Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?Why does chocolate ice cream melt faster than others?Does supersaturated caffeine polymerize?How do you melt metals with super high melting points?Prevent crystal growth by adding a chemical to a solution?How does ice melt?How would mixing sea salt and honey affect the water activity of honey?How could uranium be extracted from ore to be melt?Why add specifically hot solvent during recrystallization procedures instead of heating it up after?How do Invert Sugars deter crystallization in Sucrose solutions?If we start heating a substance, does it melt when we break its intermolecular bonds?

How can I wire 7 outdoor posts correctly?

How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?

Optimising a list searching algorithm

Synchronized implementation of a bank account in Java

Replace four times with sed

Do I need to consider instance restrictions when showing a language is in P?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Print a physical multiplication table

How to define limit operations in general topological spaces? Are nets able to do this?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

Can a medieval gyroplane be built?

How to generate binary array whose elements with values 1 are randomly drawn

HP P840 HDD RAID 5 many strange drive failures

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?

Can you move over difficult terrain with only 5' of movement?

Do US professors/group leaders only get a salary, but no group budget?

Help rendering a complicated sum/product formula

Could Sinn Fein swing any Brexit vote in Parliament?

Is this an example of a Neapolitan chord?

Suggestions on how to spend Shaabath (constructively) alone

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

In the 1924 version of The Thief of Bagdad, no character is named, right?

What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?

What does "Four-F." mean?



Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?


Why does chocolate ice cream melt faster than others?Does supersaturated caffeine polymerize?How do you melt metals with super high melting points?Prevent crystal growth by adding a chemical to a solution?How does ice melt?How would mixing sea salt and honey affect the water activity of honey?How could uranium be extracted from ore to be melt?Why add specifically hot solvent during recrystallization procedures instead of heating it up after?How do Invert Sugars deter crystallization in Sucrose solutions?If we start heating a substance, does it melt when we break its intermolecular bonds?













15












$begingroup$


In the SciShow video Honey: Bacteria's Worst Enemy after about 00:30 the narrator says:




Honey is only about 17% water. Most, but not all of what remains is sugar. The two main types of sugar in honey are glucose and fructose. Like all sugars, glucose and fructose are sticky — they attract water.



Honey is technically a supersaturated solution, meaning it contains more sugar than would normally dissolve at that temperature. That’s why it eventually gets all crystally in the pantry — over time, sugar comes out of the solution.




In my experience when old honey "gets all crystally in the pantry" I've placed the jar in a hot water bath, and eventually the honey's viscous liquidy consistency is restored.



When I do this, am I redissolving the sugar, or melting it?



I'm asking because even hot, with only 17% water it's hard to imagine it can become an unsaturated solution.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    15












    $begingroup$


    In the SciShow video Honey: Bacteria's Worst Enemy after about 00:30 the narrator says:




    Honey is only about 17% water. Most, but not all of what remains is sugar. The two main types of sugar in honey are glucose and fructose. Like all sugars, glucose and fructose are sticky — they attract water.



    Honey is technically a supersaturated solution, meaning it contains more sugar than would normally dissolve at that temperature. That’s why it eventually gets all crystally in the pantry — over time, sugar comes out of the solution.




    In my experience when old honey "gets all crystally in the pantry" I've placed the jar in a hot water bath, and eventually the honey's viscous liquidy consistency is restored.



    When I do this, am I redissolving the sugar, or melting it?



    I'm asking because even hot, with only 17% water it's hard to imagine it can become an unsaturated solution.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      15












      15








      15


      2



      $begingroup$


      In the SciShow video Honey: Bacteria's Worst Enemy after about 00:30 the narrator says:




      Honey is only about 17% water. Most, but not all of what remains is sugar. The two main types of sugar in honey are glucose and fructose. Like all sugars, glucose and fructose are sticky — they attract water.



      Honey is technically a supersaturated solution, meaning it contains more sugar than would normally dissolve at that temperature. That’s why it eventually gets all crystally in the pantry — over time, sugar comes out of the solution.




      In my experience when old honey "gets all crystally in the pantry" I've placed the jar in a hot water bath, and eventually the honey's viscous liquidy consistency is restored.



      When I do this, am I redissolving the sugar, or melting it?



