Polynomial and prime factors Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Proof polynomial is always divisible by numberIf $m^4+4^n$ is prime, then $m=n=1$ or $m$ is odd and $n$ evenSolving $p_1^e_1 p_2^e_2…p_k^e_k=e_1^p_1 e_2^p_2…e_k^p_k$Product of two primitive roots $bmod p$ cannot be a primitive root.How to show that for $n$ sufficiently large, relative to $k$, $(n+1)(n+2) ldots (n+k)$ is divisible by at least $k$ distinct primesI've searched and cannot find this pattern anywhere concerning integers and their factorsFactorization of polynomial with prime coefficientsThe same number of prime factors and decimal digits.distributions of prime numbers - theorem of ChebyshevPrime sequence.Criteria for Leyland Numbers to be Prime
After Sam didn't return home in the end, were he and Al still friends?
Found this skink in my tomato plant bucket. Is he trapped? Or could he leave if he wanted?
Is it dangerous to install hacking tools on my private linux machine?
Can an iPhone 7 be made to function as a NFC Tag?
Special flights
Resize vertical bars (absolute-value symbols)
Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?
Why not send Voyager 3 and 4 following up the paths taken by Voyager 1 and 2 to re-transmit signals of later as they fly away from Earth?
Why shouldn't this prove the Prime Number Theorem?
what is the log of the PDF for a Normal Distribution?
Why BitLocker does not use RSA
How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?
Trying to understand entropy as a novice in thermodynamics
Question about this thing for timpani
Can humans save crash-landed aliens?
Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?
Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?
Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?
How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?
Caught masturbating at work
What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?
A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem
Monty Hall Problem-Probability Paradox
What order were files/directories output in dir?
Polynomial and prime factors
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Proof polynomial is always divisible by numberIf $m^4+4^n$ is prime, then $m=n=1$ or $m$ is odd and $n$ evenSolving $p_1^e_1 p_2^e_2…p_k^e_k=e_1^p_1 e_2^p_2…e_k^p_k$Product of two primitive roots $bmod p$ cannot be a primitive root.How to show that for $n$ sufficiently large, relative to $k$, $(n+1)(n+2) ldots (n+k)$ is divisible by at least $k$ distinct primesI've searched and cannot find this pattern anywhere concerning integers and their factorsFactorization of polynomial with prime coefficientsThe same number of prime factors and decimal digits.distributions of prime numbers - theorem of ChebyshevPrime sequence.Criteria for Leyland Numbers to be Prime
$begingroup$
So I've been thinking about this questions for ages but I haven't made any progress on it.
I need to prove that for every $f(X) in mathbbZ[X]$ with $f(0) = 1$, there exists a $n in mathbbZ$ such that $f(n)$ is divisible by at least 2019 distinct primes.
The only thing that I've seen is that this is easy to show when $f(X)$ has a root in $mathbbZ$ but for the rest I haven't made any progress?
Does anyone know how I can solve this?
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I've been thinking about this questions for ages but I haven't made any progress on it.
I need to prove that for every $f(X) in mathbbZ[X]$ with $f(0) = 1$, there exists a $n in mathbbZ$ such that $f(n)$ is divisible by at least 2019 distinct primes.
The only thing that I've seen is that this is easy to show when $f(X)$ has a root in $mathbbZ$ but for the rest I haven't made any progress?
Does anyone know how I can solve this?
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Perhaps induction on the degree of the polynomial? You'd need to assume that the degree is at least one, of course.
$endgroup$
– Gary Moon
Mar 20 at 13:42
$begingroup$
Perhaps the answer there will help you: math.stackexchange.com/questions/601526/…
$endgroup$
– B.Swan
Mar 20 at 14:37
$begingroup$
I don't really see how that answer can help me? Like, I don't know which primes divide my function divides and they also don't need to be the same for every value?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 14:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I've been thinking about this questions for ages but I haven't made any progress on it.
I need to prove that for every $f(X) in mathbbZ[X]$ with $f(0) = 1$, there exists a $n in mathbbZ$ such that $f(n)$ is divisible by at least 2019 distinct primes.
The only thing that I've seen is that this is easy to show when $f(X)$ has a root in $mathbbZ$ but for the rest I haven't made any progress?
Does anyone know how I can solve this?
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers
$endgroup$
So I've been thinking about this questions for ages but I haven't made any progress on it.
I need to prove that for every $f(X) in mathbbZ[X]$ with $f(0) = 1$, there exists a $n in mathbbZ$ such that $f(n)$ is divisible by at least 2019 distinct primes.
