Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?












14















My music teacher sometimes tells me too memorize a song, but sometimes also tells me to read straight from sheet music. This confuses me as I am unsure which one is better practice. Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?










share|improve this question





























    14















    My music teacher sometimes tells me too memorize a song, but sometimes also tells me to read straight from sheet music. This confuses me as I am unsure which one is better practice. Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?










    share|improve this question



























      14












      14








      14


      4






      My music teacher sometimes tells me too memorize a song, but sometimes also tells me to read straight from sheet music. This confuses me as I am unsure which one is better practice. Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?










      share|improve this question
















      My music teacher sometimes tells me too memorize a song, but sometimes also tells me to read straight from sheet music. This confuses me as I am unsure which one is better practice. Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?







      sheet-music sight-reading memorization






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 22 at 23:09







      Xilpex

















      asked Mar 22 at 23:03









      XilpexXilpex

      908225




      908225






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          29














          Very simply, playing a song from memory is one very useful skill, whilst being able to sight read is another very useful skill. It sounds like you have a wise teacher who is giving you a balanced curriculum!



          It may be that as you progress, you find yourself favoring activities where one or the other is clearly more useful. In some situations (e.g. playing in an orchestra), instrumentalists are expected to be able to work from and refer to the score. In a live rock band situation, performing from memory (possibly including an element of improvisation) is more common.



          There are other aspects of music theory that nevertheless tie these two approaches together. When playing from the score, you should learn to recognise the motion of the harmony; when playing back a song from memory, remembering the motion of the harmony will give you a good basis for recalling the piece (and for improvisation, where required).






          share|improve this answer





















          • 6





            I would stress that the two activities are absolutely not orthogonal. An experienced instrumentalist in, say, an orchestra, will be expected to have the piece memorized, but also to be able to follow along with the sheet music and the director. The sheet music is to give you cues to keep on track, and the director (or band leader) leads everyone to play the piece as a unified whole. A director will not like you if you are unprepared to follow along.

            – Dúthomhas
            2 days ago



















          12














          As topo says, both are excellent skills to have. There are times when being able to play something accurately (and musically) straight from the dots is what's needed. Some musos earn good money using that particular skill - in recording studios, for example, where time is expensive.



          Others will take time learning something, and be able to play it from memory. With some people, this happens as a natural course. It paid off for me on several occasions when my stand was knocked over, or the wind blew the charts all over the place. It also means that you, as a performer, can be more than someone whose head is stuck in the music - you can interact with the audience (or even those playing with you) which is all but impossible when sight-reading for the first time, however well you do it.



          So, yes, your teacher is providing great bases for you and your playing. Well done! I'd take it even further, and encourage you to play something, then want you to continue in the same vein, without the music, and before you've memorised it. Sort of improvisation on the spot - busking, if you like. Another useful skill, that's often not within the remit.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            The clue is also that the two (and other methods) will have a positive fruitful interaction.

            – Albrecht Hügli
            2 days ago



















          5














          Why should this confuse you? There are always different ways and approaches to reach a goal in your life - not only in music. And don’t try to find out which method is better.



          There are even more methods:



          1. reduce the harmony,
          2. exchange the motifs,
          3. play both hands or only one hand,
          4. play a two voices piece both hands in octavas,
          5. accompany with chords,
          5. simplifying the chord or the accompaniment,
          6. invent own solutions,
          7. improvise above some motifs,
          8. invent an own tune above a preludium etc.


          These are all ways I’ve found out myself (inspired by Gounod’s AVE MARIA) and later I found them approved by other composers or pianists or editors.



