Find 108 by using 3,4,6












2












$begingroup$


Assemble a formula using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$ in any order to make 108.



You may use the operations;




  • $x + y$


  • $x - y$


  • $x times y$


  • $x div y$


  • $x!$


  • $sqrt{x}$


  • $sqrt[leftroot{-2}uproot{2}x]{y}$


  • $x^y$


  • Brackets to clarify order of operations "(",")"

  • Concatenate two or more of the three digits you start with (concatenation of numbers from calculations is not permitted)


as long as all operands are either $3$, $4$ and $6$.



Note that double, triple, etc. factorials (n-druple-factorials) are not allowed though factorials of factorials are fine, such as $((6-3)!)! = 6!$.






mathematics logical-deduction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If I could, I would have done something like $$3times style{display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)}{4}times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    2 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane :)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago
















2












$begingroup$


Assemble a formula using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$ in any order to make 108.



You may use the operations;




  • $x + y$


  • $x - y$


  • $x times y$


  • $x div y$


  • $x!$


  • $sqrt{x}$


  • $sqrt[leftroot{-2}uproot{2}x]{y}$


  • $x^y$


  • Brackets to clarify order of operations "(",")"

  • Concatenate two or more of the three digits you start with (concatenation of numbers from calculations is not permitted)


as long as all operands are either $3$, $4$ and $6$.



Note that double, triple, etc. factorials (n-druple-factorials) are not allowed though factorials of factorials are fine, such as $((6-3)!)! = 6!$.






mathematics logical-deduction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If I could, I would have done something like $$3times style{display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)}{4}times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    2 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane :)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Assemble a formula using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$ in any order to make 108.



You may use the operations;




  • $x + y$


  • $x - y$


  • $x times y$


  • $x div y$


  • $x!$


  • $sqrt{x}$


  • $sqrt[leftroot{-2}uproot{2}x]{y}$


  • $x^y$


  • Brackets to clarify order of operations "(",")"

  • Concatenate two or more of the three digits you start with (concatenation of numbers from calculations is not permitted)


as long as all operands are either $3$, $4$ and $6$.



Note that double, triple, etc. factorials (n-druple-factorials) are not allowed though factorials of factorials are fine, such as $((6-3)!)! = 6!$.






mathematics logical-deduction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Assemble a formula using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$ in any order to make 108.



You may use the operations;




  • $x + y$


  • $x - y$


  • $x times y$


  • $x div y$


  • $x!$


  • $sqrt{x}$


  • $sqrt[leftroot{-2}uproot{2}x]{y}$


  • $x^y$


  • Brackets to clarify order of operations "(",")"

  • Concatenate two or more of the three digits you start with (concatenation of numbers from calculations is not permitted)


as long as all operands are either $3$, $4$ and $6$.



Note that double, triple, etc. factorials (n-druple-factorials) are not allowed though factorials of factorials are fine, such as $((6-3)!)! = 6!$.






mathematics logical-deduction




mathematics logical-deduction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









JonMark Perry

20.8k64199




20.8k64199










asked 2 hours ago









OrayOray

16.2k437157




16.2k437157








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If I could, I would have done something like $$3times style{display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)}{4}times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    2 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane :)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If I could, I would have done something like $$3times style{display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)}{4}times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    2 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane :)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
If I could, I would have done something like $$3times style{display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)}{4}times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
$endgroup$
– user477343
2 hours ago






$begingroup$
If I could, I would have done something like $$3times style{display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)}{4}times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
$endgroup$
– user477343
2 hours ago






2




2




$begingroup$
@user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
@user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
@WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
@WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
1 hour ago






2




2




$begingroup$
@user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@WeatherVane :)
$endgroup$
– user477343
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@WeatherVane :)
$endgroup$
– user477343
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Could this be




$frac{6^3}{sqrt{4}} = frac{216}{2} = 108$?




@Oray found another one, which might possibly be




$6^{sqrt{4}} times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, @Oray!!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago



















4












$begingroup$

I have found this solution




$6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



    Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



    Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




    34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




    Here's another one without concatenation:




    (4 + 3 + 3) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




    Or maybe:




    (4*6+3)*4 = 108




    I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
      $endgroup$
      – Weather Vane
      48 mins ago












    • $begingroup$
      @WeatherVane - Do you mean that I had to use all of them? It's not really clear from the question. I understood that those are the only allowed digits, but that I can use (or not use) as many of each as I want.
      $endgroup$
      – Vilx-
      4 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @WeatherVane - Anyways, updated it to use all the numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – Vilx-
      2 mins ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81947%2ffind-108-by-using-3-4-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Could this be




    $frac{6^3}{sqrt{4}} = frac{216}{2} = 108$?




    @Oray found another one, which might possibly be




    $6^{sqrt{4}} times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, @Oray!!
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago
















    3












    $begingroup$

    Could this be




    $frac{6^3}{sqrt{4}} = frac{216}{2} = 108$?