      I'm asking because even hot, with only 17% water it's hard to imagine it can become an unsaturated solution.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In the SciShow video Honey: Bacteria's Worst Enemy after about 00:30 the narrator says:




      Honey is only about 17% water. Most, but not all of what remains is sugar. The two main types of sugar in honey are glucose and fructose. Like all sugars, glucose and fructose are sticky — they attract water.



      Honey is technically a supersaturated solution, meaning it contains more sugar than would normally dissolve at that temperature. That’s why it eventually gets all crystally in the pantry — over time, sugar comes out of the solution.




      In my experience when old honey "gets all crystally in the pantry" I've placed the jar in a hot water bath, and eventually the honey's viscous liquidy consistency is restored.



      When I do this, am I redissolving the sugar, or melting it?



      I'm asking because even hot, with only 17% water it's hard to imagine it can become an unsaturated solution.







      everyday-chemistry solubility melting-point recrystallization viscosity






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday







      uhoh

















      asked yesterday









      uhohuhoh

      1,586838




      1,586838




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          19












          $begingroup$

          Honey is indeed a complex mixture containing more than hundred compounds.



          As for Wikipedia and depending on the point of view it is a



          • supersatured liquid solution


          • a viscous supercooled liquid (in the sense that can get so viscous to appear solid, without affecting its status of being a supersatured solution, and undergoes glass transition).


          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey#Physical_and_chemical_properties



          The facts that you describe in the Q are less surprising if we consider that



          • with respect to sugars crystallization, of which at least there are two different ones, glucose and fructose, the rest of the non-sugar components must be considered as impurities;


          • impurities, even in traces, often hamper the crystallisation of a compound, even in simple mixture of a single compound and the above traces. This is common after organic synthesis, in which often a viscous "oil" is attained that might crystallize only upon prolonged storage or a careful removal of the disturbing trace compound(s);


          • finally and most important, the solubility of sugars in water is very high, and very sensitive to T. For instance, already at room temperature glucose is soluble in the reason of 90 g per 100 ml of water, that means a saturated solution contains already about fifty percent w/w of sugar.


          A table is here (I didn't cross checked the values):



          http://www.mpcfaculty.net/mark_bishop/supersaturated.htm



          All this makes the attainment of a supersatured solution particularly easy, as in the kitchen in the case of sucrose:



          https://sciencing.com/make-supersaturated-solution-sugar-6199355.html



          As such, heating crystallized honey does indeed dissolve sugars, and a supersaturated solution is attained upon subsequent cooling.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In the circumstances the other answer is more than valid. What is peculiar is the easy to maintain the super-saturation regime (ie the resistance to crystallisation). @uhoh
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            You might add the high viscosity to the list. Just about everything is slow in honey.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Karl I thought the •supercooled entry did the job. Shall I put it more in connection with slow crystallisation?
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I think so. Supercooled water is still very much like water, and the viscosity of sugar solutions does not rise differently above the solubility limit.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            10 hours ago


















          13












          $begingroup$

          Melting and dissolving are all the same when you look at mixtures close to saturation.



          You can say water lowers the melting point of the sugar, or that the solubility of sugar increases with temperature. Different description, same fact.



          What makes this seem different from e.g. a salt water solution is that the molten (i.e. non-crystalline) sugar is fully miscible with water, which is only possible because the m.p. of sugar is not so far above the Bp. of water. If you go to high pressures (like in earth's mantle), the situation between (supercritical) water and rock is probably very similar.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Is this a general principle in chemistry (for supersaturated solutions), or does it mostly apply to saturated solutions of sugar?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday







          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I would call it a non-principle. ;-) If you think about a saltwater solution, you would clearly use the word "solubility". There's a large miscibility gap. Molten sugar and water however are completely miscible, the Bp of one and Mp of the other are closeby.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            yesterday










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "431"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111060%2fis-honey-really-a-supersaturated-solution-does-heating-to-un-crystalize-redisso%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          19












          $begingroup$

          Honey is indeed a complex mixture containing more than hundred compounds.



          As for Wikipedia and depending on the point of view it is a



          • supersatured liquid solution


          • a viscous supercooled liquid (in the sense that can get so viscous to appear solid, without affecting its status of being a supersatured solution, and undergoes glass transition).


