When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?How can the same runway have two different gradients?When is runway slope most important?When an airport has helipads, why would a helicopter take-off or land on a runway?What is the purpose of Runway Grooving?What factors are considered when a runway is planned?How does a runway inspection radar work?When was trim on airplanes used for the first time?How is tire rubber removed from the runway?Why would a runway friction measurement improve over time?Why are months (e.g. December) used to notate a runway?

How to have a sharp product image?

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

Determine the application client is using to connect

How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives

How does Nebula have access to these memories?

Random Forest different results for same observation

Big O /Right or wrong?

Extension of 2-adic valuation to the real numbers

Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?

Your bread will be buttered on both sides

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?

Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?

How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile

Usage of 万 (wàn): ten thousands or just a great number?

How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?

Cyclomatic Complexity reduction JS

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat



When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?


How can the same runway have two different gradients?When is runway slope most important?When an airport has helipads, why would a helicopter take-off or land on a runway?What is the purpose of Runway Grooving?What factors are considered when a runway is planned?How does a runway inspection radar work?When was trim on airplanes used for the first time?How is tire rubber removed from the runway?Why would a runway friction measurement improve over time?Why are months (e.g. December) used to notate a runway?













24












$begingroup$


Wikipedia states that Kai Tak Airport in Hong Kong originally had two runways, both built under Japanese occupation during World War II:




... In 1942, the Japanese army expanded Kai Tak, using many Allied prisoner-of-war (POW) labourers,[9] building two concrete runways, 13/31 and 07/25.




However, by the time Kai Tak was closed in 1998, only one runway (the famous 13/31) remained. I can find no mention of when runway 07/25 was closed, or why; can someone help answer those questions?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Because @Terry told them it was of no use as he could not land his 747 there...
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Mar 20 at 15:38















24












$begingroup$


Wikipedia states that Kai Tak Airport in Hong Kong originally had two runways, both built under Japanese occupation during World War II:




... In 1942, the Japanese army expanded Kai Tak, using many Allied prisoner-of-war (POW) labourers,[9] building two concrete runways, 13/31 and 07/25.




However, by the time Kai Tak was closed in 1998, only one runway (the famous 13/31) remained. I can find no mention of when runway 07/25 was closed, or why; can someone help answer those questions?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Because @Terry told them it was of no use as he could not land his 747 there...
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Mar 20 at 15:38













24












24








24





$begingroup$


Wikipedia states that Kai Tak Airport in Hong Kong originally had two runways, both built under Japanese occupation during World War II:




... In 1942, the Japanese army expanded Kai Tak, using many Allied prisoner-of-war (POW) labourers,[9] building two concrete runways, 13/31 and 07/25.




However, by the time Kai Tak was closed in 1998, only one runway (the famous 13/31) remained. I can find no mention of when runway 07/25 was closed, or why; can someone help answer those questions?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Wikipedia states that Kai Tak Airport in Hong Kong originally had two runways, both built under Japanese occupation during World War II:




... In 1942, the Japanese army expanded Kai Tak, using many Allied prisoner-of-war (POW) labourers,[9] building two concrete runways, 13/31 and 07/25.




However, by the time Kai Tak was closed in 1998, only one runway (the famous 13/31) remained. I can find no mention of when runway 07/25 was closed, or why; can someone help answer those questions?







airport aviation-history runways






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 20 at 9:06









ymb1

71.5k7231385




71.5k7231385










asked Mar 20 at 4:22









SeanSean

6,51543183




6,51543183







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Because @Terry told them it was of no use as he could not land his 747 there...
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Mar 20 at 15:38












  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Because @Terry told them it was of no use as he could not land his 747 there...
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Mar 20 at 15:38







5




5




$begingroup$
Because @Terry told them it was of no use as he could not land his 747 there...
$endgroup$
– Dave
Mar 20 at 15:38




$begingroup$
Because @Terry told them it was of no use as he could not land his 747 there...
$endgroup$
– Dave
Mar 20 at 15:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















37












$begingroup$

enter image description here



The two original short runways (shown above) were actually abandoned c. 1955 in favor of a brand new longer runway built into the bay (completed 1958) to accommodate the new jetliner (the 13/31 you know).




The year also saw the start of work on a $110,000,000 project to revolutionize Kai Tak Airport by the construction of a 7,200-ft runway on an artificial promontory reclaimed from the sea and projecting out into the waters of Kowloon Bay. In danger of being knocked off the international airline map by reason of its airport being too small and dangerous for the Comet and the larger conventional airliners, Hong Kong has now taken steps to keep itself firmly on the map. The airport project, when completed in 1958, will provide, for the first time since aviation started in the Colony, facilities for day and night operation all the year round.




A note on the design of runways: Two intersecting runways are usually treated as one, as both can't be used simultaneously unless they're sufficiently long and a procedure like LAHSO is used. Kai Tak started with 2 to cover the compass as much as possible, since early on the designers didn't have wind data. It was typical of that era to build 3 runways 60° apart, then later on expand the most useful, and abandon the rest.




Source: https://gwulo.com/kai-tak-airport-history






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Of course, not all postwar airports ended up abandoning some of their runway directions - for instance, KBOS is still triangular.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    Mar 22 at 3:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Sean: Yep, this is probably why.
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    Mar 22 at 7:13











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61396%2fwhen-and-why-was-runway-07-25-at-kai-tak-removed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









37












$begingroup$

enter image description here



The two original short runways (shown above) were actually abandoned c. 1955 in favor of a brand new longer runway built into the bay (completed 1958) to accommodate the new jetliner (the 13/31 you know).