The only thing that I've seen is that this is easy to show when $f(X)$ has a root in $mathbbZ$ but for the rest I haven't made any progress?
Does anyone know how I can solve this?
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers
asked Mar 20 at 13:36
Mee98Mee98
340110
340110
$begingroup$
Perhaps induction on the degree of the polynomial? You'd need to assume that the degree is at least one, of course.
$endgroup$
– Gary Moon
Mar 20 at 13:42
$begingroup$
Perhaps the answer there will help you: math.stackexchange.com/questions/601526/…
$endgroup$
– B.Swan
Mar 20 at 14:37
$begingroup$
I don't really see how that answer can help me? Like, I don't know which primes divide my function divides and they also don't need to be the same for every value?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 14:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perhaps induction on the degree of the polynomial? You'd need to assume that the degree is at least one, of course.
$endgroup$
– Gary Moon
Mar 20 at 13:42
$begingroup$
Perhaps the answer there will help you: math.stackexchange.com/questions/601526/…
$endgroup$
– B.Swan
Mar 20 at 14:37
$begingroup$
I don't really see how that answer can help me? Like, I don't know which primes divide my function divides and they also don't need to be the same for every value?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 14:46
$begingroup$
Perhaps induction on the degree of the polynomial? You'd need to assume that the degree is at least one, of course.
$endgroup$
– Gary Moon
Mar 20 at 13:42
$begingroup$
Perhaps induction on the degree of the polynomial? You'd need to assume that the degree is at least one, of course.
$endgroup$
– Gary Moon
Mar 20 at 13:42
$begingroup$
Perhaps the answer there will help you: math.stackexchange.com/questions/601526/…
$endgroup$
– B.Swan
Mar 20 at 14:37
$begingroup$
Perhaps the answer there will help you: math.stackexchange.com/questions/601526/…
$endgroup$
– B.Swan
Mar 20 at 14:37
$begingroup$
I don't really see how that answer can help me? Like, I don't know which primes divide my function divides and they also don't need to be the same for every value?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 14:46
$begingroup$
I don't really see how that answer can help me? Like, I don't know which primes divide my function divides and they also don't need to be the same for every value?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 14:46
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose you know $f(x)$ has a root $r_i$ modulo a prime $p_i$, for $m$ different such primes.
Let $P_m$ be the product of the $m$ primes.
Then since $f(0) = 1$, this tells you that
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 1notequiv 0 pmod p_i
$$
for any integer $k$. So none of the existing $m$ primes divide this.
By choosing $k$ large enough, this is not zero (since a polynomial only have finitely many roots) and therefore it must have a prime factor $p_m+1$ not the same as the current $m$ you have found. Thus you get a new root $kP_m$ and prime $p_m+1$. i.e.
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 0 pmodp_m+1
$$
So you can find solution to
$$
f(r_i) equiv 0 pmodp_i
$$
for arbitrarily many primes $p_i$.
Finally, you can use Chinese Remainder Theorem to find a common root $r$ for all these primes. So that $f(r)$ will be divisible by each of the $p_i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How exactly can you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem in the last step?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Mee98 The CRT system to solve is $$r equiv r_i pmodp_i,$$ since if $r_i$ is a root mod $p_i$, then any $r equiv r_i pmodp_i$ is also a root. Alternatively, if we have $f(r) equiv 0pmod A, f(s) equiv 0pmod B$ then we can set $k equiv (s-r)A^-1pmod B$ to get $$f(r+kA)equiv 0 pmodAB$$, then repeat. (Adding one prime at a time to the product.)
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:45
$begingroup$
which works since $$f(r+ kA)equiv f(r)equiv 0 pmod A$$ and $$f(r+kA) equiv f(r + (s-r)A^-1A) equiv f(r +(s-r))equiv f(s) equiv 0pmod B$$So divisible by $A$ and $B$ means divisible by $AB$.
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155458%2fpolynomial-and-prime-factors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose you know $f(x)$ has a root $r_i$ modulo a prime $p_i$, for $m$ different such primes.
Let $P_m$ be the product of the $m$ primes.
Then since $f(0) = 1$, this tells you that
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 1notequiv 0 pmod p_i
$$
for any integer $k$. So none of the existing $m$ primes divide this.
By choosing $k$ large enough, this is not zero (since a polynomial only have finitely many roots) and therefore it must have a prime factor $p_m+1$ not the same as the current $m$ you have found. Thus you get a new root $kP_m$ and prime $p_m+1$. i.e.