          The question is not which is the better methode the question is:



          Which approach is better for which student for which piece of music!






          share|improve this answer

































            4














            These are instructions for developing completely different skills. To prepare for a performance, and to develop your memory, memorization is important. This allows you to put more feeling into the performance, and to improvise a bit if appropriate. It is difficult to "perform" if you are only focused on the sheet music. After some time the sheet music is just a road map to keep you on track but you shouldn't literally be sight reading. However, that being said, we sometimes get called on to read new stuff at a moment's notice (perhaps literally Moment's Notice). In these cases you need to be relaxed enough to play with some feeling and focused enough to follow the sheet music without making mistakes. You also need to be able to move on when you do screw up since time does not stop. For guitarists William Levitt have developed whole books of sight reading exercises with unusual rhythms and key changes just to keep you on your toes.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "240"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81837%2fis-it-better-practice-to-read-straight-from-sheet-music-rather-than-memorize-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              29














              Very simply, playing a song from memory is one very useful skill, whilst being able to sight read is another very useful skill. It sounds like you have a wise teacher who is giving you a balanced curriculum!



              It may be that as you progress, you find yourself favoring activities where one or the other is clearly more useful. In some situations (e.g. playing in an orchestra), instrumentalists are expected to be able to work from and refer to the score. In a live rock band situation, performing from memory (possibly including an element of improvisation) is more common.



              There are other aspects of music theory that nevertheless tie these two approaches together. When playing from the score, you should learn to recognise the motion of the harmony; when playing back a song from memory, remembering the motion of the harmony will give you a good basis for recalling the piece (and for improvisation, where required).






              share|improve this answer





















              • 6





                I would stress that the two activities are absolutely not orthogonal. An experienced instrumentalist in, say, an orchestra, will be expected to have the piece memorized, but also to be able to follow along with the sheet music and the director. The sheet music is to give you cues to keep on track, and the director (or band leader) leads everyone to play the piece as a unified whole. A director will not like you if you are unprepared to follow along.

                – Dúthomhas
                2 days ago
















              29














              Very simply, playing a song from memory is one very useful skill, whilst being able to sight read is another very useful skill. It sounds like you have a wise teacher who is giving you a balanced curriculum!



              It may be that as you progress, you find yourself favoring activities where one or the other is clearly more useful. In some situations (e.g. playing in an orchestra), instrumentalists are expected to be able to work from and refer to the score. In a live rock band situation, performing from memory (possibly including an element of improvisation) is more common.



              There are other aspects of music theory that nevertheless tie these two approaches together. When playing from the score, you should learn to recognise the motion of the harmony; when playing back a song from memory, remembering the motion of the harmony will give you a good basis for recalling the piece (and for improvisation, where required).






              share|improve this answer





















              • 6





                I would stress that the two activities are absolutely not orthogonal. An experienced instrumentalist in, say, an orchestra, will be expected to have the piece memorized, but also to be able to follow along with the sheet music and the director. The sheet music is to give you cues to keep on track, and the director (or band leader) leads everyone to play the piece as a unified whole. A director will not like you if you are unprepared to follow along.

                – Dúthomhas
                2 days ago














              29












              29








              29







              Very simply, playing a song from memory is one very useful skill, whilst being able to sight read is another very useful skill. It sounds like you have a wise teacher who is giving you a balanced curriculum!



              It may be that as you progress, you find yourself favoring activities where one or the other is clearly more useful. In some situations (e.g. playing in an orchestra), instrumentalists are expected to be able to work from and refer to the score. In a live rock band situation, performing from memory (possibly including an element of improvisation) is more common.



              There are other aspects of music theory that nevertheless tie these two approaches together. When playing from the score, you should learn to recognise the motion of the harmony; when playing back a song from memory, remembering the motion of the harmony will give you a good basis for recalling the piece (and for improvisation, where required).






              share|improve this answer















              Very simply, playing a song from memory is one very useful skill, whilst being able to sight read is another very useful skill. It sounds like you have a wise teacher who is giving you a balanced curriculum!



              It may be that as you progress, you find yourself favoring activities where one or the other is clearly more useful. In some situations (e.g. playing in an orchestra), instrumentalists are expected to be able to work from and refer to the score. In a live rock band situation, performing from memory (possibly including an element of improvisation) is more common.



              There are other aspects of music theory that nevertheless tie these two approaches together. When playing from the score, you should learn to recognise the motion of the harmony; when playing back a song from memory, remembering the motion of the harmony will give you a good basis for recalling the piece (and for improvisation, where required).