          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey#Physical_and_chemical_properties



          The facts that you describe in the Q are less surprising if we consider that



          • with respect to sugars crystallization, of which at least there are two different ones, glucose and fructose, the rest of the non-sugar components must be considered as impurities;


          • impurities, even in traces, often hamper the crystallisation of a compound, even in simple mixture of a single compound and the above traces. This is common after organic synthesis, in which often a viscous "oil" is attained that might crystallize only upon prolonged storage or a careful removal of the disturbing trace compound(s);


          • finally and most important, the solubility of sugars in water is very high, and very sensitive to T. For instance, already at room temperature glucose is soluble in the reason of 90 g per 100 ml of water, that means a saturated solution contains already about fifty percent w/w of sugar.


          A table is here (I didn't cross checked the values):



          http://www.mpcfaculty.net/mark_bishop/supersaturated.htm



          All this makes the attainment of a supersatured solution particularly easy, as in the kitchen in the case of sucrose:



          https://sciencing.com/make-supersaturated-solution-sugar-6199355.html



          As such, heating crystallized honey does indeed dissolve sugars, and a supersaturated solution is attained upon subsequent cooling.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In the circumstances the other answer is more than valid. What is peculiar is the easy to maintain the super-saturation regime (ie the resistance to crystallisation). @uhoh
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            You might add the high viscosity to the list. Just about everything is slow in honey.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Karl I thought the •supercooled entry did the job. Shall I put it more in connection with slow crystallisation?
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I think so. Supercooled water is still very much like water, and the viscosity of sugar solutions does not rise differently above the solubility limit.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            10 hours ago















          19












          $begingroup$

          Honey is indeed a complex mixture containing more than hundred compounds.



          As for Wikipedia and depending on the point of view it is a



          • supersatured liquid solution


          • a viscous supercooled liquid (in the sense that can get so viscous to appear solid, without affecting its status of being a supersatured solution, and undergoes glass transition).


          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey#Physical_and_chemical_properties



          The facts that you describe in the Q are less surprising if we consider that



          • with respect to sugars crystallization, of which at least there are two different ones, glucose and fructose, the rest of the non-sugar components must be considered as impurities;


          • impurities, even in traces, often hamper the crystallisation of a compound, even in simple mixture of a single compound and the above traces. This is common after organic synthesis, in which often a viscous "oil" is attained that might crystallize only upon prolonged storage or a careful removal of the disturbing trace compound(s);


          • finally and most important, the solubility of sugars in water is very high, and very sensitive to T. For instance, already at room temperature glucose is soluble in the reason of 90 g per 100 ml of water, that means a saturated solution contains already about fifty percent w/w of sugar.


          A table is here (I didn't cross checked the values):



          http://www.mpcfaculty.net/mark_bishop/supersaturated.htm



          All this makes the attainment of a supersatured solution particularly easy, as in the kitchen in the case of sucrose:



          https://sciencing.com/make-supersaturated-solution-sugar-6199355.html



          As such, heating crystallized honey does indeed dissolve sugars, and a supersaturated solution is attained upon subsequent cooling.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In the circumstances the other answer is more than valid. What is peculiar is the easy to maintain the super-saturation regime (ie the resistance to crystallisation). @uhoh
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            You might add the high viscosity to the list. Just about everything is slow in honey.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Karl I thought the •supercooled entry did the job. Shall I put it more in connection with slow crystallisation?
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I think so. Supercooled water is still very much like water, and the viscosity of sugar solutions does not rise differently above the solubility limit.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            10 hours ago













          19












          19








          19





          $begingroup$

          Honey is indeed a complex mixture containing more than hundred compounds.



          As for Wikipedia and depending on the point of view it is a



          • supersatured liquid solution


          • a viscous supercooled liquid (in the sense that can get so viscous to appear solid, without affecting its status of being a supersatured solution, and undergoes glass transition).


          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey#Physical_and_chemical_properties



          The facts that you describe in the Q are less surprising if we consider that



          • with respect to sugars crystallization, of which at least there are two different ones, glucose and fructose, the rest of the non-sugar components must be considered as impurities;


          • impurities, even in traces, often hamper the crystallisation of a compound, even in simple mixture of a single compound and the above traces. This is common after organic synthesis, in which often a viscous "oil" is attained that might crystallize only upon prolonged storage or a careful removal of the disturbing trace compound(s);


          • finally and most important, the solubility of sugars in water is very high, and very sensitive to T. For instance, already at room temperature glucose is soluble in the reason of 90 g per 100 ml of water, that means a saturated solution contains already about fifty percent w/w of sugar.