    @Oray found another one, which might possibly be




    $6^{sqrt{4}} times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, @Oray!!
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Could this be




    $frac{6^3}{sqrt{4}} = frac{216}{2} = 108$?




    @Oray found another one, which might possibly be




    $6^{sqrt{4}} times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Could this be




    $frac{6^3}{sqrt{4}} = frac{216}{2} = 108$?




    @Oray found another one, which might possibly be




    $6^{sqrt{4}} times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    El-GuestEl-Guest

    21.8k35092




    21.8k35092












    • $begingroup$
      good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, @Oray!!
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, @Oray!!
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Thank you, @Oray!!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you, @Oray!!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago











    4












    $begingroup$

    I have found this solution




    $6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      I have found this solution




      $6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        I have found this solution




        $6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I have found this solution




        $6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Weather VaneWeather Vane

        2,387112




        2,387112























            0












            $begingroup$

            In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



            Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



            Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




            34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




            Here's another one without concatenation:




            (4 + 3 + 3) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




            Or maybe:




            (4*6+3)*4 = 108




            I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              48 mins ago












            • $begingroup$
              @WeatherVane - Do you mean that I had to use all of them? It's not really clear from the question. I understood that those are the only allowed digits, but that I can use (or not use) as many of each as I want.
              $endgroup$
              – Vilx-
              4 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @WeatherVane - Anyways, updated it to use all the numbers.
              $endgroup$
              – Vilx-
              2 mins ago
















            0












            $begingroup$

            In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



            Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



            Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




            34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




            Here's another one without concatenation:




            (4 + 3 + 3) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




            Or maybe:




            (4*6+3)*4 = 108




            I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              48 mins ago












            • $begingroup$
              @WeatherVane - Do you mean that I had to use all of them? It's not really clear from the question. I understood that those are the only allowed digits, but that I can use (or not use) as many of each as I want.
              $endgroup$
              – Vilx-
              4 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @WeatherVane - Anyways, updated it to use all the numbers.
              $endgroup$
              – Vilx-
              2 mins ago














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



            Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



            Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




            34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




            Here's another one without concatenation:




            (4 + 3 + 3) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




            Or maybe:




            (4*6+3)*4 = 108




            I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



            Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



            Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




            34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




            Here's another one without concatenation:




            (4 + 3 + 3) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




            Or maybe:




            (4*6+3)*4 = 108




            I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 mins ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            Vilx-Vilx-

            1315




            1315












            • $begingroup$
              The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              48 mins ago












            • $begingroup$
              @WeatherVane - Do you mean that I had to use all of them? It's not really clear from the question. I understood that those are the only allowed digits, but that I can use (or not use) as many of each as I want.
              $endgroup$
              – Vilx-
              4 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @WeatherVane - Anyways, updated it to use all the numbers.
              $endgroup$
              – Vilx-
              2 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              48 mins ago












            • $begingroup$
              @WeatherVane - Do you mean that I had to use all of them? It's not really clear from the question. I understood that those are the only allowed digits, but that I can use (or not use) as many of each as I want.
              $endgroup$
              – Vilx-
              4 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @WeatherVane - Anyways, updated it to use all the numbers.
              $endgroup$
              – Vilx-
              2 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
            $endgroup$
            – Weather Vane
            48 mins ago






            $begingroup$
            The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
            $endgroup$
            – Weather Vane
            48 mins ago














            $begingroup$
            @WeatherVane - Do you mean that I had to use all of them? It's not really clear from the question. I understood that those are the only allowed digits, but that I can use (or not use) as many of each as I want.
            $endgroup$
            – Vilx-
            4 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @WeatherVane - Do you mean that I had to use all of them? It's not really clear from the question. I understood that those are the only allowed digits, but that I can use (or not use) as many of each as I want.
            $endgroup$
            – Vilx-
            4 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            @WeatherVane - Anyways, updated it to use all the numbers.
            $endgroup$
            – Vilx-
            2 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @WeatherVane - Anyways, updated it to use all the numbers.
            $endgroup$
            – Vilx-
            2 mins ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81947%2ffind-108-by-using-3-4-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Masuk log Menu navigasi

            Image
            JawaSundaBanyumasanBugisAcehBanjarMinangMelayuDeutschEnglishEspañolFrançaisItalianoNederlands (function()var node=document.getElementById("mw-dismissablenotice-anonplace");if(node)node.outerHTML="u003Cdiv class="mw-dismissable-notice"u003Eu003Cdiv class="mw-dismissable-notice-close"u003E[u003Ca tabindex="0" role="button"u003Etutupu003C/au003E]u003C/divu003Eu003Cdiv class="mw-dismissable-notice-body"u003Eu003Cdiv id="localNotice" lang="id" dir="ltr"u003Eu003C/divu003Eu003C/divu003Eu003C/divu003E";()); Masuk log Loncat ke navigasi Loncat ke pencarian Bahasa: Jawa | Sunda | Banyumasan | Bugis | Aceh | Banjar | Minang | Melayu | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands Nama pengguna Kata sandi   Biarkan saya tetap masuk Masuk log Bantuan masuk log Lupa kata sandi? Belum punya akun?Gabung Wikipedia Diperoleh dari "https:/
            Read more