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 2 days ago

























              answered Mar 22 at 23:17









              topo mortotopo morto

              26.5k246105




              26.5k246105








              • 6





                I would stress that the two activities are absolutely not orthogonal. An experienced instrumentalist in, say, an orchestra, will be expected to have the piece memorized, but also to be able to follow along with the sheet music and the director. The sheet music is to give you cues to keep on track, and the director (or band leader) leads everyone to play the piece as a unified whole. A director will not like you if you are unprepared to follow along.

                – Dúthomhas
                2 days ago














              • 6





                I would stress that the two activities are absolutely not orthogonal. An experienced instrumentalist in, say, an orchestra, will be expected to have the piece memorized, but also to be able to follow along with the sheet music and the director. The sheet music is to give you cues to keep on track, and the director (or band leader) leads everyone to play the piece as a unified whole. A director will not like you if you are unprepared to follow along.

                – Dúthomhas
                2 days ago








              6




              6





              I would stress that the two activities are absolutely not orthogonal. An experienced instrumentalist in, say, an orchestra, will be expected to have the piece memorized, but also to be able to follow along with the sheet music and the director. The sheet music is to give you cues to keep on track, and the director (or band leader) leads everyone to play the piece as a unified whole. A director will not like you if you are unprepared to follow along.

              – Dúthomhas
              2 days ago





              I would stress that the two activities are absolutely not orthogonal. An experienced instrumentalist in, say, an orchestra, will be expected to have the piece memorized, but also to be able to follow along with the sheet music and the director. The sheet music is to give you cues to keep on track, and the director (or band leader) leads everyone to play the piece as a unified whole. A director will not like you if you are unprepared to follow along.

              – Dúthomhas
              2 days ago











              12














              As topo says, both are excellent skills to have. There are times when being able to play something accurately (and musically) straight from the dots is what's needed. Some musos earn good money using that particular skill - in recording studios, for example, where time is expensive.



              Others will take time learning something, and be able to play it from memory. With some people, this happens as a natural course. It paid off for me on several occasions when my stand was knocked over, or the wind blew the charts all over the place. It also means that you, as a performer, can be more than someone whose head is stuck in the music - you can interact with the audience (or even those playing with you) which is all but impossible when sight-reading for the first time, however well you do it.



              So, yes, your teacher is providing great bases for you and your playing. Well done! I'd take it even further, and encourage you to play something, then want you to continue in the same vein, without the music, and before you've memorised it. Sort of improvisation on the spot - busking, if you like. Another useful skill, that's often not within the remit.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                The clue is also that the two (and other methods) will have a positive fruitful interaction.

                – Albrecht Hügli
                2 days ago
















              12














              As topo says, both are excellent skills to have. There are times when being able to play something accurately (and musically) straight from the dots is what's needed. Some musos earn good money using that particular skill - in recording studios, for example, where time is expensive.



              Others will take time learning something, and be able to play it from memory. With some people, this happens as a natural course. It paid off for me on several occasions when my stand was knocked over, or the wind blew the charts all over the place. It also means that you, as a performer, can be more than someone whose head is stuck in the music - you can interact with the audience (or even those playing with you) which is all but impossible when sight-reading for the first time, however well you do it.



              So, yes, your teacher is providing great bases for you and your playing. Well done! I'd take it even further, and encourage you to play something, then want you to continue in the same vein, without the music, and before you've memorised it. Sort of improvisation on the spot - busking, if you like. Another useful skill, that's often not within the remit.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                The clue is also that the two (and other methods) will have a positive fruitful interaction.

                – Albrecht Hügli
                2 days ago














              12












              12








              12







              As topo says, both are excellent skills to have. There are times when being able to play something accurately (and musically) straight from the dots is what's needed. Some musos earn good money using that particular skill - in recording studios, for example, where time is expensive.