The year also saw the start of work on a $110,000,000 project to revolutionize Kai Tak Airport by the construction of a 7,200-ft runway on an artificial promontory reclaimed from the sea and projecting out into the waters of Kowloon Bay. In danger of being knocked off the international airline map by reason of its airport being too small and dangerous for the Comet and the larger conventional airliners, Hong Kong has now taken steps to keep itself firmly on the map. The airport project, when completed in 1958, will provide, for the first time since aviation started in the Colony, facilities for day and night operation all the year round.




A note on the design of runways: Two intersecting runways are usually treated as one, as both can't be used simultaneously unless they're sufficiently long and a procedure like LAHSO is used. Kai Tak started with 2 to cover the compass as much as possible, since early on the designers didn't have wind data. It was typical of that era to build 3 runways 60° apart, then later on expand the most useful, and abandon the rest.




Source: https://gwulo.com/kai-tak-airport-history






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Of course, not all postwar airports ended up abandoning some of their runway directions - for instance, KBOS is still triangular.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    Mar 22 at 3:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Sean: Yep, this is probably why.
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    Mar 22 at 7:13















37












$begingroup$

enter image description here



The two original short runways (shown above) were actually abandoned c. 1955 in favor of a brand new longer runway built into the bay (completed 1958) to accommodate the new jetliner (the 13/31 you know).




The year also saw the start of work on a $110,000,000 project to revolutionize Kai Tak Airport by the construction of a 7,200-ft runway on an artificial promontory reclaimed from the sea and projecting out into the waters of Kowloon Bay. In danger of being knocked off the international airline map by reason of its airport being too small and dangerous for the Comet and the larger conventional airliners, Hong Kong has now taken steps to keep itself firmly on the map. The airport project, when completed in 1958, will provide, for the first time since aviation started in the Colony, facilities for day and night operation all the year round.




A note on the design of runways: Two intersecting runways are usually treated as one, as both can't be used simultaneously unless they're sufficiently long and a procedure like LAHSO is used. Kai Tak started with 2 to cover the compass as much as possible, since early on the designers didn't have wind data. It was typical of that era to build 3 runways 60° apart, then later on expand the most useful, and abandon the rest.




Source: https://gwulo.com/kai-tak-airport-history






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Of course, not all postwar airports ended up abandoning some of their runway directions - for instance, KBOS is still triangular.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    Mar 22 at 3:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Sean: Yep, this is probably why.
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    Mar 22 at 7:13













37












37








37





$begingroup$

enter image description here



The two original short runways (shown above) were actually abandoned c. 1955 in favor of a brand new longer runway built into the bay (completed 1958) to accommodate the new jetliner (the 13/31 you know).




The year also saw the start of work on a $110,000,000 project to revolutionize Kai Tak Airport by the construction of a 7,200-ft runway on an artificial promontory reclaimed from the sea and projecting out into the waters of Kowloon Bay. In danger of being knocked off the international airline map by reason of its airport being too small and dangerous for the Comet and the larger conventional airliners, Hong Kong has now taken steps to keep itself firmly on the map. The airport project, when completed in 1958, will provide, for the first time since aviation started in the Colony, facilities for day and night operation all the year round.




A note on the design of runways: Two intersecting runways are usually treated as one, as both can't be used simultaneously unless they're sufficiently long and a procedure like LAHSO is used. Kai Tak started with 2 to cover the compass as much as possible, since early on the designers didn't have wind data. It was typical of that era to build 3 runways 60° apart, then later on expand the most useful, and abandon the rest.




Source: https://gwulo.com/kai-tak-airport-history






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



enter image description here



The two original short runways (shown above) were actually abandoned c. 1955 in favor of a brand new longer runway built into the bay (completed 1958) to accommodate the new jetliner (the 13/31 you know).




The year also saw the start of work on a $110,000,000 project to revolutionize Kai Tak Airport by the construction of a 7,200-ft runway on an artificial promontory reclaimed from the sea and projecting out into the waters of Kowloon Bay. In danger of being knocked off the international airline map by reason of its airport being too small and dangerous for the Comet and the larger conventional airliners, Hong Kong has now taken steps to keep itself firmly on the map. The airport project, when completed in 1958, will provide, for the first time since aviation started in the Colony, facilities for day and night operation all the year round.




A note on the design of runways: Two intersecting runways are usually treated as one, as both can't be used simultaneously unless they're sufficiently long and a procedure like LAHSO is used. Kai Tak started with 2 to cover the compass as much as possible, since early on the designers didn't have wind data. It was typical of that era to build 3 runways 60° apart, then later on expand the most useful, and abandon the rest.




Source: https://gwulo.com/kai-tak-airport-history







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 20 at 16:34

























answered Mar 20 at 4:52









ymb1ymb1

71.5k7231385




71.5k7231385











  • $begingroup$
    Of course, not all postwar airports ended up abandoning some of their runway directions - for instance, KBOS is still triangular.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    Mar 22 at 3:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Sean: Yep, this is probably why.
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    Mar 22 at 7:13
















  • $begingroup$
    Of course, not all postwar airports ended up abandoning some of their runway directions - for instance, KBOS is still triangular.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    Mar 22 at 3:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Sean: Yep, this is probably why.
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    Mar 22 at 7:13















$begingroup$
Of course, not all postwar airports ended up abandoning some of their runway directions - for instance, KBOS is still triangular.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Mar 22 at 3:12




$begingroup$
Of course, not all postwar airports ended up abandoning some of their runway directions - for instance, KBOS is still triangular.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Mar 22 at 3:12




1




1




$begingroup$
@Sean: Yep, this is probably why.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 22 at 7:13




$begingroup$
@Sean: Yep, this is probably why.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 22 at 7:13

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61396%2fwhen-and-why-was-runway-07-25-at-kai-tak-removed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Masuk log Menu navigasi

Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области