            Identifying “long and narrow” polygons in with PostGISlength and width of polygonWhy postgis st_overlaps reports Qgis' “avoid intersections” generated polygon as overlapping with others?Adjusting polygons to boundary and filling holesDrawing polygons with fixed area?How to remove spikes in Polygons with PostGISDeleting sliver polygons after difference operation in QGIS?Snapping boundaries in PostGISSplit polygon into parts adding attributes based on underlying polygon in QGISSplitting overlap between polygons and assign to nearest polygon using PostGIS?Expanding polygons and clipping at midpoint?Removing Intersection of Buffers in Same Layers

            Image
            Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up? Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium? gnu parallel how to use with ffmpeg Has any spacecraft ever had the ability to directly communicate with civilian air traffic control? Reverse the word in a string with the same order in javascript Is creating your own "experiment" considered cheating during a physics exam? How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian? What is a Recurrent Neural Network? Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears? Confusion about capacitors TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes? Does a creature that is immune to a condition still make a saving throw? How to verbalise code in Mathematica? Upright [...] in italics quotation Cannot populate data in lightning data table Stark VS Thanos Binary Numbers Magic Trick In gnome-terminal only 2 out of 3 zoom keys work You look catfish vs You look like a
            Read more

            Старые Смолеговицы Содержание История | География | Демография | Достопримечательности | Примечания | НавигацияHGЯOLHGЯOL41 206 832 01641 606 406 141Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области«Переписная оброчная книга Водской пятины 1500 года», С. 793«Карта Ингерманландии: Ивангорода, Яма, Копорья, Нотеборга», по материалам 1676 г.«Генеральная карта провинции Ингерманландии» Э. Белинга и А. Андерсина, 1704 г., составлена по материалам 1678 г.«Географический чертёж над Ижорскою землей со своими городами» Адриана Шонбека 1705 г.Новая и достоверная всей Ингерманландии ланткарта. Грав. А. Ростовцев. СПб., 1727 г.Топографическая карта Санкт-Петербургской губернии. 5-и верстка. Шуберт. 1834 г.Описание Санкт-Петербургской губернии по уездам и станамСпецкарта западной части России Ф. Ф. Шуберта. 1844 г.Алфавитный список селений по уездам и станам С.-Петербургской губернииСписки населённых мест Российской Империи, составленные и издаваемые центральным статистическим комитетом министерства внутренних дел. XXXVII. Санкт-Петербургская губерния. По состоянию на 1862 год. СПб. 1864. С. 203Материалы по статистике народного хозяйства в С.-Петербургской губернии. Вып. IX. Частновладельческое хозяйство в Ямбургском уезде. СПб, 1888, С. 146, С. 2, 7, 54Положение о гербе муниципального образования Курское сельское поселениеСправочник истории административно-территориального деления Ленинградской области.Топографическая карта Ленинградской области, квадрат О-35-23-В (Хотыницы), 1930 г.АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1933, С. 27, 198АрхивированоАдминистративно-экономический справочник по Ленинградской области. — Л., 1936, с. 219АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Л., 1966, с. 175АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1973, С. 180АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — Лениздат, 1990, ISBN 5-289-00612-5, С. 38АрхивированоАдминистративно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб., 2007, с. 60АрхивированоКоряков Юрий База данных «Этно-языковой состав населённых пунктов России». Ленинградская область.Административно-территориальное деление Ленинградской области. — СПб, 1997, ISBN 5-86153-055-6, С. 41АрхивированоКультовый комплекс Старые Смолеговицы // Электронная энциклопедия ЭрмитажаПроблемы выявления, изучения и сохранения культовых комплексов с каменными крестами: по материалам работ 2016-2017 гг. в Ленинградской области

            Image
            Населённые пункты по алфавитуНаселённые пункты Волосовского районаМызы Ингрии Беседском сельском поселенииВолосовского районаЛенинградской областиПисцовой книгеВодской пятиныКопорского уездаИнгерманландииА. И. БергенгеймамызаАдриана ШонбекаСанкт-Петербургской губернииФ. Ф. ШубертадворовП. И. КёппенаингерманландцевсавакотовЯмбургского уездадесятиныПервой переписи населения Российской империиКингисеппского уездаМолосковицкого районанационального сельсоветаКингисеппского районаМолосковицыКряковоМолосковицыБелого движенияЭрмитажаголубца 59°22′14″ с. ш. 29°02′42″ в. д. H G Я O L Старые Смолеговицы Материал из Википедии — свободной энциклопедии Перейти к навигации Перейти к поиску Деревня Старые Смолеговицы 59°22′14″ с. ш. 29°02′42″ в. д. H G Я O L Страна Россия   Россия Субъект Федерации Ленинградская область Муниципальный район Волосовский Сельское поселение Беседское История и география Первое упоминание 1500 год Прежние названия Смолиговичи, Смолего
            Read more