              Others will take time learning something, and be able to play it from memory. With some people, this happens as a natural course. It paid off for me on several occasions when my stand was knocked over, or the wind blew the charts all over the place. It also means that you, as a performer, can be more than someone whose head is stuck in the music - you can interact with the audience (or even those playing with you) which is all but impossible when sight-reading for the first time, however well you do it.



              So, yes, your teacher is providing great bases for you and your playing. Well done! I'd take it even further, and encourage you to play something, then want you to continue in the same vein, without the music, and before you've memorised it. Sort of improvisation on the spot - busking, if you like. Another useful skill, that's often not within the remit.






              share|improve this answer













              As topo says, both are excellent skills to have. There are times when being able to play something accurately (and musically) straight from the dots is what's needed. Some musos earn good money using that particular skill - in recording studios, for example, where time is expensive.



              Others will take time learning something, and be able to play it from memory. With some people, this happens as a natural course. It paid off for me on several occasions when my stand was knocked over, or the wind blew the charts all over the place. It also means that you, as a performer, can be more than someone whose head is stuck in the music - you can interact with the audience (or even those playing with you) which is all but impossible when sight-reading for the first time, however well you do it.



              So, yes, your teacher is providing great bases for you and your playing. Well done! I'd take it even further, and encourage you to play something, then want you to continue in the same vein, without the music, and before you've memorised it. Sort of improvisation on the spot - busking, if you like. Another useful skill, that's often not within the remit.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 2 days ago









              TimTim

              104k10107261




              104k10107261








              • 1





                The clue is also that the two (and other methods) will have a positive fruitful interaction.

                – Albrecht Hügli
                2 days ago














              • 1





                The clue is also that the two (and other methods) will have a positive fruitful interaction.

                – Albrecht Hügli
                2 days ago








              1




              1





              The clue is also that the two (and other methods) will have a positive fruitful interaction.

              – Albrecht Hügli
              2 days ago





              The clue is also that the two (and other methods) will have a positive fruitful interaction.

              – Albrecht Hügli
              2 days ago











              5














              Why should this confuse you? There are always different ways and approaches to reach a goal in your life - not only in music. And don’t try to find out which method is better.



              There are even more methods:



              1. reduce the harmony,
              2. exchange the motifs,
              3. play both hands or only one hand,
              4. play a two voices piece both hands in octavas,
              5. accompany with chords,
              5. simplifying the chord or the accompaniment,
              6. invent own solutions,
              7. improvise above some motifs,
              8. invent an own tune above a preludium etc.


              These are all ways I’ve found out myself (inspired by Gounod’s AVE MARIA) and later I found them approved by other composers or pianists or editors.



              The question is not which is the better methode the question is:



              Which approach is better for which student for which piece of music!






              share|improve this answer






























                5














                Why should this confuse you? There are always different ways and approaches to reach a goal in your life - not only in music. And don’t try to find out which method is better.



                There are even more methods:



                1. reduce the harmony,
                2. exchange the motifs,
                3. play both hands or only one hand,
                4. play a two voices piece both hands in octavas,
                5. accompany with chords,
                5. simplifying the chord or the accompaniment,
                6. invent own solutions,
                7. improvise above some motifs,
                8. invent an own tune above a preludium etc.


                These are all ways I’ve found out myself (inspired by Gounod’s AVE MARIA) and later I found them approved by other composers or pianists or editors.



                The question is not which is the better methode the question is:



                Which approach is better for which student for which piece of music!






                share|improve this answer




























                  5












                  5








                  5







                  Why should this confuse you? There are always different ways and approaches to reach a goal in your life - not only in music. And don’t try to find out which method is better.



                  There are even more methods:



                  1. reduce the harmony,
                  2. exchange the motifs,
                  3. play both hands or only one hand,
                  4. play a two voices piece both hands in octavas,
                  5. accompany with chords,
                  5. simplifying the chord or the accompaniment,
                  6. invent own solutions,
                  7. improvise above some motifs,
                  8. invent an own tune above a preludium etc.


                  These are all ways I’ve found out myself (inspired by Gounod’s AVE MARIA) and later I found them approved by other composers or pianists or editors.