          A table is here (I didn't cross checked the values):



          http://www.mpcfaculty.net/mark_bishop/supersaturated.htm



          All this makes the attainment of a supersatured solution particularly easy, as in the kitchen in the case of sucrose:



          https://sciencing.com/make-supersaturated-solution-sugar-6199355.html



          As such, heating crystallized honey does indeed dissolve sugars, and a supersaturated solution is attained upon subsequent cooling.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Honey is indeed a complex mixture containing more than hundred compounds.



          As for Wikipedia and depending on the point of view it is a



          • supersatured liquid solution


          • a viscous supercooled liquid (in the sense that can get so viscous to appear solid, without affecting its status of being a supersatured solution, and undergoes glass transition).


          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey#Physical_and_chemical_properties



          The facts that you describe in the Q are less surprising if we consider that



          • with respect to sugars crystallization, of which at least there are two different ones, glucose and fructose, the rest of the non-sugar components must be considered as impurities;


          • impurities, even in traces, often hamper the crystallisation of a compound, even in simple mixture of a single compound and the above traces. This is common after organic synthesis, in which often a viscous "oil" is attained that might crystallize only upon prolonged storage or a careful removal of the disturbing trace compound(s);


          • finally and most important, the solubility of sugars in water is very high, and very sensitive to T. For instance, already at room temperature glucose is soluble in the reason of 90 g per 100 ml of water, that means a saturated solution contains already about fifty percent w/w of sugar.


          A table is here (I didn't cross checked the values):



          http://www.mpcfaculty.net/mark_bishop/supersaturated.htm



          All this makes the attainment of a supersatured solution particularly easy, as in the kitchen in the case of sucrose:



          https://sciencing.com/make-supersaturated-solution-sugar-6199355.html



          As such, heating crystallized honey does indeed dissolve sugars, and a supersaturated solution is attained upon subsequent cooling.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 8 hours ago

























          answered yesterday









          AlchimistaAlchimista

          1,83739




          1,83739







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In the circumstances the other answer is more than valid. What is peculiar is the easy to maintain the super-saturation regime (ie the resistance to crystallisation). @uhoh
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            You might add the high viscosity to the list. Just about everything is slow in honey.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Karl I thought the •supercooled entry did the job. Shall I put it more in connection with slow crystallisation?
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I think so. Supercooled water is still very much like water, and the viscosity of sugar solutions does not rise differently above the solubility limit.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            10 hours ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In the circumstances the other answer is more than valid. What is peculiar is the easy to maintain the super-saturation regime (ie the resistance to crystallisation). @uhoh
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            yesterday











          • $begingroup$
            You might add the high viscosity to the list. Just about everything is slow in honey.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Karl I thought the •supercooled entry did the job. Shall I put it more in connection with slow crystallisation?
            $endgroup$
            – Alchimista
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I think so. Supercooled water is still very much like water, and the viscosity of sugar solutions does not rise differently above the solubility limit.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            10 hours ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          In the circumstances the other answer is more than valid. What is peculiar is the easy to maintain the super-saturation regime (ie the resistance to crystallisation). @uhoh
          $endgroup$
          – Alchimista
          yesterday





          $begingroup$
          In the circumstances the other answer is more than valid. What is peculiar is the easy to maintain the super-saturation regime (ie the resistance to crystallisation). @uhoh
          $endgroup$
          – Alchimista
          yesterday













          $begingroup$
          You might add the high viscosity to the list. Just about everything is slow in honey.
          $endgroup$
          – Karl
          12 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          You might add the high viscosity to the list. Just about everything is slow in honey.
          $endgroup$
          – Karl
          12 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Karl I thought the •supercooled entry did the job. Shall I put it more in connection with slow crystallisation?
          $endgroup$
          – Alchimista
          12 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Karl I thought the •supercooled entry did the job. Shall I put it more in connection with slow crystallisation?
          $endgroup$
          – Alchimista
          12 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          I think so. Supercooled water is still very much like water, and the viscosity of sugar solutions does not rise differently above the solubility limit.
          $endgroup$
          – Karl
          10 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I think so. Supercooled water is still very much like water, and the viscosity of sugar solutions does not rise differently above the solubility limit.
          $endgroup$
          – Karl
          10 hours ago











          13












          $begingroup$

          Melting and dissolving are all the same when you look at mixtures close to saturation.



          You can say water lowers the melting point of the sugar, or that the solubility of sugar increases with temperature. Different description, same fact.