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 0 pmodp_m+1
$$
So you can find solution to
$$
f(r_i) equiv 0 pmodp_i
$$
for arbitrarily many primes $p_i$.
Finally, you can use Chinese Remainder Theorem to find a common root $r$ for all these primes. So that $f(r)$ will be divisible by each of the $p_i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How exactly can you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem in the last step?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Mee98 The CRT system to solve is $$r equiv r_i pmodp_i,$$ since if $r_i$ is a root mod $p_i$, then any $r equiv r_i pmodp_i$ is also a root. Alternatively, if we have $f(r) equiv 0pmod A, f(s) equiv 0pmod B$ then we can set $k equiv (s-r)A^-1pmod B$ to get $$f(r+kA)equiv 0 pmodAB$$, then repeat. (Adding one prime at a time to the product.)
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:45
$begingroup$
which works since $$f(r+ kA)equiv f(r)equiv 0 pmod A$$ and $$f(r+kA) equiv f(r + (s-r)A^-1A) equiv f(r +(s-r))equiv f(s) equiv 0pmod B$$So divisible by $A$ and $B$ means divisible by $AB$.
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose you know $f(x)$ has a root $r_i$ modulo a prime $p_i$, for $m$ different such primes.
Let $P_m$ be the product of the $m$ primes.
Then since $f(0) = 1$, this tells you that
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 1notequiv 0 pmod p_i
$$
for any integer $k$. So none of the existing $m$ primes divide this.
By choosing $k$ large enough, this is not zero (since a polynomial only have finitely many roots) and therefore it must have a prime factor $p_m+1$ not the same as the current $m$ you have found. Thus you get a new root $kP_m$ and prime $p_m+1$. i.e.
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 0 pmodp_m+1
$$
So you can find solution to
$$
f(r_i) equiv 0 pmodp_i
$$
for arbitrarily many primes $p_i$.
Finally, you can use Chinese Remainder Theorem to find a common root $r$ for all these primes. So that $f(r)$ will be divisible by each of the $p_i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How exactly can you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem in the last step?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Mee98 The CRT system to solve is $$r equiv r_i pmodp_i,$$ since if $r_i$ is a root mod $p_i$, then any $r equiv r_i pmodp_i$ is also a root. Alternatively, if we have $f(r) equiv 0pmod A, f(s) equiv 0pmod B$ then we can set $k equiv (s-r)A^-1pmod B$ to get $$f(r+kA)equiv 0 pmodAB$$, then repeat. (Adding one prime at a time to the product.)
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:45
$begingroup$
which works since $$f(r+ kA)equiv f(r)equiv 0 pmod A$$ and $$f(r+kA) equiv f(r + (s-r)A^-1A) equiv f(r +(s-r))equiv f(s) equiv 0pmod B$$So divisible by $A$ and $B$ means divisible by $AB$.
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose you know $f(x)$ has a root $r_i$ modulo a prime $p_i$, for $m$ different such primes.
Let $P_m$ be the product of the $m$ primes.
Then since $f(0) = 1$, this tells you that
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 1notequiv 0 pmod p_i
$$
for any integer $k$. So none of the existing $m$ primes divide this.
By choosing $k$ large enough, this is not zero (since a polynomial only have finitely many roots) and therefore it must have a prime factor $p_m+1$ not the same as the current $m$ you have found. Thus you get a new root $kP_m$ and prime $p_m+1$. i.e.
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 0 pmodp_m+1
$$
So you can find solution to
$$
f(r_i) equiv 0 pmodp_i
$$
for arbitrarily many primes $p_i$.
Finally, you can use Chinese Remainder Theorem to find a common root $r$ for all these primes. So that $f(r)$ will be divisible by each of the $p_i$.
$endgroup$
Suppose you know $f(x)$ has a root $r_i$ modulo a prime $p_i$, for $m$ different such primes.
Let $P_m$ be the product of the $m$ primes.
Then since $f(0) = 1$, this tells you that
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 1notequiv 0 pmod p_i
$$
for any integer $k$. So none of the existing $m$ primes divide this.
By choosing $k$ large enough, this is not zero (since a polynomial only have finitely many roots) and therefore it must have a prime factor $p_m+1$ not the same as the current $m$ you have found. Thus you get a new root $kP_m$ and prime $p_m+1$. i.e.
$$
f(kP_m) equiv 0 pmodp_m+1
$$
So you can find solution to
$$
f(r_i) equiv 0 pmodp_i
$$
for arbitrarily many primes $p_i$.