                  The question is not which is the better methode the question is:



                  Which approach is better for which student for which piece of music!






                  share|improve this answer















                  Why should this confuse you? There are always different ways and approaches to reach a goal in your life - not only in music. And don’t try to find out which method is better.



                  There are even more methods:



                  1. reduce the harmony,
                  2. exchange the motifs,
                  3. play both hands or only one hand,
                  4. play a two voices piece both hands in octavas,
                  5. accompany with chords,
                  5. simplifying the chord or the accompaniment,
                  6. invent own solutions,
                  7. improvise above some motifs,
                  8. invent an own tune above a preludium etc.


                  These are all ways I’ve found out myself (inspired by Gounod’s AVE MARIA) and later I found them approved by other composers or pianists or editors.



                  The question is not which is the better methode the question is:



                  Which approach is better for which student for which piece of music!







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli

                  3,749220




                  3,749220























                      4














                      These are instructions for developing completely different skills. To prepare for a performance, and to develop your memory, memorization is important. This allows you to put more feeling into the performance, and to improvise a bit if appropriate. It is difficult to "perform" if you are only focused on the sheet music. After some time the sheet music is just a road map to keep you on track but you shouldn't literally be sight reading. However, that being said, we sometimes get called on to read new stuff at a moment's notice (perhaps literally Moment's Notice). In these cases you need to be relaxed enough to play with some feeling and focused enough to follow the sheet music without making mistakes. You also need to be able to move on when you do screw up since time does not stop. For guitarists William Levitt have developed whole books of sight reading exercises with unusual rhythms and key changes just to keep you on your toes.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        4














                        These are instructions for developing completely different skills. To prepare for a performance, and to develop your memory, memorization is important. This allows you to put more feeling into the performance, and to improvise a bit if appropriate. It is difficult to "perform" if you are only focused on the sheet music. After some time the sheet music is just a road map to keep you on track but you shouldn't literally be sight reading. However, that being said, we sometimes get called on to read new stuff at a moment's notice (perhaps literally Moment's Notice). In these cases you need to be relaxed enough to play with some feeling and focused enough to follow the sheet music without making mistakes. You also need to be able to move on when you do screw up since time does not stop. For guitarists William Levitt have developed whole books of sight reading exercises with unusual rhythms and key changes just to keep you on your toes.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          4












                          4








                          4







                          These are instructions for developing completely different skills. To prepare for a performance, and to develop your memory, memorization is important. This allows you to put more feeling into the performance, and to improvise a bit if appropriate. It is difficult to "perform" if you are only focused on the sheet music. After some time the sheet music is just a road map to keep you on track but you shouldn't literally be sight reading. However, that being said, we sometimes get called on to read new stuff at a moment's notice (perhaps literally Moment's Notice). In these cases you need to be relaxed enough to play with some feeling and focused enough to follow the sheet music without making mistakes. You also need to be able to move on when you do screw up since time does not stop. For guitarists William Levitt have developed whole books of sight reading exercises with unusual rhythms and key changes just to keep you on your toes.






                          share|improve this answer













                          These are instructions for developing completely different skills. To prepare for a performance, and to develop your memory, memorization is important. This allows you to put more feeling into the performance, and to improvise a bit if appropriate. It is difficult to "perform" if you are only focused on the sheet music. After some time the sheet music is just a road map to keep you on track but you shouldn't literally be sight reading. However, that being said, we sometimes get called on to read new stuff at a moment's notice (perhaps literally Moment's Notice). In these cases you need to be relaxed enough to play with some feeling and focused enough to follow the sheet music without making mistakes. You also need to be able to move on when you do screw up since time does not stop. For guitarists William Levitt have developed whole books of sight reading exercises with unusual rhythms and key changes just to keep you on your toes.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          ggcgggcg

                          5,393424




                          5,393424






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81837%2fis-it-better-practice-to-read-straight-from-sheet-music-rather-than-memorize-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Masuk log Menu navigasi

                              Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

                              Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области