to, when I plug in one of the external power supplies, have it add it's available current to the mix. If I unplug something (and doing so should turn "off" the diode) I don't care about backfeeding any longer.
$endgroup$
– Helpful
Mar 20 at 15:31
$begingroup$
to get as much balance as possible between the supplies I would go with a diode with common cathode, to have temperature balance and let the current over Vf balance out.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:32
1
$begingroup$
physically the mosfet barrier takes some time to close, so what I mean to say is that it will always be some backfeed unless it's perfectly balanced.
$endgroup$
– Anton Ingemarson
Mar 20 at 15:37
1
$begingroup$
Not necessarily silly, since there are circuits designed for these situations, though the design isn't great. I've read a couple of Linear Tech appnotes describing ideal current-sharing circuits etc. Anything with such a low voltage shouldn't really draw that much current because the voltage drops will be large relative to the nominal voltage.
$endgroup$
– pipe
Mar 20 at 15:57