          What makes this seem different from e.g. a salt water solution is that the molten (i.e. non-crystalline) sugar is fully miscible with water, which is only possible because the m.p. of sugar is not so far above the Bp. of water. If you go to high pressures (like in earth's mantle), the situation between (supercritical) water and rock is probably very similar.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Is this a general principle in chemistry (for supersaturated solutions), or does it mostly apply to saturated solutions of sugar?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday







          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I would call it a non-principle. ;-) If you think about a saltwater solution, you would clearly use the word "solubility". There's a large miscibility gap. Molten sugar and water however are completely miscible, the Bp of one and Mp of the other are closeby.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            yesterday















          13












          $begingroup$

          Melting and dissolving are all the same when you look at mixtures close to saturation.



          You can say water lowers the melting point of the sugar, or that the solubility of sugar increases with temperature. Different description, same fact.



          What makes this seem different from e.g. a salt water solution is that the molten (i.e. non-crystalline) sugar is fully miscible with water, which is only possible because the m.p. of sugar is not so far above the Bp. of water. If you go to high pressures (like in earth's mantle), the situation between (supercritical) water and rock is probably very similar.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Is this a general principle in chemistry (for supersaturated solutions), or does it mostly apply to saturated solutions of sugar?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday







          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I would call it a non-principle. ;-) If you think about a saltwater solution, you would clearly use the word "solubility". There's a large miscibility gap. Molten sugar and water however are completely miscible, the Bp of one and Mp of the other are closeby.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            yesterday













          13












          13








          13





          $begingroup$

          Melting and dissolving are all the same when you look at mixtures close to saturation.



          You can say water lowers the melting point of the sugar, or that the solubility of sugar increases with temperature. Different description, same fact.



          What makes this seem different from e.g. a salt water solution is that the molten (i.e. non-crystalline) sugar is fully miscible with water, which is only possible because the m.p. of sugar is not so far above the Bp. of water. If you go to high pressures (like in earth's mantle), the situation between (supercritical) water and rock is probably very similar.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Melting and dissolving are all the same when you look at mixtures close to saturation.



          You can say water lowers the melting point of the sugar, or that the solubility of sugar increases with temperature. Different description, same fact.



          What makes this seem different from e.g. a salt water solution is that the molten (i.e. non-crystalline) sugar is fully miscible with water, which is only possible because the m.p. of sugar is not so far above the Bp. of water. If you go to high pressures (like in earth's mantle), the situation between (supercritical) water and rock is probably very similar.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 13 hours ago

























          answered yesterday









          KarlKarl

          6,1521433




          6,1521433











          • $begingroup$
            Is this a general principle in chemistry (for supersaturated solutions), or does it mostly apply to saturated solutions of sugar?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday







          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I would call it a non-principle. ;-) If you think about a saltwater solution, you would clearly use the word "solubility". There's a large miscibility gap. Molten sugar and water however are completely miscible, the Bp of one and Mp of the other are closeby.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            yesterday
















          • $begingroup$
            Is this a general principle in chemistry (for supersaturated solutions), or does it mostly apply to saturated solutions of sugar?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday







          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I would call it a non-principle. ;-) If you think about a saltwater solution, you would clearly use the word "solubility". There's a large miscibility gap. Molten sugar and water however are completely miscible, the Bp of one and Mp of the other are closeby.
            $endgroup$
            – Karl
            yesterday















          $begingroup$
          Is this a general principle in chemistry (for supersaturated solutions), or does it mostly apply to saturated solutions of sugar?
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          yesterday





          $begingroup$
          Is this a general principle in chemistry (for supersaturated solutions), or does it mostly apply to saturated solutions of sugar?
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          yesterday





          4




          4




          $begingroup$
          I would call it a non-principle. ;-) If you think about a saltwater solution, you would clearly use the word "solubility". There's a large miscibility gap. Molten sugar and water however are completely miscible, the Bp of one and Mp of the other are closeby.
          $endgroup$
          – Karl
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          I would call it a non-principle. ;-) If you think about a saltwater solution, you would clearly use the word "solubility". There's a large miscibility gap. Molten sugar and water however are completely miscible, the Bp of one and Mp of the other are closeby.
          $endgroup$
          – Karl
          yesterday

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111060%2fis-honey-really-a-supersaturated-solution-does-heating-to-un-crystalize-redisso%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Masuk log Menu navigasi

          Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

          Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области