Finally, you can use Chinese Remainder Theorem to find a common root $r$ for all these primes. So that $f(r)$ will be divisible by each of the $p_i$.
answered Mar 20 at 15:08
Yong Hao NgYong Hao Ng
3,7091222
3,7091222
$begingroup$
How exactly can you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem in the last step?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Mee98 The CRT system to solve is $$r equiv r_i pmodp_i,$$ since if $r_i$ is a root mod $p_i$, then any $r equiv r_i pmodp_i$ is also a root. Alternatively, if we have $f(r) equiv 0pmod A, f(s) equiv 0pmod B$ then we can set $k equiv (s-r)A^-1pmod B$ to get $$f(r+kA)equiv 0 pmodAB$$, then repeat. (Adding one prime at a time to the product.)
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:45
$begingroup$
which works since $$f(r+ kA)equiv f(r)equiv 0 pmod A$$ and $$f(r+kA) equiv f(r + (s-r)A^-1A) equiv f(r +(s-r))equiv f(s) equiv 0pmod B$$So divisible by $A$ and $B$ means divisible by $AB$.
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How exactly can you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem in the last step?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Mee98 The CRT system to solve is $$r equiv r_i pmodp_i,$$ since if $r_i$ is a root mod $p_i$, then any $r equiv r_i pmodp_i$ is also a root. Alternatively, if we have $f(r) equiv 0pmod A, f(s) equiv 0pmod B$ then we can set $k equiv (s-r)A^-1pmod B$ to get $$f(r+kA)equiv 0 pmodAB$$, then repeat. (Adding one prime at a time to the product.)
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:45
$begingroup$
which works since $$f(r+ kA)equiv f(r)equiv 0 pmod A$$ and $$f(r+kA) equiv f(r + (s-r)A^-1A) equiv f(r +(s-r))equiv f(s) equiv 0pmod B$$So divisible by $A$ and $B$ means divisible by $AB$.
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:50
$begingroup$
How exactly can you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem in the last step?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 16:29
$begingroup$
How exactly can you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem in the last step?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@Mee98 The CRT system to solve is $$r equiv r_i pmodp_i,$$ since if $r_i$ is a root mod $p_i$, then any $r equiv r_i pmodp_i$ is also a root. Alternatively, if we have $f(r) equiv 0pmod A, f(s) equiv 0pmod B$ then we can set $k equiv (s-r)A^-1pmod B$ to get $$f(r+kA)equiv 0 pmodAB$$, then repeat. (Adding one prime at a time to the product.)
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:45
$begingroup$
@Mee98 The CRT system to solve is $$r equiv r_i pmodp_i,$$ since if $r_i$ is a root mod $p_i$, then any $r equiv r_i pmodp_i$ is also a root. Alternatively, if we have $f(r) equiv 0pmod A, f(s) equiv 0pmod B$ then we can set $k equiv (s-r)A^-1pmod B$ to get $$f(r+kA)equiv 0 pmodAB$$, then repeat. (Adding one prime at a time to the product.)
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:45
$begingroup$
which works since $$f(r+ kA)equiv f(r)equiv 0 pmod A$$ and $$f(r+kA) equiv f(r + (s-r)A^-1A) equiv f(r +(s-r))equiv f(s) equiv 0pmod B$$So divisible by $A$ and $B$ means divisible by $AB$.
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:50
$begingroup$
which works since $$f(r+ kA)equiv f(r)equiv 0 pmod A$$ and $$f(r+kA) equiv f(r + (s-r)A^-1A) equiv f(r +(s-r))equiv f(s) equiv 0pmod B$$So divisible by $A$ and $B$ means divisible by $AB$.
$endgroup$
– Yong Hao Ng
Mar 20 at 16:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155458%2fpolynomial-and-prime-factors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Perhaps induction on the degree of the polynomial? You'd need to assume that the degree is at least one, of course.
$endgroup$
– Gary Moon
Mar 20 at 13:42
$begingroup$
Perhaps the answer there will help you: math.stackexchange.com/questions/601526/…
$endgroup$
– B.Swan
Mar 20 at 14:37
$begingroup$
I don't really see how that answer can help me? Like, I don't know which primes divide my function divides and they also don't need to be the same for every value?
$endgroup$
– Mee98
Mar 20 at 14:46